95-23869. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; VirginiaVOC RACT Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 49767-49770]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-23869]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [VA21-1-5883a; FRL-5292-2]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
    Virginia--VOC RACT Requirements
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
    submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia. This revision pertains to 
    amendments to Virginia's major source volatile organic compound (VOC) 
    reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements applicable 
    in the Richmond ozone nonattainment area and the Virginia portion of 
    the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area. The revision was submitted 
    to comply with the RACT ``Catch-up'' provisions of the Clean Air Act 
    Amendments of 1990 (The Amendments). The intended effect of this action 
    is to approve the submitted amendments to Virginia's major source VOC 
    RACT requirements because they strengthen Virginia's SIP. This action 
    is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
    
    DATES: This final rule is effective November 27, 1995, unless notice is 
    received on or before October 27, 1995, that adverse or critical 
    comments will be submitted. If the effective date is delayed, timely 
    notice will be published in the Federal Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Marcia L. Spink, Associate 
    Director, Air Programs (3AT00), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107. 
    Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for 
    public inspection during normal business hours at the Air, Radiation & 
    Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 841 
    Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107; the Air and 
    Radiation Docket and Information Center, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460; and Virginia 
    Department of Environmental Quality, 629 East Main Street, Richmond, 
    Virginia 23219.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Pino, (215) 597-9337.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 6, 1992, the Virginia Department 
    of Environmental Quality submitted a revision to its ozone SIP to 
    comply with the RACT ``Catch-up'' provisions of the Clean Air Act (the 
    
    [[Page 49768]]
    Act). The revision consists of amendments to Virginia's major source 
    VOC RACT regulation to: (1) Lower the applicability threshold for RACT 
    in the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area 
    and; (2) add a compliance date of May 31, 1995 for major VOC sources in 
    the Richmond nonattainment area and the Virginia portion of the 
    Washington. DC nonattainment area to comply with RACT emission 
    standards.
    
