02-4637. Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

    ACTION:

    Notice of denials.

    SUMMARY:

    The FMCSA is publishing the names of persons denied exemptions from the vision standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and the reasons for the denials.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    For information about the applications addressed in this notice, Ms. Teresa Doggett, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations, MC-PSD, (202) 366-2990; for information about legal issues related to this notice, Mr. Joseph Solomey, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1374, FMCSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), the FMCSA may grant an exemption for a renewable 2-year period if it finds “such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.”

    Accordingly, the FMCSA individually evaluated 251 exemption requests on their merits and made a determination that the applicants do not satisfy the criteria established to demonstrate that granting the exemptions is likly to achieve an equal or greater level of safety that exists without the exemption. Each applicant has, prior to this notice, received a letter of final disposition on his/her individual exemption request. Those decision letters fully outlined the basis for the denial and constitute final agency action. The list published today summarizes the agency's recent denials as required under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by periodically publishing names and reason for denials.

    One hundred fourteen applicants lacked sufficient recent driving experience over the past three years. Eighteen applicants had no experience operating a commercial motor vehicle and therefore presented no evidence from which the FMCSA can conclude that granting the exemption is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption. Forty-one did not have 3 years of experience driving a commercial motor vehicle on public highways with the vision deficiency. Fourteen did not have 3 years recent experience driving a commercial motor vehicle with the vision deficiency. One applicant did not qualify for the exemption because he met the vision standards at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). Thirteen applicants did not qualify because they were charged with moving violation(s) in conjunction with commercial motor vehicle accident(s), which is a disqualifying offense under the exemption criteria. Two applicants had more that two commercial motor vehicle moving violations during a 3-year period and/or application process. Each applicant is only allowed two moving citations. One applicant did not have sufficient peripheral vision in the better eye to qualify for an exemption. Twelve applicants' licenses were suspended during the 3-year period because of a moving violation and, therefore, could not qualify for the exemption. Two applicants could not qualify for the exemption because they were convicted of two serious traffic violations within the 3-year period. An applicant for a vision exemption is only allowed two traffic violations in a 3-year period, of which only one can be a serious violation. Eight applicants did not have verifiable proof of commercial driving experience during a 3-year period under normal highway operating conditions that would serve as an adequate predictor of future safety performance. Fifteen applicants were involved in commercial motor vehicle accidents in which they contributed to the accident. Based on information received from State motor vehicle records, two applicants did not demonstrate the level Start Printed Page 9022of safety required for interstate driving because of excessive moving/non-moving violations during the 3-year period. Three applicants did not hold licenses which allowed operation of a CMV over 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight rating for all or part of the 3-year period. An applicant did not qualify for the exemption because he was not willing to make the required statement on the application indicating “he is otherwise qualified under 49 CFR 391.41(b)(1-13), without the benefit of any other waiver or exemption.” Another applicant did not meet the minimum requirements for consideration for a renewal exemption. According to information submitted with the application and other records obtained by FMCSA, the applicant drove a CMV in interstate commerce during the 2-year period the exemption was in effect while in violation of other medical qualification requirements. Three applicants were placed in the “other” category for having multiple reasons for denial. One applicant in this category had only two years of CMV experience and his license was suspended during the 3-year period. Another applicant in this category met the Federal vision requirements but only drove 16-18 hours per week. The third applicant was involved in an accident during the 3-year period where he contributed to the accident and was also involved in a CMV accident during the 3-year period where he was cited in the accident.

    Summary of Causes for Not Granting Exemptions

    The FMCSA has denied the following petitions for exemption from the vision standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). All applicants were previously notified of their denials by individual letters. The purpose of publishing these denials is simply to comply with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4)(C), by periodically publishing in the Federal Register the names of persons denied exemptions and the reasons for such denials.

