98-26028. Albertson's, Inc., et al.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 188 (Tuesday, September 29, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 51933-51936]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-26028]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    [File No. 981-0134]
    
    
    Albertson's, Inc., et al.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment
    
    AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged 
    violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or 
    practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to 
    Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft 
    complaint that accompanies the consent agreement an the terms of the 
    consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle 
    these allegations.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 30, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, 
    Room 159, 6th St. and Pa. Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20580.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    William Baer or Richard Liebeskind, FTC/H-374, Washington, DC 20580. 
    (202) 326-2932 or 326-2441.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal 
    Trade
    
    [[Page 51934]]
    
    Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46 and Section 2.34 of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 2.34), notice is hereby given 
    that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order 
    to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to 
    final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record 
    for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public 
    Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the 
    allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of 
    the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page 
    (for September 22, 1998), on the World Wide Web, at ``http://
    www.ftc.gov/os/actions97.htm.'' A paper copy can be obtained from the 
    FTC Public Reference Room, Room H-130, Sixth Street and Pennsylvania 
    Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 
    326-3627. Public comment is invited. Such comments or views will be 
    considered by the Commission and will be available for inspection and 
    copying at its principal office in accordance with Section 
    4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 
    4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
    
    Analysis of The Draft Complaint, Proposed Consent Order, and Asset 
    Maintenance Agreement to Aid Public Comment
    
    I. Introduction
    
        The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted for 
    public comment from Albertson's, Inc. (``Albertson's''), Locomotive 
    Acquisition Corporation (``Locomotive''), Buttrey Food and Drug Store 
    Company (``Buttrey''), and FS Equity Partners II, L.P. (``FS Equity 
    Partners'')(collectively ``the proposed Respondents'') an Agreement 
    Containing Consent Order (``the proposed consent order'') and an Asset 
    Maintenance Agreement. Locomotive is a wholly-owned subsidiary of 
    Albertson's, and FS Equity Partners owns a majority of the voting 
    securities of Buttrey. The proposed consent order is designed to remedy 
    likely anticompetitive effects arising from Albertson's and 
    Locomotive's proposed acquisition of the outstanding shares of Buttrey.
    
    II. Description of the Parties and the Proposed Acquisition
    
        Albertson's, a Delaware corporation headquartered in Boise, Idaho, 
    operates approximately 916 supermarkets in 23 Western, Midwestern, and 
    Southern states. Albertson's supermarkets operate under the 
    ``Albertson's'' and ``Max Food and Drug'' trade names. In the states 
    where Albertson's competes with Buttrey, Albertson's operates nine 
    supermarkets in Montana (eight directly compete with Buttrey stores) 
    and nine supermarkets in Wyoming (seven directly compete with Buttrey 
    stores). Albertson's total sales for the fiscal year ending January 29, 
    1998, were approximately $14.7 billion. At this time, based on total 
    sales, Albertson's is the fourth largest supermarket chain in the 
    United States.
        Buttrey, a Delaware corporation headquartered in Great Falls, 
    Montana, operates 44 supermarkets in Montana, Wyoming, and North 
    Dakota. Buttrey operates supermarkets under the ``Buttrey Big Fresh,'' 
    ``Buttrey Food & Drug,'' and ``Buttrey Fresh Foods'' trade names. 
    Buttrey's total sales for the fiscal year ending January 31, 1998, were 
    $391.4 million. FS Equity Partners owns 50.8% of the outstanding shares 
    of Buttrey and is the ultimate parent entity. Freeman Spogli & Co., 
    Inc., an investment firm, is the general partner of FS Equity Partners.
        On or about January 19, 1998, Albertson's and Locomotive entered 
    into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (``the proposed acquisition'') 
    with Buttrey to acquire through a cash tender offer all of the 
    outstanding common stock of Buttrey for $15.50 per share. Albertson's 
    will also assume Buttrey's debt obligations. The total value of the 
    proposed acquisition, including debt obligations, is approximately $174 
    million.
    
