97-25733. Removal of Miscellaneous Obsolete Regulations  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 50885-50887]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-25733]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Surface Transportation Board
    
    49 CFR Parts 1022, 1030, 1091, 1131, 1143, 1156, and 1170
    
    [STB Ex Parte No. 572]
    
    
    Removal of Miscellaneous Obsolete Regulations
    
    AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is removing seven 
    obsolete parts of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: These rules are effective September 29, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 565-1600. [TDD for 
    the hearing impaired: (202) 565-1695.]
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective January 1, 1996, the ICC 
    Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-88, 109 Stat. 803 (ICCTA), 
    abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) and established the 
    Board. Section 204(a) of the ICCTA directs the Board to rescind all 
    regulations established by the ICC that are based on provisions of law 
    repealed and not substantively reenacted by the ICCTA. Pursuant to that 
    directive, the Board has removed many such regulations. We have 
    identified 6 additional parts of title 49, chapter X of the Code of 
    Federal Regulations that should be removed because their statutory 
    bases have been eliminated: Parts 1022, 1030, 1091, 1143, 1156, and 
    1170. A seventh part, 49 CFR part 1131, is being deleted because of 
    revisions the Board is making in response to the ICCTA. Because it is 
    clear that these regulations are obsolete, and in order to have these 
    changes in place for the next issue of title 49, we are making the rule 
    removals effective on the date of service.
    
    [[Page 50886]]
    
    Part 1022
    
        In response to an amendment to former section 205(f) of the 
    Interstate Commerce Act, the ICC issued the regulations now found at 49 
    CFR part 1022 concerning cooperative agreements with states. 31 FR 
    16402 (December 23, 1966). The statute authorized the ICC to make 
    cooperative agreements with the States to enforce economic and safety 
    laws and regulations of the States and the United States concerning 
    highway transportation.1 Section 205(f) was 
    recodified,2 as here relevant, at former 49 U.S.C. 
    11502.3 This section has been removed by the ICCTA. 
    Accordingly, we are removing the obsolete regulations at 49 CFR part 
    1022.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ The regulations were later modified, removing references to 
    safety. 55 FR 11196 (March 27, 1990).
        \2\ In 1978, the Interstate Commerce Act was recodified without 
    substantive change pursuant to Pub. L. 95-473, Oct. 17, 1978.
        \3\ Part of former section 205(f) concerning joint boards was 
    recodified at former 49 U.S.C. 10344. This section was also removed 
    by the ICCTA.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Part 1030
    
        The regulations now found at 49 CFR part 1030 were originally 
    published at 17 FR 7548 (August 19, 1952). This rule, concerning the 
    filing of contracts with other carriers, was based on former section 
    6(5) of the Interstate Commerce Act, later recodified at former 49 
    U.S.C. 10764. That section has been eliminated by the ICCTA, and, 
    accordingly, we are removing the part 1030 regulations based on that 
    statute.
    
    Part 1091
    
        Part 1091 concerns tariff requirements for Alaskan motor-ocean-
    motor ``substituted service,'' where water carriage is substituted for 
    motor carriage for a portion of the transportation even though the 
    motor carrier holds itself out to perform the entire movement. Under 
    the ICCTA, tariffs no longer have to be filed with the Board for these 
    movements. Now, the only motor carrier tariffs that must be filed with 
    us are those concerning joint rates with water carriers in the 
    noncontiguous domestic trade. 49 U.S.C. 13701(a)(1)(B).4 It 
    is unnecessary to file a ``tariff where the entire service is held out 
    by the motor carrier (notwithstanding that some of the service may be 
    performed by a water carrier under substitute service rules.* * *)'' 
    Id.5 Because substituted service is not a joint rate 
    arrangement, the tariff requirements in part 1091 are obsolete and are 
    being removed.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ In Exemption of Freight Forwarders in the Noncontiguous 
    Domestic Trade from Rate Reasonableness and Tariff Filing 
    Requirements, STB Ex Parte No. 598, __ STB __ (Feb. 21, 1997), slip. 
    op. at 5, we interpreted the language in 49 U.S.C. 13701(a)(1)(B) 
    (``movement by or with a water carrier'') as denoting, as here 
    relevant, ``joint rates in which a water carrier is a participant.''
        \5\ See also Sea-Land Freight Serv., Inc. et al.--Alaskan Trade 
    Substituted Serv.--Petition for Declaratory Order, Docket No. MC-C-
    10924, 1987 MCC Lexis 529, at *10 (ICC served Mar. 13, 1987): 
    ``[S]ubstituted service is not a through route/joint rate 
    arrangement * * *.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Part 1131
    
