95-23742. Medicare Program; Update of Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment Rates Effective for Services On or After October 1, 1995  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 26, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 49619-49622]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-23742]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    Health Care Financing Administration
    [BPD-824-N]
    
    
    Medicare Program; Update of Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) 
    Payment Rates Effective for Services On or After October 1, 1995
    
    AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice implements section 1833(i)(2)(C) of the Social 
    Security Act, which mandates an automatic inflation adjustment to 
    Medicare payment amounts for ambulatory surgical center (ASC) facility 
    services during the years when the payment amounts are not updated 
    based on a survey of the actual audited costs incurred by ASCs.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: The payment rates contained in this notice are 
    effective for services furnished on or after October 1, 1995.
        Copies: To order copies of the Federal Register containing this 
    document, send your request to: New Orders, Superintendent of 
    Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. Specify the date 
    of the issue requested and enclose a check or money order payable to 
    the Superintendent of Documents, or enclose your Visa or Master Card 
    number and expiration date. Credit card orders can also be placed by 
    calling the order desk at (202) 512-1800 or by faxing to (202) 512-
    2250. The cost for each copy is $8. As an alternative, you can view and 
    photocopy the Federal Register document at most libraries designated as 
    Federal Depository Libraries and at many other public and academic 
    libraries throughout the country that receive the Federal Register.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan Haile Sanow, (410) 786-5723.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background and Legislative Authority
    
        Section 1832(a)(2)(F)(i) of the Social Security Act (the Act) 
    provides that benefits under the Medicare Supplementary Medical 
    Insurance program (Part B) include services furnished in connection 
    with those surgical procedures that, under section 1833(i)(1)(A) of the 
    Act, are specified by the Secretary and are performed on an inpatient 
    basis in a hospital but that also can be performed safely on an 
    ambulatory basis in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC), in a rural 
    primary care hospital, or in a hospital outpatient department. To 
    participate in the Medicare program as an ASC, a facility must meet the 
    standards specified under section 1832(a)(2)(F)(i) of the Act and 42 
    CFR 416.25, which set forth basic requirements for ASCs.
        Generally, there are two elements in the total charge for a 
    surgical procedure: A charge for the physician's professional services 
    for performing the procedure, and a charge for the facility's services 
    (for example, use of an operating room). Section 1833(i)(2)(A) of the 
    Act authorizes the Secretary to pay ASCs a prospectively determined 
    rate for facility services associated with covered surgical procedures. 
    ASC facility services are subject to the usual Medicare Part B 
    deductible and coinsurance requirements. Therefore, participating ASCs 
    are paid 80 percent of the prospectively determined rate for facility 
    services, adjusted for regional wage variations. This rate is intended 
    to represent our estimate of a fair payment that takes into account the 
    costs incurred by ASCs generally in providing the services that are 
    furnished in connection with performing the procedure. Currently, this 
    rate is a standard overhead amount that does not include physician fees 
    and other medical items and services (for example, durable medical 
    equipment for use in the patient's home) for which separate payment may 
    be authorized under other provisions of the Medicare program.
        We have grouped procedures into nine groups for purposes of ASC 
    payment rates. The ASC facility payment for all procedures in each 
    group is established at a single rate 
    
    [[Page 49620]]
    adjusted for geographic variation. The rate is a standard overhead 
    amount that covers the cost of services such as nursing, supplies, 
    equipment, and use of the facility. (For an indepth discussion of the 
    methodology and rate-setting procedures, see our Federal Register 
    notice published on February 8, 1990, entitled ``Medicare Program; 
    Revision of Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Rate Methodology'' (55 
    FR 4526).)
    
