95-22042. Grant of Individual Exemptions; John B. Toomey Rollover IRA (the IRA), et al.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 6, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 46308-46311]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-22042]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 95-76; Exemption Application No. D-
    09819, et al.]
    
    
    Grant of Individual Exemptions; John B. Toomey Rollover IRA (the 
    IRA), et al.
    
    AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Labor.
    
    ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document contains exemptions issued by the Department of 
    Labor (the Department) from certain of the prohibited transaction 
    restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
    (the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
        Notices were published in the Federal Register of the pendency 
    before the Department of proposals to grant such exemptions. The 
    notices set forth a summary of facts and representations contained in 
    each application for exemption and referred interested persons to the 
    respective applications for a complete statement of the facts and 
    representations. The applications have been available for public 
    inspection at the Department in Washington, D.C. The notices also 
    invited interested persons to submit comments on the requested 
    exemptions to the Department. In addition the notices stated that any 
    interested person might submit a written request that a public hearing 
    be held (where appropriate). The applicants have represented that they 
    have complied with the requirements of the notification to interested 
    persons. No public comments and no requests for a hearing, unless 
    otherwise stated, were received by the Department.
        The notices of proposed exemption were issued and the exemptions 
    are being granted solely by the Department because, effective December 
    31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 
    47713, October 17, 1978) transferred the authority of the Secretary of 
    the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type proposed to the Secretary 
    of Labor.
    
    Statutory Findings
    
        In accordance with section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 
    4975(c)(2) of the Code and the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 
    2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon 
    the entire record, the Department makes the following findings:
        (a) The exemptions are administratively feasible;
        (b) They are in the interests of the plans and their participants 
    and beneficiaries; and
        (c) They are protective of the rights of the participants and 
    beneficiaries of the plans.
    
    John B. Toomey Rollover IRA (the IRA), Located in Lorton, Virginia
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 95-76 Exemption Application No. D-
    09819]
    
    Exemption
    
        The sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of the 
    Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code shall 
    not apply to the installment sale of 36.2 shares of common stock (the 
    Stock) in JBT Holding Corporation (JBT) by the IRA 1 to JBT, a 
    disqualified person with respect to the IRA; provided that: (a) The 
    purchase price JBT pays for the Stock is the greater of $410,146 or the 
    fair market value of the Stock on the date of the sale; (b) the fair 
    market value of the Stock is determined by a qualified independent 
    appraiser, as of the date of the sale; (c) the terms of the transaction 
    are no less favorable to the IRA than those negotiated at arm's length 
    with unrelated third parties in similar circumstances; (d) the trustee 
    of the IRA 
    
    [[Page 46309]]
    monitors compliance with the terms of the transaction throughout the 
    duration of the installment sale; (e) the IRA receives a cash 
    downpayment of no less than $210,146 on the date of the sale and 
    thereafter receives three (3) equal annual installment payments of 
    $66,667, the first of which is due and payable December 31, 1995, plus 
    interest at the fair market rate of interest, as determined by an 
    independent, qualified third party, as of the date of the transaction, 
    on the outstanding balance of the installment payments, payable 
    annually until all the installment payments have been made by JBT on or 
    before December 31, 1997; (f) the outstanding balance of the 
    installment payments at no time exceeds 25 percent (25%) of the value 
    of the assets of the IRA; (g) the outstanding balance on the 
    installment payments is secured by a recorded first mortgage interest 
    in real property pledged by JBT in favor of the IRA; (h) the collateral 
    which secures the installment payments has a value, as determined by an 
    independent, qualified appraiser, which at all times is no less than 
    150 percent (150%) of the outstanding balance of the installment 
    payments; and (i) the IRA pays no commissions, fees, or other expenses 
    in connection with the transaction.
    
