[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 3, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46401-46403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-22320]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 3, 1996 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 46401]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
RIN 0563-AB53
Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Cotton Crop Insurance
Provisions
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to
amend the Cotton Crop Insurance Provisions. The intended effect of this
action is to provide policy changes to better meet the needs of the
insured and implement changes made to the Federal Crop Insurance Act by
the Federal Crop Insurance Reform Act of 1994.
DATES: Written comments, data, and opinions on this proposed rule will
be accepted until close of business October 3, 1996 and will be
considered when the rule is to be made final. The comment period for
information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
continues through October 29, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to
the Chief, Product Development Branch, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 9435 Holmes Road, Kansas
City, MO 64131. Written comments will be available for public
inspection and copying in room 0324, South Building, 14th and
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C., 8:15 a.m.-5:45 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Hoy, Program Analyst, Research
and Development Division, Product Development Branch, FCIC, at 9435
Holmes Road, Kansas City, MO 64131, telephone (816) 926-7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order No. 12866 and Departmental Regulation 1512-1
This action has been reviewed under United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) procedures established by Executive Order No. 12866
and Departmental Regulation 1512-1. This action constitutes a review as
to the need, currency, clarity, and effectiveness of these regulations
under those procedures. The sunset review date established for these
regulations is March 1, 1999.
This rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order No. 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The information collection requirements contained in the
regulations were previously approved by OMB pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) under OMB control number
0563-0003 through September 30, 1998.
The amendments set forth in this proposed rule do not contain
additional information collections that require clearance by the OMB
under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
The title of this information collection is ``Catastrophic Risk
Protection Plan and Related Requirements including, Common Crop
Insurance Regulations; Cotton Crop Provisions.'' The information to be
collected includes: a crop insurance acreage report, an insurance
application, and continuous contract. Information collected from the
acreage report and application is electronically submitted to FCIC by
the reinsured companies. Potential respondents to this information
collection are producers of cotton that are eligible for Federal crop
insurance.
The information requested is necessary for the insurance company
and FCIC to provide insurance, provide reinsurance, determine
eligibility, determine the correct parties to the agreement or
contract, determine and collect premiums or other monetary amounts, and
pay benefits.
All information is reported annually. The reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 16.9 minutes per
response for each of the 3.6 responses from approximately 1,755,015
respondents. The total annual burden on the public for this information
collection is 2,676,932 hours.
The comment period for information collections under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 continues for the following: (a) whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information gathering
technology.
Comments regarding paperwork reduction should be submitted to the
Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503 and to
Bonnie Hart, Advisory and Corporate Operations Staff, Regulatory Review
Group, Farm Service Agency, P.O. Box 2415, Ag Box 0570, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20013-2415. Telephone (202)690-2857.
Copies of the information collection may be obtained from Bonnie Hart
at the above-stated address.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform of 1995 (UMRA), Pub. L.
104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, FCIC
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures of State, local, or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
1 year. When such a statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of the
UMRA generally requires FCIC to identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, more
cost-effective or least burdensome
[[Page 46402]]
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and tribal
governments or the private sector. Thus, this rule is not subject to
the requirements of section 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Executive Order No. 12612
It has been determined under section 6(a) of Executive Order No.
12612, Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The
provisions contained in this rule will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or their political subdivisions or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This regulation will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Under the current regulations, a producer is
required to complete an application and acreage report. If the crop is
damaged or destroyed, the insured is required to give notice of loss
and provide the necessary information to complete a claim for
indemnity. If the insured elects to use actual records of acreage and
production as the basis for the production guarantee, the insured may
elect to report this information on a yearly basis. This regulation
does not alter those requirements. Therefore, the amount of work
required of the insurance companies delivering and servicing these
policies will not increase significantly from the amount of work
currently required. This rule does not have any greater or lesser
impact on the producer. Therefore, this action is determined to be
exempt from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605), and no Regulatory Flexibility Analysis was prepared.
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order No.12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
No. 12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order No. 12778
The Office of the General Counsel has determined that these
regulations meet the applicable standards provided in sections 2(a) and
2(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12778. The provisions of this rule will
not have a retroactive effect prior to the effective date. The
provisions of this rule will preempt State and local laws to the extent
such State and local laws are inconsistent herewith. The administrative
appeal provisions in 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted before
action for judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant impact on the
quality of the human environment, health, and safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
National Performance Review
This regulatory action is being taken as part of the National
Performance Review Initiative to eliminate unnecessary or duplicative
regulations and improve those that remain in force.
Background
FCIC proposes to amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations (7 CFR
part 457) by revising 7 CFR Section 457.104 effective for the 1997 and
succeeding crop years. The principal changes to the provisions for
insuring cotton are as follows:
1. Section 1--Specify that the yield conversion factor normally
applied to non-irrigated skip-row cotton acreage will not be used if
the land between the rows of cotton is planted to any other spring-
planted crop. Current regulations specify that the yield conversion
factor cannot be applied if the land between the rows of cotton is
planted to any crop. This conflicts with the definition of ``skip-row''
in section 1(q)(1), which allows a planting pattern of alternating rows
of cotton and land planted to another crop the previous fall. Change
``ASCS'' to ``Farm Service Agency (FSA)'' to conform with the United
States Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994. Amend the
definition of ``written agreement'' to move the substantive provision
to section 13.
2. Sections 2(d) (1) and (2)--Change ``ASCS'' to ``FSA.''
3. Section 2(d)(2)--Clarify unit division for non-irrigated corners
of center-pivot irrigation systems.