    Statutory Provisions
    
        Section 1833(i)(2)(A) of the Act requires the Secretary to review 
    and update standard overhead amounts annually. Section 
    1833(i)(2)(A)(ii) requires that the ASC facility payment rates result 
    in substantially lower Medicare expenditures than would have been paid 
    if the same procedure had been performed on an inpatient basis in a 
    hospital. Section 1833(i)(2)(A)(iii) requires that payment for 
    insertion of an intraocular lens (IOL) include an allowance for the IOL 
    that is reasonable and related to the cost of acquiring the class of 
    lens involved.
        Under section 1833(i)(3)(A), the aggregate payment to hospital 
    outpatient departments for covered ASC procedures is equal to the 
    lesser of the following two amounts:
         The amount paid for the same services that would be paid 
    to the hospital under section 1833(a)(2)(B) (that is, the lower of the 
    hospital's reasonable costs or customary charges less deductibles and 
    coinsurance); or
         The amount determined under section 1833(i)(3)(B)(i) based 
    on a blend of the lower of the hospital's reasonable costs or customary 
    charges, less deductibles and coinsurance, and the amount that would be 
    paid to a free-standing ASC in the same area for the same procedures.
        Under section 1833(i)(3)(B)(i), the blend amount for a cost 
    reporting period is the sum of the hospital cost proportion and the ASC 
    cost proportion. Under section 1833(i)(3)(B)(ii), the hospital cost 
    proportion and the ASC cost proportion for portions of cost reporting 
    periods beginning on or after January 1, 1991 are 42 and 58 percent, 
    respectively.
        We published our last update of ASC payment rates in the Federal 
    Register on October 1, 1992 (57 FR 45544). Statutory provisions enacted 
    after October 1, 1992 that affect ASCs include the Omnibus Budget 
    Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA 1993) (Pub. L. 103-66), enacted on 
    August 10, 1993. Section 13531 prohibited the Secretary from providing 
    for any inflation update in the payment amounts for ASCs determined 
    under section 1833(i)(2)(A) and (B) of the Act for fiscal years (FYs) 
    1994 and 1995. Section 13533 of OBRA 1993 reduced the amount of payment 
    for an IOL inserted during or subsequent to cataract surgery in an ASC 
    on or after January 1, 1994, and before January 1, 1999, to $150.
        Section 141(a)(1) of the Social Security Act Amendments of 1994 
    (SSAA 1994) (Pub. L. 103-432), enacted on October 31, 1994, amended 
    section 1833(i)(2)(A)(i) of the Act to require that, for the purpose of 
    estimating ASC payment amounts, the Secretary survey not later than 
    January 1, 1995, and every 5 years thereafter, the actual audited costs 
    incurred by ASCs, based upon a representative sample of procedures and 
    facilities.
        Section 141(a)(2) of SSAA 1994 added section 1833(i)(2)(C) to the 
    Act to provide that, beginning with FY 1996, there be an automatic 
    application of an inflation adjustment during a fiscal year when the 
    Secretary does not update ASC rates based on survey data of actual 
    audited costs. Section 1833(i)(2)(C) of the Act provides that ASC 
    payment rates be increased by the percentage increase in the consumer 
    price index for urban consumers (CPI-U), as estimated by the Secretary 
    for the 12-month period ending with the midpoint of the year involved, 
    if the Secretary has not updated rates during a fiscal year, beginning 
    with FY 1996.
        Section 141(a)(3) of SSAA 1994 amended section 1833(i)(1) of the 
    Act to require the Secretary to consult with appropriate trade and 
    professional organizations in specifying Medicare-covered ASC 
    procedures and facility payment amounts. Section 141(b) of SSAA 1994 
    requires the Secretary to establish a process for reviewing the 
    appropriateness of the payment amount provided under section 
    1833(i)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act for IOLs with respect to a class of new-
    technology IOLs.
    
    ASC Survey
    
        Regulations set forth at Sec. 416.140 (``Surveys'') require us to 
    survey a randomly selected sample of participating ASCs no more often 
    than once a year to collect data for analysis or reevaluation of 
    payment rates. In addition, section 1833(i)(2)(A)(i) of the Act 
    requires that, for the purpose of estimating ASC payment amounts, the 
    Secretary survey not later than January 1, 1995, and every 5 years 
    thereafter, the actual audited costs incurred by ASCs, based upon a 
    representative sample of procedures and facilities.
        In July 1992, we mailed Form HCFA-452A, Medicare Ambulatory 
    Surgical Center Payment Rate Survey (Part I), to the nearly 1,400 ASCs 
    that were on file as being certified by Medicare at the end of 1991. 
    Part I data provided baseline information for selecting a sample of 320 
    ASCs to complete Form HCFA-452B, Medicare Ambulatory Surgical Center 
    Payment Rate Survey (Part II). The sample was randomly selected and is 
    representative of ASCs nationally in terms of facility age, 
    utilization, and surgical specialty.
        Part II of the ASC survey asked for data on costs incurred by the 
    facility that are directly related to performing certain surgical 
    procedures, such as cataract extraction with IOL insertion, as well as 
    information on facility overhead and personnel costs. We updated charge 
    data for all Medicare-covered procedures performed at the facility. We 
    audited 100 randomly selected Part II surveys between November 1994 and 
    February 1995.
        Because we are still reviewing data from Part II of the 1994 
    Medicare Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Rate Survey, we are not 
    adjusting ASC payment rates in FY 1996 to reflect these data.
    
