95-23796. Genetus Alexandria, Inc., et al.; Proposed Consent Agreement With Analysis To Aid Public Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 26, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 49605-49609]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-23796]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    [File No. 942-3161]
    
    
    Genetus Alexandria, Inc., et al.; Proposed Consent Agreement With 
    Analysis To Aid Public Comment
    
    AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
    unfair acts and practices and unfair methods of competition, this 
    consent agreement, accepted subject to final Commission approval, would 
    prohibit, among other things, a Virginia-based clinic and its operators 
    from misrepresenting the nature or extent of a physician's 
    participation in any treatment procedure, the safety or efficacy of any 
    treatment procedure, and the extent to which a treatment is covered by 
    a patient's medical insurance.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 27, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, 
    Room 159, 6th St. and Pa. Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Sondra Mills or Eric Bash, FTC/H-200, Washington, DC 20580. (202) 326-
    2673 or 326-2892.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal 
    Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46 and Sec. 2.34 of the 
    Commission's rules of practice (16 CFR 2.34), notice is hereby given 
    that the following consent agreement containing a consent order to 
    cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final 
    approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a 
    period of sixty (60) days. Public comment is invited. Such comments or 
    views will be considered by the Commission and will be available for 
    inspection and copying at its principal office in accordance with 
    Sec. 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's rules of practice (16 CFR 
    4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
    
        In the matter of Genetus Alexandria, Inc., a corporation, and 
    Galen Medical Centers, Ltd., a corporation, and George Oprean, 
    individually and as President and a director of Genetus Alexandria, 
    Inc. and Galen Medical Centers, Ltd., and Linda Huffman Oprean, 
    individually and as an officer and a director of Genetus Alexandria, 
    Inc. and as a director of Galen Medical Centers, Ltd.
    
    Agreement Containing Consent Order To Cease and Desist
    
        The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of 
    certain acts and practices of Genetus Alexandria, Inc., a corporation 
    (``Genetus''), Galen Medical Centers, 
    
    [[Page 49606]]
    Ltd., a corporation (``Galen''), George Oprean, individually and as 
    President and a director of Genetus and Galen, and Linda Huffman Oprean 
    (``Linda Oprean''), individually and as officer and a director of 
    Genetus and as a director of Galen, and it now appearing that Genetus, 
    Galen, George Oprean and Linda Huffman Oprean, hereinafter sometimes 
    referred to as proposed respondents, are willing to enter into an 
    agreement containing an order to cease and desist from the use of the 
    acts and practices being investigated,
        It is hereby agreed by and between Genetus and Galen, by their duly 
    authorized officers, George Oprean, individually and as President and a 
    director of Genetus and Galen, and Linda Huffman Oprean, individually 
    and as an officer and a director of Genetus and a director of Galen, 
    and their attorney, and counsel for the Federal Trade Commission that:
        1. Proposed respondent Genetus Alexandria, Inc. is a corporation 
    organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws 
    of the Commonwealth of Virginia, with its office and principal place of 
    business located at 2843 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.
        Proposed respondent Galen Medical Centers, Ltd. is a corporation 
    organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws 
    of the Commonwealth of Virginia, with its office and principal place of 
    business located at 2843 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.
        Proposed respondent George Oprean is the President, Secretary, 
    Treasurer and a director of Genetus and is the President and a director 
    of Galen. He formulates, directs, controls and implements the policies, 
    acts and practices of Genetus and Galen. His address is 2843 Duke 
    Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.
        Proposed respondent Linda Huffman Oprean is the Vice President and 
    a director of Genetus and is a director of Galen.
        Together with George Oprean, she formulates, directs, controls and 
    implements the policies, acts and practices of Genetus and Galen. Her 
    address is 2843 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.
        2. Proposed respondents admit all the jurisdictional facts set 
    forth in the draft of complaint.
        3. Proposed respondents waive:
        (a) Any further procedural steps;
        (b) The requirement that the Commission's decision contain a 
    statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and
        (c) All rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to challenge or 
    contest the validity of the order entered pursuant to this agreement.
        4. This agreement shall not become part of the public record of the 
    proceeding unless and until accepted by the Commission. If this 
    agreement is accepted by the Commission it, together with the draft of 
    complaint contemplated thereby, will be placed on the public record for 
    a period of sixty (60) days and information in respect thereto publicly 
    released. The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance 
    of this agreement and so notify the proposed respondents, in which 
    event it will take such action as it may consider appropriate or issue 
    and serve its complaint (in such form as the circumstances may require) 
    and decision, in disposition of the proceeding.
        5. This agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not 
    constitute an admission by the proposed respondents of facts, other 
    than jurisdictional facts, or of violations of law as alleged in the 
    draft complaint.
        6. This agreement contemplates that, if it is accepted by the 
    Commission, and if such acceptance is not subsequently withdrawn by the 
    Commission pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 2.34 of the Commission's 
    Rules, the Commission may, without further notice to proposed 
    respondents, (1) issue its complaint corresponding in form and 
    substance with the draft of complaint and its decision containing the 
    following order to cease and desist in disposition of the proceeding 
    and (2) make information public in respect thereto. When so entered, 
    the order to cease and desist shall have the same force and effect and 
    may be altered, motified or set aside in the same manner and within the 
    same time provided by statute for other orders. The order shall become 
    final upon service. Delivery by the U.S. Postal Service of the 
    complaint and decision containing the agreed-to order to proposed 
    respondents' address as stated in this agreement shall constitute 
    service. Proposed respondents waive any right they may have to any 
    other manner of service. The complaint may be used in construing the 
    terms of the order, and no agreement, understanding, representation, or 
    interpretation not contained in the order or the agreement may be used 
    to vary or contradict the terms of the order.
        7. Proposed respondents have read the proposed complaint and order 
    contemplated hereby. They understand that once the order has been 
    issued, they will be required to file one or more compliance reports 
    showing that they have fully complied with the order. Proposed 
    respondents further understand that they may be liable for civil 
    penalties in the amount provided by law for each violation of the order 
    after it becomes final.
    
