[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52211-52212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-25178]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 28, 1999 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 52211]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. 99-075-1]
Mexican Fruit Fly Regulations; Addition of Regulated Area
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the Mexican fruit fly regulations by
designating an area in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA, as a
regulated area. This action is necessary on an emergency basis to
prevent the spread of the Mexican fruit fly to noninfested areas of the
United States. This action restricts the interstate movement of
regulated articles from the regulated area in California.
DATES: This interim rule was effective September 22, 1999. We invite
you to comment on this docket. We will consider all comments that we
receive by November 29, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comment and three copies to: Docket No. 99-
075-1, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Suite 3C03,
4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that
your comment refers to Docket No. 99-075-1.
You may read any comments that we receive on this docket in our
reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
APHIS documents published in the Federal Register, and related
information, including the names of organizations and individuals who
have commented on APHIS rules, are available on the Internet at http://
www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/webrepor.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael B. Stefan, Operations
Officer, Invasive Species and Pest Management Staff, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-8247.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens (Loew), is a destructive
pest of citrus and many other types of fruit. The short life cycle of
the Mexican fruit fly allows rapid development of serious outbreaks
that can cause severe economic losses in commercial citrus-producing
areas.
The Mexican fruit fly regulations (contained in 7 CFR 301.64
through 301.64-10 and referred to below as the regulations) were
established to prevent the spread of the Mexican fruit fly to
noninfested areas of the United States. The regulations impose
restrictions on the interstate movement of regulated articles from the
regulated areas. Prior to the effective date of this rule, the only
areas in the United States regulated for the Mexican fruit fly were
portions of Texas.
Section 301.64-3 provides that the Deputy Administrator for Plant
Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), shall list as a regulated area each quarantined State,
or each portion of a quarantined State, in which the Mexican fruit fly
has been found by an inspector, in which the Deputy Administrator has
reason to believe the Mexican fruit fly is present, or that the Deputy
Administrator considers necessary to regulate because of its proximity
to the Mexican fruit fly or its inseparability for quarantine
enforcement purposes from localities in which the Mexican fruit fly
occurs.
Less than an entire quarantined State is designated as a regulated
area only if the Deputy Administrator determines that the State has
adopted and is enforcing a quarantine or regulation that imposes
restrictions on the intrastate movement of the regulated articles that
are substantially the same as those that are imposed with respect to
the interstate movement of the articles and the designation of less
than the entire State as a regulated area will otherwise be adequate to
prevent the artificial interstate spread of the Mexican fruit fly.
Recent trapping surveys by inspectors of California State and
county agencies and by inspectors of PPQ reveal that a portion of San
Bernardino County, CA, is infested with the Mexican fruit fly.
Specifically, on August 20, 26, and 27, 1999, inspectors found three
Mexican fruit flies in a residential area in San Bernardino County, CA.
Accordingly, to prevent the spread of the Mexican fruit fly to
noninfested areas of the United States, we are amending the regulations
in Sec. 301.64-3(c) by designating an area in San Bernardino and
Riverside Counties, CA, as a regulated area. A portion of Riverside
County, CA, is included in the regulated area because of its proximity
to the finding sites in San Bernardino County, CA. The regulated area
is described in the rule portion of this document.
There does not appear to be any reason to designate any other
portion of the quarantined State of California as a regulated area.
Officials of State agencies of California are conducting an intensive
Mexican fruit fly eradication program in the regulated area in
California. Also, California has adopted and is enforcing regulations
imposing restrictions on the intrastate movement of certain articles
from the regulated area that are substantially the same as those
imposed with respect to the interstate movement of regulated articles.
Emergency Action
The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
has determined that an emergency exists that warrants publication of
this interim rule without prior opportunity for public comment.
Immediate action is necessary to prevent the Mexican fruit fly from
spreading to noninfested areas of the United States.
Because prior notice and other public procedures with respect to
this action are impracticable and contrary to the public interest under
these conditions, we find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553 to make this
action effective less than 30 days after publication. We will consider
[[Page 52212]]
comments that are received within 60 days of publication of this rule
in the Federal Register. After the comment period closes, we will
publish another document in the Federal Register. The document will
include a discussion of any comments we receive and any amendments we
are making to the rule as a result of the comments.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review
process required by Executive Order 12866.