         1 Pursuant to 29 CFR 2510.3-2(d), the IRA is not within 
    the jurisdiction of Title I of the Act. However, there is 
    jurisdiction under Title II of the Act, pursuant to section 4975 of 
    the Code.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on July 21, 1995, at 58 FR 
    37682.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelena C. Le Blanc of the Department 
    (202) 219-8883. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    
    Phillips Petroleum Company (Phillips) Located in Bartlesville, OK
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 95-77; Exemption Application No. D-
    09907]
    
    Exemption
    
        The restrictions of sections 406(a), 406(b) (1) and (b)(2) of the 
    Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of 
    the Code by reason of section 4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code, 
    shall not apply to (1) the making of interest-free loans to the Thrift 
    Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (the Plan) by Phillips, the Plan 
    sponsor pursuant to the terms of a credit facility arrangement; and (2) 
    the repayment of such loans by the Plan to Phillips.
        This exemption is conditioned on the following requirements:
        (a) Each loan executed under the proposed credit facility 
    arrangement provides short-term funds to the Plan in connection with 
    inter-fund transfers, withdrawals and participant loans and permits the 
    orderly disposal of Phillips common stock.
        (b) Each loan made under the proposed credit facility arrangement 
    is unsecured and no interest, commissions or expenses are paid by the 
    Plan.
        (c) In the event of a loan default or delinquency, Phillips has no 
    recourse against the Plan.
        (d) Each loan is initiated, accounted for and administered by an 
    independent fiduciary who monitors the terms and conditions of the 
    exemption.
    
    Written Comments
    
        The Department received six written comments with respect to the 
    notice of proposed exemption and no requests for a public hearing. Of 
    the written comments received, five commenters recommended that the 
    Department grant the proposed exemption. The sixth commenter questioned 
    whether the proposed credit facility arrangement would be in the best 
    interest of the Plan since it would allow no recourse against Plan 
    assets. The commenter also raised several questions about the Plan's 
    participant loan program.
        In response to the sixth commenter, Bankers Trust Company (BTC), 
    the Plan trustee and independent fiduciary with respect to the proposed 
    transactions, notes that the purpose of the credit facility arrangement 
    is to facilitate participant directions regarding their account 
    balances on a more timely basis. According to BTC, receiving the loans 
    on an interest-free basis from Phillips meets this purpose and it 
    allows the Plan to avoid the expense of its current credit facility 
    arrangement with NationsBank of Dallas, Texas. BTC further represents 
    that by requiring that the loans be on a non-recourse basis provides an 
    additional safeguard to the Plan and ensures that participant account 
    balances will not be impacted adversely.
        With respect to the Plan's participant loan program, the commenter 
    has inquired about the (a) number of participants in the Plan having 
    outstanding participant loans, (b) the frequency of loan repayments, 
    (c) the percentage of such loans that are in arrears or default, and 
    (d) what safeguards can and should be implemented to prevent 
    depreciation in the value of Phillips common stock.
        Phillips has responded to each of the commenter's concerns on these 
    matters. In this regard, Phillips represents that as of July 17, 1995, 
    approximately 2,000 participants had outstanding participant loans with 
    the Plan. Phillips notes that for these loans, repayment schedules 
    range from three months to 180 months in duration depending upon the 
    election of the participant. Phillips further explains that virtually 
    none of the loans are in arrears or default since the Plan requires 
    that loan repayments be made by payroll deduction or repaid in full. 
    However, should a participant loan be in default, Phillips states that 
    there will be no impact on Plan participants since the participant's 
    account will serve as security for the loan and the event of default 
    will become a taxable distribution to the participant. Finally, 
    Phillips notes that neither the Plan nor BTC can control the value of 
    Phillips common stock that is held by the Plan and that the intent of 
    the exemption is to allow participants the flexibility of moving into 
    or out of stock funds with the value of the stock established as of the 
    transaction valuation date.
    
    Technical Correction
    
        The Department notes that the correct application number for the 
    subject request is ``D-09907'' and not ``D-09909'' as it appeared in 
    the proposed exemption. Therefore, the Department has incorporated this 
    revision into the grant notice.
        After giving full consideration to the entire record, including the 
    written comment that was submitted and the responses made by BTC and 
    Phillips, the Department has decided to grant the exemption as 
    described and revised above. The comment letter and responses have been 
    included as part of the public record of the exemption application. The 
    complete application file, including all supplemental submissions 
    received by the Department, is made available for public inspection in 
    the Public Documents Room of the Pension and Welfare Benefits 
    Administration, Room N-5638, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 
    Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on June 7, 1995 at 60 FR 
    30106.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jan D. Broady of the Department, 
    telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    KeyCorp 401(k) Savings Plan (the Plan), Located in Cleveland, Ohio
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 95-78; Exemption Application No. D-
    10023]
    
