96-22356. First American Strategy Funds, Inc., et al.; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 3, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 46493-46496]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-22356]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Investment Company Act Release No. 22173; 812-10236]
    
    
    First American Strategy Funds, Inc., et al.; Notice of 
    Application
    
    August 26, 1996.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').
    
    ACTION: Notice of Application for an Order under the Investment Company 
    Act of 1940 (``Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    APPLICANTS: First American Strategy Funds, Inc. (``FASF''); First 
    American Investment Funds, Inc. (``FAIF''); First American Funds, Inc. 
    (``FAF''); First Bank National Association (``First Bank''); SEI 
    Financial Services Company (``SEI'').
    
    RELEVANT ACT SECTIONS: Order requested under section 6(c) of the Act 
    for an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of the Act and under sections 
    6(c) and 17(b) of the Act for an exemption from section 17(a) of the 
    Act.
    
    SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants request an order that would permit 
    FASF to invest primarily in the securities of certain affiliated 
    investment companies in excess of the limits of section 12(d)(1).
    
    FILING DATE: The application was filed on July 5, 1996, and amended on 
    August 22, 1996.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
    applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
    requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on September 20, 
    1996, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in 
    the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. 
    Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the 
    reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request 
    notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
    20549. Applicants: FASF, FAIF, FAF and SEI, 680 East Swedesford Road, 
    Wayne, Pennsylvania, 19087; First Bank, 601 Second Avenue South, 
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mercer E. Bullard, Branch Chief, at (202) 942-0564, or Elizabeth G. 
    Osterman, Assistant Director, at (202) 942-0564 (Division of Investment 
    Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
    the SEC's Public Reference Branch.
    
    Applicants' Representations
    
        1. FASF, a Minnesota corporation, is registered as an open-end 
    management investment company under the Act. On July 2, 1996, FASF 
    filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 for the 
    offering of four series: Income Fund, Growth and Income Fund, Growth 
    Fund, and Aggressive Growth Fund (collectively, ``FASF Portfolios''). 
    Each FASF Portfolio will be separately managed and pursue a distinct 
    set of investment objectives and policies. The FASF Portfolios will 
    pursue their objectives by investing primarily in series of FAIF and 
    FAF (``Underlying Portfolios''). Additional FASF Portfolios may be 
    organized in the future.\1\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Applicants request relief for such additional FASF 
    Portfolios, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2. The FASF Portfolios initially will offer their shares in one 
    class that will be subject to an annual shareholder servicing fee equal 
    to .25% of average daily assets. This class will not be subject to 
    front-end or deferred sales charges, redemptions fees, or Rule 12b-1 
    distribution fees, although such charges and fees may be imposed in the 
    future.
        3. FAIF is organized under Maryland law and registered as an open-
    end management investment company under the Act. FAIF offers its shares 
    in 20 series with varying investment objectives and policies. The 
    series of FAIF that are currently proposed to be used as Underlying 
    Portfolios are: Equity Income Fund, Stock Fund, Diversified Growth 
    Fund, Emerging Growth Fund, Regional Equity Fund, Special Equity Fund, 
    International Fund, Technology Fund, Health Sciences Fund, Real Estate 
    Securities Fund, and Fixed Income Fund. FAF is organized under 
    Minnesota law and registered as an open-end management investment 
    company under the Act. FAF offers its shares in three series. Each 
    series holds itself out to the public as a money market fund and is 
    subject to the requirements of rule 2a-7 under the Act. The series of 
    FAF that is currently proposed to be used as an Underlying Portfolio is 
    the Prime Obligations Fund. Additional series of FAIF and FAF that 
    comply with the conditions set forth herein may be used as Underlying 
    Portfolios in the future.
        4. The Underlying Portfolios offer their shares in several classes. 
    The FASF Portfolios initially will invest only in a class of an 
    Underlying Portfolio which is not subject to front-end of deferred 
    sales charges, redemption fees, rule 12b-1 distribution fees, or 
    shareholder servicing fees. The FASF Portfolios in the future may 
    invest in one or more classes of the Underlying Portfolios which bear 
    such charges and fees.
        5. First Bank, a national banking association, is the investment 
    adviser for each of the FASF Portfolios and the Underlying Portfolios. 
    First Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Bank System, Inc. 
    (``FBS''), a bank holding company. First Bank's investment advisory 
    fees with respect to each FASF Portfolio and Underlying Portfolio are
    