    Reason—Does not have sufficient driving experience over the past three years under normal highway operating conditions that would serve as an adequate predictor of future safe performance

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Adler,DennisBeroney,Raymond
    Alberry,DavidBetit,.Thomass
    Andrews,JohnBiondo,Michael
    Arthur,EdwinBrazil,Bobby
    Bacon,NormanButts,Edwin
    Badger,DonaldCassatt,Daryl
    Badrick,RichardChapman,Franklin
    Bailey,MarcusClark,Karen
    Baptiste, Jr.BarneyCliffe,Terry
    Barrett,WilliamCline,Lonnie
    Bell, Jr.RoyCollins,Warren
    Confreda,JohnHanson,Ronald
    Davidson,RonnieHarrington,Michael
    Davis,GeraldineHarris,Edward
    Denson,SidneyHatton,Richard
    Doolittle,WilliamHeayberd,John
    Downie,NevilleHenry,Thomas
    DuRussell,DonaldHernandez,Guadalupe
    Dykstra,StephenHiggs,Gail
    Falkner,GaryHildebrand,Todd
    Farmer,AllanHougland,Randall
    Fiamma,JohnHuffman,Willard
    Flannery,WilliamJelks,Gloria
    Fleming,MartinJohnson,Jimmy
    Forslin,StevenKervin,Christopher
    Gonzalez,ValentinKnecht,Herbert
    Gove,LaurelKocher,Stan
    Gowan, IIIWalterLong, Jr.Mearlin
    Green,FrederickLovett,Gordon
    Griggs,LarryMarshall,Chester
    Hall,JohnnieMather,Michael
    Hamilton,DanielMazyck,Jason
    Hamm,JohnMcCabe,William
    McIntosh,JudithRobinson,Daniel
    McIntyre,LarryRobison,Leroy
    Medley,DonaldRogers,Larry
    Michael,AnthonySchnase,Gerald
    Morris,GarySchneider,Michael
    Morris,CharlesSimon,Arlynn
    Murayama,RobinSimpson,Wayne
    Murray,StephenSmith,Donald
    Navish,CharlesSt. John,Gary
    Neal, Sr.CharlesSutter,Jarid
    Noonan,RobertTate,Brian
    Oddy,KevinThaxton, Jr.Ronald
    Ott,WilliamThomason,Douglas
    Parks,FredTrosclair,Kory
    Patterson,JamesValente,John
    Phelps,EugeneVance,Jack
    Prezzia,RonaldVorse,Charles
    Start Printed Page 9023
    Proudfit,TerryWendt,Gerald
    Raulston,StephenWhite,Walter
    Ream,HarleyWhite,Arthur
    Reimer,PhillipWilkerson,Noel
    Reno,ThomasWilkerson, Jr.William
    Wilson,Kent
    Windnagel.Jeff
    Workman,Ronald
    Wyatt, Jr.Paul

    Reason—Has no experience operating a commercial motor vehicle and therefore presented no evidence from which the FMCSA can conclude that granting the exemption is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Aleem,AlphonsoKirby,Christopher
    Baldit,JoseLaCour,Robert
    Benton,DamonMcFadden,Wilbert
    Burns,JamesNastro,Antonino
    Ezell,CarlosRodrigues,Osvaldo
    Fisher,DavidShirk,Rhonda
    Fotheringham,JohnVeloz,Nelson
    Gomez,JuanYoung,Kevin
    Harper,Steven

    Reason—Does not have 3 years of experience driving a commercial motor vehicle with vision deficiency on public highways

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Barraco,MatthewJohnson,Eugene
    Browning,JamesJohnston,Mickey
    Buckman, JrJayJones,Benjamin
    Clark,WilliamKirouac,Donald
    Dean,JohnLeonard,Larry
    Denton, JrJamesLuckey,William
    Edwards,DewainMacPherson,Scott
    Ensor,WalterMcDermott,Eric
    Farmer, Sr.CharlesMcKenzie,Benjamin
    Ferking,TimothyMeador,Michael
    Gasper,ShawnMullins,Michael
    Hall,RobertSimmons,James
    Hoffarth,MichaelSims,LeTroy
    Holley,TonySmith,Rex
    Hurst,EdwardSmith,Eric
    Jacobs,VincentThomas,Steven
    Johnson,DarylTurner,Ronald
    Valles,HumbertoWaner,Eugene
    Varga,JosephWeber, Jr.George
    Vines,PhillipWeekly,Wesley
    Vollink,Tunis

    Reason—Does not have 3 years of experience driving a commercial motor vehicle with vision deficiency

