98-359. Glutamic Acid; Pesticide Tolerance Exemption  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 679-682]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-359]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [OPP-300598; FRL-5764-4]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Glutamic Acid; Pesticide Tolerance Exemption
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes an exemption from the requirement of a 
    tolerance for residues of the biochemical glutamic acid in or on all 
    food commodities, when applied as a plant growth and crop yield 
    enhancer in accordance with good agricultural practices. This exemption 
    was requested by Auxein Corporation.
    DATES: This regulation becomes effective February 6, 1998. Objections 
    and requests for hearings must be received by EPA on or before March 9, 
    1998.
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    docket control number, [OPP-300598], may be submitted to: Hearing Clerk 
    (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Fees accompanying objections and hearing requests 
    shall be labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA 
    Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. 
    Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. A copy of any objections and hearing 
    requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the 
    document control number and submitted to: Public Information and 
    Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services (7506C), 
    Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 
    St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and 
    hearing requests to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
    Arlington, VA 22202.
        A copy of objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing 
    Clerk may also be submitted electronically by sending electronic mail 
    (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Copies of objections and 
    hearing requests must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of 
    special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of objections and 
    hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1/
    6.1 file format or ASCII file format. All copies of objections and 
    hearing requests in electronic form must be identified by the docket 
    control number [OPP-300598]. No Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
    should be submitted through e-mail. Electronic copies of objections and 
    hearing requests on this rule may be filed online at many Federal 
    Depository Libraries.
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Edward Allen, Regulatory 
    Action Leader, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511W), 
    Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 
    St., SW., Washington, DC 20460, Office location, telephone number, and 
    e-mail: 5th Floor CS #1, 2800 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, 
    Telephone No. (703) 308-8699, e-mail: allen.edward@epamail.epa.gov.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Auxein Corporation, P.O. Box 27519, 3125 
    Sovereign Drive, Suite B, Lansing, MI 48911 had requested in pesticide 
    petition 7F4842, the establishment of an exemption from the requirement 
    of a tolerance for residues of the biochemical glutamic acid. A notice 
    of filing (PF-772) was published in the Federal Register of October 29, 
    1997 (62 FR 56268, FRL-5751-3), and the notice announced that the 
    comment period would end on November 28, 1997; no comments were 
    received. The data submitted in the petition and all other relevant 
    material have been evaluated. Following is a summary of EPA's findings 
    regarding this petition.
    
    I. Summary
    
    A. Proposed Use Practices
    
        Glutamic acid will be incorporated into the end-use product, 
    AuxiGro WP Plant Growth Enhancer as an active ingredient. AuxiGro is 
    proposed for use in a variety of agricultural, horticultural, and 
    floricultural applications to enhance plant growth and crop 
    productivity.
        Depending on the crop, the first application of AuxiGro is made at 
    first bloom, first bud, at the 4-6 leaf stage, or at a prescribed 
    growth stage. A subsequent application, for a maximum of two (2) 
    applications, may be made 1-3 weeks later. The rate range is 0.10 - 
    0.75 pounds of formulated product/acre per treatment, not to exceed a 
    maximum of 1.5 lb/acre per growing season. This equates to 0.4 lb/acre 
    (0.2 kg) of glutamic acid applied at the maximum use rate.
    
    B. Product Identity/Chemistry
    
        Glutamic acid is an amino acid found in microorganisms, tissues of 
    animal, all food, and higher plants as free amino acid or bound in 
    protein. Glutamic acid is a white, practically odorless, free flowing 
    crystalline powder. It is slightly soluble in water, forming acidic 
    solutions. The pH of a saturated solution is about 3.22. The specific 
    gravity for glutamic acid is 1.538 @ 20/4 C and the decomposition point 
    is 175 degrees C @ 10 millimeters (mm) mercury (Hg).
    
    II. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings
    
        New section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
    exemption from the requirement of a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
    pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
    the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(ii) defines ``safe'' to 
    mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
    from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including 
    all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which 
    there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
    drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include 
    occupational exposure. Section 408(c)(2)(B) requires EPA to give 
    special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the 
    pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure 
    that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to 
    infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical 
    residue...'' EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks 
    from aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines 
    the toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the 
    pesticide through food, drinking water, and through other exposures 
    that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings.
    
