97-23587. Disqualification of a Clinical Investigator  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 46875-46876]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-23587]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 312
    
    [Docket No. 95N-0138]
    
    
    Disqualification of a Clinical Investigator
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the 
    investigational new drug regulation that provides for disqualification 
    of clinical investigators who submit false information. The revision is 
    intended to clarify the agency's authority to reach sponsor-
    investigators under the regulation.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE:  November 4, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas C. Kuchenberg, Center for Drug 
    Evaluation and Research (HFD-7), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 
    Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301-594-1046.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        FDA is amending the regulations governing the disqualification of 
    clinical investigators to clarify that Sec. 312.70 (21 CFR 312.70) 
    reaches sponsor-investigators.
        Part 312 (21 CFR part 312) requires sponsors to monitor the 
    progress of clinical investigations, to review and evaluate evidence 
    relating to the safety and effectiveness of the drug under 
    investigation, and to report to FDA information based on these 
    monitoring and review activities. Clinical investigators conduct 
    clinical trials on new drugs and submit the resulting data to 
    individual or corporate sponsors. Data generated by the clinical 
    investigators are the subject of the reports submitted by sponsors to 
    FDA.
        In the Federal Register of February 16, 1996 (61 FR 6177), FDA 
    proposed amending Sec. 312.70 by adding language that would clarify 
    that FDA can disqualify clinical investigators, including sponsor-
    investigators, for submitting to sponsors or to FDA false information 
    in any required report. Under current Sec. 312.70(b), the agency may 
    disqualify an investigator who has ``deliberately or repeatedly 
    submitted false information to the sponsor in any required report.'' 
    However, unlike investigators, sponsor-investigators, who both directly 
    conduct investigations and report data to FDA, submit information 
    directly to FDA and not to a separate sponsor. Because Sec. 312.3(b) 
    specifically states that the ``requirements applicable to a sponsor-
    investigator under this part include both those applicable to an 
    investigator and a sponsor,'' Sec. 312.70(b) encompasses the 
    disqualification of sponsor-investigators. This has been the agency's 
    long-standing interpretation for clinical investigator 
    disqualifications for drugs, animal drugs, and devices. However, for 
    clarity, the agency is amending this regulation to make specific 
    reference to FDA and to sponsor-investigators. FDA also intends in the 
    near future to review and harmonize the clinical investigator 
    disqualification provisions under device and animal drug regulations 
    (21 CFR 812.119 and 511.1(c)) with the changes made in this final rule.
    
    II. Comments on the Proposed Rule
    
        FDA received one comment on the proposed rule. The comment 
    commended FDA for the proposed amendment to Sec. 312.70, stating that 
    it is imperative that data supporting the safety and efficacy of 
    pharmaceuticals be accurate and reliable. The comment noted that it was 
    in the best interest of patients, investigators, pharmaceutical 
    companies, and the Government that FDA be able to assure the integrity 
    of data. The comment also expressed support for the disqualification of 
    a clinical investigator who has deliberately or repeatedly supplied 
    false information to a sponsor or to FDA.
        FDA welcomes comments and suggestions from all persons interested 
    in protecting the integrity of clinical data. The deliberate submission 
    of false information by those directly responsible for administering or 
    dispensing an investigational new drug subverts the integrity of the 
    review process. At worst, such actions may endanger public health and 
    safety and, at a minimum, will challenge public confidence in a review 
    process that is conducted with honesty by the vast majority of 
    investigators and sponsor-investigators.
    
    III. Environmental Impact
    
        The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.24(a)(8) that this action 
    is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
    significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
    environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
    required.
    
    IV. Analysis of Impacts
    
        FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive 
    Order 12866
    
    [[Page 46876]]
    
    and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Executive Order 
    12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available 
    regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select 
    regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential 
    economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other 
    advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that 
    this final rule is consistent with the regulatory philosophy and 
    principles identified in the Executive Order. In addition, the final 
    rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by the Executive 
    Order and so is not subject to review under the Executive Order.
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze 
    regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule 
    on small entities. Because this regulation does not impose reporting, 
    recordkeeping, or other economic burdens, the agency certifies that the 
    final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities. Therefore, under the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act, no further analysis is required.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 312
    
        Drugs, Exports, Imports, Investigations, Labeling, Medical 
    research, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety.
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
    312 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 312--INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUG APPLICATION
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 312 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 201, 301, 501, 502, 503, 505, 506, 507, 701 of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 
    352, 353, 355, 356, 357, 371); sec. 351 of the Public Health Service 
    Act (42 U.S.C. 262).
    
        2. Section 312.70 is amended by revising the first sentences of 
    paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
    
    Sec. 312.70  Disqualification of a clinical investigator.
    
        (a) If FDA has information indicating that an investigator 
    (including a sponsor-investigator) has repeatedly or deliberately 
    failed to comply with the requirements of this part, part 50, or part 
    56 of this chapter, or has submitted to FDA or to the sponsor false 
    information in any required report, the Center for Drug Evaluation and 
    Research or the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research will 
    furnish the investigator written notice of the matter complained of and 
    offer the investigator an opportunity to explain the matter in writing, 
    or, at the option of the investigator, in an informal conference. * * *
        (b) After evaluating all available information, including any 
    explanation presented by the investigator, if the Commissioner 
    determines that the investigator has repeatedly or deliberately failed 
    to comply with the requirements of this part, part 50, or part 56 of 
    this chapter, or has deliberately or repeatedly submitted false 
    information to FDA or to the sponsor in any required report, the 
    Commissioner will notify the investigator and the sponsor of any 
    investigation in which the investigator has been named as a participant 
    that the investigator is not entitled to receive investigational drugs. 
    * * *
    * * * * *
    
        Dated: August 29, 1997.
    William B. Schultz,
    Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
    [FR Doc. 97-23587 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/4/1997
Published:
09/05/1997
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-23587
Dates:
November 4, 1997.
Pages:
46875-46876 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95N-0138
PDF File:
97-23587.pdf
CFR: (1)
21 CFR 312.70