    II. Analysis of and Responses to the Public Comments
    
        We published our last ASC payment rate update notice on October 1, 
    1992 (57 FR 45544). In response to that notice, we received one public 
    comment. Because section 13531 of OBRA 1993 prohibited the Secretary 
    from providing for any inflation update for FYs 1994 and 1995, we did 
    not publish update notices for those years, and, consequently, the 
    public comment on the October 1, 1992 notice and our response have not 
    been published. A summary of that comment and our response will be 
    contained in a proposed rule updating the ASC payment methodology that 
    we expect to publish in the Federal Register next year. Because the 
    public comment relates to the wage index, we believe the comment and 
    our response fit more appropriately in that document, which will 
    contain a discussion of the wage index used to adjust ASC payment rates 
    for geographic wage differences. We did not make any changes as a 
    result of our consideration of the public comment.
    
    III. Provisions of This Notice
    
        During years when the Secretary has not otherwise updated ASC rates 
    based on a survey of actual audited costs, section 1833(i)(2) of the 
    Act requires automatic application of an inflation adjustment. That 
    inflation adjustment must be the percentage increase in the CPI-U as 
    estimated by the Secretary for the 12-month period ending with the 
    
    [[Page 49621]]
    midpoint of the year involved. (The CPI-U is a general index that 
    reflects prices paid for a representative market basket of goods and 
    services.)
        Based on estimates prepared by Data Resources, Inc./McGraw Hill, 
    the forecast rate of increase in the CPI-U for the fiscal year that 
    ends March 31, 1996 is 3.2 percent. Increasing the ASC payment rates 
    currently in effect by 3.2 percent results in the following schedule of 
    rates that are payable for facility services furnished on or after 
    October 1, 1995:
    
    Group 1--$304
    Group 2--$408
    Group 3--$467
    Group 4--$576
    Group 5--$657
    Group 6--$769
    Group 7--$911
    Group 8--$903
    
    ASC facility fees are subject to the usual Medicare deductible and 
    copayment requirements. Under section 13531 of OBRA 1993, the allowance 
    for an IOL that is part of the payment rates for group 6 and group 8 is 
    $150.
        In order to implement the inflation adjustment required by section 
    141(a)(2) of SSAA 1994 beginning in FY 1996, we estimated the annual 
    percent change in the CPI-U for the 12-month period ending March 31, 
    1996. However, the first 6 months of this 12-month period, April 1, 
    1995 through September 30, 1995, fall in FY 1995, and section 13531 of 
    OBRA 1993 prohibited the Secretary from providing any inflation update 
    in ASC payment amounts for FYs 1994 and 1995. We believe that 
    determining, in part, the FY 1996 adjustment factor by reference to 
    April 1, 1995 through September 30, 1995 does not violate or contradict 
    the OBRA 1993 provision because our use of the adjustment factor 
    applies only to payments for ASC services actually furnished beginning 
    in FY 1996.
        A ninth payment group allotted exclusively to extracorporeal 
    shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) services was established in the notice 
    with comment period published December 31, 1991 (56 FR 67666). The 
    decision in American Lithotripsy Society v. Sullivan, 785 F. Supp. 1034 
    (D.D.C. 1992), prohibits payment for these services under the ASC 
    benefit at this time. ESWL payment rates are the subject of a separate 
    Federal Register proposed notice, which was published October 1, 1993 
    (58 FR 51355).
        We will continue to use the inpatient hospital prospective payment 
    system (PPS) wage index to standardize ASC payment rates for variation 
    due to geographic wage differences in accordance with the ASC payment 
    rate methodology published in the February 8, 1990 Federal Register (55 
    FR 4526). Because ASC payment rates are updated concurrently with the 
    annual update of the hospital inpatient PPS wage index, the PPS wage 
    index final rule that will be implemented on October 1, 1995 will be 
    used to adjust the ASC payment rates announced in this notice for 
    facility services furnished beginning October 1, 1995. The policy of 
    eliminating midyear corrections to the hospital inpatient PPS wage 
    index applies to ASCs and the calculation of individual ASC payment 
    amounts as well.
    