    III. The Draft Complaint
    
        The draft complaint accompanying the proposed consent order alleges 
    that the proposed acquisition under which Albertson's and Locomotive 
    would acquire all of the outstanding shares of Buttrey violates Section 
    5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45. The 
    draft complaint also alleges that the proposed acquisition would, if 
    consummated, substantially lessen competition in violation of Section 7 
    of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the 
    Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45.
        The draft complaint alleges that the relevant line of commerce 
    (i.e., the product market) is the retail sale of food and grocery items 
    in supermarkets. Supermarkets provide a distinct set of products and 
    services for consumers who desire to one-stop shop for food and grocery 
    products. Supermarkets carry a full line and wide selection of both 
    food and nonfood products (typically more than 10,000 different stock-
    keeping units (``SkUs'')) as well as a deep inventory of those SKUs. In 
    order to accommodate the large number of food and nonfood products 
    necessary for one-stop shopping, supermarkets are large stores that 
    typically have at least 10,000 square feet of selling space.
        Supermarkets compete primarily with other supermarkets that provide 
    one-stop shopping for food and grocery products. Supermarkets primarily 
    base their food and grocery prices on the prices of food and grocery 
    products sold at nearby supermarkets. Supermarkets do not regularly 
    price-check food and grocery products sold at other types of stores and 
    do not significantly change their food and grocery prices in response 
    to prices at other types of stores. Most consumers shopping for food 
    and grocery products at supermarkets are not likely to shop elsewhere 
    in response to a small price increase by supermarkets.
        Retail stores other than supermarkets that sell food and grocery 
    products, such as neighborhood ``mom & pop'' grocery stores, 
    convenience stores, specialty food stores (e.g., seafood markets, 
    bakeries, etc.), club stores, military commissaries, and mass 
    merchants, do not effectively constrain prices at supermarkets because 
    they operate significantly different retail formats. None of these 
    stores offers a supermarket's distinct set of products and services 
    that enable consumers to one-stop shop for food and grocery products.
        According to the draft complaint, the relevant sections of the 
    country (i.e., the geographic markets) in which to analyze the 
    acquisition of Buttrey by Albertson's and Locomotive are the areas in 
    and near following cities and towns: (a) Billings, Montana; (b) 
    Bozeman, Montana, (c) Butte, Montana; (d) Great Falls, Montana; (e) 
    Helena, Montana; (f) Missoula, Montana; (g) Casper, Wyoming; (h) 
    Cheyenne, Wyoming; (I) Cody, Wyoming; (j) Gillette, Wyoming; and (k) 
    Laramie, Wyoming.
        According to the draft complaint, the relevant markets are highly 
    concentrated, whether measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 
    (commonly referred to as ``HHI'') or by two-firm and four-firm 
    concentration ratios.\1\ The acquisition would substantially increase 
    concentration in each market. Albertson's and Buttrey have a combined 
    market share of more than 35% in each geographic market. The post-
    acquisition HHIs in the geographic markets range from 2,264 to 10,000.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ The HHI is a measurement of market concentration calculated 
    by summing the squares of the individual market shares of all the 
    participants.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 51935]]
    
        Albertson's and Buttrey are direct competitors in every geographic 
    market. According to the draft complaint, Albertson's and Locomotive's 
    proposed acquisition of Buttrey, if consummated, may substantially 
    lessen competition in the relevant markets by eliminating direct 
    competition between supermarkets owned or controlled by Albertson's and 
    supermarkets owned or controlled by Buttrey; by increasing the 
    likelihood that Albertson's will unilaterally exercise market power; or 
    by increasing the likelihood of, or facilitating, collusion or 
    coordinated interaction among the remaining supermarket firms. Each of 
    these effects increases the likelihood that the prices of food, 
    groceries or services will increase, and the quality and selection of 
    food, groceries or services will decrease, in the relevant sections of 
    the country. According to the draft complaint, entry is difficult and 
    would not be timely, likely, or sufficient to prevent anticompetitive 
    effects in the relevant geographic markets.
    
