95-21256. Airworthiness Directives; Beech Model 400 and 400A Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 174 (Friday, September 8, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 46765-46766]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-21256]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-31-AD; Amendment 39-9352; AD 95-18-04]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Beech Model 400 and 400A Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Beech Model 400 and 400A airplanes, that requires 
    modification of the autopilot and rudder boost interlock. This 
    amendment is prompted by a report indicating that the rudder boost 
    system installed on these airplanes does not operate correctly during 
    deployment of a thrust reverser. The actions specified by this AD are 
    intended to prevent incorrect operation of the rudder boost system 
    during deployment of a thrust reverser and to prevent the autopilot 
    from exceeding certain bank angle limits; these conditions could result 
    in reduced controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective October 10, 1995.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of October 10, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Beech Aircraft Corporation, Commercial Service 
    Department, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. This information 
    may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, Small 
    Airplane Directorate, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent 
    Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Vassalli, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Systems and Equipment Branch, ACE-130W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft 
    Certification Office, Small Airplane Directorate, 1801 Airport Road, 
    Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 
    946-4132; fax (316) 946-4407.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Beech Model 400 and 400A 
    airplanes was published in the Federal Register on May 4, 1995 (60 FR 
    22013). That action proposed to require modification of the autopilot 
    and rudder boost interlock.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response 
    to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public. 
    The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require 
    the adoption of the rule as proposed.
        There are approximately 92 Model 400 and 400A series airplanes of 
    the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 69 
    airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will 
    take approximately 24 work hours per airplane to accomplish the 
    required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. 
    Required parts will be provided by the manufacturer at no cost to 
    operators. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on 
    U.S. operators is estimated to be $99,360, or $1,440 per airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    
    [[Page 46766]]
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    95-18-04  Beech Aircraft Corporation: Amendment 39-9352. Docket 95-
    NM-31-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 400 airplanes, serial RJ-61; and Model 400A 
    airplanes, serials RK-1 through RK-77 inclusive, and RK-79 through 
    RK-92 inclusive; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (b) of this AD to request approval from the 
    FAA. This approval may address either no action, if the current 
    configuration eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions 
    necessary to address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such 
    a request should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish 
    the following:
        (a) At the next scheduled inspection, but no later than 200 
    hours time-in-service after the effective date of this AD, install 
    an autopilot and rudder boost improvement kit in accordance with 
    Beechcraft Service Bulletin No. 2533, dated October 1994.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Small Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Wichita ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Wichita ACO.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) The installation shall be done in accordance with Beechcraft 
    Service Bulletin No. 2533, dated October 1994. This incorporation by 
    reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from Beech Aircraft Corporation, Commercial Service 
    Department, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Wichita Aircraft 
    Certification Office, Small Airplane Directorate, 1801 Airport Road, 
    Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the Office 
    of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on October 10, 1995.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 22, 1995.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-21256 Filed 9-7-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/10/1995
Published:
09/08/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-21256
Dates:
Effective October 10, 1995.
Pages:
46765-46766 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-31-AD, Amendment 39-9352, AD 95-18-04
PDF File:
95-21256.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13