98-25748. Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 186 (Friday, September 25, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 51349]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-25748]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [ER-FRL-5495-7]
    
    
    Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
    EPA Comments
    
        Availability of EPA comments prepared August 17, 1998 Through 
    August 21, 1998 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), 
    under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the 
    National Environmental Policy Act as Amended
        Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office 
    of Federal Activities at (202) 564-5076.
        An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
    impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 10, 1998 (62 
    FR 17856).
    
    Draft EISs
    
        ERP No. D-DOC-C39012-PR Rating LO, Corals and Reef Associated 
    Plants and Invertebrates, Fishery Management Plan, Amendment I Marine 
    Conservation District (MCD), Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), Puerto 
    Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands, PR and VI.
        Summary: EPA believed that any of the three options being 
    considered will further the objectives of the Coral Fishery Management 
    Plan and will result in beneficial environmental impacts to the aquatic 
    resources in the US Caribbean. Therefore, in accordance with EPA 
    policy, EPA does not object to the projects implementation.
        ERP No. D-DOE-A09828-00 Rating EC2, Surplus Plutonium Disposition 
    (DOE/EIS-0283) for Siting, Construction and Operation of three 
    facilities for Plutonium Disposition, Possible Sites Hanford, Idaho 
    National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Pantex Plant and 
    Savannah River, CA, ID, NM, SC, TX and WA.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern based on the effects 
    on water and ecological resources and the presence of contamination in 
    the existing environment and lack of assurance that the proposed 
    operations would not lead to further adverse impacts.
        ERP No. D-GSA-C60004-NY Rating EC2, Governors Island Disposition of 
    Surplus Federal Real Property, Implementation, Upper New York Bay, NY.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potentially 
    significant indirect impacts to historic resources and air quality 
    which could result from the implementation of this project, and that 
    additional information (2) should be presented in the final EIS to 
    address these concerns.
        ERP No. D-NOA-A91064-00 Rating EC1, Atlantic Bluefish Fishery 
    Management, Fishery Management Plan, Implementation, Nova Scotia to 
    Florida, Northwestern Atlantic Ocean.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns that supported the 
    suite of management alternatives to be implemented to rebuild bluefish 
    stocks. Reduction of fish limits per angler from ten to four/five 
    bluefish was recommend for recreational fishing.
    
    Final EISs
    
        ERP No. F-FAA-F51043-MN, Dual Track Airport Planning Process, 
    Construction and Expansion, Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, 
    Twin Cities, Hennepin and Dakota Counties, MN.
        Summary: EPA stated that the FEIS did not provide the level of 
    information that is necessary to fully assess all environmental impacts 
    of the preferred alternative. EPA also expressed objections regarding 
    segmentation of the Runway 4-22 extension project. In addition, the 
    FEIS is lacking the following information: (1) Existing 1994 aircraft 
    operations; (2) details supporting the ``Finding of No Practicable 
    Alternative'' for wetlands lose; (3) clear distinction between impacts 
    associated with plans for 2010 versus 2020; and (4) summaries of sub-
    alternatives evaluated in the previous studies.
        ERP No. F-TVA-E09801-MS, Red Hills Power Project, Proposal to 
    Purchase 440 megawatts (MW) of Electrical Energy, COE Section 404 
    Permit, Town of Ackerman, Choctaw County, MS.
        Summary: EPA continued to have environmental concerns about the 
    project, due to the potential impact of the proposed power plant and 
    surface coal mining operations on environmentally sensitive sites.
    
        Dated: September 22, 1998.
    William D. Dickerson,
    Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
    [FR Doc. 98-25748 Filed 9-24-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/25/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-25748
Pages:
51349-51349 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
ER-FRL-5495-7
PDF File:
98-25748.pdf