[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49636-49638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-23804]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-244]
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power
Plant; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility
Operating License and Opportunity for a Hearing
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is
considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No.
DPR-18, issued to Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (the
licensee), for operation of the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant,
located at the licensee's site in Wayne County, New York.
The proposed amendment would represent a full conversion from the
current Technical Specifications (TSs) to a set of TS based on NUREG-
1431, ``Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Plants,''
Revision 0, dated September 1993, together with approved travellers
used in the issuance of
[[Page 49637]]
Revision 1, dated April 1995. NUREG-1431 was developed through working
groups composed of NRC staff members and industry representatives and
has been endorsed by the staff as part of an industry-wide initiative
to standardize and improve the TSs. As part of this submittal, the
licensee has applied the criteria contained in the Commission's Final
Policy Statement on Technical Specification Improvements for Nuclear
Power Reactors of July 22, 1993, to the current Ginna TSs, and, using
NUREG-1431 as a basis, developed a proposed set of improved TSs for
Ginna.
The licensee has categorized the proposed changes to the current
TSs into ten general groupings. These groupings can be characterized as
administrative changes, relocated changes, more restrictive changes,
and less restrictive changes.
Non-technical administrative changes were intended to incorporate
human-factors principles into the form and structure of the improved
plant TSs so that they would be easier to use for plant operations
personnel. Administrative changes are editorial in nature or involve
the reorganization or reformatting of requirements without affecting
technical content or operational requirements. The proposed changes
include: (a) Providing the appropriate numbers, etc., for NUREG-1431
bracketed information (information which must be supplied on a plant-
specific basis, and which may change from plant to plant), (b)
identifying plant-specific wording for system names, etc., and (c)
changing NUREG-1431 section wording to conform to existing licensee
practices.
Relocated changes, those current TS requirements which do not
satisfy or fall within any of the four criteria specified in the
Commission's policy statement, may be relocated to appropriate
licensee-controlled documents. In the licensee's application,
Attachment A as part of their May 26, 1995 letter, the licensee states
that such requirements are generally relocated to the Updated Final
Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) and TS Bases. The relocated limiting
conditions for operation (LCO) portion of the current TS, which
includes the system description, design limits, functional
capabilities, and performance levels, will be relocated to the UFSAR.
Changes made to these documents will be made pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59
or other appropriate control mechanisms. These changes reduce the
number of current TS requirements but the actual commitment to continue
to perform the requirement will be unchanged upon implementation of
improved TSs.
The licensee's proposed improved TSs include certain more
restrictive requirements that are contained in the current TSs, which
are either more conservative than corresponding requirements in the
current TSs, or are additional restrictions which are contained in
NUREG-1431 but are not contained in the current TSs. Examples of more
restrictive requirements include: placing an LCO on plant equipment
which is not required by the present TS to be operable; more
restrictive requirements to restore inoperable equipment; and more
restrictive SRs.
Less restrictive changes are those where current requirements are
relaxed or eliminated, or new flexibility is provided. The more
significant ``less restrictive'' requirements are justified on a case-
by-case basis. When requirements have been shown to provide little or
no safety benefit, their removal from the TSs may be appropriate. In
most cases, relaxations previously granted to individual plants on a
plant-specific basis were the result of (a) generic NRC actions, (b)
new NRC staff positions that have evolved from technological
advancements and operating experience, or (c) resolution of the Owners
Groups' comments on the improved STSs. Generic relaxations contained in
NUREG-1431 were reviewed by the staff and found to be acceptable
because they are consistent with current licensing practices and NRC
regulations. The licensee's design was reviewed to determine if the
specific design basis and licensing basis are consistent with the
technical basis for the model requirements in NUREG-1431 and thus
provides a basis for these revised TS.
These administrative, relocated, more restrictive and less
restrictive changes to the requirements of the current TSs do not
result in operations that will alter assumptions relative to mitigation
of an analyzed accident or transient event.
In addition to the changes described above, the licensee proposed
certain changes to the current TSs that are both less restrictive and
are not within the scope of application for conversion to the guidance
of NUREG-1431. All of the differences will be reviewed by the NRC staff
and a determination will be made regarding the approval or disapproval
of each item as a part of this licensing action. Specifically, the
licensee identified the following instances where their submittal
varied from the provisions of NUREG-1431.
(1) All refueling interval surveillance were changed from 18 months
to 24 months consistent with the guidance of Generic Letter 91-04,
``Changes in Technical Specification Surveillance Intervals to
Accommodate a 24-Month Fuel Cycle, dated April 2, 1991.''
(2) Allow both post-accident charcoal filters to be removed from
service at the same time, provided both containment spray trains are
operable (proposed Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.6.6).
(3) Require only one component cooling water (CCW) heat exchanger
to be operable when the system is required to be operable (proposed LCO
3.7.7).