    [[Page 680]]
    
    III. Toxicological Profile
    
        Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the 
    scientific data and other relevant information in support of this 
    action and considered its validity, completeness, reliability, and 
    relationship to human risk. EPA has also considered available 
    information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major 
    identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children.
        Glutamate has been administered to numerous species in long term 
    dietary studies without adverse effects. The end-use product containing 
    glutamic acid, AuxiGro WP, has been evaluated for acute toxicity. Acute 
    oral toxicity in rats is greater than 5,050 milligrams per kilogram 
    (mg/kg) (Toxicity Category IV). Acute dermal toxicity in rabbits is 
    greater than 5,050 mg/kg (Toxicity Category IV). In an eye irritation 
    study, all signs of irritation cleared within 48 hours following 
    administration of AuxiGro (Toxicity Category III). Irritation cleared 
    within 48 hours in the remaining rabbit. A rabbit dermal irritation 
    study with AuxiGro resulted in limited signs of irritation that cleared 
    within 24 hours (Toxicity Category IV). There was no indication of 
    dermal sensitization in a guinea pig dermal sensitization study.
        Humans have the capacity to rapidly metabolize ingested glutamate 
    (the expected exposure route) to keep plasma glutamate levels constant: 
    no adverse effects on neurological or hepatic function were observed in 
    humans administered levels up to 137 g daily for 14-41 days, which is 
    much higher than the rate applied to plants. The blood brain barrier 
    further protects the brain from large infusions of glutamate. Likewise, 
    the placental barrier protects the developing fetus against up to 
    twentyfold increases in maternal glutamate levels.
        Waivers have been requested for acute toxicity, genotoxicity, 
    reproductive and developmental toxicity, subchronic toxicity, chronic 
    toxicity, and acute toxicity to nontarget species based on glutamic 
    acid's ubiquity in nature, long history of food uses, favorable 
    toxicological profile in chronic toxicology studies, and 
    inconsequential exposure resulting from label-directed use rates.
        Waivers were also requested for acute avian oral toxicity, 
    nontarget plants, avian dietary, and nontarget insects. They were 
    accepted based on the following rationale: (a) low acute toxicity in 
    mammalian species, (b) natural occurrence and lack of persistence in 
    the environment, and (c) natural occurrence in plants and ability to 
    promote growth of numerous plant species.
    
    IV. Aggregate Exposure
    
        In examining aggregate exposure, FQPA directs EPA to consider 
    available information concerning exposures from the pesticide residue 
    in food and all other non-occupational exposures. The primary non-food 
    sources of exposure the Agency considers include drinking water or 
    groundwater, and exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or 
    buildings (residential and other indoor uses).
        1. Dietary exposure. Glutamic acid is ubiquitous in nature and is 
    found in microorganisms, lower and higher plant species, fish, birds, 
    insects, mammals, and natural and processed foods. It is the most 
    prevalent amino acid in plant and animal proteins. Worldwide production 
    of glutamic acid is over 340,000 tons/yr. Many items in the human daily 
    diet contain appreciable quantities of free glutamic acid. For example, 
    ripe tomatoes, mushrooms, peas, corn, potatoes, squash, cheese, eggs, 
    poultry and meat provide from 20 to 150 mg of glutamic acid per 100 
    gram serving. Daily consumption for a 70-kg individual of glutamate has 
    been previously reported to be 10.4 g per day, based on an intake of 
    100 grams of protein/day. Regarding the sodium salt of glutamic acid, 
    monosodium glutamate (MSG), The Joint Expert Committee on Food 
    Additives of the United Nations (JEFCA) has assigned an Acceptable 
    Daily Intake of ``not specified'' (no numerical limitation), meaning 
    that MSG can be used safely according to food manufacturing practices 
    in food by people of all ages.
        Dietary exposure due to topical applications of glutamic acid is 
    difficult to estimate because of the amino acid's prevalence in nature. 
    However, a comparison of naturally-occurring levels of glutamic acid to 
    topically applied levels shows that the applied level is a small 
    fraction of that found naturally. Naturally-occurring levels of 
    glutamic acid in corn and tomatoes are estimated to be 143 lb/acre and 
    195 lb/acre, respectively. Applied levels of glutamic acid resulting 
    from the application of AuxiGro at maximum use levels (1.5 lb/acre) is 
    0.4 lb/acre, several orders of magnitude lower than naturally-occurring 
    levels.
        Considering the low dose of AuxiGro required to achieve the desired 
    effect, the levels of glutamic acid found naturally in the diet from 
    animal and vegetable proteins and the quantity consumed from processed 
    foods, it can be concluded that incremental dietary exposure to 
    glutamic acid resulting from AuxiGro applications is negligible.
        2.  Non-dietary, non-occupational exposure. AuxiGro is proposed for 
    professional use on turf and ornamentals. Exposure from turfgrass 
    applications is expected to be minimal because golfers will be 
    protected by shoes and socks. Further, based on the limited frequency 
    of use on turfgrass, this non-food use is not likely to result in 
    potential chronic exposure and thus should not be factored into a 
    chronic exposure assessment. Exposures resulting from application to 
    ornamentals is also anticipated to be negligible because consumers will 
    not be in contact with treated plants until after the foliage is dry.
    
