94-21869. Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca Arriel 1 Series Turboshaft Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-21869]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 6, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-ANE-08]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca Arriel 1 Series Turboshaft 
    Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing 
    airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to Turbomeca Arriel 1 series 
    turboshaft engines, that currently requires repetitive checks for 
    engine rubbing noise during gas generator shutdown, and for free 
    rotation of the gas generator by rotating the compressor manually after 
    the last flight of the day. This action would continue to require these 
    checks, but eliminates the reference to the Turbomeca service bulletin, 
    allows the pilot to perform all the checks required in this proposed 
    rule, clarifies the inspection interval requirement for daily checks, 
    and specifies terminating action for the repetitive checks required by 
    this AD. In addition, this action would allow the check for engine 
    rubbing noise to be performed during engine motoring, and specifies 
    that the engine turbine (T4) temperature must be below 150 degrees 
    Centigrade when performing the check for free rotation. This proposal 
    is prompted by comments submitted by operators of the affected engines 
    in response to the existing AD and the availability of an improved 
    design 2nd stage nozzle guide vane. The actions specified by the 
    proposed AD are intended to prevent engine failure due to rubbing of 
    the 2nd stage turbine disk on the 2nd stage turbine nozzle guide vane, 
    which could result in complete engine failure and damage to the 
    aircraft.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by November 7, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-ANE-08, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    except Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Turbomeca, 64511 Bordes Cedex - France. This information 
    may be examined at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant 
    Chief Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Rumizen, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (617) 
    238-7137, fax (617) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 94-ANE-08.'' The postcard will be date-stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-ANE-08, 12 New England Executive Park, 
    Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
    
    Discussion
    
        On November 19, 1993, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 
    issued airworthiness directive (AD) 93-23-09, Amendment 39-8745 (58 FR 
    63061, November 30, 1993), applicable to Turbomeca Arriel 1 series 
    turboshaft engines, to require repetitive checks for engine rubbing 
    noise during gas generator shutdown, and for free rotation of the gas 
    generator by rotating the compressor manually after the last flight of 
    the day. That action was prompted by a report of a Turbomeca Arriel 1B 
    engine failure, which resulted in the crash of an Aerospatiale AS350B 
    helicopter. That condition, if not corrected, could result in engine 
    failure due to rubbing of the 2nd stage turbine disk on the 2nd stage 
    turbine nozzle guide vane, which could result in complete engine 
    failure and damage to the aircraft.
        Since the issuance of that AD, the FAA has received a significant 
    number of comments from operators of the affected engines indicating 
    that the performance of the checks required by this AD are within the 
    capabilities of the pilot. The FAA has also determined that 
    instructions contained in the AD are adequate for performance of 
    required actions, and the Turbomeca Service Bulletin (SB) No. 72 292 
    0181 need not be incorporated by reference. Other comments indicated 
    that the interval specified in the existing AD, ``after the last flight 
    of the day,'' is not consistent with operating and maintenance 
    schedules for operators who typically operate ``around the clock'' on a 
    24 hours per day basis, such as medevac or police operators. In 
    response to these comments, a ``daily'' interval has been specified for 
    this check.
        In addition, operators reported difficulty in listening for rubbing 
    noises during engine shutdown, and that this check could be 
    accomplished during engine motoring. The FAA has also determined that 
    the check for free rotation must be accomplished on a cold engine due 
    to the variation of rotating component clearances with engine 
    temperature. Finally, the manufacturer has completed testing and 
    analysis, and has accumulated sufficient field experience to 
    substantiate the design of the improved 2nd stage nozzle guide vane. 
    This AD would require installation of modification TU 202, which 
    incorporates an improved 2nd stage nozzle guide vane manufactured from 
    a new material that is more resistant to fatigue cracking, at the next 
    engine overhaul after the effective date of this AD, but not later than 
    December 31, 1999, as terminating action for the repetitive checks. 
    This calendar end-date is based upon parts availability.
        Turbomeca has issued SB No. 292 72 0150, dated April 10, 1992, that 
    specifies installing an improved design 2nd stage nozzle guide vane.
        This engine model is manufactured in France and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement in effect at the time 
    of type certification. The Direction Generale de L'Aviation Civile 
    (DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for France, has kept the 
    FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the 
    findings of the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and 
    determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design 
    that are certificated for operation in the United States.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would supersede AD 93-23-09 to continue to require 
    repetitive checks for engine rubbing noise during gas generator 
    shutdown, and for free rotation of the gas generator by rotating the 
    compressor manually at a daily interval until installation of the 
    improved 2nd stage nozzle guide vane.
        This proposed AD would allow pilots to perform all the required 
    checks. This action does not require special training beyond that 
    already incurred by pilots of the aircraft having affected engines, or 
    the use of tools or special measuring equipment, or reference to 
    technical data. Accordingly, the FAA has determined that pilots may 
    perform all the checks required by this proposed rule as an exception 
    to Sec. 43.3 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.3) 
    regarding the performance of maintenance.
        The FAA estimates that 160 engines installed on aircraft of U.S. 
    registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take 
    approximately 0.2 work hours per engine to accomplish the proposed 
    actions, and that the average labor rate is $55 per work hour. Required 
    parts would cost approximately $8,000 per engine. Based on an assumed 
    utilization rate and an assumed modification rate, the total cost 
    impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators over the five year 
    compliance period is estimated to be $3,101,600.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13   [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-8745 (58 FR 
    63061, November 30, 1993) and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    to read as follows:
    
