95-23898. Dried Prunes Produced in California; Expenses and Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 49749-49751]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-23898]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 993
    
    [Docket No. FV95-993-1FIR]
    
    
    Dried Prunes Produced in California; Expenses and Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting as 
    
    [[Page 49750]]
    a final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    that authorized expenses and established an assessment rate that 
    generated funds to pay those expenses under Marketing Order No. 993 for 
    the 1995-96 crop year. Authorization of this budget enables the Prune 
    Marketing Committee (Committee) to incur expenses that are reasonable 
    and necessary to administer the program. Funds to administer this 
    program are derived from assessments on handlers.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 1995, through July 31, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Sue Clark, Marketing Order 
    Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. 
    Box 96456, room 2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, telephone 202-720-
    9918; or Richard P. Van Diest, California Marketing Field Office, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, suite 102B, 2202 Monterey Street, 
    Fresno, California 93721, telephone 209-487-5901.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement and Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR part 993), 
    regulating the handling of dried prunes produced in California. The 
    marketing agreement and order are effective under the Agricultural 
    Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), 
    hereinafter referred to as the Act.
        The Department is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive 
    Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the provisions of the marketing order now in 
    effect, California prunes are subject to assessments. It is intended 
    that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all 
    assessable prunes handled during the 1995-96 crop year, which began 
    August 1, 1995, and ends July 31, 1996. This final rule will not 
    preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they 
    present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provisions of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and requesting a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business has jurisdiction in equity to review 
    the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is 
    filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing 
    Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small 
    entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 1,360 producers of California dried prunes 
    under this marketing order, and approximately 20 handlers. Small 
    agricultural producers have been defined by the Small Business 
    Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those having annual receipts of less 
    than $500,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as 
    those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. The majority of 
    California dried prune producers and handlers may be classified as 
    small entities.
        The budget of expenses for the 1995-96 crop year was prepared by 
    the Prune Marketing Committee, the agency responsible for local 
    administration of the marketing order, and submitted to the Department 
    of Agriculture for approval. The members of the Committee are producers 
    and handlers of California dried prunes. They are familiar with the 
    Committee's needs and with the costs of goods and services in their 
    local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate 
    budget. The budget was formulated and discussed in a public meeting. 
    Thus, all directly affected persons have had an opportunity to 
    participate and provide input.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of dried California 
    prunes. Because that rate will be applied to actual shipments, it must 
    be established at a rate that will provide sufficient income to pay the 
    Committee's expenses.
        The Committee met June 22, 1995, and unanimously recommended a 
    1995-96 budget of $275,280, $5,080 more than the previous year. Budget 
    items for 1995-96 which have increased compared to those budgeted for 
    1994-95 (in parentheses) are: Executive salaries, $87,980 ($83,850), 
    clerical salaries, $19,440 ($18,650), office rent, $22,000 ($21,500), 
    postage and messenger, $5,500 ($5,000), rental of equipment, $3,000 
    ($500), purchase of equipment, $5,000 ($4,500), acreage survey, $10,500 
    ($10,000), and reserve for contingencies, $19,310 ($19,250). Items 
    which have decreased compared to the amount budgeted for 1994-95 (in 
    parentheses) are: Employee benefits, $15,400 ($15,800), repairs and 
    maintenance, $3,000 ($4,000), stationery and printing, $4,000 ($6,500), 
    and Committee travel, $9,000 ($9,500). All other items are budgeted at 
    last year's amounts.
        The Committee also unanimously recommended an assessment rate of 
    $1.55 per salable ton, $0.05 less than the previous year. This rate, 
    when applied to anticipated shipments of 177,600 salable tons, will 
    yield $275,280 in assessment income, which will be adequate to cover 
    budgeted expenses. Any funds not expended by the Committee during a 
    crop year may be used, pursuant to Sec. 993.81(c), for a period of five 
    months subsequent to that crop year. At the end of such period, the 
    excess funds are returned or credited to handlers.
        An interim final rule was published in the Federal Register on 
    August 1, 1995 (60 FR 19107). That interim final rule added 
    Sec. 993.346 to authorize expenses and establish an assessment rate for 
    the Committee. That rule provided that interested persons could file 
    comments through August 31, 1995. No comments were received.
        While this action will impose some additional costs on handlers, 
    the costs are in the form of uniform assessments on handlers. Some of 
    the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these 
    costs will be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the 
    marketing order. Therefore, the Administrator of the AMS has determined 
    that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
        After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
    information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the 
    effective 
    
    [[Page 49751]]
    date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal 
    Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because the Committee needs to have sufficient 
    funds to pay its expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis. The 
    1995-96 crop year began on August 1, 1995. The marketing order requires 
    that the rate of assessment for the crop year apply to all assessable 
    California prunes handled during the crop year. In addition, handlers 
    are aware of this rule which was recommended by the Committee at a 
    public meeting and published in the Federal Register as an interim 
    final rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993
    
        Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 993 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 993--DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule adding Sec. 993.346 which was 
    published at 60 FR 39107 on August 1, 1995, is adopted as a final rule 
    without change.
    
        Dated: September 20, 1995.
    Sharon Bomer Lauritsen,
    Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 95-23898 Filed 9-26-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/27/1995
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-23898
Dates:
August 1, 1995, through July 31, 1996.
Pages:
49749-49751 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV95-993-1FIR
PDF File:
95-23898.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 993.346