    Order
    
    Definitions
    
        For purposes of this Order, the following definitions shall apply:
        1. ``Impotence'' means the inability of a man to attain and 
    maintain an erection of sufficient rigidity and/or duration to enable 
    him to engage in sexual intercourse.
        2. ``Treatment procedure'' means any method of treating impotence 
    or any other medical condition, disease or symptom, including, but not 
    limited to, injections, drug therapy, hormone replacements, use of 
    devices to induce erections, vascular surgery, use or implantation of 
    devices, behavior modification, counseling, psychotherapy, or any other 
    method.
    
    I
    
        It is ordered That respondents Genetus Alexandria, Inc., a 
    corporation, (``Genetus''), Galen Medical Centers, Ltd. (``Galen''), 
    their successors and assigns, and their officers, and George Oprean, 
    individually and as President and a director of Genetus and Galen, and 
    Linda Huffman Oprean (``Linda Oprean''), individually and as an officer 
    and a director of Genetus and as a director of Galen, and respondents' 
    agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any 
    corporation, subsidiary, division or other device, in connection with 
    the advertising, promotion, offering for sale or sale of any treatment 
    procedure in or affecting commerce, as ``commerce'' is defined in the 
    Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from, in 
    any manner, directly or by implication:
        A. Falsely representing in any manner, directly or by implication, 
    that each individual purchasing any impotence treatment procedure will 
    receive an examination by a physician, or otherwise misrepresenting the 
    nature or extent of physician participation in any treatment procedure;
        B. Falsely representing in any manner, directly or by implication, 
    that each individual purchasing any impotence treatment procedure will 
    receive a medical diagnosis and treatment of the underlying cause of 
    his impotence, or otherwise misrepresenting the nature of extent of 
    medical diagnosis or treatment provided in connection with any 
    treatment procedure;
    
    [[Page 49607]]
    
        C. Falsely representing in any manner, directly or by implication, 
    the qualifications, credentials, or licenses held by any person 
    involved in providing any treatment procedure;
        D. Representing in any manner, directly or by implication, that 
    Prostaglandin E1, Papaverine, or Phentolamine, or any combination 
    thereof, has no side-effects or contraindications, or otherwise 
    misrepresenting the side-effects or contraindications of any drug or 
    treatment procedure;
        E. Falsely representing in any manner, directly or by implication, 
    that any impotence treatment procedure is unqualifiedly safe, or 
    otherwise misrepresenting the safety of any treatment procedure;
        F. Falsely representing in any manner, directly or by implication, 
    that any impotence treatment procedure will arrest impotence, or 
    otherwise misrepresenting the efficacy or the duration of results of 
    any treatment procedure;
        G. Falsely representing in any manner, directly or by implication, 
    the extent to which medical insurance will cover the costs of any 
    treatment procedure;
        H. Falsely representing in any manner, directly or by implication, 
    that medical procedures were performed;
        I. Falsely representing in any manner, directly or by implication, 
    that claims submitted to insurance companies were signed, or approved 
    for signature, by a physician;
        J. Misrepresenting the safety, side-effects, or efficacy of, or the 
    extent, nature, or duration of results of, any treatment procedure.
    