    I. Background
    
        Under the pre-amended Act (i.e. the Act prior to the 1990 
    Amendments), ozone nonattainment areas were required to adopt RACT 
    rules for sources of VOC emissions. EPA issued three sets of control 
    technique guideline documents (CTGs), establishing a ``presumptive 
    norm'' for RACT for various categories of VOC sources. Those sources 
    not covered by a CTG were called non-CTG sources. EPA determined that 
    an area's SIP-approved attainment date established which RACT rules the 
    area needed to adopt and implement. Under pre-amended section 
    172(a)(1), ozone nonattainment areas were generally required to attain 
    the ozone standard by December 31, 1982. Those areas that submitted an 
    attainment demonstration projecting attainment by that date were 
    required to adopt RACT for sources covered by the Group I and II CTGs. 
    Those areas that sought an extension of the attainment date under 
    section 172(a)(2) to as late as December 31, 1987 were required to 
    adopt RACT for all CTG sources and for all major non-CTG sources (i.e. 
    sources having potential VOC emissions of 100 tons per year (TPY) or 
    more).
        Under the pre-amended Act, EPA designated the metropolitan 
    Washington, DC area (including a portion of Northern Virginia) and the 
    Richmond area as nonattainment. These areas both had a pre-enactment 
    (i.e. prior to enactment of the 1990 Amendments) attainment date of 
    December 31, 1987 and, therefore, were required to adopt RACT for Group 
    I, II, and III CTG categories as well as non-CTG VOC sources with the 
    potential to emit 100 TPY or more. However, these areas did not attain 
    the ozone standard by the approved attainment date.
        On November 15, 1990, amendments to the 1977 Clean Air Act were 
    enacted. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 
    7401-7671q. Under the amended Act, EPA and the States were required to 
    review the designation of areas and to redesignate areas as 
    nonattainment for ozone if the air quality data from 1987, 1988, and 
    1989 indicated that the area was violating the ozone standard. On 
    November 6, 1991 and November 30, 1992, EPA issued those designations. 
    56 FR 56694 and 57 FR 56762. The metropolitan Washington, DC and 
    Richmond nonattainment areas retained their nonattainment designation. 
    The metropolitan Washington, DC area (including a portion of Northern 
    Virginia) was classified as serious, and the Richmond area was 
    classified as moderate. 56 FR 56694 (Nov. 6, 1991).
        Section 182(b)(2) of the amended Act requires States to adopt RACT 
    rules for all areas designated nonattainment for ozone and classified 
    as moderate or above. There are three parts to the section 182(b)(2) 
    RACT requirement: (1) RACT for sources covered by an existing CTG (i.e. 
    a CTG issued prior to the enactment of the Amendments); (2) RACT for 
    sources covered by post-enactment CTGs; and (3) all major sources not 
    covered by a CTG. This RACT requirement makes nonattainment areas that 
    previously were exempt from RACT requirements ``catch up'' to those 
    nonattainment areas that became subject to those requirements during an 
    earlier period, and therefore, is known as the RACT Catch-up 
    requirement. In addition, it requires newly designated ozone 
    nonattainment areas to adopt RACT rules consistent with those for 
    previously designated nonattainment areas.
        Since the metropolitan Washington, DC and Richmond nonattainment 
    areas were previously required to adopt RACT for all CTG sources, to 
    meet the RACT Catch-up requirement Virginia was not required to submit 
    additional CTG RACT rules for these areas. However, the major source 
    definition for serious areas has been lowered under the amended Act to 
    cover sources that have the potential to emit 50 TPY of VOC or more. 
    Therefore, Virginia was required to adopt RACT rules for all sources 
    that exceed this cut-off in the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC 
    nonattainment area.
        In addition to the pre-enactment metropolitan Washington, DC and 
    Richmond nonattainment areas retaining their nonattainment 
    designations, EPA also extended their nonattainment area boundaries. 
    Therefore, under the RACT Catch-up provision of section 182(b)(2), the 
    Commonwealth was required, for these portions of the nonattainment 
    areas, to submit RACT rules covering all CTGs and all non-CTG major VOC 
    sources.
        In summary, to fully comply with the RACT Catch-up provisions of 
    the Act, Virginia is required to expand its RACT regulations to the 
    areas which have been added to the Virginia portion of the pre-
    enactment metropolitan Washington, DC nonattainment area and the pre-
    enactment Richmond nonattainment area. It must adopt RACT regulations 
    for all CTG sources and all major non-CTG VOC sources (VOC sources with 
    the potential to emit  50 TPY in the Virginia portion of the 
    metropolitan Washington, DC nonattainment area and  100 TPY 
    in the Richmond nonattainment area). Sources must comply with these 
    provisions as expeditiously as possible, but no later than May 31, 
    1995.
        This action pertains only to one portion of the RACT Catch-up 
    provisions, the requirement to lower the applicability threshold for 
    RACT in the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC nonattainment area. 
    The requirement to expand the geographic applicability of Virginia's 
    RACT rules was the subject of a separate rulemaking action. (See 59 FR 
    52704.)
    
    II. Commonwealth's Submittal
    
        Virginia's existing major source RACT regulation, section 120-04-
    0407, requires RACT for sources in the Virginia portion of the 
    Washington, DC nonattainment area and the Richmond nonattainment area 
    with the potential to emit  100 TPY of VOC. On October 19, 
    1994, EPA approved into the Virginia SIP revisions to Appendix P of 
    Virginia's air quality regulations that redefined the boundaries for 
    Virginia's ozone nonattainment areas. (See 59 FR 52701) Thus, the 
    geographic applicability of section 120-04-0407 was revised to cover 
    the expanded Richmond nonattainment area and the expanded Virginia 
    portion of the Washington, DC nonattainment area.
        Virginia's November 6, 1992 submittal contains amendments to 
    section 120-04-0407 that lower the applicability threshold such that 
    sources with potential VOC emissions of 50 TPY or greater in the 
    expanded Virginia portion of the Washington, DC nonattainment area are 
    now subject to RACT. Sources with potential VOC emissions of 100 TPY or 
    greater in the expanded Richmond nonattainment area are also subject to 
    RACT. Additionally, a compliance date of May 31, 1995 was added to the 
    rule for sources in both the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC 
    area and the Richmond area.
    