    [[Page 46494]]
    
    calculated as a per annum percentage of net assets of each Portfolio. 
    With respect to one of the Underlying Portfolios (FAIF's International 
    Fund), First Bank has engaged a subadviser, Marvin & Palmer Associates, 
    Inc., which is not affiliated with First Bank or any of its affiliates. 
    First Trust National Association, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FBS, is 
    the custodian for the FASF Portfolios and the Underlying Portfolios.
        6. SEI, which is not affiliated with First Bank, is principal 
    underwriter for each FASF Portfolio and Underlying Portfolio. 
    Applicants request relief for SEI only in its capacity as principal 
    underwriter for the FASF Portfolios and Underlying Portfolios and not 
    in its capacity as principal underwriter for other groups of investment 
    companies.\2\ Applicants request that the relief extend to any future 
    principal underwriter for the FASF Portfolios and the Underlying 
    Portfolios, provided the conditions set forth herein are satisfied.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ SEI previously received an SEC order to permit the operation 
    of a ``fund or funds'' similar to that proposed herein where all of 
    the funds were advised or distributed by SEI. SEI Institutional 
    Managed Trust, Investment Company Act Release No. 21539 (Nov. 22, 
    1995) (notice) and 21615 (Dec. 20, 1995) (order).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        7. The investment objectives of the FASF Portfolios are intended to 
    provide differing balances between the objectives of current income and 
    growth of capital. First Bank will allocate and re-allocate the FASF 
    Portfolios' assets among the Underlying Portfolios according to initial 
    percentage ranges as described in the application.
        8. The FASF Portfolios will invest primarily in Underlying 
    Portfolio shares. The FASF Portfolios also may invest in cash and cash 
    item for temporary defensive purposes and to maintain liquidity, and in 
    futures contracts and options on futures in order to: remain fully 
    invested in proportions consistent with their current asset allocation 
    strategy in a cost effective manner; re-allocate assets among asset 
    categories while minimizing transaction costs; maintain cash reserves 
    while simulating full investment; facilitate trading; or seek higher 
    investment returns when a futures contract is priced more attractively 
    than the underlying security or index.
        9. The FASF Portfolios may redeem Underlying Portfolio shares 
    through in-kind distributions of portfolio securities of Underlying 
    Portfolios. The FASF Portfolio would hold such securities until its 
    adviser determined that is was appropriate to dispose of them. Such in-
    kind distributions would be made only in order to resolve potential 
    conflicts of interest between an FASF Portfolio and an Underlying 
    Portfolio. For example, when a redemption by an FASF Portfolio would 
    cause the Underlying Portfolio to incur sizable brokerage commissions, 
    the transaction may be effected in-kind so that the brokerage costs 
    would be borne only by the FASF Portfolio and not by the Underlying 
    Portfolio's shareholders. Any such in-kind redemption would be made pro 
    rata and comply with paragraph (a) through (f) of rule 17a-7 under the 
    Act, except that the consideration for the securities distributed by 
    the Underlying Portfolio would be the Underlying Portfolio's shares 
    rather than cash.
        10. Applicants request that any relief granted pursuant to the 
    application also apply to any open-end management investment company 
    that is or will be part of the same ``group of investment companies,'' 
    as defined in rule 11a-3 under the Act, as FASF.\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ Rule 11a-3 under the Act defines ``group of investment 
    companies'' as two or more companies that: (1) Hold themselves out 
    to investors as related companies for purposes of investment and 
    investor services, and (2) have a common investment adviser or 
    principal underwriter.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Applicant's Legal Analysis
    
