98-25951. Atlantic Billfishes; Atlantic Blue Marlin and Atlantic White Marlin Minimum Size; Billfish Tournament Notification Requirements; Atlantic Marlin Bag Limit  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 188 (Tuesday, September 29, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 51859-51862]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-25951]
    
    
    
    [[Page 51859]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    
    50 CFR Part 644
    
    [Docket No. 980305056-8245-02; I.D. 020398B]
    RIN 0648-AK88
    
    
    Atlantic Billfishes; Atlantic Blue Marlin and Atlantic White 
    Marlin Minimum Size; Billfish Tournament Notification Requirements; 
    Atlantic Marlin Bag Limit
    
    AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Interim rule; amendment; extension of expiration date; response 
    to comments; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: By interim rule, published in the Federal Register on March 
    24, 1998, NMFS increased the minimum size limits for Atlantic blue 
    marlin (BUM) and Atlantic white marlin (WHM) respectively, and required 
    operators of tournaments involving any Atlantic billfish to notify NMFS 
    at least 4 weeks prior to commencement. NMFS extends this interim rule 
    for an additional 180 days, and amends it to increase the minimum size 
    limit for Atlantic BUM to 99 inches LJFL (251 cm); establish a 
    recreational bag limit of one Atlantic BUM or WHM per vessel per trip; 
    and grant the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA (AA) 
    authority to adjust the bag limit. The intent of this amendment and 
    extension is to continue to reduce overfishing of Atlantic BUM and WHM, 
    and implement the recommendation of the International Commission for 
    the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), as required under the 
    Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA). These actions are necessary until 
    an amendment to the Atlantic Billfish Fishery Management Plan is 
    proposed and approved, and other more comprehensive measures as 
    established by that amendment, are implemented by final rule.
    
    DATES: Effective September 23, 1998, the regulations published on March 
    24, 1998 at 63 FR 14030 are extended through March 19, 1999. The 
    amendments in this rule are effective September 24, 1998 through March 
    19, 1999. Comments on the increase in minimum size limit for Atlantic 
    BUM to 99 inches LJFL and the establishment of an Atlantic marlin bag 
    limit must be received no later than November 23, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be mailed to Dr. Rebecca Lent, Highly 
    Migratory Species Management Division, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, 
    Silver Spring, MD 20910. Copies of this document and documents 
    supporting this action are available from Buck Sutter, Highly Migratory 
    Species Management Division, NMFS, Southeast Regional Office, 9721 
    Executive Center Drive N, St. Petersburg, FL 33702. Comments regarding 
    the collection-of-information requirement contained in this extended 
    interim rule, as amended, should be sent both to one of the previous 
    addresses and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Washington, 
    DC 20503 (Attention: NOAA Desk Officer).
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Buck Sutter, 813-570-5447; fax: 813-
    570-5364.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 305(c) of the Magnuson Fishery 
    Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), NMFS 
    promulgated an interim rule (63 FR 14030, March 24, 1998) that 
    increased the minimum size limits for Atlantic BUM and WHM to 96 inches 
    (244 cm) lower jaw-fork length (LJFL) and 66 inches (168 cm) LJFL, 
    respectively, and required operators of tournaments involving any 
    Atlantic billfish to notify NMFS at least 4 weeks prior to 
    commencement. The interim rule was intended to reduce overfishing of 
    Atlantic BUM and WHM and to implement a recommendation of ICCAT to 
    reduce Atlantic BUM and WHM landings by 25 percent for each of these 
    species from 1996 levels and to improve current monitoring, data 
    collection, and reporting requirements. The interim rule also directly 
    responded to a petition for rulemaking from the National Fisheries 
    Institute (NFI), received on July 28, 1997, which recommended mandatory 
    registration and reporting requirements for all billfish tournaments. 
    NMFS announced receipt of the petition in a Federal Register notice on 
    August 28, 1997 (62 FR 45614), and made copies available to interested 
    parties, including members of the Billfish Advisory Panel (AP). A 
    discussion of the management and stock status of Atlantic BUM and WHM, 
    ICCAT's recommendation relating to Atlantic billfish, and the need for 
    interim action is found in the preamble to the interim rule.
        The increased minimum sizes for Atlantic BUM and WHM, established 
    in the original interim rule, were selected based on the 1994 to 1996 
    size distribution of recorded landings for those species and were 
    calculated to reduce Atlantic BUM and WHM landings by number and weight 
    during 1998 to provide an adequate timeframe to determine whether these 
    size measures were an effective means to meet U.S. billfish landing 
    caps by the end of 1999. The ICCAT recommendation restricts U.S. 
    landings to 26.2 mt whole weight (ww) of BUM and 2.48 mt ww of WHM. The 
    increased minimum sizes were expected to reduce the number and weight 
    of landings of Atlantic BUM by 46 percent and 39 percent, respectively, 
    and of Atlantic WHM by both number and weight by 53 percent from 1996 
    levels.
        The size limits established in the interim final rule were based on 
    the best available information at the time. However, an analysis of a 
    more extensive database that includes 1997 landings has since been 
    completed. This information indicates that the minimum size of 96 
    inches (244 cm) LJFL for Atlantic BUM may not be adequate to achieve 
    the required 25 percent reduction in landings. Application of a 96-inch 
    (244 cm) LJFL limit on the size frequency of Atlantic BUM landed during 
    1995 to 1997 results in a reduction in landings of only 21 percent by 
    weight and 32 percent by number. Therefore, the minimum size for 
    Atlantic BUM must be increased to 99 inches (251 cm) LJFL to help 
    ensure full compliance with the 1997 ICCAT recommendation, with a 
    projected reduction in landings of 32.44 percent by weight and 44.33 
    percent by number. Application of a 66-inch (168 cm) LJFL limit on the 
    size frequency of WHM landed during 1995 to 1997 results in a projected 
    reduction in landings of 42 percent by weight and 47 percent by number. 
    While this reduction in WHM landings is less than the interim rule 
    estimate of 53 percent by weight and by number, it is still sufficient 
    for compliance with the 1997 ICCAT recommendation. Therefore, this 
    extended interim rule, as amended, maintains the 66-inch (168 cm) LJFL 
    minimum size for Atlantic WHM.
        A complicating factor in evaluating minimum size for the 
    recreational billfish fishery is the source of data used to evaluate 
    management alternatives. Actual landings (weight, number, and size 
    distributions) by U.S. recreational anglers are unknown; minimum 
    landing estimates are calculated from billfish tournaments and from the 
    Large Pelagic Survey (LPS). The only available size distribution data 
    are collected from the Recreational Billfish Survey of tournaments, and 
    it is unknown whether this information accurately reflects the true 
    distribution of recreational landings. Although the use of increased 
    minimum sizes will reduce
    
