[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1780-1787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-646]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 611
RIN 1840-AC65
Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education issues
regulations to implement a requirement of section 204(e) of the Higher
Education Act (HEA), as amended by the Higher Education Amendments of
1998. Section 204(e) requires that students in teacher preparation
programs funded under the Teacher Recruitment Program must repay
scholarships provided with program funds if they do not teach in high-
need local educational agencies for the period of time for which they
receive scholarship assistance. These regulations also would apply to
any scholarships awarded to students in teacher preparation programs
funded under the State and Partnership Programs authorized in sections
202 and 203 of the HEA.
DATES: These regulations are effective January 12, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Louis Venuto, Higher Education
Programs, Office of Postsecondary Education, Office of Policy,
Planning, and Innovation, 1990 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006-
8525: Telephone: (202) 502-7763. Inquiries also may be sent by e-mail
to: Louis__Venuto@ed.gov or by FAX to: (202) 502-7699. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding
paragraph.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 8, 1998, the President signed into law the Higher
Education Amendments of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-244). Title II of this law
addresses the Nation's need to ensure that new teachers enter the
classroom prepared to teach all students to high standards by
authorizing, as Title II of the Higher Education Act (HEA), Teacher
Quality Enhancement Grants for States and Partnerships.
The new Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program consists of
three different competitive grant programs. Together, the State Grants
Program, the Partnership Grants for Improving Teacher Preparation
Program, and the Teacher Recruitment Program, these programs are
designed to increase student achievement by supporting comprehensive
approaches to improving teacher quality.
One key aspect of the Teacher Recruitment Grants Program is the
availability of scholarships to students who are enrolled in teacher
preparation programs at the grantee institutions of higher education
(IHEs) (or at IHEs working with State Teacher Recruitment Program
grantees), and who agree to teach in high-need school districts. As
provided in section 204(e) of the HEA, in exchange for scholarship
support recipients must agree to incur a contractual obligation, under
terms the Department establishes, to teach in high-need LEAs for a
period equivalent to the period for which they receive the scholarship.
On November 5, 1999, the Secretary published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for this part in the Federal Register (64 FR 60632).
In the preamble to the NPRM, the Secretary discussed on pages 60632
through 60638 the proposed terms and conditions of this contractual
agreement. The major issues addressed by the NPRM included--
Whether all with Teacher Recruitment Program scholarship
recipients should have to meet their service obligations by teaching in
high-need schools of high-need LEAs;
The definition of a ``high-need LEA'' and a ``high-need
school'' in which scholarship recipients would need to teach in order
to avoid responsibility for repaying their scholarships;
How, in order to retain the financial assistance as a
scholarship, the Department will calculate the period of time in which
the scholarship recipient must teach in a high-need school of a high-
need LEA;
Conditions under which the Department may defer a
scholarship recipient's service obligation;
The amount of the scholarship recipient's indebtedness to
the Federal government for failure to meet the service obligation,
terms of repayment, and any limited circumstances under which the
Department would discharge this indebtedness;
The content of the scholarship agreement that the
scholarship recipient would execute;
[[Page 1781]]
The respective responsibilities of the scholarship
recipient, teacher preparation program in which the recipient is
enrolled, and the LEA in which he or she is later employed, to provide
periodically to the Department basic employment and other information
on the recipient until the Department has determined that the recipient
has fulfilled the service obligation or has repaid the scholarship,
interest, and any costs of collection; and
Whether the rules governing the receipt of scholarships
provided under the Teacher Recruitment Program should also apply to the
receipt of scholarships that grantees provide under the State and
Partnership Programs.