    IV. Terms of the Agreement Containing Consent Order, i.e., the 
    Proposed Consent Order
    
        The proposed consent order attempts to remedy the Commission's 
    competitive concerns about the proposed acquisition. Under the terms of 
    the proposed consent order, the proposed Respondents must divest 
    fifteen specific supermarkets in the relevant markets. Six of the 
    supermarkets that the proposed Respondents must divest are currently 
    owned and operated by Albertson's (of which five operate under the 
    ``Albertson's'' banner and one operates under the ``Max'' banner) and 
    nine of the supermarkets are currently owned and operated by Buttrey 
    (of which two operate under the ``Buttrey Big Fresh'' banner and seven 
    operate under the ``Buttrey Fresh Foods'' banner). The proposed 
    Respondents must divest thirteen supermarkets to Smith's Food & Drug 
    Centers, Inc. (``Smith's''), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fred Meyer, 
    Inc., and two supermarkets to Supervalu Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned 
    subsidiary of Supervalu, Inc. (collectively ``Supervalu''). The 
    specific supermarkets that the proposed Respondents must divest to 
    Smith's and Supervalu are listed below.
        The Commission's goal in evaluating possible purchasers of divested 
    assets is to maintain the competitive environment that exists prior to 
    the merger. When divestiture is an appropriate remedy in a supermarket 
    merger, the Commission requires the merging parties to find a buyer for 
    the divested stores. A proposed buyer must not itself present 
    competitive problems. For example, the Commission is less likely to 
    approve a buyer that already has a large retail presence in the 
    relevant geographic area than a buyer without such a presence. The 
    Commission is satisfied that the purchasers presented by the parties 
    are well qualified to run the divested stores and pose no separate 
    competitive issues.
        Although a supermarket chain is the proposed purchaser in many of 
    the markets in this matter, this does not represent a Commission 
    position that only large chains can be competitive in the supermarket 
    business. Indeed, in several cases during the last few years, 
    supermarkets required to be divested as a result of a Commission merger 
    investigation have been sold to independent store operators (often with 
    financial support from a wholesaler). See Jitney-Jungle Stores of 
    America, Inc., Docket No. C-3784 (1998), Koninklijke Ahold nv, 122 
    F.T.C. 248 (1996), Schnuck Markets, Inc., 119 F.T.C. 798 (1995), 
    Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc., 119 F.T.C. 783 (1995), Red Apple 
    Companies, Inc., 119 F.T.C. 273 (1995). With respect to the proposed 
    divestiture in this matter, the proposed purchaser in Casper, Wyoming 
    is Supervalu, Inc., itself a supplier of independent grocers.
        Under the terms of the proposed consent order, the proposed 
    Respondents must divest thirteen supermarkets to Smith's and two 
    supermarkets to Supervalue either within ten days after the date on 
    which Albertson's and Locomotive complete their proposed acquisition of 
    the outstanding shares of Buttrey or four months after the date the 
    proposed Respondents have signed the proposed consent order, whichever 
    is earlier. Alternatively, the proposed Respondents shall divest the 
    supermarkets to another acquirer that receives the prior approval of 
    the Commission within three months after the proposed consent order 
    becomes final. A sale to Smith's must be in accordance with the 
    agreement between Albertson's and Smith's dated August 10, 1998. A sale 
    to Supervalue must be in accordance with the agreement between 
    Albertson's and Supervalu dated August 12, 1998. Supervalu cannot sell 
    either of the two divested supermarkets within three years of when the 
    proposed consent order becomes final to anyone without the prior 
    approval of the Commission. If the proposed Respondents fail to satisfy 
    any of the divestiture provisions, the Commission may appoint a trustee 
    to divest supermarkets to satisfy the terms of the proposed consent 
    order.
        Eight of the supermarkets that the proposed Respondents must divest 
    are located in Montana--two in Billings, two in Butte, and one each in 
    Bozeman, Great Falls, Helena, and Missoula. Seven of the supermarkets 
    that the proposed Respondents must divest are located in Wyoming--two 
    in Casper, two in Cheyenne, and one each in Cody, Gillette, and 
    Laramie.
        The thirteen supermarkets that the proposed Respondents must divest 
    to Smith's in accordance with the agreement between Albertson's and 
    Smith's dated August 10, 1998, are the following:
        1. Buttery store no. 3925 operating under the ``Buttrey Big Fresh'' 
    trade name, which is located at 1601 Marketplace Drive, Great Falls, MT 
    59404 (Cascade County).
        2. Buttery store no. 3934 operating under the ``Buttrey Big Fresh'' 
    trade name, which is located at 2825 West Main Street, Bozeman, MT 
    59715 (Gallatin County).
        3. Buttery store no. 3824 operating under the ``Buttrey Fresh 
    Foods'' trade name, which is located at 1000 Boulder Avenue, Helena, MT 
    59601 (Lewis and Clerk County).
        4. Albertson's store no. 226 operating under the ``Albertson's'' 
    trade name, which is located at 1906 Brooks Street, Missoula, MT 59801 
    (Missoula County).
        5. Buttery store no. 3930 operating under the ``Buttrey Fresh 
    Foods'' trade name, which is located at 3745 Harrison Avenue, Butte, MT 
    59701 (Silver Bow County).
        6. Buttery store no. 3985 operating under the ``Buttrey Fresh 
    Foods'' trade name, which is located at 600 South Excelsior Street, 
    Butte, MT 59701 (Silver Bow County).
        7. Albertson's store no. 209 operating under the ``Albertson's'' 
    trade name, which is located at 1633 Grand Avenue, Billing, MT 59102 
    (Yellowstone County).
        8. Albertson's store no. 232 operating under the ``Albertson's'' 
    trade name, which is located at 1531 Main Street, Billings, MT 59101 
    (Yellowstone County).
        9. Albertson's store no. 805 operating under the ``Albertson's'' 
    trade name, which is located at 1209 15th Street, Laramie, WY 82070 
    (Albany County).
        10. Buttery store no. 3855 operating under the ``Buttrey Fresh 
    Foods'' trade name, which is located at 906 Camel Drive, Gillette, WY 
    82716 (Campbell County).
        11. Albertson's store no. 863 operating under the ``Albertson's'' 
    trade name, which is located at 3745 E. Lincoln
    
    [[Page 51936]]
    