(4) Allow both motor driven auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pumps to be
removed from service for up to 72 hours (proposed LCO 3.7.5).
(5) Increase the allowed outage times for certain reactor trip
system and engineered safety feature actuation system functions up to
72 hours (proposed LCO 3.3.1 and 3.3.2).
(6) Allow an additional 48 hours to restore an inoperable reactor
trip breaker or automatic trip logic train in reactor operating modes
3, 4, and 5 (Hot Standby, Hot Shutdown, Cold Shutdown) after exiting
mode 2 (Startup) with this condition (proposed LCO 3.3.1).
(7) Allow the use of a closed system to isolate a containment
penetration with a failed containment isolation valve (proposed LCO
3.6.3).
(8) Require only one offsite power source to be operable during
reactor operating mode changes (proposed LCO 3.8.1).
(9) Allow 72 hours to reduce the power range neutron flux trip
function setpoint when the heat flux hot channel factor (Fq) or nuclear
enthalpy rise hot channel factor (F delta h) is not within limits
(proposed LCO 3.2.1 and 3.2.2).
(10) Remove the requirement to test certain reactor coolant system
pressure isolation valves when the plant has been in reactor operating
mode 5 (cold shutdown) for greater than 7 days (proposed surveillance
requirement (SR) 3.4.14.1).
(11) Remove the requirement to test the motor driven AFW pump
cross-over motor operated isolation valves (proposed LCO 3.7.5).
(12) Remove the requirement to verify that the AFW pumps and valves
can actuate within 10 minutes (proposed 3.7.5).
(13) Increase the allowed tolerances for the pressurizer safety
valves setpoint (proposed LCO 3.4.10).
(14) Increase the allowed fuel enrichment limit from 4.25 weight
percent to 5.05 weight percent (proposed Specification 4.3.1.1.a).
(15) Relocate the following parameters and setpoints to the core
operating limits report (COLR):
[[Page 49638]]
Overpower delta temperature and overtemperature delta temperature
(proposed LCO 3.3.1).
Refueling water storage tank boron concentration (proposed LCO
3.5.4).
Accumulator boron concentration (proposed LCO 3.5.1). Shutdown
margin (proposed LCO 3.1.1).
(16) Relocate the containment integrity requirements during
refueling reactor operating mode 6 (Refueling) from the TSs.
(17) Relocate the reactor coolant pump underfrequency trip function
from the TSs.
(18) Relocate the AFW and standby AFW system manual initiation
functions from the TSs.
Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission
will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
By October 26, 1995, the licensee may file a request for a hearing
with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility
operating license and any person whose interest may be affected by this
proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding
must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to
intervene. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene
shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Rules of Practice
for Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR Part 2. Interested
persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is
available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public
document room located at the Rochester Public Library, 115 South
Avenue, Rochester, NY 14610. If a request for a hearing or petition for
leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission or an
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the Commission or by
the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule
on the request and/or petition; and the Secretary or the designated
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an
appropriate order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene
shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in
the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of
the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons
why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the
following factors: (1) The nature of the petitioner's right under the
Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of
the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the
proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be
entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition
should also identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of
the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person
who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been
admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of
the Board up to 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference
scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy
the specificity requirements described above.
Not later than 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference
scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to
the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions
which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each contention must
consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be
raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall provide a
brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a concise
statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the
contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the
contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references
to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is
aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those
facts or expert opinion. Petitioner must provide sufficient information
to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material
issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within
the scope of the amendment under consideration. The contention must be
one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A
petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these
requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be
permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding,
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene,
and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-
examine witnesses.
A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must
be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Docketing and Services
Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room,
the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, by the above
date. Where petitions are filed during the last 10 days of the notice
period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform the
Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-(800)
248-5100 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union operator
should be given Datagram Identification Number N1023 and the following
message addressed to Ledyard B. Marsh, Director, Project Directorate I-
1: petitioner's name and telephone number; date petition was mailed;
plant name; and publication date and page number of this Federal
Register notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to the
Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555, and to Nicholas S. Reynolds, Winston & Strawn,
1400 L St. NW., Washington, DC 20005, attorney for the licensee.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended
petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not
be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding
officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the
petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the
factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
If a request for a hearing is received, the Commission's staff may
issue the amendment after it completes its technical review and prior
to the completion of any required hearing if it publishes a further
notice for public comment of its proposed finding of no significant
hazards consideration in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 and 50.92.
For further details with respect to this action, see the
application for amendment dated May 26, 1995, which is available for
public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public
document room located at the Rochester Public Library, 115 South
Avenue, Rochester, NY 14610.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of September.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ledyard B. Marsh,
Director, Project Directorate I-1, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-23804 Filed 9-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
