95-24030. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Broker- Dealer Orders on PACE  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 188 (Thursday, September 28, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 50226-50228]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-24030]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-36263; File No. SR-Phlx-95-32]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Broker-
    Dealer Orders on PACE
    
    September 21, 1995.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on 
    June 12, 1995, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' or 
    ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
    and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
    organization. On September 19, 1995, the Exchange submitted to the 
    Commission Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change, which is also 
    described below.\1\ The Commission is 
    
    [[Page 50227]]
    publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
    from interested persons.
    
        \1\ See letter from Gerald D. O'Connell, First Vice President, 
    Phlx, to Glen Barrentine, Team Leader, Division of Market 
    Regulation, SEC, dated September 7, 1995.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Phlx, pursuant to Rule 19b-4 of the Act, proposes to amend Rule 
    229, Philadelphia Stock Exchange Automated Communication and Execution 
    System (``PACE''), to permit non-agency orders under certain 
    circumstances. Specifically, Supplementary Material .02 is proposed to 
    be amended to permit non-agency orders in situations where a Specialist 
    Agreement is in effect. The Specialist Agreement is an Exchange form 
    signed by a Phlx equity specialist who has agreed to accept non-agency 
    orders through PACE. The Agreement shall identify the member firms 
    responsible for the orders and shall set forth the execution parameters 
    applicable to the orders. The text of the proposed rule change is 
    available at the Exchange and at the Commission.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
    has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the 
    most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 229 to 
    permit non-agency orders on the PACE System. PACE is the Exchange's 
    system for the automatic delivery and execution of orders on the Phlx 
    equity floor. Currently, Supplementary Material .02 to Rule 229 states 
    that only agency orders are eligible under PACE. Further, agency orders 
    are defined as orders entered on behalf of public customers, which are 
    not for the account of a broker-dealer or any account in which a 
    broker-dealer or an associate person of a broker-dealer has any direct 
    or indirect interest.
        At this time, it is proposed that under certain circumstances non-
    agency orders be permitted over PACE. Phlx specialists may file a 
    Specialist Agreement with the Exchange to allow the receipt and 
    execution of such orders.\2\ A Specialist Agreement is an Exchange form 
    signed by a Phlx equity specialist who has agreed to accept non-agency 
    orders through PACE. The Agreement shall identify the member firms 
    responsible for the orders and shall set forth the execution parameters 
    applicable to the orders (i.e., order size guarantees).\3\ The 
    execution parameters need not include volume guarantees in excess of 
    firm quote obligations to buy on the displayed bid or sell on the 
    displayed offer for the displayed size in accordance with existing 
    rules for orders not currently on PACE.
    
        \2\ According to the Exchange, Phlx equity specialists who agree 
    to accept non-agency orders through PACE would have the option of 
    agreeing to execute non-agency orders on either a manual or 
    automatic basis. Specifically, specialists who agree to accept such 
    orders for manual execution would be using the PACE system as an 
    order routing system and would be required to execute such orders 
    manually in accordance with existing Phlx rules. Where the 
    specialist agrees to provide for the automatic execution of non-
    agency orders, such orders would be executed automatically pursuant 
    to the PACE execution parameters for public customer orders under 
    Phlx Rule 229. Telephone conversation between Jerry O'Connell, Phlx, 
    and Glen Barrentine and Jennifer Choi, SEC, on September 12, 1995.
        \3\ According to the Exchange, specialists who agree to accept 
    non-agency orders through PACE would have the option of setting 
    different size guarantees for agency and non-agency orders. For 
    example, a specialist could agree to provide automatic execution of 
    all agency orders up to 2,000 shares while limiting the size 
    guarantee for non-agency orders to 1,000 shares. Conversely, a 
    specialist could agree to provide a larger size guarantee to non-
    agency orders than to agency orders. Telephone conversation between 
    Jerry O'Connell, Phlx, and Glen Barrentine and Jennifer Choi, SEC, 
    on September 12, 1995. Except for such different size guarantees, a 
    specialist who agrees to provide for the automatic execution of non-
    agency orders through PACE would not be allowed to vary any other 
    PACE execution parameters. Accordingly, such specialist would be 
    required to execute such orders through PACE in all other respects 
    in the same manner as public agency orders are currently executed 
    through PACE. Telephone conversation between Jerry O'Connell and 
    Edith Hallahan, Phlx, and Glen Barrentine and Jennifer Choi, SEC, on 
    September 20, 1995.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Moreover, the Exchange would require that any specialist who has 
    entered into a Specialist Agreement to facilitate broker-dealer orders 
    on PACE, pursuant to the proposed provision, must also provide the same 
    execution parameters to any other member broker-dealer that desires the 
    same parameters (i.e., same order size guarantees) with that 
    specialist.\4\ This requirement is to ensure that all broker-dealers 
    are afforded the opportunity to receive the same treatment by a 
    specialist which that specialist has bestowed on any other individual 
    broker-dealer. Lastly, the Exchange notes that the order designator 
    ``P'' will be utilized by the PACE system to indicate when an order is 
    for the account of a broker-dealer.
    
        \4\ As a result, a specialist who agrees to provide automatic 
    execution for one member's non-agency orders, must be willing to 
    provide automatic execution for such orders of any other member who 
    requests it. Telephone conversation between Jerry O'Connell, Phlx, 
    and Glen Barrentine and Jennifer Choi, SEC, on September 12, 1995.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The purpose of permitting non-agency orders onto PACE is to extend 
    the benefits of PACE to Phlx member firms for their proprietary as well 
    as customer orders. The Exchange believes that allowing such orders 
    onto PACE should serve the important function of adding liquidity and 
    trading opportunities to the Phlx marketplace. In addition, the 
    Exchange believes that PACE provides efficiencies to the Exchange's 
    marketplace, which reduces costs incurred through the handling of 
    orders on a more manual basis. This proposal contemplates that such 
    savings can now be realized for proprietary as well as customer orders.
    2. Statutory Basis
        The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6 of the Act in 
    general, and in particular, with Section 6(b)(5), in that it is 
    designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove 
    impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and 
    a national market system, as well as to protect investors and the 
    public interest, by reducing the costs and increasing the efficiencies 
    of handling proprietary orders.
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any inappropriate burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        No written comments were either solicited or received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal 
    Register or within such other period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes 
    
    [[Page 50228]]
    its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory 
    organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW., 
    Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-95-32 and should be 
    submitted by October 19, 1995.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-24030 Filed 9-27-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/28/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-24030
Pages:
50226-50228 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-36263, File No. SR-Phlx-95-32
PDF File:
95-24030.pdf