In response to public comment received on the NPRM, these final
regulations have been renumbered to enhance clarity. They also contain
three changes to the proposed regulations announced in the NPRM. These
regulations now--
(1) Clarify that a middle or secondary school may be considered
``high need'' if it either has at least 50 percent of its enrolled
students eligible for free and reduced lunch subsidies, or is otherwise
eligible to operate as a schoolwide program under Title I of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (Sec. 611.1);
(2) Require program grantees offering teacher recruitment
scholarships, in collaboration with the high-need LEA(s) participating
in their projects, to ensure that scholarship recipients are placed, to
the extent possible, in the highest-need schools of those LEAs
(Sec. 611.52(c)); and
(3) Provide two ways in which a scholarship recipient may meet his
or her responsibility to ensure that the Department has timely
information confirming that the recipient is meeting the service
obligation. The first, as proposed in the NPRM, is by having the LEA in
which he or she teaches submit the needed employment information to the
Department in the time periods the regulation specifies. The second is
by submitting to the Department, within the required time periods, a
notarized statement that the recipient has asked the LEA to provide
this information to the Department along with a copy of the information
the LEA has been asked to provide. Where a scholarship recipient
chooses the second option, the Department's determination that he or
she is meeting the service obligation is only provisional; the
recipient maintains a responsibility to work to have the LEA submit the
needed information as soon as possible (Secs. 611.46(a) and 611.47(a)).
Corresponding changes also have been made to the proposed terms and
conditions of the scholarship agreement and LEA reporting form, which
were included in the November 5, 1999 notice as Appendices A and B to
the NPRM, respectively. In all other respects, these regulations are
the same as those published in the NPRM.
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to the Assistant Secretary's invitation in the NPRM, we
received eight comments. An analysis of these comments and of the
changes in the regulations since publication of the NPRM is published
in an appendix at the end of these final regulations. Generally, we do
not address technical and other minor changes--and suggested changes
the law does not authorize the Secretary to make.
Goals 2000: Educate America Act
The Goals 2000: Educate America Act (Goals 2000) focuses the
Nation's education reform efforts on the eight National Education Goals
and provides a framework for meeting them. Goals 2000 promotes new
partnerships to strengthen schools and expands the Department's
capacities for helping communities to exchange ideas and obtain
information needed to achieve the goals.
These proposed regulations would address the National Education
Goal that the Nation's teaching force will have the content knowledge
and teaching skills needed to instruct all American students for the
next century.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 does not require you to respond
to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. We display the valid OMB control numbers assigned to the
collections of information in these final regulations at the end of the
affected sections of the regulations.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to the requirements of Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR Part 79. The objective of the
Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism by relying on processes developed by State and
local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
In accordance with the order, we intend this document to provide
early notification of specific plans and actions for this program.
Assessment of Educational Impact
In the NPRM we requested comments on whether the proposed
regulations would require transmission of information that any other
agency or authority of the United States gathers or makes available.
Based on the response to the NPRM and on our review, we have
determined that these final regulations do not require transmission of
information that any other agency or authority of the United States
gathers or makes available.
Waiver of Delayed Effective Date
5 U.S.C. 553(d) provides that the effective date of regulations
generally must be at least 30 days after their publication in the
Federal Register, but permits the Secretary to establish an earlier
effective date for good cause found and published with the regulations.
The Secretary makes thee regulations effective as of the date of
publication because program grantees need them immediately in order to
award scholarships with grant funds for the academic term beginning
January 2000.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may review this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or
portable document format (PDF) on the World Wide Web at either of the
following sites: http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm, http://www.ed.gov/
news.html. To use the PDF you must have the Adobe Acrobat Reader
Program with Search, which is available free at either of these sites.
If you have questions about using the PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office at (202) 512-1530 or, toll free, at 1-888-293-6498.
Note: The official version of the document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.336: Teacher
Quality Enhancement Grants Program)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR part 611
Colleges and universities, Elementary and secondary education,
Grant programs--education.
[[Page 1782]]
Dated: January 6, 2000.
A. Lee Fritschler,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Secretary amends
Chapter VI of title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations by revising
part 611 to read as follows:
PART 611--TEACHER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT GRANTS PROGRAM
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
611.1 What definitions apply to the Teacher Quality Enhancement
Grants Program?
Subpart B [Reserved]
Subpart C [Reserved]
Subpart D [Reserved]
Subpart E--Scholarships
611.41 Under what circumstances may an individual receive a
scholarship of program funds to attend a teacher training program?
611.42 How does the Secretary calculate the period of the
scholarship recipient's service obligation?
611.43 What are the consequences of a scholarship recipient's
failure to meet the service obligation?
