98-25474. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 186 (Friday, September 25, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 51277-51279]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-25474]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-77-AD; Amendment 39-10798; AD 98-20-31]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes, that requires 
    repetitive inspections to detect cracking in the pressurized floor 
    pick-up angles on the rear spar of the wing, and replacement of any 
    cracked pick-up angle and its associated diaphragms with improved 
    parts. Such replacement terminates the repetitive inspections for that 
    angle. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing 
    airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. 
    The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct 
    cracking in the pressurized floor pick-up angles at the rear spar of 
    the wing, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the 
    airframe.
    
    DATES: Effective October 30, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of October 30, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 
    Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A320 series 
    airplanes was
    
    [[Page 51278]]
    
    published in the Federal Register on April 27, 1998 (63 FR 20546). That 
    action proposed to require repetitive inspections to detect cracking in 
    the pressurized floor pick-up angles on the rear spar of the wing, and 
    replacement of any cracked pick-up angle and its associated diaphragms 
    with improved parts. Such replacement would terminate the repetitive 
    inspections for that angle.
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the single comment received.
    
    Request To Accept Additional Versions of Service Bulletins
    
        The commenter (the manufacturer) generally supports the proposed 
    rule. However, the commenter states that an inspection performed in 
    accordance with instructions defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
    57-1090, dated April 19, 1996, complies with the requirements of 
    paragraph (a) of the proposed AD. (The proposed AD cited only Revision 
    1 of that service bulletin as the appropriate means of compliance.)
        The commenter adds that accomplishment of the modification, in 
    accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1025, Revision 2, dated 
    November 25, 1994; Revision 3, dated May 22, 1995; or Revision 4, dated 
    December 8, 1995; should be considered acceptable as terminating action 
    for the proposed AD. (The proposed AD cited only Revision 5, dated June 
    26, 1997, of that service bulletin as the appropriate means of 
    compliance.)
        The FAA concurs that accomplishment of those earlier versions of 
    the service bulletins, in lieu of the revision levels cited in the 
    proposed rule, is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of 
    this AD. The inspection procedures described in Airbus Service Bulletin 
    A320-57-1090, dated April 19, 1996, are essentially the same as those 
    described in Revision 1, dated June 10, 1997. Likewise, the 
    modification procedures described in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-
    1025, Revision 2, dated November 25, 1994; Revision 3, dated May 22, 
    1995; and Revision 4, dated December 8, 1995; are essentially the same 
    as those described in Revision 5, dated June 26, 1997. Therefore, the 
    final rule has been revised to include Note 2 and Note 3, which credit 
    operators for inspections and modifications accomplished prior to the 
    effective date of the final rule in accordance with the referenced 
    additional revision levels.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comment 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the change described 
    previously. The FAA has determined that this change will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 120 airplanes of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 8 work hours per 
    airplane (including access and close) to accomplish the required 
    inspection, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based 
    on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection required by this AD 
    on U.S. operators is estimated to be $57,600, or $480 per airplane, per 
    inspection cycle.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
        Should an operator elect to accomplish the optional terminating 
    action that is provided by this AD, it would take approximately 140 
    work hours to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work 
    hour. The cost of required parts would be approximately $10,103 per 
    airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of that optional 
    terminating action would be $18,503 per airplane.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    98-20-31  Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-10798. Docket 98-NM-77-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model A320 series airplanes, as listed in Airbus 
    Service Bulletin A320-57-1090, Revision 01, dated June 10, 1997; 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To detect and correct cracking in the pressurized floor pick-up 
    angles at the rear spar of the wing, which could result in reduced 
    structural integrity of the airframe, accomplish the following:
        (a) Prior to the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or 
    within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
    later: Perform an eddy current inspection to detect cracking in the 
    pressurized floor pick-up angles on the rear spar of the wing, in 
    accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1090, Revision 01, 
    dated June 10, 1997.
    
    
    [[Page 51279]]
    
    
        Note 2: Accomplishment of the inspection prior to the effective 
    date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-
    1090, dated April 19, 1996, is also considered acceptable for 
    compliance with paragraph (a) of this AD.
    
        (1) If no cracking is found, repeat the inspection thereafter at 
    intervals not to exceed 10,000 flight cycles.
        (2) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by 
    this AD, prior to further flight, replace each cracked pick-up angle 
    and its associated diaphragms with improved parts, in accordance 
    with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1025, Revision 05, dated June 
    26, 1997. For all pick-up angles not replaced with improved angles, 
    repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 10,000 
    flight cycles.
        (b) Replacement of a pick-up angle and its associated diaphragms 
    with improved parts, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin 
    A320-57-1025, Revision 05, dated June 26, 1997, constitutes 
    terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements for 
    that pick-up angle.
    
        Note 3: Accomplishment of the replacement prior to the effective 
    date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-
    1025, Revision 2, dated November 25, 1994; Revision 3, dated May 22, 
    1995; or Revision 4, dated December 8, 1995; is also considered 
    acceptable for compliance with paragraphs (a)(2) and (b) of this AD.
    
        (c) If any crack is detected during any inspection required by 
    this AD, and the applicable service bulletin specifies to contact 
    Airbus for appropriate action: Prior to further flight, repair in 
    accordance with a method approved by either the Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; 
    or the Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile (or its delegated 
    agent).
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116. 
    Operators shall submit their request through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
    
        Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs.  21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (f) The inspections shall be done in accordance with Airbus 
    Service Bulletin A320-57-1090, Revision 01, dated June 10, 1997. 
    Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this AD, the replacement, if 
    accomplished, shall be done in accordance with Airbus Service 
    Bulletin A320-57-1025, Revision 05, dated June 26, 1997, which 
    contains the following effective pages:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Page number shown on page         Revision level shown on page              Date shown on page
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1, 13, 30-32, 101, 102.................  05..........................  June 26, 1997.
    2-5....................................  4...........................  December 8, 1995.
    10, 15, 19, 24, 28, 29.................  3...........................  May 22, 1995.
    6-9, 11, 12, 14, 16-18, 20-23 25-27, 33- 2...........................  November 25, 1994.
     100, 103-106.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of 
    the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point 
    Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
        Note 5: The subject of this AD is addressed in French 
    airworthiness directive CN 97-084-097 (B), dated March 12, 1997.
    
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on October 30, 1998.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 17, 1998.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-25474 Filed 9-24-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/30/1998
Published:
09/25/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-25474
Dates:
Effective October 30, 1998.
Pages:
51277-51279 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-77-AD, Amendment 39-10798, AD 98-20-31
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-25474.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13