    II
    
        It is further ordered That respondents and their officers agents, 
    servants, employees, attorneys, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, 
    assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with them 
    who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or 
    otherwise, and each of them, shall take no further actions to collect 
    any payments from customers of Genetus on any outstanding accounts 
    receivable of Genetus; provided, however, that this Paragraph shall not 
    prohibit respondents from fulfilling any legal obligations arising out 
    of any bona fide pledge or assignment of such accounts receivable made 
    to third party creditors of Genetus prior to September 1, 1994.
    
    III
    
        It is further ordered:
        A. That respondents Genetus, George Oprean and Linda Oprean shall 
    jointly and severally pay to the FTC as consumer redress the sum of 
    $250,000; provided, however, that this liability will be suspended, 
    subject to the provisions of subparts B and C below, upon the execution 
    and submission to the Commission of a truthful sworn declaration by 
    respondents Genetus, Galen, George Oprean, and Linda Oprean, in the 
    form shown on Exhibit A to this Order, no later than three (3) days 
    after the date of service of this Order, that shall reaffirm and attest 
    to the truth, accuracy and completeness of the financial statement of 
    each such respondent, each dated August 24, 1995, and previously 
    submitted to the Commission.
        B. That the Commission's acceptance of this Order is expressly 
    premised upon the financial statements and related documents provided 
    by respondents to the FTC referred to in subpart A above. After service 
    upon respondents of an order to show cause, the FTC may reopen this 
    proceeding to make a determination whether there are any material 
    misrepresentations or omissions in said financial statements and 
    related documents. Respondents shall be given an opportunity to present 
    evidence on this issue. If, upon consideration of respondents' evidence 
    and other information before it, the FTC determines that there are any 
    material misrepresentations or omissions in said financial statements 
    and related documents showing that any of the respondents failed to 
    disclose the existence of assets in the financial statements, that 
    determination shall cause the entire amount of $250,000 to become 
    immediately due and payable to the FTC, and interest computed at the 
    rate prescribed in 28 U.S.C. 1961, as amended, shall immediately begin 
    to accrue on any unpaid balance of this amount. Proceedings initiated 
    under Part III are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other civil 
    or criminal remedies as may be provided by law, including any 
    proceedings the FTC may initiate to enforce this Order.
        C. That any funds paid by respondents pursuant to subparts A and B 
    above shall be paid into a redress fund administered by the FTC and 
    shall be used to provide direct redress to consumers who purchased 
    Genetus' services. If the FTC determines, in its sole discretion, that 
    redress to consumers is wholly or partially impracticable, any funds 
    not so used shall be paid to the United States Treasury. Respondents 
    shall be notified as to how the funds are disbursed, but shall have no 
    right to contest the manner of distribution chosen by the Commission.
    
    IV
    
        It is further ordered That for five (5) years after the last date 
    of dissemination of any representation covered by this Order, 
    respondents, or their successors and assigns, shall maintain and upon 
    request make available to the Federal Trade Commission for inspection 
    and copying:
        A. All materials that were relied upon in disseminating such 
    representation; and
        B. All tests, reports, studies, surveys, demonstrations or other 
    evidence in their possession or control that contradict, qualify, or 
    call into question such representation, or the basis relied upon for 
    such representation, including complaints from consumers.
    
    V
    
        It is further ordered That, for a period of five (5) years from the 
    date of entry of this Order, respondents shall distribute a copy of 
    this Order to each of their operating divisions, to each of their 
    managerial employees, and to each of their officers, agents, 
    representatives, or employees engaged in the preparation or placement 
    of advertising or other material covered by this Order and shall secure 
    from such person a signed statement acknowledging receipt of this 
    Order.
    
    VI
    
        It is further ordered that respondents shall notify the Commission 
    at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in the 
    corporation such as dissolution, assignment, or sale resulting in the 
    emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of 
    subsidiaries or any other change in the corporation which may affect 
    compliance obligations arising out of this Order.
    
    VII
    
        It is further ordered That, for a period of ten (10) years from the 
    date of entry of this Order, each individual respondent named herein 
    shall promptly notify the Commission of the discontinuance of his or 
    her present business or employment, with each such notice to include 
    the respondent's new business address and a statement of the nature of 
    the business or employment in which the respondent is newly engaged as 
    well as a description of respondent's duties and responsibilities in 
    connection with the business or employment.
    