    [[Page 51860]]
    
    the number of fish that are landed and provide immediate reductions in 
    current fishing mortality levels, the exact impact on the total 
    mortality is unknown, since size limits and resulting landing reduction 
    estimates were based on fish taken only during fishing tournaments.
        The impact of handling or release mortality must also be considered 
    in evaluating the effectiveness of any management measure requiring the 
    release of live fish (e.g., fish less than the minimum size). Accurate 
    measures of release mortality are complicated by a variety of factors, 
    including fishing techniques (e.g., type of tackle and bait, length of 
    fight), location on fish of hooking, water temperature, handling time, 
    size of the fish, and many other parameters.
        Considering the limits the above factors place on using minimum 
    sizes as the only measure for complying with the ICCAT recommendation, 
    NMFS also amends the interim rule to establish a recreational bag limit 
    of one Atlantic marlin (either BUM or WHM) per vessel per trip. NMFS 
    also amends the interim rule to grant the AA the authority to adjust 
    the bag limit, with 3-days notice, including an adjustment to a zero 
    bag limit. This will allow the bag limit to be reduced to zero when the 
    recommended ICCAT landing cap of 26.2 mt ww Atlantic BUM and 2.48 mt ww 
    WHM (25 percent reduction from 1996 Atlantic BUM and WHM landings) is 
    reached.
        Retention of more than one billfish (of any species) during a 
    recreational trip is relatively rare. It has been estimated that over 
    70 percent of recreational trips do not result in a landed billfish 
    (Fisher and Ditton, 1992). There are occasional trips, however, where 
    more billfish are encountered, and limiting landings to one fish per 
    vessel could significantly reduce fishing mortality. One concern 
    associated with bag limits is that ``culling'' of fish could occur, 
    that is the retention of several fish until fishing is completed, then 
    the retention of the bag limit. However, given the conservation ethics 
    of most billfish anglers, culling is not anticipated to be a problem. 
    Therefore, the extended interim rule, as amended, would establish a one 
    marlin (either BUM or WHM) per vessel, per trip bag limit. The AA would 
    have the authority, under this alternative, to adjust the bag limit 
    with a 3-day notice, including a zero bag limit.
        In a survey of recreational billfish anglers who participate in 
    billfish tournaments, Fisher and Ditton (1992) found that 50.1 percent 
    of the sample population either was neutral or agreed with a one 
    billfish per vessel, per day bag limit. Interestingly, results of the 
    mail survey by Fisher and Ditton indicated that more anglers supported 
    a zero bag limit (74.2 percent were either neutral or in agreement with 
    this action). At their September 1998 meeting, Billfish AP members 
    supported a one billfish per vessel, per trip bag limit, but were 
    opposed to granting the AA authority to reduce the bag limit to zero.
        Shortly, NMFS will propose an amendment to the Atlantic Billfish 
    FMP, that includes a comprehensive set of management measures 
    addressing overfishing and long-term rebuilding of overfished Atlantic 
    billfish, including BUM and WHM, and will propose regulations 
    implementing these measures. To allow time for the FMP Amendment and 
    rulemaking processes to be completed, the interim rule needs to be 
    extended to ensure that 1999 BUM and WHM landings are at least 25 
    percent below 1996 levels as required by the ICCAT. Therefore, in 
    addition to the amendments discussed above, the interim rule, which 
    would otherwise expire on September 23, 1998, is extended through March 
    19, 1998.
    