        1. Section 12(d)(1)(A) of the Act provides that no registered 
    investment company may acquire securities of another investment company 
    if such securities represent more than 3% of the acquired company's 
    outstanding voting stock, more than 5% of the acquiring company's total 
    assets, or if such securities, together with the securities of any 
    other acquired investment companies, represent more than 10% of the 
    acquiring company's total assets. Section 12(d)(1)(B) provides that no 
    registered open-end investment company may sell its securities to 
    another investment company if the sale will cause the acquiring company 
    to own more than 3% of the acquired company's voting stock, or if the 
    sale will cause more than 10% of the acquired company's voting stock to 
    be owned by investment companies.
        2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the SEC may exempt persons 
    or transactions from any provision of the Act if such exemption is 
    necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the 
    protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy 
    and provisions of the Act.
        3. The restrictions in section 12(d)(1) were intended to prevent 
    certain abuses perceived to be associated with the pyramiding of 
    investment companies, including: (1) Unnecessary duplication of costs 
    (e.g. sales loads, advisory fees, and administrative costs); (2) undue 
    influence by the fund holding company over its underlying funds; (3) 
    the threat of large scale redemptions of the securities of the 
    underlying investment companies; and (4) unnecessary complexity. For 
    the following reasons, applicants believe that the proposed 
    arrangements will not give rise to these dangers.
        4. Applicants contend that the proposed structure will not raise 
    the sales charge layering concerns underlying section 12(d)(1). The 
    FASF initially will offer one class of shares that charges an annual 
    shareholder servicing fee of .25% of average daily assets. This class 
    will not be subject to any front-end or deferred sales charges, 
    redemption fees, or rule 12b-1 distribution fees. The class of 
    Underlying Portfolio shares in which the FASF Portfolios will invest 
    initially will not be subject to any front-end or deferred sales 
    charges, redemption fees, rule 12b-1 distribution fees, or shareholder 
    servicing fees. Although future classes of FASF Portfolios and classes 
    of Underlying Portfolios in which the FASF Portfolios invest may be 
    subject to such charges and fees, any sales charges or service fees 
    relating to the shares of an FASF Portfolio will not exceed the limits 
    set forth in rule 2830 of the NASD's Conduct Rules when aggregated with 
    any sales charges or service fees that the FASF Portfolio pays relating 
    to Underlying Portfolio shares.
        5. With regard to concerns about layering of advisory fees, 
    applicants state that, before approving any advisory contract under 
    section 15 of the Act, the board of directors of FASF, including a 
    majority of the directors who are not ``interested persons,'' as 
    defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act, will find that any advisory 
    fees charged under the contract are based on services provided that are 
    in addition to, rather than duplicative of, services provided under any 
    Underlying Portfolio advisory contract.
        6. Applicants believe that, while administrative and other fees are 
    expected to be charged at both the FASF Portfolio and Underlying 
    Portfolio levels, overall expenses may be reduced under the proposed 
    arrangement. Applicants anticipate that the total expense ratio of the 
    FASF Portfolios, including the expenses borne directly at the FASF 
    Portfolio level and indirectly at the Underlying Portfolio level, will 
    be disclosed in the FASF Portfolios' prospectuses. Applicants contend 
    that investors will have a means for determining whether the layering 
    of administrative and other expenses results in total expense ratios 
    which are
    
    [[Page 46495]]
    
    out of line from those of other mutual funds.
        7. Applicants believe that the FASF Portfolios will provide a 
    simple means through which investors can obtain professional allocation 
    services. Applicants also believe that any additional expenses 
    associated with investing in FASF will be deemed by many investors to 
    be outweighed by the benefits received by such investors in the form of 
    such asset allocation services.
        8. Applicants contend that the risk that a ``fund of funds'' may be 
    able to control the management decisions of the underlying funds by 
    threatening large redemptions is not relevant to the proposed 
    arrangements. The FASF Portfolios and the Underlying Portfolios will be 
    part of the same ``group of investment companies,'' as defined in rule 
    11a-3 under the Act, and the FASF Portfolios and Underlying Portfolios 
    therefore will share the same or affiliated investment advisers or 
    principal underwriters. Applicants argue that, where the FASF 
    Portfolios and Underlying Portfolios have a common investment adviser 
    and investment decisions for the Underlying Portfolios already are 
    controlled by the adviser for the FASF Portfolios, the adviser has no 
    incentive to wield this control in a manner which is detrimental to the 
    Underlying Portfolios.
        9. Applicants contend that the FASF Portfolios will be structured 
    in a manner intended to minimize problems related to the impact that 
    large scale redemptions may have on the orderly management of the 
    Underlying Portfolios. The FASF Portfolios generally are designed for 
    long-term investors, which applicants assert should reduce the 
    possibility of the FASF Portfolios being used as short-term trading 
    vehicles and further protect the FASF Portfolios and the Underlying 
    Portfolios from unexpected large redemptions.
        10. Applicants believe that the problem of unnecessarily complex 
    investment vehicles is addressed by the condition set forth herein that 
    prohibits Underlying Portfolios from acquiring securities in another 
    investment company in excess of the limits of section 12(d)(1)(A), 
    except as authorized under a prior SEC order that permits series of 
    FAIF to invest in series of FAF in excess of the limits of section 
    12(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act up to the greater of $2.5 million or 5% of 
    the FAIF series' assets (``Cash Sweep Order'').\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ First American Investment Funds, Inc., Investment Company 
    Act Release Nos. 21722 (Jan. 30, 1996) (notice) and 21784 (Feb. 27, 
    1996) (order).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        11. Section 17(a) of the Act makes it unlawful for an affiliated 
    person of a registered investment company to sell securities to, or 
    purchase securities from, the company. Applicants believe that the FASF 
    Portfolios and the Underlying Portfolios could be deemed ``affiliated 
    persons'' of each other, as defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Act, by 
    virtue of being under the control of a common investment adviser, First 
    Bank, or because an FASF Portfolio owns 5% or more of the shares of an 
    Underlying Portfolio. Applicants believe that purchases by the FASF 
    Portfolios of Underlying Portfolio shares and sales by the Underlying 
    Portfolios of their shares to the FASF Portfolios may be deemed to be 
    principal transactions between affiliated persons under section 17(a).
        12. Section 17(b) of the Act provides that the SEC shall exempt a 
    proposed transaction from section 17(a) if evidence establishes that: 
    (1) The terms of the proposed transaction are reasonable and fair and 
    do not involve overreaching; (2) the proposed transaction is consistent 
    with the policies of the registered investment company involved; and 
    (3) the proposed transaction is consistent with the general provisions 
    of the Act.
        13. Applicants request an exemption under section 6(c) from the 
    limits of sections 12(d)(1) (A) and (B), and under sections 6(c) and 
    17(b) from section 17(a), to permit the transactions described above. 
    Applicants believe that the requested exemptions are fully consistent 
    with the policies and purposes of the Act and that, for the reasons 
    provided above, it would be appropriate for the SEC to grant the 
    requested relief under section 6(c).
        14. Applicants also believe that the section 17(b) standard has 
    been satisfied for the following reasons. First, the consideration paid 
    for the sale and redemption of Underlying Portfolio shares will be 
    based on the net asset values of the Portfolios, subject to any 
    applicable sales charges. Second, the investment of assets of the FASF 
    Portfolios in Underlying Portfolio shares and the issuance of 
    Underlying Portfolio shares will be effected in accordance with each 
    FASF Portfolio's investment restrictions and will be consistent with 
    the policies as set forth in each FASF Portfolio's registration 
    statement. Finally, the Proposed arrangement does not involve 
    overreaching by applicants and is consistent with the purposes of the 
    Act for the reasons discussed above.
    