This rule restricts the interstate movement of regulated articles
from an area in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA. Within the
regulated area there are approximately 106 small entities that may be
affected by this rule. These include 2 distributors, 62 fruit sellers,
19 growers, 1 landfill, 18 nurseries, 1 packer, 1 processor, and 2
swapmeets. These 106 entities comprise less than 1 percent of the total
number of similar entities operating in the State of California.
Additionally, these small entities sell regulated articles primarily
for local intrastate, not interstate movement, so the effect, if any,
of this regulation on these entities appears to be minimal.
The effect on those few entities that do move regulated articles
interstate will be minimized by the availability of various treatments,
that, in most cases, will allow these small entities to move regulated
articles interstate with very little additional cost.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This interim rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws
and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
National Environmental Policy Act
An environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
have been prepared for this interim rule. The assessment provides a
basis for the conclusion that the methods employed to eradicate the
Mexican fruit fly will not present a risk of introducing or
disseminating plant pests and will not have a significant impact on the
quality of the human environment. Based on the finding of no
significant impact, the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service has determined that an environmental impact
statement need not be prepared.
The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
were prepared in accordance with: (1) The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2)
regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing
the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA
regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
Copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no
significant impact are available for public inspection at USDA, room
1141, South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except holidays. Persons wishing to inspect copies are requested to
call ahead on (202) 690-2817 to facilitate entry into the reading room.
In addition, copies may be obtained by writing to the individual listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule contains no information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 301 as follows:
PART 301--DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 147a, 150bb, 150dd, 150ee, 150ff, 161, 162,
and 164-167; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(c).
2. In Sec. 301.64-3, paragraph (c) is amended by adding an entry
for California, in alphabetical order, to read as follows:
Sec. 301.64-3 Regulated areas.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
California
San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. That portion of San
Bernardino and Riverside Counties in the Bloomington area bounded by
a line drawn as follows: Beginning at the intersection of Sierra
Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; then east along Foothill Boulevard to
Meridian Avenue; then south along Meridian Avenue to Mill Street;
then east along Mill Street to Rancho Avenue; then south along
Rancho Avenue to Laurel Street; then east along Laurel Street to
Eighth Street; then south along Eighth Street to La Cadena Drive;
then south along La Cadena Drive to Interstate Highway 10; then east
along Interstate Highway 10 to Mount Vernon Avenue; then south along
Mount Vernon Avenue to Interstate Highway 215; then southwest along
Interstate Highway 215 to State Highway 91; then southwest along
State Highway 91 to Mission Inn Avenue; then northwest along Mission
Inn Avenue to Buena Vista Avenue; then northwest along Buena Vista
Avenue to Mission Boulevard; then northwest along Mission Boulevard
to Riverview Drive; then southwest along Riverview Drive to Limonite
Avenue; then southwest along Limonite Avenue to Camino Real; then
north along Camino Real to Red Mountain Drive; then west along Red
Mountain Drive to Longs Peak Drive; then southwest along Longs Peak
Drive to Tyrolite Street; then north along Tyrolite Street to Galena
Street; then west along Galena Street to Agate Street; then north
along Agate Street to Mission Boulevard; then west along Mission
Boulevard to Pedley Road; then north along Pedley Road to Granite
Hill Drive; then north along an imaginary line to the intersection
of Cherry Avenue and Live Oak Avenue; then north along Live Oak
Avenue to Boyle Avenue; then north along an imaginary line to the
intersection of Washington Drive and Live Oak Avenue; then north
along Live Oak Avenue to Valley Boulevard; then east along Valley
Boulevard to Fontana Avenue; then northeast along Fontana Avenue to
Citrus Avenue; then north along Citrus Avenue to Arrow Boulevard;
then east along Arrow Boulevard to Sierra Avenue; then north along
Sierra Avenue to the point of beginning.
* * * * *
Done in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of September 1999.
Bobby R. Acord,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 99-25178 Filed 9-27-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-U