        The rules at 49 CFR part 1131 concern the procedures for rate 
    complaints and (Sec. 1131.4) petitions by railroads to review state 
    intrastate rate decisions or applications to prescribe intrastate 
    rates. We will remove these rules. Insofar as rate complaints are 
    concerned, the ICC revised its regulations in 1982 to provide for two 
    sets of formal complaint rules, one for rate complaints and another for 
    all other complaints. See Revision and Redesignation of the Rules of 
    Practice, Ex Parte No. 55 (Sub-No. 55) (ICC served Nov. 1, 1982) (47 FR 
    49572). By decision served on October 1, 1996, in Expedited Procedures 
    for Processing Rail Rate Reasonableness, Exemption and Revocation 
    Proceedings, Ex Parte No. 527, published in the Federal Register on 
    October 8, 1996, 61 FR 52710, the Board adopted final rules at 49 CFR 
    part 1111 to expedite the handling of challenges to the reasonableness 
    of railroad rates, including the adoption of a procedural schedule 
    applicable in stand-alone rate cases.6 Part 1111 also 
    contains procedures for non-rate complaint cases. It is therefore 
    unnecessary, and confusing, to have a second set of rate complaint 
    rules.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ In an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Expedited 
    Procedures for Processing Simplified Rail Rate Reasonableness 
    Proceedings, Ex Parte No. 527 (Sub-No. 1) (served and published in 
    the Federal Register on February 12, 1997 (62 FR 6508)), the Board 
    solicited comments to establish a general procedural schedule for 
    cases processed under the simplified rate evaluation procedures 
    adopted in Rate Guidelines-- Non-Coal Proceedings, Ex Parte No. 347 
    (Sub-No. 2). When final rules are issued in that proceeding, the 
    Board will have in place rules applicable to all rate complaints.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        With respect to intrastate rate decisions, the intrastate rail rate 
    rules in Sec. 1131.4 are based on former 49 U.S.C. 11501. The parts of 
    Sec. 11501 pertaining to rail matters were eliminated by the 
    ICCTA.7 Because the statutory basis for the Sec. 1131.4 
    rules was removed, we are deleting these obsolete regulations.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ Under 49 U.S.C. 10501(a)(2)(A), the Board has jurisdiction 
    over transportation between a place in one state and a place in the 
    same state ``as part of the interstate rail network.'' Accordingly, 
    only if the intrastate movement is not part of the interstate rail 
    system can a state exercise jurisdiction. In such limited areas, the 
    Board does not have jurisdiction.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Part 1143
    
        Part 1143 provides that if an interstate motor carrier of 
    passengers has requested permission from a state authority to raise an 
    intrastate rate, and that request has been denied in whole or in part 
    or the state has not taken final action on the request within a 120 
    days, the carrier can petition the ICC for review. This provision was 
    based on former 49 U.S.C. 11501(e). Section 211(b)(2) of Public Law 
    103-311, 108 Stat. 1673 (1994) removed the procedures of former section 
    11501(e) for petitioning the ICC. Moreover, the ICCTA broadened the 
    preemption of state regulation of intrastate motor carrier of passenger 
    rates. Prior to the ICCTA, states were preempted from regulating 
    reductions in intrastate motor carrier passenger rates over interstate 
    routes. Now, states are preempted from regulating all intrastate motor 
    passenger rates over interstate routes. See 49 U.S.C. 14501(a). 
    Accordingly, we are removing the part 1143 regulations.
    