    V. Cumulative Effects
    
        Glutamic acid has a very low toxicity to humans. Because of its low 
    toxicity, low rate of application, and use patterns, the Agency 
    believes that there is no reason to expect any cumulative effects from 
    glutamic acid and other substances.
    
    VI. Endocrine Disruptors
    
        The Agency has no information to suggest that glutamic acid will 
    adversely affect the immune or endocrine systems. The Agency is not 
    requiring information on the endocrine effects of this biochemical 
    pesticide at this time; Congress has allowed 3 years after August 3, 
    1996, for the Agency to implement a screening program with respect to 
    endocrine effects.
    
    VII. Safety Determination for U.S. Population, Infants and Children
    
        Based on the information discussed above, EPA concludes that there 
    is reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate 
    exposure to the U.S. population, including infants and children, to 
    residues of glutamic acid. This includes all anticipated dietary 
    exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable 
    information. The Agency has arrived at this conclusion because, as 
    discussed above, the toxicity of glutamic acid to mammals is very low 
    and under reasonably foreseeable circumstances it does not pose a risk.
        FFDCA section 408 provides that EPA shall apply an additional 
    tenfold margin of exposure (safety) for infants and children in the 
    case of threshold effects to account for pre- and post-natal toxicity 
    and the completeness of the database, unless EPA determines that a 
    different margin of exposure (safety) will be safe for infants and 
    children. Margins of exposure (safety) are often referred to as 
    uncertainty (safety)
    
    [[Page 681]]
    
    factors. In this instance, the Agency believes there is reliable data 
    to support the conclusion that glutamic acid is practically non-toxic 
    to mammals, including infants and children, and, thus, a margin of 
    exposure (safety) approach is not needed to protect adults or infants 
    and children.
        Glutamic acid is classified as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) 
    for use as a direct food additive by the Food and Drug Administration 
    (FDA) and is cleared by the EPA for use as an inert ingredient in 
    certain pesticide products. Condensed, extracted fermentation glutamic 
    acid is approved by the FDA for use in animal feed.
    
    VIII. Analytical Method
    
        The Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
    tolerance without any numerical limitation; therefore, the Agency has 
    concluded that an analytical method is not required for enforcement 
    purposes for glutamic acid.
    
    IX. Codex Maximum Residue Level
    
        There are no CODEX tolerances or international tolerance exemptions 
    for glutamic acid at this time.
    
    X. Conclusion
    
        Based on its abundance in nature and long history of use by humans 
    without deleterious effects, there is reasonable certainty that no harm 
    will result from aggregate exposure to the U.S. population, including 
    infants and children, to residues of glutamic acid. This includes all 
    anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there 
    is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this conclusion 
    because of the preponderance of data from the open literature 
    supporting the safe use of glutamate in foods, the supporting acute 
    toxicity data on AuxiGro, and inconsequential resulting from its 
    application to crops. As a result, EPA establishes an exemption from 
    the requirement of a tolerance pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c) for 
    glutamic acid.
    