611.44 Under what circumstances may the Secretary defer a
scholarship recipient's service obligation?
611.45 Under what circumstances does the Secretary discharge a
scholarship recipient's obligation to repay for failure to meet the
service obligation?
611.46 What are a scholarship recipient's reporting
responsibilities upon graduation from the teacher preparation
program?
611.47 What are a scholarship recipient's reporting
responsibilities upon the close of the LEA's academic year?
611.48 What are a scholarship recipient's reporting
responsibilities upon failure to graduate or withdrawal of
scholarship support?
611.49 What are a grantee's responsibilities for implementing the
scholarship requirements before awarding a scholarship?
611.50 What are a grantee's reporting responsibilities?
611.51 How does a grantee ensure that a scholarship recipient
understands the terms and conditions of the scholarship before the
recipient leaves the teacher preparation program?
611.52 What are a grantee's programmatic responsibilities for
ensuring that scholarship recipients become successful teachers in
high-need schools?
Subpart F--Other Grant Conditions
611.61 What is the maximum indirect cost rate for States and local
educational agencies?
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq. and 1024(e), unless otherwise
noted.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 611.1 What definitions apply to the Teacher Quality Enhancement
Grants Program?
The following definitions apply to this part:
High-need local educational agency (LEA) means an LEA that meets
one of the following definitions:
(1) An LEA with at least one school--
(i) In which 50 percent or more of the enrolled students are
eligible for free and reduced lunch subsidies; or
(ii) That otherwise is eligible, without receipt of a waiver, to
operate as a schoolwide program under Title I of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act.
(2) An LEA that has one school where--
(i) More than 34 percent of academic classroom teachers overall
(across all academic subjects) do not have a major, minor, or
significant course work in their main assignment field; or
(ii) More than 34 percent of the main assignment faculty in two of
the core-subject departments do not have a major, minor, or significant
work in their main assigned field.
(3) An LEA that serves a school whose attrition rate among
classroom teachers was 15 percent or more over the last three school
years.
High-need school means an elementary, middle, or secondary school
operated by a high-need LEA in which the school's students or teaching
staff meet the elements in paragraphs (1), (2), or (3) of the
definition of a high-need LEA.
Main assignment field means the academic field in which teachers
have the largest percentage of their classes.
Significant course work means four or more college-or graduate-
level courses in the content area.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Subparts B-D [Reserved]
Subpart E--Scholarships
Sec. 611.41 Under what circumstances may an individual receive a
scholarship of program funds to attend a teacher training program?
(a) General: The service obligation. An individual, whom a grantee
finds eligible to receive a scholarship funded under this part to
attend a teacher preparation program, may receive the scholarship only
after executing a binding agreement with the institution of higher
education (IHE) offering the scholarship that, after completing the
program, the individual will either--
(1) Teach in a high-need school of a high-need LEA for a period of
time equivalent to the period for which the individual receives the
scholarship; or
(2) Repay, as set forth in Sec. 611.43, the Teacher Quality
Enhancement Grant Program funds provided as a scholarship.
(b) Content of the scholarship agreement. To implement the service-
obligation requirement, the scholarship agreement must include terms,
conditions, and other information consistent with Secs. 611.42-611.49
that the Secretary determines to be necessary.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.42 How does the Secretary calculate the period of the
scholarship recipient's service obligation?
(a) Calculation of period of scholarship assistance.
(1) The Secretary calculates the period of time for which a student
received scholarship assistance on the basis of information provided by
the grantee under Sec. 611.50.
(2) The period for which the recipient received scholarship
assistance is the period during which an individual enrolled in the
teacher preparation program on a full-time basis, excluding the summer
period, would have completed the same course of study.
(b) Calculation of period needed to teach to meet the service
obligation. (1) The period of the scholarship recipient's service
obligation is the period of the individual's receipt of scholarship
assistance as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) The Secretary calculates the period that a scholarship
recipient must teach in a high-need school of a high-need LEA in order
to fulfill his or her service obligation by--
(i) Comparing the period in which the recipient received a
scholarship as provided in paragraph (a) of this section with the
information provided by the high-need LEA under Secs. 611.46 and 611.47
on the period the recipient has taught in one of its high-need schools;
and
(ii) Adjusting the period in which the recipient has taught in a
high-need school to reflect the individual's employment, if any, as a
teacher on a part-time basis relative to classroom teachers the LEA
employs on a full-time basis under the LEA's standard yearly contract
(excluding any summer or intersession period).