    III. EPA Evaluation and Action
    
        EPA is approving the amendments to section 120-04-0407 described 
    above because they comply with the RACT Catch-up requirements of the 
    Act and serve to strengthen Virginia's SIP. Detailed descriptions of 
    the 
    
    [[Page 49769]]
    amendments addressed in this document, and EPA's evaluation of the 
    amendments, are contained in the technical support document (TSD) 
    prepared for these revisions. Copies of the TSD are available from the 
    EPA Regional office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
        EPA is approving this SIP revision without prior proposal because 
    the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates 
    no adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
    Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision 
    should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be 
    effective November 27, 1995, unless, by October 27, 1995, adverse or 
    critical comments are received.
        If EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn before 
    the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will 
    withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be 
    addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a 
    proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this 
    action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
    so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is 
    advised that this action will be effective on November 27, 1995.
    
    Final Action
    
        EPA is approving amendments to section 120-04-0407, Virginia's 
    major source VOC RACT requirements applicable in the Richmond ozone 
    nonattainment area and the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC ozone 
    nonattainment area, submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia on 
    November 6, 1992.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to 
    the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light 
    of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
    relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the 
    Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve 
    requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
    Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the 
    Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on 
    any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the 
    Federal-State relationship under the Act, preparation of a flexibility 
    analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic 
    reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base 
    its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. 
    EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
        Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to 
    the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA 
    must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
    that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
    statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan 
    for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
    significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
    by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
    Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
    July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for 
    Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    exempted this regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
        EPA has determined that the approval action proposed/promulgated 
    does not include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs 
    of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments 
    in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action 
    approves pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and 
    imposes no new Federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs 
    to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, 
    result from this action.
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
    judicial review of this action, pertaining to Virginia's major source 
    VOC RACT requirements, must be filed in the United States Court of 
    Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 27, 1995. Filing a 
    petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
    does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
    review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
    review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
    rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
    to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
    Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: August 24, 1995.
    W. Michael McCabe,
    Regional Administrator, Region III.
    
        40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart VV--Virginia
    
        2. Section 52.2420 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(106) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.2420  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (106) Revisions to the Virginia State Implementation Plan submitted 
    on November 6, 1992 by the Virginia Department of Environmental 
    Quality:
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) Letter of November 6, 1992 from the Virginia Department of 
    Environmental Quality transmitting revisions to Virginia's State 
    Implementation Plan, pertaining to volatile organic compound 
    requirements in Virginia's air quality regulations.
        (B) Revisions to Sec. 120-04-0407 that lower the applicability 
    threshold for RACT in the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC ozone 
    nonattainment area and add a RACT compliance date of May 31, 1995 for 
    major VOC sources in the Richmond ozone nonattainment area and the 
    Virginia portion of the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area, 
    adopted by the Virginia State Air 
    
    [[Page 49770]]
    Pollution Board on October 30, 1992 and effective on January 1, 1993.
        (ii) Additional material.
        (A) Remainder of Virginia's November 6, 1992 State submittal 
    pertaining to Sec. 120-04-0407.
    
    [FR Doc. 95-23869 Filed 9-26-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P'
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/27/1995
Published:
09/27/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
95-23869
Dates:
This final rule is effective November 27, 1995, unless notice is received on or before October 27, 1995, that adverse or critical comments will be submitted. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
49767-49770 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
VA21-1-5883a, FRL-5292-2
PDF File:
95-23869.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.2420