2024-19436. Air Plan Approval; Maryland; Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date for the 2010 1-Hour Primary Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard  

  • Table 1—Annual Emissions From Major Stationary SO 2 Sources in the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County Nonattainment Area for 2012-2021

    [Tons of SO 2 per year]

    Year Brandon Shores H.A. Wagner C.P. Crane Total
    Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 1 Unit 2
    2012 1,547 1,301 0.2 2,513 4,964 41.1 1,214 962 12,542
    2013 1,389 1,482 0.2 1,555 8,557 72.7 719 2,143 15,918
    2014 1,670 1,475 72.6 1,940 7,277 323 574 1,316 14,648
    2015 1,311 1,643 65.0 1,188 8,754 185 382 946 14,474
    2016 1,450 1,270 26.5 163 7,575 74.8 412 638 11,609
    2017 1,098 1,418 2.5 117 1,245 60.8 379 449 4,769
    2018 1,747 1,785 6.1 230 2,733 197 392 475 7,565
    2019 547 954 15.3 88.8 1,124 39.9 0 0 2,769
    2020 420 267 0 0 605 13.5 0 0 1,306
    2021 759 720 5.7 0 645 17.4 0 0 2,147

    C. Evaluation of SO2 Monitoring Data

    The 3-year design values of 1-hour SO2 from 2014-2021 as well as the annual 99th percentile of 1-hour SO2 concentrations for the Essex Monitor are shown in table 2 in this document. The Essex Monitor has been below the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS design value since 2012 and has had no hourly SO2 values exceeding the 75 ppb 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS in the same timeframe. From 2014 to 2020, the Essex Monitor design value has declined from 22 ppb to 9 ppb, representing a decrease of approximately 59%, which could be attributed to the significant decline in operations of the coal fired EGUs in the Area over the past decade. The 2018-2020 design value of 9 ppb represents 12% of the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. Since 2014, the Essex Monitor has reliably reported data, collecting and logging data on approximately 95% of days since its installation. This ( print page 72773) represents complete data for monitoring purposes.[15]

    Table 2—2014-2021 Essex Monitor SO 2 Values for the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County Area

    Year 99th Percentile daily 1-hour maximum value (ppb) Design value (ppb) * Number of hourly SO 2 values above 75 ppb (by year) Valid monitor days (by year)
    2014 26.4 22 0 360
    2015 17.7 22 0 357
    2016 12.9 19 0 355
    2017 8.5 13 0 323
    2018 12.3 11 0 318
    2019 10.5 10 0 351
    2020 4.7 9 0 352
    2021 5.4 7 0 354
    * The design value was calculated with the reported year as the final year of the three-year period used in determining the design value ( e.g., 2014 was calculated from the years 2012-2014).

    The other monitor in the Area, the special purpose Riviera Beach Monitor, has a 2018-2020 1-hour SO2 design value of 24 ppb. This monitor was discontinued in mid-2022, precluding the use of a more recent design value. Furthermore, this monitor has experienced significant periods of invalid or missing measurements since its installation in January 2018 and as such, the incorporation of its data into this determination of attainment by the attainment date will be limited to segments of valid and recorded monitoring periods.

    The EPA finds the monitoring data from the Essex monitor in the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County Area supports the conclusion that the Area attained the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS by the September 12, 2021 attainment date.

    D. Evaluation of Modeling Data

    The EPA conducted a modeling analysis for the CDD proposal [16] in July 2022, and as both this action and the CDD largely pertain to the same timeframe, this determination of attainment by the attainment date will utilize the same modeling results. The modeling analysis was based on a combination of actual and allowable emissions for 2019-2021. Concurrent meteorological data for 2019-2021 and appropriate background concentrations were incorporated into the model, and inputs were overlaid into a model receptor grid covering the areas near the sources to adequately capture the maximum modeled concentration. As noted, this modeling analysis followed much of the modeling procedures outlined in Maryland's modeling protocol document and Maryland's original designation modeling analysis. Therefore, this modeling largely follows established model guidelines previously utilized in Maryland's analysis of the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County Area. Additional information on the model assumptions and development is available in the docket for this action.[17]

    The EPA's modeling analysis based on 2019-2021 SO2 emissions demonstrate a peak design value of 53.1 ppb occurs within the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County Area. This modeled value is approximately 71% of the 75 ppb 2010 SO2 NAAQS and occurred about one kilometer east of the Fort Smallwood Complex, near the southern shoreline of the Patapsco River. The peak model receptor design value and the 99th percentile model concentrations used in this calculation are summarized in table 3 in this document. It should be noted that the 99th percentile values decline over this modeled period—aligning with the reduced SO2 emissions from the major stationary sources in the Area.