4. Section 5--Change the cancellation and termination dates of
February 15 to January 15. This change is necessary to correspond with
the requirement of the Federal Crop Insurance Reform Act of 1994 that
moved the sales closing dates for spring-planted crops to 30 days
earlier. Those areas with the present cancellation and termination
dates of February 28 and March 15 will remain the same because these
dates have already been moved 30 days earlier in the 1995 crop year.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Cotton, Crop insurance.
Pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Crop Insurance
Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.), the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation hereby proposes to amend the Common Crop Insurance
Regulations (7 CFR part 457), effective for the 1997 and succeeding
crop years, to read as follows:
PART 457--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1) and 1506(p)
2. Section 457.104 is amended by revising 1(l) as follows:
Sec. 457.104 Cotton crop insurance provisions.
* * * * *
1. Definitions
* * * * *
(l) Planted acreage--Land in which seed has been placed by a
machine appropriate for the insured crop and planting method, at the
correct depth, into a seedbed which has been properly prepared for the
planting method and production practice. Cotton must be planted in rows
to be considered planted. Planting in any other manner will be
considered as a failure to follow recognized good farming practices and
any loss of production will not be insured unless otherwise provided by
the Special Provisions or by written agreement to insure such crop. The
yield conversion factor normally applied to non-irrigated skip-row
cotton acreage will not be used if the land between the rows of cotton
is planted to any other spring-planted crop.
* * * * *
3. Subsection 1(q)(2) is revised to read as follows:
(q) * * *
(1) * * *
(2) Qualifies as a skip-row planting pattern as defined by the Farm
Service Agency (FSA).
* * * * *
4. Subsection 1(s) is revised to read as follows:
(s) Written agreement--A written document that alters designated
terms of a policy in accordance with section 13.
* * * * *
[[Page 46403]]
5. Subsection 2(d)(1) is amended by removing ``ASCS'' and inserting
in its place ``FSA.''
* * * * *
6. Subsection 2(d)2 is revised to read as follows:
2. Unit Division
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(2) Optional Units on Acreage Including Both Irrigated and Non-
Irrigated Practices: In addition to, or instead of, establishing
optional units by Section, section equivalent, or FSA Farm Serial
Number, optional units may be based on irrigated acreage or non-
irrigated acreage if both are located in the same section, section
equivalent, or FSA Farm Serial Number. To qualify as separate irrigated
and non-irrigated optional units, the non-irrigated acreage may not
continue into the irrigated acreage in the same rows or planting
pattern. The irrigated acreage may not extend beyond the point at which
the irrigation system can deliver the quantity of water needed to
produce the yield on which the guarantee is based, except that the
corners of a field in which a center-pivot irrigation system is used
will be considered as irrigated acreage unless separate acceptable
records of production from the corners are provided indicating
otherwise. If the corners of a field in which a center-pivot irrigation
system is used do not qualify as a separate non-irrigated optional
unit, they will be considered part of the unit containing the irrigated
acreage. Non-irrigated acreage that is not a part of a field in which a
center-pivot irrigation system is used may qualify as a separate
optional unit provided that all other requirements of this section are
met.
* * * * *
7. Section 5 is revised to read as follows:
5. Cancellation and Termination Dates
In accordance with section 2 (Life of Policy, Cancellation, and
Termination) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy (Sec. 457.8), the
cancellation and termination dates are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancellation and
State and county termination dates
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Val Verde, Edwards, Kerr, Kendall, Bexar, January 15.
Wilson, Karnes, Goliad, Victoria, and
Jackson Counties, Texas, and all Texas
counties lying south thereof.
Alabama; Arizona; Arkansas; California; February 28.
Florida; Georgia; Louisiana; Mississippi;
Nevada; North Carolina; South Carolina; El
Paso, Hudspeth, Culberson, Reeves, Loving,
Winkler, Ector, Upton, Reagon, Sterling,
Coke, Tom Green, Concho, McCulloch, San
Saba, Mills, Hamilton, Bosque, Johnson,
Tarrant, Wise, and Cooke Counties, Texas,
and all Texas counties lying south and east
thereof to and including Terrell, Crocket,
Sutton, Kimble, Gillespie, Blanco, Comal,
Guadalupe, Gonzales, De Witt, Lavaca,
Colorado, Wharton, Matagorda Counties, Texas.
All other Texas counties and all other States March 15.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
8. Section 13 is added to read as follows:
13. Written Agreements
Designated terms of this policy may be altered by written
agreement. The following conditions will apply:
(a) You must apply in writing for each written agreement no later
than the sales closing date, except as provided in section 13(e).
(b) The application for written agreement must contain all terms of
the contract between the insurance provider and the insured that will
be in effect if the written agreement is not approved.
(c) If approved, the written agreement will include all variable
terms of the contract, including, but not limited to, crop type or
variety, the guarantee, premium rate, and price election.
(d) Each written agreement will only be valid for 1 year. If the
written agreement is not specifically renewed the following year,
insurance coverage for subsequent crop years will be in accordance with
the printed policy.
(e) An application for written agreement submitted after the sales
closing date may be approved if, after physical inspection of the
acreage, it is determined that no loss has occurred and the crop is
insurable in accordance with the policy and written agreement
provisions.
Signed in Washington, D.C., on August 23, 1996.
Kenneth D. Ackerman,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 96-22320 Filed 8-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-FA-P