    Applicants' Conditions
    
        Applicants agree that the order granting the requested relief shall 
    be subject to the following conditions:
        1. Each FASF Portfolio and each Underlying Portfolio will be part 
    of the same ``group of investment companies,'' as defined in rule 11a-3 
    under the Act.
        2. No Underlying Portfolio will acquire securities of any other 
    investment company in excess of the limits contained in Section 
    12(d)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, except as permitted under the Cash Sweep 
    Order.
        3. A majority of the Board of Directors of FASF will not be 
    ``interested persons,'' as defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act.
        4. Any sales charges or service fees charged relating to the shares 
    of an FASF Portfolio, when aggregated with any sales charges or service 
    fees paid by the FASF Portfolio relating to its acquisition, holding or 
    disposition of shares of the Underlying Portfolios, will not exceed the 
    limits set forth in rule 2830 of the NASD's Conduct Rules.
        5. Before approving any advisory contract under section 15 of the 
    Act, the Board of Directors of FASF, including a majority of Directors 
    who are not ``interested persons,'' as defined in section 2(a)(19), 
    will find that the advisory fees charged under the contract are based 
    on services provided that are in addition to, rather than duplicative 
    of, services provided under any Underlying Portfolio advisory contract. 
    The finding, and the basis upon which the finding was made, will be 
    recorded fully in the minute books of the FASF Portfolios.
        6. Applicants agree to provide the following information, in 
    electronic format, to the Chief Financial Analyst of the SEC's Division 
    of Investment Management: monthly average total assets of each FASF 
    Portfolio and Underlying Portfolio; monthly purchases and redemptions 
    (other than by exchange) for each FASF Portfolio and each Underlying 
    Portfolio; monthly exchanges into and out of each FASF Portfolio and 
    each Underlying Portfolio; month-end allocations of each FASF 
    Portfolio's assets among the Underlying Portfolios; annual expense 
    ratios for each FASF Portfolio and each Underlying Portfolio; and a 
    description of any vote taken by the shareholders of any Underlying 
    Portfolio, including a statement of the percentage of votes case for 
    and against the proposal by the FASF Portfolios and by the other 
    shareholders of the Underlying Portfolio. The information will be
    
    [[Page 46496]]
    
    provided as soon as reasonably practicable following each fiscal year-
    end of the FASF Portfolio (unless the Chief Financial Analyst shall 
    notify applicants in writing that such information need no longer be 
    submitted).
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
    under delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-22356 Filed 8-30-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/03/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Application for an Order under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'').
Document Number:
96-22356
Dates:
The application was filed on July 5, 1996, and amended on August 22, 1996.
Pages:
46493-46496 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Investment Company Act Release No. 22173, 812-10236
PDF File:
96-22356.pdf