    Part 1156
    
        Part 1156 concerns submission of cost data for reimbursement for 
    directed service. Under former section 1(16)(b) of the Interstate 
    Commerce Act (recodified at former 49 U.S.C. 11125), the directed 
    carrier was to be reimbursed by the Federal Government in the amount 
    that costs for routing, handling, and moving traffic over the other 
    carrier's lines exceeded the direct revenues from that traffic. The 
    regulations were originally issued in Regional Rail Reorg. Act--
    Submission of Cost Data, 348 I.C.C. 251 (1975). The directed service 
    statute under the ICCTA is now found at 49 U.S.C. 11123, and the 
    reimbursement provision has been eliminated. Now, section 11123(b)(3) 
    states that ``compensation for the directed operations shall derive 
    only from revenues generated by the directed operations.'' 8 
    Accordingly, the regulations in part 1156 for providing cost data to 
    justify reimbursement for directed service are obsolete and are being 
    eliminated.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ The conference report accompanying the ICCTA notes that the 
    statute ``restricts directed rail transportation to situations where 
    no Federal funding is involved, and compensation to the carrier 
    providing the directed service comes entirely from the revenues 
    generated by the service.'' H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 422, 104th Cong., 
    1st Sess. 185 (1995), reprinted in 1995 U.S.C.C.A.N. 793, 870.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Part 1170
    
        We are removing part 1170. These regulations concern reemployment 
    rights for employees of motor passenger carriers who lose their jobs 
    because of discontinuances or reductions of regular-route bus service. 
    The rules were issued in response to section 27 of the Bus Regulatory 
    Reform Act of 1982 and published as a note to former 49
    
    [[Page 50887]]
    
    U.S.C. 10935. See Employee Protection--Motor Passenger Carriers, 133 
    M.C.C. 140 (1983). By its terms, the provisions of section 27 expired 
    12 years after its November 1982 effective date. See Section 27(i). The 
    ICCTA, moreover, repealed former section 10935.
    
    Small Entities
    
        The Board certifies that this rule will not have a significant 
    economic effect on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    Environment
    
        This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
    human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    49 CFR Part 1022
    
        Intergovernmental relations.
    
    49 CFR Part 1030
    
        Railroads.
    
    49 CFR Part 1091
    
        Alaska, Intermodal transportation, Motor carriers.
    
    49 CFR Part 1131
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Investigations, Railroads.
    
    49 CFR Part 1143
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Intergovernmental relations.
    
    49 CFR Part 1156
    
        Railroads, Uniform system of accounts.
    
    49 CFR Part 1170
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Buses, Employment.
    
        Decided: September 19, 1997.
    
        By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
    Vernon A. Williams,
    Secretary.
    
    PART 1022--[REMOVED]
    
    PART 1030--[REMOVED]
    
    PART 1091--[REMOVED]
    
    PART 1131--[REMOVED]
    
    PART 1143--[REMOVED]
    
    PART 1156--[REMOVED]
    
    PART 1170--[REMOVED]
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble and under the authority 
    of 49 U.S.C. 721(a), title 49, chapter X, of the Code of Federal 
    Regulations is amended by removing parts 1022, 1030, 1091, 1131, 1143, 
    1156 and 1170.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-25733 Filed 9-26-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-00-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/29/1997
Published:
09/29/1997
Department:
Surface Transportation Board
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-25733
Dates:
These rules are effective September 29, 1997.
Pages:
50885-50887 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
STB Ex Parte No. 572
PDF File:
97-25733.pdf
CFR: (1)
49 CFR 11501