(c) The Secretary adjusts the period of a scholarship recipient's
service obligation as provided in paragraph (b) of this section to
reflect information the
[[Page 1783]]
high-need LEA provides under Secs. 611.46 and 611.47 that the
scholarship recipient also has taught in a high-need school in a summer
or intersession period.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.43 What are the consequences of a scholarship recipient's
failure to meet the service obligation?
(a) Obligation to repay: General. (1) A scholarship recipient who
does not fulfill his or her service obligation must--
(i) Repay the Department the full amount of the scholarship,
including the principal balance, accrued interest, and any collection
costs charged under paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section; or
(ii) Be discharged of any repayment obligation as provided in
Sec. 611.45.
(2) Unless the service obligation is deferred as provided in
Sec. 611.44 or the repayment requirement is discharged, the obligation
to repay the amount provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section begins
six months after the date the recipient--
(i) Completes the teacher training program without beginning to
teach in a high-need school of a high-need LEA; or
(ii) Is no longer enrolled in the teacher training program.
(3) The Secretary determines whether a scholarship recipient has
fulfilled the service obligation on the basis of information that the
Department receives as provided in Secs. 611.46 and 611.47.
(b) Obligation to Repay: Partial performance of the service
obligation. (1) A scholarship recipient who teaches in a high-need
school of a high-need school district for less than the period of his
or her service obligation must repay--
(i) The amount of the scholarship that is proportional to the unmet
portion of the service obligation;
(ii) Interest that accrues on this portion of the scholarship
beginning six months after the recipient's graduation from the teacher
preparation program; and
(iii) Costs of collection, if any.
(2) Unless the service obligation is deferred or the repayment
requirement is discharged, the obligation to repay the amount provided
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section begins six months after the date
the recipient is no longer employed as a teacher in a high-need school
of a high-need LEA.
(c) Availability of payment schedule. (1) Upon request to the
Secretary, the scholarship recipient may repay the scholarship and
accrued interest according to a payment schedule that the Secretary
establishes.
(2) A payment schedule must permit the full amount of the
scholarship and accrued interest to be repaid within ten years. The
minimum monthly payment is $50 unless a larger monthly payment is
needed to enable the full amount that is due to be paid within this
timeframe.
(d) Interest. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 34 CFR part 30,
the Secretary charges interest on the unpaid balance that the
scholarship recipient owes. (The grantee offering the scholarship must
ensure that scholarship agreement the recipient executes includes the
current rate of interest, as provided by the Department.) However,
except as provided in Sec. 611.44(d), the Secretary does not charge
interest for the period of time that precedes the date on which the
scholarship recipient is required to begin repayment.
(e) Failure to meet requirements. A scholarship recipient's failure
to satisfy the requirements of Secs. 611.42-611.48 in a timely manner
results in the recipient being--
(1) In non-compliance with the terms of the scholarship;
(2) Liable for repayment of the scholarship and accrued interest;
and
(3) Subject to collection action.
(f) Action by reason of default. The Secretary may take any action
authorized by law to collect the amount of scholarship, accrued
interest and collection costs, if any, on which a scholarship recipient
obligated to repay under this section has defaulted. This action
includes, but is not limited to, filing a lawsuit against the
recipient, reporting the default to national credit bureaus, and
requesting the Internal Revenue Service to offset the recipient's
Federal income tax refund.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.44 Under what circumstances may the Secretary defer a
scholarship recipient's service obligation?
(a) Upon written request, the Secretary may defer a service
obligation for a scholarship recipient who--
(1) Has not begun teaching in a high-need school of a high-need LEA
as required by Sec. 611.41(a); or
(2) Has begun teaching in a high-need school of a high-need LEA,
and who requests the deferment within six months of the date he or she
no longer teaches in this school.