    [[Page 49608]]
    
    
    VIII
    
        It is further ordered That this Order will terminate twenty years 
    from the date of its issuance, or twenty years from the most recent 
    date that the United States or the Federal Trade Commission files a 
    complaint (with or without an accompanying consent decree) in federal 
    court alleging any violation of the Order, whichever comes later; 
    provided, however, that the filing of such a complaint will not affect 
    the duration of:
        A. Any paragraph in this Order that terminates in less than twenty 
    years;
        B. This Order's application to any respondent that is not named as 
    a defendant in such a complaint; and
        C. This Order if such complaint is filed after the Order has 
    terminated pursuant to this Paragraph.
        Provided further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal 
    court rules that the respondent did not violate any provision of the 
    Order, and the dismissal or ruling is either not appealed or upheld on 
    appeal, then the Order will terminate according to this Paragraph as 
    though the complaint was never filed, except that the Order will not 
    terminate between the date such complaint is filed and the later of the 
    deadline for appealing such dismissal or ruling and the date such 
    dismissal or ruling is upheld on appeal.
    
    IX
    
        It is further ordered That respondents shall, within sixty (60) 
    days after service upon them of this Order and at such other times as 
    the Commission may require, file with the Commission a report, in 
    writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have 
    complied with the requirements of this Order.
    
    Exhibit A
    
        In the Matter of Genetus Alexandria, Inc., a corporation, and 
    Galen Medical Centers, Ltd., a corporation, and George Oprean, 
    individually and as President and a director of Genetus Alexandria, 
    Inc. and Galen Medical Centers, Ltd., and Linda Huffman Oprean, 
    individually and as an officer and a director of Genetus Alexandria, 
    Inc. and as a director of Galen Medical Centers, Ltd.
    
    File No.
    
    Declaration of
    
    Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746
    
        Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, I, __________________, hereby state 
    that the information contained in the financial statement of 
    ______________, provided to the Federal Trade Commission on 
    ______________, 1995, was true, accurate and complete at such time.
        I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and 
    correct.
    
    Dated:-----------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    [signature]
    
    Analysis of Proposed Consent to Aid Public Comment
    
        The Federal Trade Commission has accepted for comment a proposed 
    consent order with Genetus Alexandria, Inc. (``Genetus''), Galen 
    Medical Centers, Ltd. (``Galen''), George Oprean, and Linda Huffman 
    Oprean (``Linda Oprean''). Under the direction and control of George 
    Oprean and Linda Huffman Oprean, Genetus and Galen have marketed and 
    provided impotence treatment services through clinics located in 
    Virginia and Maryland.
        The Commission has placed the proposed order on the public record 
    for sixty days for comment by interested persons. Comments received 
    during this period will become part of the public record. After sixty 
    days, the Commission will again review the agreement and decide whether 
    it should withdraw from, or make final, any or all of the proposed 
    order.
        According to the complaint, impotence is frequently a symptom or 
    side-effect of serious diseases, such as arteriosclerosis, aneurysms, 
    high blood pressure, diabetes, strokes, kidney disease, and spinal cord 
    injuries. Impotence can also be a side-effect of various prescription 
    medications and alcoholism, and can also be caused by depression, 
    stress, anxiety, and other psychological factors.
        The complaint states that impotence can be treated by various 
    methods. Some treat the underlying physical, psychological, or 
    behavioral, cause; others produce an erection without treating the 
    underlying cause. According to the complaint, the only treatment 
    offered by respondents Genetus, George Oprean, and Linda Oprean was the 
    latter. These respondents' sole treatment method consisted of injecting 
    the drug Prostaglandin E-1 or ``Tri-mix'' (a solution of the drugs 
    Prostaglandin E-1, Papaverine, and Phentolamine). If injected in 
    appropriate doses into the patient's penis, these drugs may cause an 
    erection but do not treat the underlying cause of the impotence.
        The Commission's complaint charges that respondents Genetus, George 
    Oprean, and Linda Oprean deceptively promoted their impotence treatment 
    services. The complaint charges that Galen is also liable for other 
    respondent's deceptive practices because it is the successor 
    corporation of Genetus and the alter ego of Genetus and/or George 
    Oprean.
        Alleged Misrepresentations Re: Treatments Provided. The 
    Commission's complaint charges that respondents Genetus, George Oprean, 
    and Linda Oprean falsely represented that each patient of Genetus would 
    be examined by a physician, that each patient would receive a medical 
    diagnosis and treatment of the underlying cause of his impotence, and 
    that each patient would be evaluated and treated by a physician or 
    other medical practitioner licensed to do so. (para. 7) The complaint 
    also specifically charges that respondents Genetus, George Oprean, and 
    Linda Oprean falsely represented that Linda Oprean was a ``nurse 
    practitioner'' under Virginia law. (para. 11) In fact, according to the 
    complaint, Linda Oprean was only a ``registered nurse'' under Virginia 
    law (para. 12), and many patients were examined, evaluated, and treated 
    only by her. (para. 8) Therefore, the complaint alleges that many 
    Genetus patients were not examined by a physician, and were not 
    evaluated or treated by a physician or other medical practitioner 
    licensed to do so. (para. 8) The complaint further alleges that 
    Genetus' patients did not receive a medical diagnosis or treatment of 
    the underlying cause of their impotence. (para. 8) The proposed order 
    prohibits all respondents from making the alleged false representations 
    in connection with any ``treatment procedure,'' (Paras. I.A., I.B., 
    I.C.) defined to include not only procedures for treating impotence but 
    also those for treating any other medical condition, disease or 
    symptom. (Definitions Section, para. 2)
        Alleged Misrepresentations Re: Efficacy and Safety. The complaint 
    also charges that respondents Genetus, George Oprean, and Linda Oprean 
    falsely represented that Prostaglandin E-1 has no side-effects or 
    contraindications, and that their treatment program was unqualified 
    safe and would arrest each patient's impotence. (para. 9) In fact, 
    Prostaglandin E-1 has possible side-effects, including priapism (a 
    prolonged erection) and fibrosis of penile tissue, and its use is 
    contraindicated for some patients. (para. 10) The complaint further 
    alleges that the treatment program provided by Genetus, George Oprean, 
    and Linda Oprean was not unqualifiedly safe, and that their treatments 
    did not arrest each patient's impotence. (para. 10) As a remedy, the 
    proposed order prohibits misrepresentations about the side-effects and 
    contraindications of any drug or treatment procedure, the safety of any 
    treatment procedure, and the 
    