    XI. Objections and Hearing Requests
    
        The new FFDCA section 408(g) provides essentially the same process 
    for persons to ``object'' to a tolerance exemption regulation issued by 
    EPA under new section 408(e) as was provided in the old section 408. 
    However, the period for filing objections is 60 days, rather than 30 
    days. EPA currently has procedural regulations which govern the 
    submission of objections and hearing requests. These regulations will 
    require some modification to reflect the new law. However, until those 
    modifications can be made, EPA will continue to use those procedural 
    regulations with appropriate adjustments to reflect the new law.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may within 60 days 
    after publication of this document in the Federal Register file written 
    objections to the regulation and may also request a hearing on those 
    objections. Objections and hearing requests must be filed with the 
    Hearing Clerk, at the address given under ADDRESSES at the beginning of 
    this rule (40 CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/or hearing 
    requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be submitted to the OPP 
    Docket for this rulemaking. The objections submitted must specify the 
    provisions of the regulation deemed objectionable and the grounds for 
    the objections (40 CFR 178.25). Each objection must be accompanied by 
    the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the 
    objections must include a statement of the factual issue(s) on which a 
    hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a 
    summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A 
    request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator determines 
    that the material submitted shows the following: There is genuine and 
    substantial issue of fact; there is reasonable possibility that 
    available evidence identified by the requestor would, if established, 
    resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking 
    into account uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and 
    resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner sought by the 
    requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 
    178.32). Information submitted in connection with an objection or 
    hearing request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all 
    of that information as ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). 
    Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
    procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the information that 
    does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public 
    record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed publicly 
    by EPA without prior notice.
    
    XII. Public Record and Electronic Submissions
    
        EPA has established a record for this rulemaking under docket 
    control number [OPP-300598] (including any comments and data submitted 
    electronically). A public version of this record, including printed, 
    paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include any 
    information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8:30 a.m. 
    to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The public 
    record is located in Room 1132 of the Public Information and Records 
    Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), 
    Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal 
    Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Electronic comments may be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov.
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer any copies of objections and hearing requests 
    received electronically into printed, paper form as they are received 
    and will place the paper copies in the official rulemaking record which 
    will also include all comments submitted directly in writing. The 
    official rulemaking record is the paper record maintained at the 
    address in ADDRESSES at the beginning of this document.
    
    XIII. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
        This final rule establishes an exemption from the tolerance 
    requirement under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition 
    submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 
    12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 
    1993). This final rule does not contain any information collections 
    subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 
    U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any 
    unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 
    Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Nor does it require any 
    prior consultation as specified by Executive Order 12875, entitled 
    Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, October 28, 
    1993), or special considerations as required by Executive Order 12898, 
    entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority 
    Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994), 
    or require OMB review in accordance with Executive Order 13045, 
    entitled Protection of Children from
    
    [[Page 682]]
    
    Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 
    1997).
        In addition, since tolerances and exemptions that are established 
    on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the 
    exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed 
    rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 
    U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. Nevertheless, the Agency previously 
    assessed whether establishing tolerances, exemptions from tolerances, 
    raising tolerance levels or expanding exemptions might adversely impact 
    small entities and concluded, as a generic matter, that there is no 
    adverse economic impact. The factual basis for the Agency's generic 
    certification for tolerance actions published on May 4, 1981 (46 FR 
    24950), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small 
    Business Administration.
    
    XIV. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
    
        Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), EPA submitted a report containing this 
    rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House 
    of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the General 
    Accounting Office prior to publication in today's Federal Register. 
    This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(a).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: December 30, 1997.
    
    Janet L. Andersen,
    
    Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
        2. Section 180.1187 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.1187   Glutamic acid; exemption from the requirement of a 
    tolerance.
    
        Glutamic acid is exempt from the requirement of a tolerance on all 
    raw agricultural commodities when used as a plant growth enhancer in 
    accordance with good agricultural practices.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-359 Filed 1-6-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/6/1998
Published:
01/07/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-359
Dates:
This regulation becomes effective February 6, 1998. Objections and requests for hearings must be received by EPA on or before March 9, 1998.
Pages:
679-682 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OPP-300598, FRL-5764-4
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
98-359.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.1187