    Table 3—Summary of 2019-2021 Peak Modeled Receptor 1-Hour SO 2 Design Values and 99th Percentile Values for the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County, MD Area

    Design value (ppb) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
    Date Hour of day SO 2 99th percentile (ppb) Date Hour of day SO 2 99th percentile (ppb) Date Hour of day SO 2 99th percentile (ppb)
    53.1 10-02-2019 14 69.3 7-27-2020 12 52.3 1-20-2021 09 37.9

    As previously discussed, this CDD modeling data includes approximately 3.5 months of data occurring after the attainment date and does not include approximately 3.5 months of data from September 2018 through December 2018. To ensure consideration of the 36-month period prior to the attainment date, the EPA has analyzed the emissions data of these 3.5 months at the end of 2018. While emissions between these two 36-month periods (September 2018 through September 2021 vs. January 2018 through December 2021) are relatively similar, the substitution of the September through December 2018 data for the September through December 2021 data does represent an approximately 16% increase in the total emissions during the 36-month period utilized for ( print page 72774) assessing timely attainment. This data, compiled from the EPA's Clean Air Markets Program Data,[18] is available in table 4 in this document and can be compared to the totals for the 2019-2021 timeframe provided in table 1 in this document. The total tons of SO2 emissions for each of these 1-year (or 12-month) periods on a 2019-2021 calendar-year basis vs. a September 2018 through September 2021 basis, respectively, are as follows: Period 1—2,769 vs. 3,396; Period 2—1,306 vs. 1,764; and Period 3—2,147 vs. 2,083.

    Table 4—Emissions From Major Stationary SO 2 Sources in the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County Nonattainment Area for September 2018 Through September 2021

    [Tons of SO 2 per year]

    Time period Brandon Shores Wagner Total *
    Sept. 12, 2018-Sept. 11, 2019 1,976.1 1,419.4 3,395.5
    Sept. 12, 2019-Sept. 11, 2020 779.3 984.7 1,764.0
    Sept. 12, 2020-Sept. 11, 2021 1,608.2 474.5 2,082.7
    * C.P. Crane is excluded from this table as the facility had ceased operation by September 12, 2018.

Document Information

Published:
09/06/2024
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
2024-19436
Dates:
Written comments must be received on or before October 7, 2024.
Pages:
72770-72775 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
EPA-R03-OAR-2024-0152, FRL-11858-01-R3
Topics:
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides
PDF File:
2024-19436.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» 1971 SO2 NAAQS 36_FR_8186
» EPA Guidance - User’s Guide for the AERMOD Meteorological Preprocessor (AERMET) (June 2022) [EPA-454/B-22-006]
» EPA Guidance - AERMINUTE User’s Guide - October 2015
» EPA Guidance - Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications, Feb 2000 (EPA-454/R-99-005)
» EPA Guidance - User's Guide for AERSURFACE Tool (February 2020) [EPA-454/B-20-008]
» EPA Guidance - User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD) - June 2022 [EPA-454/B-22-007]
» EPA Guidance - Guidelines for Determining Good Engineering Practice Stack Height (June 1985) [EPA 450/4-80-023R]
» EPA Guidance Memo - "Questions and Answers on Implementing the Revised Stack Height Regulation," dated October 10, 1985
» EPA Guidance - "User's Guide To EPA's Building Profile Input Program" - April 21, 2004
» EPA Guidance - "Additional Clarification Regarding Application of Appendix W Modeling Guidance for the 1-hour N02 NAAQS," dated March 01, 2011
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52