    Exemption
    
        The restrictions of sections 406(a) and 406(b)(1) and 406(b)(2) of 
    the Act and the sanctions resulting from the 
    
    [[Page 46310]]
    application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section 
    4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of the Code, shall not apply to the loan of 
    funds (the Loan) to the Plan by KeyCorp the sponsor of the Plan, with 
    respect to Guaranteed Investment Contract No. 62149 (the GIC) issued by 
    Confederation Life Insurance Company of Canada (Confederation), and the 
    potential repayment by the Plan of the Loan upon receipt of payments 
    under the GIC; provided the following conditions are satisfied: (a) No 
    interest and/or other expenses are paid by the Plan in connection with 
    the Loan; (b) All of the terms and conditions of the Loan are no less 
    favorable to the Plan than those which the Plan could obtain in an 
    arm's-length transaction with an unrelated party; (c) The Loan will be 
    no less than the amount described in paragraph 4 of the Notice of 
    Proposed Exemption; (d) The repayment of the Loan will not exceed the 
    total amount of the Loan; (e) The repayment of the Loan by the Plan 
    will be restricted to funds paid to the Plan under the GIC by 
    Confederation or other responsible third parties with respect to the 
    GIC; and (f) The repayment of the Loan will be waived to the extent the 
    amount of the Loan exceeds the proceeds the Plan receives from the GIC.
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on June 29, 1995 at 60 FR 
    33871.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles S. Edelstein of the 
    Department, telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    
    The Bank of New York (the Bank) Located in New York, New York
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 95-79; Application No. D-10030]
    
    Exemption
    
    Section I--Exemption for the Acquisition, Holding and Disposition of 
    BNY Stock
    
        The restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of 
    the Act, and the sanctions resulting from the application of section 
    4975 of the Code by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(D) and (E) of the 
    Code, shall not apply to the acquisition, holding or disposition of the 
    common stock of the Bank's parent corporation, The Bank of New York 
    Company, Inc. (BNY Stock), by Index or Model-Driven Funds, if the 
    following conditions and the General Conditions of Section II are met:
        (a) The Index or Model-Driven Fund is based on an index which 
    represents the investment performance of a specific segment of the 
    public market for equity securities in the United States and/or foreign 
    countries. The organization creating and maintaining the index must be 
    (1) engaged in the business of providing financial information, 
    evaluation, advice or securities brokerage services to institutional 
    clients, (2) a publisher of financial news or information, or (3) a 
    public stock exchange or association of securities dealers. The index 
    must be created and maintained by an organization independent of the 
    Bank and its affiliates. The index must be a generally accepted 
    standardized index of securities which is not specifically tailored for 
    the use of the Bank or its affiliates.
        (b) The acquisition or disposition of the BNY Stock is for the sole 
    purpose of maintaining strict quantitative conformity with the relevant 
    index upon which the Index or Model-Driven Fund is based.
        (c) All acquisitions comply with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, including the limitations regarding the price paid 
    or received for such stock.
        (d) Aggregate daily purchases of BNY Stock constitute no more than 
    the greater of: (1) 10 percent of the stock's average daily trading 
    volume for the previous five days; or (2) 10 percent of the stock's 
    trading volume on the date of the transaction.
        (e) If the necessary number of shares of BNY Stock cannot be 
    acquired within 10 business days from the date of the event which 
    causes the particular Index or Model-Driven Funds to require BNY Stock, 
    the Bank appoints a fiduciary which is independent of the Bank and its 
    affiliates to design acquisition procedures and monitor the Bank's 
    compliance with such procedures.
        (f) All purchases and sales of BNY Stock are executed on the 
    national exchange on which BNY Stock is primarily traded.
        (g) No transactions involve purchases from, or sales to, the Bank 
    or any affiliate (including officers, directors and employees of the 
    Bank, as defined in Section III(c) below), or any party in interest 
    with respect to a plan which has invested in an Index or Model-Driven 
    Fund.
        (h) No more than five (5) percent of the total amount of BNY Stock 
    issued and outstanding at any time is held in the aggregate by the 
    Index and Model-Driven Funds.
        (i) BNY Stock constitutes no more than two (2) percent of the value 
    of any independent third-party index on which the investments of an 
    Index or Model-Driven Fund are based.
        (j) A plan fiduciary independent of the Bank and its affiliates 
    authorizes the investment of such plan's assets in an Index or Model-
    Driven Fund which purchases and/or holds BNY Stock.
        (k) A fiduciary independent of the Bank and its affiliates directs 
    the voting of the BNY Stock held by an Index or Model-Driven Fund on 
    any matter in which shareholders of BNY Stock are required or permitted 
    to vote.
    
