2022-20248. Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of San Mateo County, California, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Office of Personnel Management.

    ACTION:

    Proposed rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing a rule to define San Mateo County, California, as an area of application county to the Monterey, CA, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there are three NAF FWS employees working in San Mateo County, and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.

    DATES:

    Send comments on or before October 21, 2022.

    ADDRESSES:

    You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by the following method:

    Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

    All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or RIN for this document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

    Start Further Info Start Printed Page 57652

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202) 606-2858 or by email at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    OPM is proposing a rule to would define San Mateo County, CA, as an area of application to the Monterey, CA, NAF FWS wage area. The Department of Defense, on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs, notified OPM the Veterans Canteen Service now has three NAF FWS employees in San Mateo County.

    Under section 532.219 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, each NAF wage area “shall consist of one or more survey areas, along with nonsurvey areas, if any, having nonappropriated fund employees.” San Mateo County does not meet the regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.219 to be established as a separate NAF wage area; however, nonsurvey counties may be combined with a survey area to form a wage area. Section 532.219 lists the regulatory criteria OPM considers when defining FWS wage area boundaries. This regulation allows consideration of the following criteria: proximity of largest activity in each county, transportation facilities and commuting patterns, and similarities of the counties in overall population, private employment in major industry categories, and kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments.

    San Mateo, CA, would be defined as an area of application to the Monterey, CA, NAF FWS wage area. The proximity criterion favors the Monterey wage area. The transportation facilities and commuting patterns criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. The overall population, employment sizes, and kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. While a standard review of regulatory criteria shows mixed results, the proximity criterion favors the Monterey wage area. Based on this analysis, we propose that San Mateo County be defined to the Monterey NAF wage area.

    With the definition of San Mateo County to the Monterey NAF wage area, the Monterey wage area would consist of one survey county (Monterey County, CA) and two area of application counties (San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties, CA). The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, the national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, recommended this change by consensus. This change would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations.

    Regulatory Impact Analysis

    This action is not a “significant regulatory action” under the terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).

    Regulatory Flexibility Act

    OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

    Federalism

    We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal Governments.

    Civil Justice Reform

    This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in Executive Order 12988.

    Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

    This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

    Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    • Administrative practice and procedure
    • Freedom of information
    • Government employees
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Wages
    End List of Subjects Start Signature

    Office of Personnel Management.

    Stephen Hickman,

    Federal Register Liaison.

    End Signature

    Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.

    End Authority Start Amendment Part

    2. In Appendix D to subpart B, amend the table in paragraph (3) by revising the wage area listing for CALIFORNIA, to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part

    Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—Nonappropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas

    * * * * *

    Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas

    *    *    *    *    *
    CALIFORNIA
    Kern
    Survey Area
    California:
    Kern
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    California:
    Fresno
    Kings
    Los Angeles
    Survey Area
    California:
    Los Angeles
    Area of Application. Survey area.
    Monterey
    Survey Area
    California:
    Monterey
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    California:
    San Mateo
    Santa Clara
    Orange
    Survey Area
    California:
    Orange
    Area of Application. Survey area.
    Riverside
    Survey Area
    California:
    Riverside
    Area of Application. Survey area.
    Sacramento
    Survey Area
    California:
    Sacramento
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    California:
    Yuba
    Oregon:
    Jackson
    Klamath
    San Bernadino
    Survey Area
    California:
    San Bernadino
    Area of Application. Survey area.
    San Diego
    Survey Area
    California:
    San Diego
    Area of Application. Survey area.
    San Joaquin
    Survey Area
    California:
    Start Printed Page 57653
    San Joaquin
    Area of Application. Survey area.
    Santa Barbara
    Survey Area
    California:
    Santa Barbara
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    California:
    San Luis Obispo
    Solano
    Survey Area
    California:
    Solano
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    California:
    Alameda
    Contra Costa
    Marin
    Napa
    San Francisco
    Sonoma
    Ventura
    Survey Area
    California:
    Ventura
    Area of Application. Survey area.
    *    *    *    *    *
    * * * * *
    End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2022-20248 Filed 9-20-22; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6325-39-P

Document Information

Published:
09/21/2022
Department:
Personnel Management Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
2022-20248
Dates:
Send comments on or before October 21, 2022.
Pages:
57651-57653 (3 pages)
RINs:
3206-AO46
Topics:
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages
PDF File:
2022-20248.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Excepted Service
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Federal Employees Health Benefits Open Season Express Interactive Voice Response System and Open Season Website
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: We Need Information About Your Missing Payment-OPM Form RI 38-31, OMB No. 3206-0187
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Representative Payee Survey
» Meetings: Hispanic Council on Federal Employment
» Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program Enrollee Decision Period for Current Enrollees
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Application for Deferred or Postponed Retirement- Federal Employees Retirement System
CFR: (1)
5 CFR 532