98-26207. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 189 (Wednesday, September 30, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 52311]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-26207]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388]
    
    
    Pennsylvania Power and Light Company Allegheny Electric 
    Cooperative, Inc. Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2; 
    Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Nos. 
    NPF-14 and NPF-22, issued to Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (the 
    licensee), for operation of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station 
    (SSES), Units 1 and 2, located in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed
    
        The proposed action would revise Facility Operating Licenses Nos. 
    NPF-14 and NPF-22, to reflect the change in the licensee's name from 
    Pennsylvania Power & Light Company to PP&L, Inc.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for amendment dated April 23, 1998.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is needed to have the licenses accurately 
    reflect the new legal name of the licensee.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed changes 
    to the licenses. There will be no impact on the status of the Operating 
    Licenses (OLs) or the continued operation of the SSES, since the 
    proposed changes are solely administrative in nature. The proposed 
    changes update the OLs so that references to the licensee's name will 
    be consistent with the new corporate name, PP&L, Inc., of the licensee.
        The proposed changes are administrative in nature and will not 
    increase the probability or consequences of accidents, no changes are 
    being made in the types or amounts of any effluents that may be 
    released offsite, and there is no significant increase in the allowable 
    occupational or public radiation exposure. Accordingly, the Commission 
    concludes that there are no significant radiological environmental 
    impacts associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    changes are administrative in nature and do not involve any physical 
    features of the plant. Thus, the proposed changes do not affect 
    nonradiological plant effluents and have no other environmental impact.
        Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    nonradiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed 
    action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission has concluded there is no significant 
    environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
    alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
    evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff 
    considered denial of the proposed action (no-action alternative). 
    Denial of the application would result in no change in current 
    environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action 
    and the alternative action are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for SSES, 
    Units 1 and 2.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on August 21, 1998, the staff 
    consulted with the Pennsylvania State official, Mr. M. Maingi of the 
    Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau, Division of 
    Nuclear Safety, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed 
    action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated April 23, 1998, which is available for public 
    inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room located at the Osterhout Free Library, Reference 
    Department, 71 South Franklin Street, Wilkes-Barre, PA 19464.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of September 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Victor Nerses,
    Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate I-2, Division of Reactor 
    Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 98-26207 Filed 9-29-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/30/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-26207
Pages:
52311-52311 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388
PDF File:
98-26207.pdf