    Section II--General Conditions
    
        (a) The Bank maintains or causes to be maintained for a period of 
    six years from the date of the transaction the records necessary to 
    enable the persons described in paragraph (b) of this Section to 
    determine whether the conditions of the exemption have been met, except 
    that (1) a prohibited transaction will not be considered to have 
    occurred if, due to circumstances beyond the control of the Bank, the 
    records are lost or destroyed prior to the end of the six-year period, 
    and (2) no party in interest other than the Bank shall be subject to 
    the civil penalty that may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act 
    or to the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code if the 
    records are not maintained or are not available for examination as 
    required by paragraph (b) below.
        (b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) and notwithstanding 
    any provisions of section 504 (a)(2) and (b) of the Act, the records 
    referred to in paragraph (a) of this Section are available at their 
    customary location for examination during normal business hours by--
        (A) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the 
    Department of Labor or the Internal Revenue Service,
        (B) Any fiduciary of a plan participating in an Index or Model-
    Driven Fund who has authority to acquire or dispose of the interests of 
    the plan, or any duly authorized employee or representative of such 
    fiduciary,
        (C) Any contributing employer with respect to any plan 
    participating in an Index or Model-Driven Fund or any duly authorized 
    employee or representative of such employer, and
        (D) Any participant or beneficiary of any plan participating in an 
    Index or Model-Driven Fund, or any duly authorized employee or 
    representative of such participant or beneficiary.
        (2) None of the persons described in paragraph (b)(1)(B) through 
    (D) shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of the Bank, any of 
    its affiliates, or commercial or financial information which is 
    privileged or confidential. 
    
    [[Page 46311]]
    
    
    Section III--Definitions
    
        (a) Index Fund--Any investment fund, account or portfolio 
    sponsored, maintained and/or trusteed by the Bank, or an affiliate of 
    the Bank, in which one or more investors invest which is designed to 
    replicate the capitalization-weighted composition of a stock index 
    which satisfies the conditions of Section I(a) and (i).
        (b) Model-Driven Fund--Any investment fund, account or portfolio 
    sponsored, maintained and/or trusteed by the Bank, or an affiliate of 
    the Bank, in which one or more investors invest which is based on 
    computer models using prescribed objective criteria to transform an 
    independent third-party stock index which satisfies the conditions of 
    Section I (a) and (i).
        (c) Affiliate--Any person directly or indirectly, through one or 
    more intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common 
    control with such person; any officer, director, partner, employee, 
    relative (as defined in section 3(15) of the Act), a brother, a sister, 
    or a spouse of a brother or a sister of such person; and any 
    corporation or partnership of which such person is an officer, 
    director, or partner.
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on July 12, 1995, at 60 FR 
    35944.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. E. F. Williams of the Department, 
    telephone (202) 219-8194. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    Rollover Individual Retirement Accounts for Joseph Shepard, Located in 
    Jacksonville, Florida; William Haspel, Located in Bethesda, Maryland; 
    and Richard Geisendaffer, Paul Petryszak, William Kroh and Rolf Graage, 
    Located in Baltimore, Maryland (Collectively, the IRAs)
    
    [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 95-80; Exemption Application Nos. D-
    10054-10059]
    