    Way, Cheyenne, WY 82001 (Laramie County).
        12. Albertson's store no. 1804 operating under the ``Max'' trade 
    name, which is located at 1600 E. Pershing Blvd., Cheyenne, WY 82001 
    (Laramie County).
        13. Buttery store no. 3941 operating under the ``Buttrey Fresh 
    Foods'' trade name, which is located at 1526 Rumsey Avenue, Cody, WY 
    82414 (Park County).
        The two supermarkets that the proposed Respondents must divest to 
    Supervalu in accordance with the agreement between Albertson's and 
    Supervalu dated August 12, 1998, are the following:
        1. Buttery store no. 3872 operating under the ``Buttrey Fresh 
    Foods'' trade name, which is located at 2101 East 12th Street, Casper, 
    WY 82601 (Natrona County).
        2. Buttery store no. 3878 operating under the ``Buttrey Fresh 
    Foods'' trade name, which is located at 4075 Cy Avenue, Caspter, WY 
    82601 (Natrona County).
        For a period of ten years from the date the proposed consent order 
    becomes final, the proposed Respondents are prohibited from acquiring, 
    without prior notice to the Commission, supermarket assets located in, 
    or any interest (such as stock) in any entity that owns or operates a 
    supermarket located in, Cascade, Gallatin, Lewis and Clerk, Missoula, 
    Silver Bow, and Yellowstone counties in Montana, and Albany, Campbell, 
    Laramie, Natrona, and Park counties in Wyoming. This provision does not 
    prevent the proposed Respondents from constructing new supermarket 
    facilities on their own; nor does it prevent the proposed Respondents 
    from leasing facilities not operated as supermarkets within the 
    previous six months.
        For a period of ten years, the proposed consent order also 
    prohibits the proposed Respondents from entering into or enforcing any 
    agreement that restricts the ability of any person that acquires any 
    supermarket, any leasehold interest in any supermarket, or any interest 
    in any retail location used as a supermarket on or after January 1, 
    1998, to operate a supermarket at that site if such supermarket was 
    formerly owned or operated by the proposed Respondents in Cascade, 
    Gallatin, Lewis and Clark, Missoula, Silver Bow, and Yellowstone 
    counties in Montana, and Albany, Campbell, Laramie, Natrona, and Park 
    counties in Wyoming. In addition, the proposed Respondents may not 
    remove any equipment from a supermarket they own or operate in these 
    counties prior to a sale, sublease, assignment, or change in occupancy 
    in these counties, except in the ordinary course of business, or except 
    as part of any negotiation for a sale, sublease, assignment, or change 
    in occupancy of such supermarket.
        The proposed Respondents are required to provide to the Commission 
    a report of compliance with the proposed consent order within thirty 
    (30) days following the date on which they signed the proposed consent, 
    every thirty (30) days thereafter until the divestitures are completed, 
    and annually for a period of ten years. The obligations of FS Equity 
    Partners under the proposed consent order will terminate upon 
    consummation of the proposed acquisition between Albertson's, 
    Locomotive, and Buttrey.
    
    V. Terms of the Asset Maintenance Agreement
    
        The proposed Respondents also entered into an Asset Maintenance 
    Agreement. Under the terms of the Asset Maintenance Agreement, from the 
    time Albertson's and Locomotive acquire the outstanding stock of 
    Buttrey until the divestitures have been completed, the proposed 
    Respondents must maintain the viability, competitiveness and 
    marketability of the assets to be divested, and must not cause their 
    wasting or deterioration, and cannot sell, transfer, or otherwise 
    impair their marketability or viability. The Asset Maintenance 
    Agreement specifies these obligations in detail. The obligations of FS 
    Equity Partners under the Asset Maintenance Agreement will terminate 
    upon consummation of the proposed acquisition between Albertson's, 
    Locomotive, and Buttrey.
    
    VI. Opportunity for Public Comment
    
        The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for 
    sixty (60) days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments 
    received during this period will become part of the public record. 
    After sixty days, the Commission will again review the agreement and 
    the comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from 
    the agreement or make final the agreement's proposed consent order.
        By accepting the proposed consent order subject to final approval, 
    the Commission anticipates that the competitive problems alleged in the 
    complaint will be resolved. The purpose of this analysis is to invite 
    public comment on the proposed consent order, including the proposed 
    sale of supermarkets to Smith's and Supervalu, to aid the Commission in 
    its determination of whether it should make final the proposed consent 
    order contained in the agreement. This analysis is not intended to 
    constitute an official interpretation of the proposed consent order or 
    the Asset Maintenance Agreement, nor is it intended to modify the terms 
    of the proposed consent order or Asset Maintenance Agreement in any 
    way.
    
    By direction of the Commission.
    Donald S. Clark,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-26028 Filed 9-28-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/29/1998
Department:
Federal Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Proposed Consent Agreement.
Document Number:
98-26028
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before November 30, 1998.
Pages:
51933-51936 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
File No. 981-0134
PDF File:
98-26028.pdf