94-24096. Patton Island Bridge and Approaches Crossing the Tennessee River and Connecting the Cities of Florence and Muscle Shoals, Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, AL  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 188 (Thursday, September 29, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-24096]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 29, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
    
     
    
    Patton Island Bridge and Approaches Crossing the Tennessee River 
    and Connecting the Cities of Florence and Muscle Shoals, Colbert and 
    Lauderdale Counties, AL
    
    AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
    
    ACTION: Issuance of Record of Decision.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with the National 
    Environmental Policy Act and Section 5.4.9 of TVA's implementing 
    procedures, 45 FR 54, 111-115 (1980), that TVA has decided to adopt the 
    ``build'' alternative identified in the ``Final Environmental Impact 
    Statement and Section 4(f) Determination'' prepared by the U.S. 
    Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and 
    Alabama Highway Department in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of 
    Engineers, the U.S. Coast Guard, and TVA, dated August 6, 1991. TVA has 
    decided to: (1) Provide a permanent easement over 63.7 acres of TVA 
    land for construction, operation, and maintenance of a new highway and 
    bridge approaches on the Muscle Shoals Reservation, Patton Island 
    (Tract XPR-82PT), and Pickwick Reservoir (Tract XPR-81PT), and (2) 
    provide Section 26a approval of the bridge over the Tennessee River at 
    Tennessee River Mile 258.0.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Dale V. Wilhelm, Manager, National Environmental Policy Act Department, 
    Environmental Management, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West Summit 
    Hill Drive, WT 8C, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499; telephone (615) 
    632-6693.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: From 1987 to 1991, TVA cooperated with the 
    Alabama Highway Department in evaluating bridge routings, navigational 
    impacts, impacts on TVA's Rockpile National Recreation Trail, and other 
    environmental impact analyses necessary to support the EIS. TVA has now 
    received a request for a permanent easement which would allow the 
    Department to build the project. The proposed bridge and multi-lane 
    highway project would connect Muscle Shoals with Florence and 
    eventually with the proposed Memphis to Atlanta Interstate Highway. 
    Upon receipt of the permanent easement and 26a permit, construction 
    work would likely begin on the project.
    
    Alternatives Considered
    
        The following alternative corridors were considered by the Alabama 
    Highway Department and cooperating agencies and were evaluated in the 
    final EIS.
    
    1. Corridor East of Wilson Dam
    2. Corridor from Wilson Dam Road Near TVA to Wilson Dam Road near the 
    Corps of Engineers Lock System
    3. Seven Mile Island Corridor
    4. O'Neal Corridor
    5. Patton Island Corridor
    
        Based upon comparison of the corridors, the Patton Island and 
    O'Neal Corridors were chosen for detailed review, and the Patton Island 
    Corridor was chosen as the preferred routing.
        The following Alternatives for the Patton Island Corridor were 
    evaluated in the EIS:
        1A. Build along a corridor designated ``Alternative A.'' South of 
    the Tennessee River on the Muscle Shoals Reservation, this route is to 
    the east of Pond Creek.
        1B. Build along a corridor designated ``Alternative B.'' South of 
    the Tennessee River on the Muscle Shoals Reservation, this route is 
    along Pond Creek.
        2. The No Action Alternative, in which the bridge, approaches, and 
    highway project would not be built.
        The EIS discussed but did not consider in detail two other 
    alternatives for the Patton Island Corridor: alternate modes of 
    transportation and postponing the action. Alternate transportation 
    systems such as mass transit do not currently exist in the area, and 
    postponing the action would increase the impacts associated with 
    building the project when action is taken.
        TVA concurs with the determination that the Patton Island corridor 
    offers the most benefits, and that the Alternative A route is the 
    appropriate build alternative across TVA lands south of the Tennessee 
    River. The Alternative B route north of the river in the city of 
    Florence is the appropriate build alternative.
    
    BASIS FOR DECISION: Alternative A across TVA lands is chosen because it 
    would minimize the need to relocate several miles of Pond Creek, allow 
    improved transportation and economic growth, and enhance safety. The 
    major recreational impact would be the relocation of 800 feet of the 
    Rockpile National Recreation Trail. Alternative A would require 29 
    acres of upland habitat out of the 1,200 acres on Muscle Shoals 
    Reservation.
        The O'Neal corridor across TVA land would result in greater upland 
    habitat loss, more impacts on potential archaeological sites, greater 
    impacts on TVA recreational facilities, and would require 75 acres of 
    upland habitat.
        Alternative B would require the relocation of several miles of Pond 
    Creek on the Muscle Shoals Reservation and has not been chosen as the 
    preferred alternative across TVA land. However, north of TVA land in 
    Florence, Alternative B was found to be more practical given the 
    topography of the Florence area, and the fact that it would create less 
    traffic congestion on Florence Boulevard. Also, Alternative A north of 
    the river would require a retaining wall at the Cherry Hills Housing 
    Project playground, which representatives of the project have said is 
    not desirable. The No Action alternative is not desirable because it 
    would result in increasing traffic congestion as the area grows.
    
    Environmental Consequences and Commitments
    
        Implementation of the proposed project is not expected to have 
    substantial land use impacts and would not result in substantial loss 
    of prime farmland. It would not disrupt neighborhoods or communities, 
    but would change travel patterns in the area and relocate part of a low 
    income housing project. Many of the displaced residences are low 
    income; however, there would be financial assistance available to those 
    who would be required to relocate.
        The proposed project would generate 350-375 full-time construction 
    jobs, resulting in some need for temporary housing for workers brought 
    in from outside the area, and increased job opportunities for area 
    residents. By improving the transportation network in the area, local 
    businesses would be able to serve regional markets rather than just 
    local ones.
        Environmental analysis on the proposed project suggests that there 
    would not be substantial air emissions, noise, or water quality impacts 
    on the proposed project. Two endangered mussels inhabiting the 
    Tennessee River in the vicinity of the bridge would be relocated to a 
    suitable area prior to placement of bridge piers. As part of its 
    approval, TVA would require best management practices to control 
    erosion and sedimentation to prevent adverse aquatic impacts. These 
    conditions include:
        1. Removal of vegetation will be minimized.
        2. All disturbed areas will be stabilized as soon as possible. In 
    slow germination conditions and on steep slopes, erosion control 
    netting will be utilized to facilitate revegetation.
        3. Both temporary (fast germinating) and permanent ground cover 
    will be established.
        4. Native woody vegetation, to include trees, will be used (versus 
    riprap) wherever practicable as permanent stabilization.
        5. Silt fences will be used around material stockpile areas.
        6. Any riprap needed (e.g., at immediate streambank/water 
    interface) will be applied in such a manner as to avoid stream 
    sedimentation or disturbance.
        7. Cement and other pollutants will not be spilled into streams.
        8. Equipment will be kept off of streambanks to the degree 
    practicable.
        Soils within the corridor could contain some toxic materials; 
    however, no environmental impacts are expected to result from the 
    minute amounts of existing toxics.
        Although construction of the bridge would occur within the 
    floodplain of the Tennessee River, it would not constrict or impede the 
    flow of the Tennessee River and no unacceptable increases in flood 
    elevations are expected. One archaeological site could possibly be 
    impacted by bridge piers. Data recovery will take place at this site if 
    it is necessary to disturb it.
    
        Dated: September 20, 1994.
    Ralph H. Brooks,
    Acting Senior Vice President, Resource Group, Tennessee Valley 
    Authority.
    [FR Doc. 94-24096 Filed 9-28-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8120-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/29/1994
Department:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Issuance of Record of Decision.
Document Number:
94-24096
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 29, 1994