    [[Page 49609]]
    efficacy or duration of results of any treatment procedure. 
    (Paras. I.D., I.E., I.F.)
        Alleged Misrepresentations Re: Billing Practices. The complaint 
    further charges that respondents Genetus, George Oprean, and Linda 
    Oprean misrepresented to patients and their insurance companies that 
    all medical tests and laboratory procedures billed by Genetus had been 
    performed, that all patients had been diagnosed and had services 
    performed or ordered by a medical practitioner licensed to do so, and 
    that all claims submitted by Genetus to insurance companies were signed 
    or approved for signature by a physician. (para. 13) The complaint also 
    charges that respondents Genetus, George Oprean, and Linda Oprean also 
    misrepresented to patients that, in most cases, the costs of their 
    treatment program would be covered by the patients' health insurance. 
    (para. 15) In fact, according to the complaint, not all the medical 
    tests and laboratory tests billed by Genetus were performed, many 
    patients were diagnosed and had services performed or ordered by Linda 
    Oprean, and many claims were signed by Linda Oprean without a 
    physician's knowledge or permission. (para. 14) For these reasons, the 
    costs of Genetus' treatment program were not, in most cases, covered by 
    patients' health insurance. (para. 16) In addition, patients were 
    otherwise responsible for paying for most or all of the amounts billed 
    by Genetus because the amounts Genetus charged bore no reasonable 
    relationship to the costs of certain goods and services and 
    substantially exceeded the amount the insurers had agreed to pay for 
    such items. (para. 16) The proposed order prohibits all respondents 
    from making the alleged misrepresentations. (Paras. I.H., I.I.)
        Monetary Remedies. The proposed order also prohibits all 
    respondents from taking any action to collect any payments still owing 
    from any customers of Genetus for any of its impotence treatment 
    services. In addition, the proposed order requires Genetus, George 
    Oprean, and Linda Oprean to pay consumer redress in the amount of 
    $250,000, liability for which is suspended based upon the truthfulness 
    and accuracy of financial statements provided to the Commission by all 
    four respondents. If the Commission later determines that any financial 
    statement contained any material misrepresentations or omissions, the 
    entire amount of $250,000 is immediately due and payable.
        The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate comment on the 
    proposed consent order. This analysis is not intended to constitute an 
    official interpretation of the agreement or proposed order, or to 
    modify in any way its terms.
    Donald S. Clark,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-23796 Filed 9-25-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/26/1995
Department:
Federal Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Proposed consent agreement.
Document Number:
95-23796
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before November 27, 1995.
Pages:
49605-49609 (5 pages)
Docket Numbers:
File No. 942-3161
PDF File:
95-23796.pdf