    Comments Received to Date
    
        A 4-week notification requirement for tournaments involving 
    Atlantic billfish was originally included in a proposed rule to 
    consolidate regulations for Atlantic Migratory Species Fisheries (61 FR 
    57361, November 6, 1996). Five public hearings were held to receive 
    comments on the proposed consolidated rule. Comments addressing 
    billfish tournament requirements were also received by mail and fax and 
    were summarized in the interim rule, along with responses to these 
    comments.
        Subsequent to the publication of the interim rule, seven public 
    hearings, announced in the Federal Register on April 9, 1998, were held 
    to receive comments. NMFS found no opposition to the interim rule 
    regulations at these hearings. There were 13 letters received during 
    the comment period; 5 of these did not address the interim rule. 
    Comments pertaining to Atlantic billfish management issues beyond the 
    scope of the interim rule will not be addressed here. There was general 
    support for the interim management measures; responses to additional 
    comments on the interim rule are provided.
    
    Responses to Comments
    
        Comment 1: One commenter stated concern that the tournament 
    reporting requirements should help to monitor billfish mortality but 
    doubted if the universe of tournaments is known or even closely 
    estimated.
        Response 1: NMFS agrees that the universe of tournaments is not 
    known, and plans to use the tournament registration requirement to 
    better estimate the total number of tournaments. Additional measures to 
    monitor Atlantic billfish landings are being considered in the 
    development of the Atlantic Billfish FMP amendment.
        Comment 2: The NFI found it difficult to verify the statement that 
    landings will be reduced by 46 percent by number and 39 percent by 
    weight for Atlantic BUM and by 53 percent by both number and weight of 
    Atlantic WHM and that these figures should be based on cumulative 
    frequency distribution plots or suitable tables listing the numbers of 
    Atlantic BUM and WHM sampled by LJFL. This commenter also felt that the 
    rule should explicitly state the assumptions underlying conclusions 
    about the effect that larger minimum sizes will have on total 
    recreational billfish landings based on the existing sample size 
    frequency.
        Response 2: NMFS agrees. The Atlantic BUM and WHM minimum sizes and 
    associated reductions in landings established in the existing interim 
    final rule were based on the best available information at the time. 
    However, further analysis using subsequent information, which includes 
    1997 Atlantic BUM and WHM landings, indicates that the resultant 
    reductions in landings from the increased minimum size were 
    overestimated. A discussion of the new analysis and its results is 
    mentioned in the section of supplementary information. Further detail, 
    as requested by NFI, is contained in the EA/RIR document supporting 
    this action.
        Comment 3: The Blue Water Fishermen's Association (BWFA) supported 
    the interim measures but stated that these measures alone are not 
    sufficiently strict to ensure that the United States meets ICCAT 
    Atlantic BUM and WHM landing caps and recommendations. BWFA wants the 
    interim rule to be implemented in concert with strict quota monitoring 
    to ensure that ICCAT caps are not exceeded. There were three other 
    written comments expressing similar concern.
        Response 3: NMFS also agrees that the increases in minimum sizes of 
    Atlantic marlin may not be adequate to achieve the required 25-percent 
    reduction in Atlantic BUM and WHM landings. Further the interim rule is 
    being amended to ensure that the ICCAT recommendation is met. The 
    minimum size for BUM has been increased to 99 inches LJFL. In addition, 
    NMFS is establishing a one Atlantic marlin per
    
