99-25222. Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Model PC-7 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 52260-52263]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-25222]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-CE-61-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Model PC-7 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive 
    (AD) 98-08-07, which currently requires replacing the rudder and 
    elevator pivot arms with parts of improved design on
    
    [[Page 52261]]
    
    certain Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Model PC-7 airplanes. The 
    proposed AD would require replacing the rudder and elevator pivot arms 
    with parts that have been improved since issuance of AD 98-08-07. The 
    proposed AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness 
    information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for 
    Switzerland. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to 
    prevent failure of the elevator and rudder caused by fatigue cracking 
    of the pivot arms, which could result in reduced airplane 
    controllability and possible loss of control of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 27, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-CE-61-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 Stans, 
    Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619 65 09; facsimile: +41 41 610 33 51. 
    This information also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the 
    address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roman T. Gabrys, Aerospace Engineer, 
    FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1201 Walnut, suite 900, Kansas 
    City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-6932; facsimile: (816) 426-
    2169.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 99-CE-61-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: 
    Rules Docket No. 99-CE-61-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas 
    City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        AD 98-08-07, Amendment 39-10456 (63 FR 17323, April 9, 1998), 
    currently requires replacing the rudder and elevator pivot arms with 
    the following parts of improved design, on certain Pilatus Model PC-7 
    airplanes:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Designation                         New part No.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Pivot Arm--Left-hand Elevator.........................     113.50.07.108
    Pivot Arm--Right-hand Elevator........................     113.50.07.109
    Pivot Arm--Upper Rudder...............................     113.40.07.084
    Pivot Arm--Lower Rudder...............................     113.40.07.083
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Accomplishment of AD 98-08-07 was required in accordance with 
    Pilatus Service Bulletin No. PC7-55-001, Revision No. 1, dated June 20, 
    1995.
        AD 98-08-07 was the result of reports of cracks in the elevator and 
    rudder trim tab pivot arms on the above-referenced airplanes.
        The actions specified in AD 98-08-07 were intended to prevent 
    failure of the elevator and rudder caused by fatigue cracking of the 
    pivot arms, which could result in reduced airplane controllability and 
    possible loss of control of the airplane.
    
    Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
    
        The Federal Office for Civil Aviation (FOCA), which is the 
    airworthiness authority for Switzerland, recently notified the FAA that 
    an unsafe condition may exist on certain Pilatus PC-7 airplanes. The 
    FOCA of Switzerland advises that cracks have been found in the improved 
    design rudder and elevator pivot arms that are specified in Pilatus 
    Service Bulletin No. PC7-55-001, Revision No. 1, dated June 20, 1995, 
    and mandated to be installed by AD 98-08-07.
        Analyis reveals that the cause of the cracks is due to a 
    manufacturing defect where the manufacturing process deviated from the 
    design specifications.
    
    Relevant Service Information
    
        Pilatus has issued Service Bulletin No. 55-003, dated July 7, 1999, 
    which specifies procedures for replacing the rudder and elevator pivot 
    arms with parts of improved design, as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Previous part  No.
             Designation            installed  per AD       New part No.
                                        98-08-07
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Pivot Arm, Inner Elevator....       113.50.07.108  113.50.07.108
                                                       (green paint).
    Pivot Arm, Outer Elevator....       113.50.07.109  113.50.07.109
                                                       (green paint).
    Pivot Arm, Upper Rudder......       113.40.07.084  113.40.07.084
                                                       (green paint).
    Pivot Arm, Lower Rudder......       113.40.07.083  113.40.07.083
                                                       (green paint).
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The FOCA classified this service bulletin as mandatory and issued 
    Swiss Airworthiness Directive HB 99-412, Effective Date: August 31, 
    1999, in order to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes 
    in Switzerland.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        This airplane model is manufactured in Switzerland and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under
    
    [[Page 52262]]
    
    the provisions of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. 
    Pursuant to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the FOCA of 
    Switzerland has kept the FAA informed of the situation described above.
        The FAA has examined the findings of the FOCA; reviewed all 
    available information, including the referenced service information; 
    and determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type 
    design that are certificated for operation in the United States.
    
    Explanation of the Provisions of the Proposed AD
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other Pilatus PC-7 airplanes of the same type 
    design registered for operation in the United States, the FAA is 
    proposing AD action to supersede AD 98-08-07. The proposed AD would 
    require replacing the rudder and elevator pivot arms with parts that 
    have been improved since issuance of AD 98-08-07.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 8 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 6 
    workhours per airplane to accomplish the proposed action, and that the 
    average labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost 
    approximately $300 per airplane. Based on these figures, the total cost 
    impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $5,280, 
    or $660 per airplane.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Airworthiness Directive 
    (AD) 98-08-07, Amendment 39-10456, and by adding a new AD to read as 
    follows:
    
    Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. 99-CE-61-AD; Supersedes AD 98-08-
    07, Amendment 39-10456.
    
        Applicability: Model PC-7 airplanes, manufacturer serial number 
    (MSN) 001 through MSN 614, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated in the body of this AD, unless 
    already accomplished.
        To prevent fatigue failure of the elevator and rudder trim tab 
    pivot arms because of cracks, which could result in the loss of 
    airplane control, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the 
    effective date of this AD, replace the rudder and elevator pivot 
    arms with parts of improved design (or FAA-approved equivalent part 
    numbers), as specified in and in accordance with Pilatus Service 
    Bulletin No. 55-003, dated July 7, 1999. The part numbers of the 
    improved design pivot arms are reflected in the following chart:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Previous part No.
             Designation            installed per AD        New part No.
                                        98-08-07
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Pivot Arm, Inner Elevator....       113.50.07.108  113.50.07.108
                                                       (green paint).
    Pivot Arm, Outer Elevator....       113.50.07.109  113.50.07.109
                                                       (green paint).
    Pivot Arm, Upper Rudder......       113.40.07.084  113.40.07.084
                                                       (green paint).
    Pivot Arm, Lower Rudder......       113.40.07.083  113.40.07.083
                                                       (green paint).
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, 
    on any of the affected airplanes, an elevator or rudder pivot arm 
    that is not of the improved design specified in paragraph (a) of 
    this AD.
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance times that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 1201 Walnut, 
    suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
        (1) The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate FAA 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate.
        (2) Alternative methods of compliance approved in accordance 
    with AD 98-08-07 are not considered approved as alternative methods 
    of compliance for this AD.
    
    
    [[Page 52263]]
    
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Small Airplane Directorate.
    
        (e) Questions or technical information related to Pilatus 
    Service Bulletin No. 55-003, dated July 7, 1999, should be directed 
    to Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 Stans, 
    Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619 65 09; facsimile: +41 41 610 33 
    51. This service information may be examined at the FAA, Central 
    Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th 
    Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
        Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in Swiss 
    Airworthiness Directive HB 99-412, Effective Date: August 31, 1999.
    
        (f) This amendment supersedes AD 98-08-07, Amendment 39-10456.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 20, 1999.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-25222 Filed 9-27-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/28/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-25222
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before October 27, 1999.
Pages:
52260-52263 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-CE-61-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-25222.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13