    Exemption
    
        The sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of the 
    Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code, shall 
    not apply to the past sale by the IRAs of all the common stock (the 
    Stock) of Purchase Port Services, Inc. (PPS) held by the IRAs to PPS, 
    provided that the following conditions were satisfied: (1) The sale of 
    Stock by each IRA was a one-time transaction for cash; (2) no 
    commissions or other expenses were paid by the IRAs in connection with 
    the sale; and (3) the IRAs received the greater of: (a) the fair market 
    value of the Stock as determined by a qualified independent appraiser 
    as of May 31, 1995, or (b) the fair market value of the Stock as of the 
    time of the sale.2
    
         2 Pursuant to 29 CFR 2510.3-2(d), the IRAs are not within the 
    jurisdiction of Title I of the Act. However, there is jurisdiction 
    under Title II of the Act pursuant to section 4975 of the Code.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For a more complete statement of the facts and representations 
    supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to 
    the notice of proposed exemption published on July 21, 1995 at 60 FR 
    37688.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This exemption is effective July 28, 1995.
    
    WRITTEN COMMENT: The Department received one written comment with 
    respect to the proposed exemption, which was submitted by the 
    applicants. The applicants had represented (see notice of proposed 
    exemption, rep. 4) when they filed their exemption application that 
    ``Business and income tax considerations have compelled PPS to consider 
    making an election to be treated as a `Subchapter S' Corporation under 
    section 1362(a) of the Code.'' The applicants noted in their comment 
    letter that subsequent to the filing of the exemption request, PPS 
    determined that, rather than electing Subchapter S Corporation status 
    itself, PPS would merge into its subsidiary, Hobelmann Port Services, 
    Inc. (HPS), and that HPS would elect Subchapter S Corporation status. 
    That merger was concluded effective July 31, 1995, and HPS elected 
    Subchapter S Corporation status effective August 1, 1995. The 
    applicants represent that the decision to make HPS rather than PPS the 
    entity to elect Subchapter S status was made for business purposes 
    unrelated to the redemption of the IRAs' shares, and is not material to 
    the requested exemption.
        The applicants also requested that the exemption be made effective 
    July 28, 1995, instead of July 31, 1995, as had been proposed. The sale 
    of shares from the IRAs to PPS occurred on July 28, 1995 to allow 
    sufficient time before July 31, 1995 to complete other steps relating 
    to the Subchapter S Corporation election. The applicants represent that 
    the sale was made in accordance with all of the conditions set forth in 
    the proposed exemption.
        The Department has considered the entire record, including the 
    comment submitted by the applicants, and has determined to grant the 
    exemption effective July 28, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary H. Lefkowitz of the Department, 
    telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)
    
    General Information
    
        The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
        (1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption 
    under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code 
    does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified 
    person from certain other provisions to which the exemptions does not 
    apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of section 
    404 of the Act, which among other things require a fiduciary to 
    discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of the 
    participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in 
    accordance with section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does it affect the 
    requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate 
    for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining 
    the plan and their beneficiaries;
        (2) These exemptions are supplemental to and not in derogation of, 
    any other provisions of the Act and/or the Code, including statutory or 
    administrative exemptions and transactional rules. Furthermore, the 
    fact that a transaction is subject to an administrative or statutory 
    exemption is not dispositive of whether the transaction is in fact a 
    prohibited transaction; and
        (3) The availability of these exemptions is subject to the express 
    condition that the material facts and representations contained in each 
    application are true and complete and accurately describe all material 
    terms of the transaction which is the subject of the exemption. In the 
    case of continuing exemption transactions, if any of the material facts 
    or representations described in the application change after the 
    exemption is granted, the exemption will cease to apply as of the date 
    of such change. In the event of any such change, application for a new 
    exemption may be made to the Department.
    
        Signed at Washington, D.C., this 31st day of August, 1995.
    Ivan Strasfeld,
    Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
    Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
    [FR Doc. 95-22042 Filed 9-5-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/28/1995
Published:
09/06/1995
Department:
Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Grant of individual exemptions.
Document Number:
95-22042
Dates:
This exemption is effective July 28, 1995.
Pages:
46308-46311 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Prohibited Transaction Exemption 95-76, Exemption Application No. D- 09819, et al.
PDF File:
95-22042.pdf