    [[Page 51861]]
    
    vessel, per trip bag limit and is granting the AA the authority to 
    adjust the bag limit with a 3-day notice, including adjusting to a zero 
    bag limit. Additional conservation measures to ensure that the United 
    States meets ICCAT landing caps and recommendations are being developed 
    as part of the Atlantic Billfish FMP amendment.
        Comment 4: BWFA commented that NMFS should also implement a strict 
    ``landing tag'' program immediately to ensure that the quota is not 
    exceeded. Similarly, NFI recommended that NMFS require all tournaments 
    to obtain a permit to land and/or target, in the case of catch and 
    release tournaments, Atlantic marlin.
        Response 4: NMFS is considering requiring a landing tag to be 
    affixed to all recreationally landed Atlantic billfish as part of the 
    Atlantic Billfish FMP amendment. However, the success of such a tagging 
    program is dependent on self-reporting, and even then, it would not 
    ensure that the ICCAT recommended landing cap is not exceeded. More 
    comprehensive management measures are being developed as part of the 
    Atlantic Billfish FMP amendment.
        Comment 5: NFI is disappointed with the reporting requirements of 
    the interim rule and concerned that NMFS \1\ failure to implement 
    anything more than a negligible improvement in billfish monitoring will 
    jeopardize compliance with the ICCAT recommendation and undermine the 
    credibility of the United States in the ICCAT forum. BWFA also comments 
    that the United States has failed to monitor the recreational sector 
    after years of advocating strict commercial measures and that the 
    disparity in treatment undermines our credibility at ICCAT. Both NFI 
    and BWFA commented on how much of the effort by U.S. recreational 
    fishermen goes entirely unregulated, undetected, and undocumented. NFI 
    specifically commented that NMFS ignored billfish landings from private 
    and charter fishing activities not associated with tournaments and 
    ignores comments that NFI and other organizations have submitted over 
    several years on the need to improve monitoring of recreational 
    fisheries for Atlantic marlin and sailfish, especially for charter and 
    tournament businesses. Nine additional commenters expressed concern 
    about discriminatory regulations, and they want NMFS to hold the 
    sportfishing sector accountable for its associated fish mortalities.
        Response 5: NMFS agrees that all sectors of the billfish fishery 
    must be held accountable for their associated billfish mortality. These 
    interim management measures are intended only as initial actions until 
    a more comprehensive set of management measures can be implemented. 
    Actions to improve monitoring, including private and charter/party 
    vessels, are being developed for both the proposed Billfish Amendment 
    and the proposed HMS FMP. Alternatives include requiring (1) permits 
    and logbook reporting for charter/headboat operations targeting 
    Atlantic highly migratory species; (2) observer coverage onboard 
    charter/headboats targeting highly migratory species; (3) a landing tag 
    to be affixed to all recreationally landed Atlantic Billfish; and (4) 
    vessel permits for all U.S. registered vessels fishing recreationally 
    for Atlantic highly migratory species.
        Comment 6: BWFA requested that NMFS require every tournament to 
    submit data on catches and effort, not just selected tournaments. NFI 
    requested that there be 100 percent tournament reporting selection 
    until a statistically based sampling program is implemented.
        Response 6: The total number of tournaments held is unknown. Since 
    implementation of the tournament registration requirement, 114 
    tournaments have registered. NMFS anticipates the number of tournaments 
    registered will increase as public outreach expands. A statistically 
    based sample of tournaments will be selected for reporting in order to 
    reduce the potential burden on NMFS and on tournament directors. 
    Currently, all registered tournaments that land billfish must submit 
    tournament reports. Until a statistically based sampling program is 
    implemented, all tournaments be 100 percent tournaments will be 
    required to report.
    
