94-21870. Medicare Program; Criteria and Standards for Evaluating Intermediary and Carrier Performance During FY 1994

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-21870]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 6, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    Health Care Financing Administration
    [BPO-117-GN]
    
     
    
    Medicare Program; Criteria and Standards for Evaluating 
    Intermediary and Carrier Performance During FY 1994
    
    AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.
    
    ACTION: General notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In the September 30, 1993 issue of the Federal Register, we 
    published a general notice with comment period describing the criteria 
    and standards for evaluating intermediary and carrier performance in 
    administering the Medicare program during FY 1994. This notice amends 
    that document to require that contractors certify the accuracy and 
    completeness of the information submitted to HCFA with respect to the 
    evaluation process.
    
    DATES: This notice is effective September 6, 1994 and does not alter 
    the criteria and standards that were effective October 1, 1993.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Pratt, (410) 966-7403.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On September 30, 1993, we published in the Federal Register (58 FR 
    51085) the criteria and standards to be used for evaluating the 
    performance of fiscal intermediaries and carriers in the administration 
    of the Medicare program beginning October 1, 1993 under the Contractor 
    Performance Evaluation Program (CPEP). We publish a similar notice 
    annually in accordance with sections 1816(f) and 1842(b) of the Social 
    Security Act. CPEP measures contractor compliance with program 
    requirements; promotes contractor initiatives to improve administrative 
    processes; provides comparable data on customer satisfaction; and 
    serves as a basis of information for contract management activities. 
    The results of the CPEP are considered whenever HCFA enters into, 
    renews, or terminates an intermediary agreement or carrier contract or 
    takes other contract actions.
        The 1994 CPEP was structured into three criteria, designed to meet 
    the above objectives. Criterion one, titled Program Requirements, 
    measures contractor performance against basic program requirements. 
    Within this criterion, we identified performance standards which, when 
    measured, evidence how well each contractor is performing the basic 
    requirements of administering the Medicare program. Criterion two, 
    titled Process Improvement, recognizes contractor performance 
    improvement (compared to the previous review period) and contractor 
    efforts to achieve program efficiencies by evaluating and improving the 
    processes with which it administers the Medicare program. Criterion 
    three, titled Customer Satisfaction, assesses the degree to which the 
    contractor's customers are satisfied with the services provided by the 
    contractor in its administration of the Medicare program. We also 
    developed separate criteria and standards that measure only the 
    activities of regional home health intermediaries and Common Working 
    File hosts.
    
    II. Amendment to the FY 1994 CPEP Notice
    
        The notice published on September 30, 1993 (58 FR 51085), in 
    addition to providing detailed descriptions of the specific CPEP 
    criteria, standards, and procedures, included a summary of how the 
    performance evaluations and assessments affect individual contract 
    action decisions. The summary was contained on page 50190 and was 
    entitled ``Action Based on Performance Evaluations.'' In our discussion 
    of action to be taken based on performance, we did not address a 
    situation that could arise if we did not receive accurate information 
    from our contractors.
        We have discovered a number of instances where information has been 
    manipulated or falsified by contractor personnel in an effort to 
    receive a more favorable evaluation under CPEP. On October 28, 1993, we 
    issued notices to each of the Medicare contractors that they must 
    certify that all information submitted to HCFA with respect to CPEP for 
    fiscal year 1993 was accurate and complete to the best of their 
    knowledge and belief. We also informed the Medicare contractors that we 
    would modify the annual CPEP notice to include mention of the 
    requirement that they certify, under penalty of perjury, the accuracy 
    of the information reviewed and data submitted to HCFA with respect to 
    CPEP. The modification does not alter the criteria and standards that 
    were effective October 1, 1993.
        So that our public notice relating to CPEP accurately reflects our 
    administration of the evaluation program, we are revising Section H. 
    Action Based on Performance Evaluations (page 50190 of the 1994 CPEP 
    notice published September 30, 1993) by adding the following:
    
        Each contractor must certify that all information submitted to 
    HCFA related to CPEP, including without limitation all records, 
    reports, files, papers and other information, whether in written, 
    electronic, or other form, are accurate and complete to the best of 
    the contractor's knowledge and belief. A contractor will also be 
    required to certify that its files, records, documents, and data 
    have not been manipulated or falsified in an effort to receive a 
    more favorable performance evaluation. A contractor must further 
    certify that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, the 
    contractor has submitted, without withholding any relevant 
    information, all information required to be submitted with respect 
    to CPEP under the authority of applicable law(s), regulation(s), 
    contracts, or HCFA manual provision(s). Any contractor that makes a 
    false, fictitious, or fraudulent certification may be subject to 
    criminal and/or civil prosecution, as well as appropriate 
    administrative action. Such administrative action may include 
    debarment or suspension of the contractor, as well as the 
    termination or nonrenewal of a contract.
    