        Turbomeca: Docket No. 94-ANE-08. Supersedes AD 93-23-09, 
    Amendment 39-8745.
    
        Applicability: Turbomeca Arriel turboshaft engines Models 1B 
    that do have modification TU 76 but do not have modification TU 197 
    or TU 202; Arriel Models 1D and 1D1 that do not have modification TU 
    197 or TU 202; Arriel Models 1A, 1A1, 1A2 that have had modification 
    TU 76 but do not have modification TU 197 or TU 202; and Arriel 
    Models 1C, 1C1, and 1C2 that do not have TU 197 or TU 202. These 
    engines are installed on but not limited to Aerospatiale Models 
    AS350B, SA365, and AS565 helicopters.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent engine failure due to rubbing of the 2nd stage 
    turbine disk on the 2nd stage turbine nozzle guide vane, which could 
    result in engine failure and damage to the aircraft, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) For Turbomeca Arriel turboshaft engines Models 1B that have 
    modification TU 76 but do not have modification TU 197 or TU 202; 
    and Arriel Models 1D and 1D1 that do not have modification TU 197 or 
    TU 202; accomplish the following:
        (1) Perform a daily check for unusual engine rubbing noises 
    during gas generator shutdown or as engine gas generator speed 
    decreases after completion of engine motoring.
        (2) Perform a daily check for free rotation of the gas 
    generator, when T4 temperature is below 150 degrees Centigrade, by 
    rotating the compressor manually.
        (3) While checking for free rotation of the gas generator, 
    perform a check for engine rubbing noise.
        (b) For Turbomeca Arriel turboshaft engines Models 1A, 1A1, 1A2 
    that have modification TU 76 but do not have modification TU 197 or 
    TU 202; and Arriel Models 1C, 1C1, and 1C2 that do not have 
    modification TU 197 or TU 202; accomplish the following:
        (1) Within 50 hours time in service (TIS) after the effective 
    date of this AD, perform a check for unusual engine rubbing noise 
    during gas generator shutdown or within 5 seconds after engine 
    motoring.
        (2) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS since 
    the last check, perform a check for unusual engine rubbing noise 
    during gas generator shutdown or within 5 seconds after engine 
    motoring.
        (3) Perform a daily check for free rotation of the gas generator 
    when T4 temperature is below 150 degrees C, by rotating the 
    compressor manually.
        (4) While checking for free rotation of the gas generator, 
    perform a check for engine rubbing noise.
        (c) If any engine rubbing noise is detected during the checks 
    required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, prior to further 
    flight replace gas generator module M03 with a serviceable module.
        (d) Install the improved 2nd stage nozzle guide vane, 
    modification TU 202, at the next engine overhaul after the effective 
    date of this AD, but not later than December 31, 1999, in accordance 
    with Turbomeca Service Bulletin 292 72 0150, dated April 10, 1992. 
    Installation of this hardware constitutes terminating action to the 
    checks required by this AD.
        (e) The checks required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD may 
    be performed by the pilot holding at least a private pilot 
    certificate as an exception to the requirements of part 43 of the 
    Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 43). The checks must be 
    recorded in accordance with Sections 43.9 and 91.417(a)(2)(v) of the 
    Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.9 and 14 CFR 
    91.417(a)(2)(v)), and the records must be maintained as required by 
    the applicable Federal Aviation Regulation.
        (f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. The 
    request should be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Engine Certification Office.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, 
    if any, may be obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        (g) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 24, 1994.
    Jay J. Pardee,
    Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-21869 Filed 9-2-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/06/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
94-21869
Dates:
Comments must be received by November 7, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 6, 1994, Docket No. 94-ANE-08
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13