    IV. Regulatory Impact Analysis
    
    A. Introduction
    
        This notice implements section 1833(i)(2) of the Act, which 
    mandates an automatic inflation adjustment to Medicare payment amounts 
    for ASC facility services during the years when the payment amounts are 
    not updated based on a survey of the actual audited costs incurred by 
    ASCs.
        Actuarial estimates of the cost of updating the ASC rates by 3.2 
    percent are as follows:
    
                       Projected Additional Medicare Costs                  
                                 [In millions]*                             
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
    FY 1996..........................................................    $35
    FY 1997..........................................................     40
    FY 1998..........................................................     50
    FY 1999..........................................................     55
    FY 2000..........................................................    60 
                                                                            
    *Rounded to the nearest $5 million.                                     
    
    These amounts are in the Medicare budget baseline.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        We generally prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis that is 
    consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 
    through 612) unless we certify that a notice will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    For purposes of the RFA, all ASCs and hospitals are considered to be 
    small entities.
        Section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a regulatory 
    impact analysis if a notice may have a significant impact on the 
    operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This 
    analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For 
    purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural 
    hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Metropolitan 
    Statistical Area and has fewer than 50 beds.
        Although we believe an impact analysis on small rural hospitals is 
    not required, this notice may have a significant impact on a 
    substantial number of ASCs. Therefore, we believe that a regulatory 
    flexibility analysis is required for ASCs. In addition, we are 
    voluntarily providing a brief discussion of the impact this notice may 
    have on hospitals.
    
    1. Impact on ASCs
    
        Section 1833(i)(2) of the Act requires that we automatically adjust 
    ASC rates for inflation during a fiscal year when we do not update ASC 
    payment rates based on survey data. Therefore, we are updating the 
    current ASC payment rates, which were published in our October 1, 1992 
    Federal Register notice (57 FR 45544), by incorporating the projected 
    rate of change in the CPI-U for the 12-month period ending March 31, 
    1996, a 3.2 percent increase. There are other factors, however, that 
    affect the actual payments to an individual ASC.
        First, variations in an ASC's Medicare case mix affect the size of 
    the ASC's aggregate payment increase. Although we uniformly adjusted 
    ASC payment rates by the CPI-U forecast for the 12-month period ending 
    March 31, 1996, we did not adjust the IOL payment allowance that is 
    included in the payment rate for group 6 and group 8 because OBRA 1993 
    froze the amount of payment for an IOL furnished by an ASC at $150 for 
    the period beginning January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1998. 
    Therefore, because the net adjustment for inflation for procedures in 
    group 6 is 2.56 percent and for group 8 is 2.66 percent, ASCs that 
    perform a high percentage of the IOL insertion procedures that comprise 
    these groups may expect a somewhat lower increase in their aggregate 
    payments than ASCs that perform fewer IOL insertion procedures.
        A second factor determining the effect of the change in payment 
    rates is the percentage of total revenue an ASC receives from Medicare. 
    The larger the proportion of revenue an ASC receives from the Medicare 
    program, the greater the impact of the updated rates in this notice. 
    The percentage of revenue derived from the Medicare program depends on 
    the volume and types of services furnished. Since Medicare patients 
    account for as much as 80 percent of all IOL insertion procedures 
    performed in ASCs, an ASC that performs a high percentage of IOL 
    insertion procedures will probably receive a higher percentage of its 
    revenue from Medicare than would an ASC with a case mix comprised 
    largely of procedures that do not involve 
    
    [[Page 49622]]
    insertion of an IOL. For an ASC that receives a large portion of its 
    revenue from the Medicare program, the changes in this notice will 
    likely have a greater influence on the ASC's operations and management 
    decisions than they will have on an ASC that receives a large portion 
    of revenue from other sources.
        In general, we expect the rate changes in this notice to affect 
    ASCs positively by increasing the rates upon which payments are based.
    
