2012-23346. Irradiation Treatment; Location of Facilities in the Southern United States; Technical Amendment  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

    ACTION:

    Final rule; technical amendment.

    SUMMARY:

    In a final rule that was published in the Federal Register on July 20, 2012, and effective on August 20, 2012, we amended the phytosanitary treatment regulations to, among other things, allow for irradiation treatment of mangoes from India upon arrival in the mainland United States rather than just at the point of origin. In the final rule, we neglected to amend the inspection requirements to address shipments that are treated upon arrival in the United States and not at the point of origin. This document corrects that error.

    DATES:

    Effective Date: September 21, 2012.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Dr. Inder P. S. Gadh, Senior Risk Manager-Treatments, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 851-2018.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    The phytosanitary treatment regulations contained in 7 CFR part 305 (referred to below as the regulations) set out the general requirements for performing treatments and certifying or approving treatment facilities for fruits, vegetables, and other articles to prevent the introduction or dissemination of plant pests or noxious weeds into or through the United States. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture administers these regulations.

    In a final rule [1] published in the Federal Register on July 20, 2012 (77 FR 4261-4265, Docket No. APHIS-2009-0100), with an effective date of August 20, 2012, we amended the regulations in § 319.56-46 to allow for irradiation treatment of mangoes from India upon arrival in the mainland United States rather than just at the point of origin.

    Paragraph (c) of § 319.56-46 indicates that each consignment of mangoes must be inspected jointly by APHIS and the national plant protection organization (NPPO) of India as part of the required preclearance inspection activities. Paragraph (e) of § 319.56-46 also indicates that joint inspection by APHIS and the NPPO of India is required. While joint inspection and preclearance are practical when irradiation treatment is applied in the country of origin, it is more useful and cost effective for the NPPO of India to inspect the fruit in India and for APHIS to inspect the fruit upon arrival in the United States when irradiation treatment is applied in the United States. This also ensures compliance with the standard [2] of the International Plant Protection Convention, of which the United States is a contracting party, of applying the least restrictive measures resulting in the minimal impact to trade while effectively managing plant pest risks. We are therefore removing the words “jointly” and “preclearance” from § 319.56-46(c) and the word “jointly” from § 319.56-46(e) to allow inspections to occur separately in India and the United States when appropriate.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319

    • Coffee
    • Cotton
    • Fruits
    • Imports
    • Logs
    • Nursery stock
    • Plant diseases and pests
    • Quarantine
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Rice
    • Vegetables
    End List of Subjects Start Printed Page 58471

    Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 319 as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.

    End Authority
    [Amended]
    Start Amendment Part

    2. Section § 319.56-46 is amended as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

    a. In paragraph (c), by removing the words “jointly” and “preclearance”.

    End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

    b. In paragraph (e), by removing the word “jointly”.

    End Amendment Part Start Signature

    Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of September 2012.

    Kevin Shea,

    Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    Footnotes

    1.  To view the final rule and related documents, go to http://www.regulations.gov/​#!docketDetail;​D=​APHIS-2009-0100.

    Back to Citation

    2.  International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) Number 1. To view this and other ISPMS on the Internet, go to http://www.ippc.int/​IPP/​En/​default.jsp and click on the “Adopted Standards” link under the “Core Activities” heading.

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2012-23346 Filed 9-20-12; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 3410-34-P

Document Information

Comments Received:
0 Comments
Published:
09/21/2012
Department:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; technical amendment.
Document Number:
2012-23346
Pages:
58470-58471 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. APHIS-2009-0100
RINs:
0579-AD35: Irradiation Treatment; Location of Facilities in the Southern United States
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0579-AD35/irradiation-treatment-location-of-facilities-in-the-southern-united-states
Topics:
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rice, Vegetables
PDF File:
2012-23346.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Irradiation Facilities for Phytosanitary Treatments in the Southern United States; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No significant Impact
» Analysis in Support of Certification that the Rule will not have a Significant Economic Impact on a Substantial Number of Small Entities; Amendment of Irradiation Treatments for Fruit Flies and Other Pests of Concern in Southern United States
» Regulatory Impact Analysis & Analysis in Support of Certification that the Rule will not have a Significant Economic Impact on a Substantial Numberof Small Entities
» Generic Phytosanitary Criteria for Establishing Locations for Irradiation Facilities in the Southern United States: Treatment Evaluation Document
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 319.56-46