2013-07413. Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of March 11, 2013 through March 15, 2013.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:

(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and

(3) one of the following must be satisfied:

(A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased;

(B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased;

(C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased;

(D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and

(4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:

(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) one of the following must be satisfied:

(A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;

(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and

(3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and

(3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) either—

(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.

(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in—

(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);

(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or

(C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));

(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the date on which—

(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or

(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and

(3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers' firm within—

(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or

(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
81,458	Rock Tenn Company, Container Division, Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, Manpower	Shelby, NC	March 29, 2011.
82,213	CompuCom Systems, Inc	Tewksbury, MA	December 4, 2011.
82,246	Itron, Inc	Waseca, MN	December 11, 2011.
82,389	Elster AMCO Water, LLC, Elster—Melrose Industries PLC, Spherion Staffing, Kelly Services, etc	Ocala, FL	January 29, 2012.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
82,266	Dominion Medical Management, Inc., Revenue Cycle Management, LLC, and Barrington Lakes Group, LLC, Integrated Medical Partners, etc	Milwaukee, WI	December 14, 2011.
82,308	TE Connectivity, Tyco Electronics, Relay Products Business Unit, Kelly Services	Winston-Salem, NC	December 21, 2011.
82,315	Lands' End, Inc., Merchandising Inventory Planning Department, Sears Holding Corporation	Dodgeville, WI	June 9, 2012.
82,382	Amdocs, Inc., Amdocs, Ltd, Billing Testing Group, At&T, ACD Division, Wavecreste, etc	New Haven, CT	January 21, 2012.
82,382A	Amdocs, Inc., Amdocs, Ltd, Billing Testing Group, At&T, ACD Division, Wavecreste, etc	New Haven, CT	March 5, 2013.
82,382B	Amdocs, Inc., Amdocs, Ltd, Billing Testing Group, AT&T, ACD Division, Wavecreste, etc	Hoover, AL	January 21, 2012.
82,382C	Amdocs, Inc., Amdocs, Ltd, Billing Testing Group, AT&T, ACD Division, Wavecreste, etc	Indianapolis, IN	January 21, 2012.
82,382D	Amdocs, Inc., Amdocs, Ltd, Billing Testing Group, AT&T, ACD Division, Wavecreste, etc	St. Louis, MO	January 21, 2012.
82,394	L.M. Berry and Company LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, Publishing Operations Group, YP LLC, YP Holdings LLC	Nashville, TN	January 30, 2012.
82,399	Berwick Offray, LLC, CSS Industries, Onesource Staffing Solutions, etc	Berwick, PA	June 26, 2012.
82,414	Sears Holdings Management Corporation, Point-of-Sale Software Division, Teksystems, Paterson, etc	Round Rock, TX	February 4, 2012.
82,422	St. Marys Carbon Company	Brookville, PA	March 9, 2012.
82,426A	Destron Fearing Corporation, Visual & Electronic tags for Livestock and Implants for Companion Pets, etc	St. Paul, MN	February 6, 2012.
82,434	Dell Products LP, Global Products Data Management	Austin, TX	February 7, 2012.
82,434A	Dell Products LP, Global Products Data Management	Round Rock, TX	February 7, 2012.
82,459	Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials, LLC, Dow Chemical, Kelly Services	Marlborough, MA	February 13, 2012.
82,468	LSI Corporation	Milpitas, CA	February 14, 2012.
82,468A	LSI Corporation	San Jose, CA	February 14, 2012.
82,468B	LSI Corporation	Colorado Springs, CO	February 14, 2012.
82,468C	LSI Corporation	Fort Collins, CO	February 14, 2012.
82,468D	LSI Corporation	Longmont, CO	February 14, 2012.
82,468E	LSI Corporation	Norcross, GA	February 14, 2012.
82,468F	LSI Corporation	Wichita, KS	February 14, 2012.
82,468G	LSI Corporation	Waltham, MA	February 14, 2012.
82,468H	LSI Corporation	Mendota Heights, MN	February 14, 2012.
82,468I	LSI Corporation, Pro Unlimited and Prosero, Inc	Allentown, PA	February 14, 2012.
82,468J	LSI Corporation	Austin, TX	February 14, 2012.
82,470	Citigroup, Corporate Finance for Operations & Technology	New York, NY	February 14, 2012.
82,473	Northshore Mining Company, Cliffs Natural Resources, Vanhouse and Express Employment	Silver Bay, MN	February 15, 2012.
82,478	Brayton International, Steelcase, Inc., The Manpower Group/Experis	High Point, NC	February 15, 2012.
82,488	Sierra Video Systems, Kramer Electronics Company, Adecco, Trinet Human Resources Corporation	Nevada City, CA	February 20, 2012.
82,493	Steelcase, Inc., Manpower Group/Tapfin, 6100 East Paris	Caledonia, MI	February 21, 2012.
82,493A	Steelcase Inc., Manpower Group/Tapfin, 4100 68th Street	Caledonia, MI	February 21, 2012.
82,504	Cardinal Health 200, LLC, Cardinal Health, Medical-Presource Mfg, Adecco USA, Countryside, etc	Waukegan, IL	February 25, 2012.
82,527	ArjoHuntleigh, Stout Manufacturing, Express Employment Professional, Aerotek, etc	San Antonio, TX	March 5, 2012.
82,533	Sun Chemical Corporation, Performance Pigments Division, Manpower Staffing	Wurtland, KY	March 5, 2012.
82,534	VF Jeanswear Limited Partnership, VF Corporation	Saltillo, MS	March 6, 2012.
82,538	Zebra Technologies Corporation	Lincoln, RI	March 7, 2012.
82,539	Elster Solutions, Elster, The Greer Group	Raleigh, NC	March 7, 2012.
82,543	Zebra Technologies Corporation, Specialty Printing Group, Spherion Staffing Services	Vernon Hills, IL	March 7, 2012.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified.

The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
82,426	Destron Fearing Corporation, Readers for Livestock, Companion Pet and Fisheries	St. Paul, MN
82,475	Sysco Portland, Inc., Sysco Corporation, IT Department	Wilsonville, OR

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
82,350	Kurz-Kasch, Inc., South Boston Facility	South Boston, VA
82,371	T-Mobile USA, Inc., Code Fault Isolation Team, Engineering Division	Bethlehem, PA
82,388	Aleris Recycling Bens Run, LLC, Winans Extras Support Staffing and CDI Corporation	Friendly, WV
82,429	Colville Indian Precision Pine, Colville Tribal Enterprise Corporation	Omak, WA

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
82,405	Boise Paper Holdings, LLC	Boise, ID
82,465	Kern-Liebers USA, Inc.	Holland, OH

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
82,489	LSI Corporation	Fort Collins, CO

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of March 11, 2013 through March 15, 2013. These determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/taa_search_form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-0365-6822.

Dated: March 19, 2013.

Michael W. Jaffe,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.