    2. Impact on Hospitals and Small Rural Hospitals
    
        Section 1833(i)(3)(A) of the Act mandates the method of determining 
    payments to hospitals for ASC-approved procedures performed in an 
    outpatient setting. The Congress believed some comparability should 
    exist in the amount of payment to hospitals and ASCs for similar 
    procedures. The Congress recognized, however, that hospitals have 
    certain overhead costs that ASCs do not and allowed for those costs by 
    establishing a blended payment methodology. For ASC procedures 
    performed in an outpatient setting, hospitals are paid based on the 
    lower of their aggregate costs, aggregate charges, or a blend of 58 
    percent of the applicable wage-adjusted ASC rate and 42 percent of the 
    lower of the hospital's aggregate costs or charges. According to 
    statistics from the Office of the Actuary within HCFA, 12.7 percent of 
    Medicare payments to hospitals by intermediaries is attributable to 
    services furnished in conjunction with ASC-covered procedures.
        We believe that, due to a variety of factors, the ASC rate increase 
    in this notice will result in only a 0.9 percent increase in 
    intermediary payments to hospitals for ASC-covered procedures. We would 
    not expect an ASC rate increase in every instance to keep pace with 
    actual hospital cost increases, although we would fully recognize cost 
    increases resulting from inflation alone to the extent that the blended 
    payment methodology includes aggregate hospital costs. The weight of 
    the ASC portion of the blended payment amount, which would reflect the 
    ASC rate increase, is offset to a degree when hospital costs 
    significantly exceed the ASC rate. Another element that would eliminate 
    the effect of the ASC rate increase on hospital outpatient payments is 
    the application of the lowest payment screen in determining payments. 
    Applying the lowest of costs, charges, or a blend can result in some 
    hospitals being paid entirely on the basis of a hospital's costs or 
    charges. In those instances, the increase in the ASC rates will have no 
    effect on hospital payments. The number of Medicare beneficiaries a 
    hospital serves and its case-mix variation would also influence the 
    total impact of the new ASC rates on Medicare payments to hospitals. 
    Based on these factors, we have determined, and we certify that this 
    notice will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of 
    small rural hospitals. Therefore, we have not prepared a small rural 
    hospital impact analysis.
    
    V. Waiver of 30-Day Delay in the Effective Date
    
        We ordinarily publish notices, such as this, subject to a 30-day 
    delay in the effective date. However, if adherence to this procedure 
    would be impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, 
    we may waive the delay in the effective date. The provisions of this 
    notice are effective for services furnished beginning on October 1, 
    1995, to coincide with the FY 1996 PPS updated wage index. These 
    provisions will increase payment to ASCs by 3.2 percent (as modified by 
    any change to the wage indices), in accordance with section 1833(i)(2) 
    of the Act, which requires automatic application of an inflation 
    adjustment. As a practical matter, if we allowed a 30-day delay in the 
    effective date of this notice, ASCs would be unable to take timely 
    advantage of the increase in payment rates contained in this notice. 
    Moreover, we believe a delay is impractical and unnecessary because the 
    statute, which, as explained earlier, provides that ASC payment rates 
    be increased by the percentage increase in the CPI-U if the Secretary 
    has not updated rates during a fiscal year beginning with FY 1996. 
    Therefore, we find good cause to waive the delay in the effective date.
        In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this 
    notice was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    
    (Sec. 1832(a)(2)(F) and 1833(i)(1) and (2) of the Social Security 
    Act (42 U.S.C. 1395k(a)(2)(F) and 1395l(i)(1) and (2)); 42 CFR 
    416.120, 416.125, and 416.130)
    
        (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs No. 93.774, 
    Medicare--Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
    
        Dated: July 28, 1995.
    Bruce C. Vladeck,
    Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration.
    [FR Doc. 95-23742 Filed 9-25-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/1/1995
Published:
09/26/1995
Department:
Health Care Finance Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
95-23742
Dates:
The payment rates contained in this notice are effective for services furnished on or after October 1, 1995.
Pages:
49619-49622 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
BPD-824-N
PDF File:
95-23742.pdf