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Boersma,JohnJones,Earnest
    Burnworth,KeithKempke,Clarence
    Demaree,RobinMilbourn,Peggy
    Gallion,PamelaRiordan, IIDonald
    Goode,LarryRyals,Robert
    Jackson, Sr.JosephWalker,Norman
    Johnson,HowardYezerski,Thomas
    Start Printed Page 9024

    Reason—Meets the vision requirements of 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). Does not need a vision exemption

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Pearl,Steven

    Reason—Charged with moving violations(s) in conjunction with commercial motor vehicle accident(s). Disqualifying offense

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Allen,RonaldCooper,William
    Briones, Jr.RobertGalloway,Jerry
    Cooper,WilliamSequera,Anthony
    Galloway,JerryWhite,Ronald
    Luce,RobertWilliams,James
    Miller,StuartMoose,Harry

    Reason—Had more than 2 commercial motor vehicle violations during 3-year period and/or application process. Each applicant is only allowed 2 moving citations

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Brannon,RobertPearson, Jr.Jesse

    Reason—Does not have sufficient peripheral vision in the better eye to qualify for an exemption

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Williams,Sandy

    Reason—Commercial driver's license was suspended during 3-year period in relation to a moving violation. Applicants do not qualify for an exemption with a suspension during a 3-year period

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Abbott,HaroldKulibert,James
    Dolbear,CecilLogan,Leonard
    Eagling,DonaldRelien,Steven
    Gard,KevinRight,Willie
    Griffin,ClarenceShell,Juan
    Hogan,EarlHowe,Marvin

    Reason—Had two serious commercial motor vehicle violations within the 3-year period. Each applicant is only allowed a total of two moving citations, of which only one can be serious

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Persun,BryonWalden,Billy

    Reason—Does not have verifiable proof of commercial driving experience over the past 3 years under normal highway operating conditions that would serve as an adequate predictor of future safe performance

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Barber,JimmyHarding, Jr.Glenn
    Bennett,AaronHigh,Frank
    Cole,KevinLamontagne,Kenneth
    FryarSheldonMcJunkin,Walter

    Reason—Contributed to accident(s) in which applicant was operating a commercial motor vehicle. Disqualifying offense

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Campbell,PaulSchnautz,Paul
    Craddock,DonShipley,John
    Start Printed Page 9025
    Doeing,GeraldSmith,Henry
    Hurley,RobertSucharda,Todd
    Mangen,PhillipTriguerio,Rick
    Manuel,AllenWilliams,Samuel
    Matthews, Jr.RonaldWood,Bernard
    Reveal,Gary

    Reason—Based on information received on State-issued driving report, applicant did not demonstrate the level of safety required for interstate driving (excessive moving/nonmoving violations during 3-year period)

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Davison,GregoryHouston,Jon

    Reason—Did not hold a license which allowed operation of vehicles over 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight rating for all or part of 3-year period

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Slinker,ElstonTurek,Timothy
    Sumner,Brian

    Reason—Applicant not willing to make required statement indicating they are otherwise qualified under 49 CFR 391.41(b)(1)-(b)(13) without the benefit of any other waiver or exemption

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Laderoute, Jr.Fred

    Reason—Does not meet the minimum requirements for consideration for a renewal exemption

    Last nameFirst nameLast nameFirst name
    Watt,Ronald

    Reason—Other (Multiple reasons for denial)

    Last nameFirst nameReasons for denial
    Byerly,Dennis(1) only has two years of CMV experience and (2) his license was suspended during the 3-year period
    Harbin,Duane(1) currently meets Federal vision requirements and (2) only drives 16-18 hours per week.
    Lathrop,Jeffery(1) involved in an accident during the 3-year period where he contributed to accident and (2) involved in CMV accident during 3-year period where he was cited in the accident.
    Start Authority

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322,31315, and 31136; 49 CFR 1.73.

    End Authority Start Signature

    Issued on: January 29, 2002.

    Brian M. McLaughlin,

    Associate Administrator, Policy and Program Development.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 02-4637 Filed 2-26-02; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P

Document Information

Published:
02/27/2002
Department:
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of denials.
Document Number:
02-4637
Pages:
9021-9025 (5 pages)
PDF File:
02-4637.pdf