    Classification
    
        NMFS extends the interim rule published on March 24, 1998, at 63 FR 
    14030, as amended, for 180 days. As authorized by section 305(c)(3)(B) 
    of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, an interim rule may be extended for an 
    additional 180 days provided the public has had an opportunity to 
    comment on the interim rule and, at the time of this extension, a 
    proposed plan amendment to address the overfishing on a permanent basis 
    is being actively pursued. The public has had opportunity to comment on 
    the interim rule as noted in the supplementary information section. 
    These comments were considered in determining the amendment and 
    extension of this interim rule, and responses to comments have been 
    provided. The Billfish AP commented on various aspects of this extended 
    rule, as amended, at their September 1998 meeting. NMFS is preparing an 
    amendment to the Atlantic Billfish FMP outlining a rebuilding plan and 
    concomitant management strategies to reduce bycatch and bycatch 
    mortality. The amendment is being developed using the best possible 
    science and input from the Billfish AP, and various outreach forums 
    will ensure public input into this process.
        The AA has determined that this extension of the interim rule is 
    necessary to continue to reduce overfishing of BUM and WHM and to meet 
    U.S. obligations under ICCAT. The extension of the interim rule is 
    consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
        The actions set forth in the extended interim rule respond to the 
    over-exploitation of these resources in the Atlantic Ocean and to the 
    need to improve current monitoring, data collection, and reporting 
    procedures, as well as to promote the release of live billfish. The 
    United States is also obligated, under ATCA, to implement ICCAT 
    recommendations. Failure to implement these actions in a timely manner 
    may result in failure to meet ICCAT obligations and increase the need 
    for more severe restrictions in the future.
        The AA has determined that, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), there is good 
    cause to waive the requirement for prior notice and an opportunity for 
    public comment as such procedures would be contrary to the public 
    interest. The modifications in this rule are necessary to ensure 
    compliance with international legal obligations. Additionally, these 
    modifications were discussed in a public AP meeting. To ensure wide 
    circulation of the extended interim measures, as amended, NMFS will 
    work with the Billfish AP, recreational fishing organizations, 
    sportfishing media, and fishing tournaments known to involve billfish, 
    to notify affected entities. In addition, notice will be provided 
    through the HMS FAX network and NOAA weather radio.
        Further, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the AA has determined that there 
    is good cause, as explained above, to waive the 30-day delay in 
    effective date. NMFS will rapidly communicate the new regulations to 
    fishery participants through its FAX network, HMS Information Line, 
    billfish brochure, and NOAA weather radio.
        The extension of this interim rule has been determined to be not 
    significant for purposes of E.O. 12866.
        Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required 
    to respond
    
    [[Page 51862]]
    
    to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply 
    with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) unless that collection of information 
    displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control 
    number. This extended interim rule contains the same collection-of-
    information requirement subject to the PRA. Fishing tournament 
    registration and selective reporting in Sec. 644.10 have already been 
    approved by OMB under control number 0648-0323 and estimated at 10 
    minutes per report. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any 
    other aspect of this collection-of-information requirement including 
    suggestions on how to reduce or eliminate this burden to NMFS and OMB 
    (see ADDRESSES).
        Because prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not 
    required to be provided for the extension of this interim rule by 5 
    U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the analytical requirements of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are inapplicable.
    
    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 644
    
        Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: September 23, 1998.
    Andrew A. Rosenberg,
    Deputy Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
    Service.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 644 is amended 
    as follows:
    50 CFR CHAPTER VI
    
    PART 644--ATLANTIC BILLFISHES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 644 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
    
        2. Section 644.21 is amended by suspending paragraph (e) and adding 
    paragraph (f), effective from September 24, 1998, through March 19, 
    1999, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 644.21  Size limits.
    
    * * * * *
        (f) The following minimum size limits, expressed in terms of lower 
    jaw-fork length (LJFL), apply for the possession of billfish shoreward 
    of the outer boundary of the EEZ, regardless of where caught:
        (1) Blue marlin-99 inches (251 cm)
        (2) White marlin-66 inches (168 cm)
        (3) Sailfish-57 inches (145 cm)
        3. Section 644.26 is added, effective from September 24, 1998, 
    through March 19, 1999, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 644.26  Catch Limits.
    
        (a) Only one Atlantic marlin (either a blue marlin or a white 
    marlin) may be possessed or landed per vessel per trip.
        (b) If he determines after considering the most recent tournament 
    and other landings data that such action is necessary to comply 
    international obligations, the Assistant Administrator may increase or 
    reduce the catch limit, including reduction to zero Atlantic marlin per 
    vessel per trip. The Assistant Administrator will publish a notice in 
    the Federal Register of any adjustment in the allowable catch limit per 
    trip under this paragraph.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-25951 Filed 9-24-98; 1:23 pm]
    BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/23/1998
Published:
09/29/1998
Department:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim rule; amendment; extension of expiration date; response to comments; request for comments.
Document Number:
98-25951
Dates:
Effective September 23, 1998, the regulations published on March 24, 1998 at 63 FR 14030 are extended through March 19, 1999. The amendments in this rule are effective September 24, 1998 through March 19, 1999. Comments on the increase in minimum size limit for Atlantic BUM to 99 inches LJFL and the establishment of an Atlantic marlin bag limit must be received no later than November 23, 1998.
Pages:
51859-51862 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 980305056-8245-02, I.D. 020398B
RINs:
0648-AK88: Atlantic Billfish Size Limits and Tournament Notification Requirements
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0648-AK88/atlantic-billfish-size-limits-and-tournament-notification-requirements
PDF File:
98-25951.pdf
CFR: (2)
50 CFR 644.21
50 CFR 644.26