        For the convenience of the reader, the full text of Section H is 
    republished below with the addition found in the first paragraph.
    
    H. Action Based on Performance Evaluations
    
        A contractor's performance is evaluated against each applicable 
    standard in the Program Requirements criterion. Each contractor must 
    certify that all information submitted to HCFA related to CPEP, 
    including without limitation all records, reports, files, papers and 
    other information, whether in written, electronic, or other form, are 
    accurate and complete to the best of the contractor's knowledge and 
    belief. A contractor will also be required to certify that its files, 
    records, documents, and data have not been manipulated or falsified in 
    an effort to receive a more favorable performance evaluation. A 
    contractor must further certify that, to the best of its knowledge and 
    belief, the contractor has submitted, without withholding any relevant 
    information, all information required to be submitted with respect to 
    CPEP under the authority of applicable law(s), regulation(s), 
    contracts, or HCFA manual provision(s). Any contractor that makes a 
    false, fictitious, or fraudulent certification may be subject to 
    criminal and/or civil prosecution, as well as appropriate 
    administrative action. Such administrative action may include debarment 
    or suspension of the contractor, as well as the termination or 
    nonrenewal of a contract. If a contractor meets the level of 
    performance required by operational instructions, it meets the 
    requirements of that standard. Any performance measured below basic 
    operational expectations constitutes a deficiency. The contractor may 
    be required to develop and implement a corrective action plan when 
    performance problems are identified. The contractor will be monitored 
    to assure effective and efficient compliance with the corrective action 
    plan and improved performance where standards are not met.
        A contractor's performance is assessed under the Process 
    Improvement criterion to determine the success of the improvements 
    developed and/or implemented by the contractor during the review 
    period. A contractor's performance is similarly assessed under the 
    Customer Satisfaction criterion to determine the degree to which the 
    contractor has satisfied its customers.
        The results of performance evaluations and assessments under all 
    three criteria will be used for contract management activities and will 
    be published in the contractor's annual performance report. We may 
    initiate administrative actions as a result of the evaluation of 
    contractor performance based on these performance criteria and 
    standards. Under sections 1816 and 1842 of the Act, we consider the 
    results of the evaluation in our determinations on:
         Entering into, renewing, or terminating agreements or 
    contracts with contractors; and
         Decisions concerning other contract actions for 
    intermediaries and carriers (such as deletion of an automatic renewal 
    clause). These decisions are made on a case-by-case basis and depend 
    primarily on the nature and degree of performance. More specifically, 
    they depend on:
    
    --Relative overall performance compared to other contractors;
    --Number of standards in which deficient performance occurs;
    --Extent of each deficiency;
    --Relative significance of the standards for which deficient 
    performance occurs within the overall CPEP; and
    --Efforts to improve program quality, service, and efficiency.
    
         Decisions concerning the assignment or reassignment of 
    providers and designation of regional or national intermediaries for 
    classes of providers.
        We make individual contract action decisions after considering 
    these factors in terms of their relative significance and impact on the 
    effective and efficient administration of the Medicare program.
    
    III. Effective Date
    
        As stated in the September 30 notice, we make every effort to 
    publish the CPEP criteria and standards prior to the beginning of the 
    Federal fiscal year to which they will be applied, and it is not our 
    intention to revise the criteria and standards once this information 
    has been published in the Federal Register. Should changes be 
    necessary, we will issue a Federal Register notice prior to 
    implementation of the changes and specify a prospective effective date 
    applicable to the revised standard or criterion. In this instance, the 
    addition of this certification requirement to our discussion of actions 
    based on performance evaluations does not alter any standard or 
    criterion published September 30, 1993. Therefore, this notice is 
    effective September 6, 1994.
        In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this 
    notice was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    
        Authority: (Secs. 1102, 1816, 1842, and 1871 of the Social 
    Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302, 1395h, 1395u, and 1395hh)).
    
    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 13.773, 
    Medicare--Hospital Insurance Program; and No. 13.774, Medicare--
    Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
    
        Dated: June 7, 1994.
    Bruce C. Vladeck,
    Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration.
    [FR Doc. 94-21870 Filed 9-2-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/6/1994
Published:
09/06/1994
Department:
Health Care Finance Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
General notice.
Document Number:
94-21870
Dates:
This notice is effective September 6, 1994 and does not alter the criteria and standards that were effective October 1, 1993.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 6, 1994, BPO-117-GN