(b) To obtain a deferment of the service obligation, the recipient
must provide the Secretary satisfactory information of one or more of
the following circumstances:
(1) Serious physical or mental disability that prevents or
substantially impairs the scholarship recipient's employability as a
teacher.
(2) The scholarship recipient's inability, despite due diligence
(for reasons that may include the failure to pass a required teacher
certification or licensure examination), to secure employment as a
teacher in a high-need school of a high-need school LEA.
(3) Membership in the armed forces of the United States on active
duty for a period not to exceed three years.
(4) Other extraordinary circumstances that the Secretary accepts.
(c) Unless the Secretary determines otherwise--
(1) A scholarship recipient must apply to renew a deferment of the
service obligation on a yearly basis; and
(2) The recipient has 60 days from the end of the deferment period
to begin teaching in a high-need school of a high-need LEA or become
liable for repayment of the scholarship, any accrued interest, and any
costs of collection.
(d)(1) As provided in Sec. 611.43(a)(2), during periods for which
the Secretary defers a scholarship recipient's service obligation, the
scholarship recipient does not have an obligation to repay the
scholarship. However, interest continues to accrue on the amount of the
scholarship.
(2) If the scholarship recipient fulfills his or her service
obligation after the end of the deferment, the Secretary waives the
obligation to repay accrued interest.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.45 Under what circumstances does the Secretary discharge a
scholarship recipient's obligation to repay for failure to meet the
service obligation?
(a) The Secretary discharges the obligation of a scholarship
recipient to repay the scholarship, interest, and any costs for failure
to meet the service obligation based on information acceptable to the
Secretary of--
(1) The recipient's death; or
(2) The total and permanent physical or mental disability of the
recipient that prevents the individual from being employable as a
classroom teacher.
(b) Upon receipt of acceptable documentation and approval of the
discharge request, the Secretary returns
[[Page 1784]]
to the scholarship recipient, or for a discharge based on death to the
recipient's estate, those payments received after the date the
eligibility requirements for discharge were met. The Secretary returns
these payments whether they are received before or after the date the
discharge was approved.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.46 What are a scholarship recipient's reporting
responsibilities upon graduation from the teacher preparation program?
(a) Within six months of graduating from a teacher preparation
program, a scholarship recipient must either--
(1) Have the LEA in which the recipient is employed as a teacher
provide the Department information, which the Secretary may require, to
confirm--
(i) The home address, phone number, social security number, and
other identifying information about the recipient;
(ii) That he or she is teaching in a high-need school of a high-
need LEA; and
(iii) Whether the individual is teaching full- or part-time and, if
part-time, the full-time equivalency of this teaching compared to the
LEA's full-time teachers;
(2) Provide the Department--
(i) A notarized statement that the scholarship recipient has asked
the LEA to provide the Department the information identified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, including the name and telephone
number of the LEA official to whom the request was made; and
(ii) A copy of the information identified in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section that the recipient has asked the LEA to provide to the
Department; or
(3) Provide the Department a current home address and telephone
number, a work address and telephone number, the recipient's social
security number, and one of the following:
(i) The required repayment of the scholarship.
(ii) A request that the Secretary permit the recipient to repay the
scholarship and accrued interest in installments as permitted by
Sec. 611.43(c).
(iii) A request that the Secretary defer the service obligation as
permitted by Sec. 611.44.
(b) If the recipient provides the Department the information
identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Department accepts
the information provisionally, but the recipient retains responsibility
for working to have the LEA submit the information.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.47 What are a scholarship recipient's reporting
responsibilities upon the close of the LEA's academic year?
(a) At the close of the LEA's academic year, a scholarship
recipient whose LEA reports under Sec. 611.46(a) that he or she is
teaching in a high-need school of a high-need LEA must--
(1) Have the LEA provide information to the Department, as the
Secretary may require, that confirms the recipient's actual employment
status for the preceding period; or
(2) Provide the Department--
(i) A notarized statement that the scholarship recipient has asked
the LEA to provide the Department the information identified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, including the name and telephone
number of the LEA official to whom the request was made; and
(ii) A copy of the information identified in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section that the recipient has asked the LEA to provide to the
Department.
(b) If the recipient provides the Department the notarized
statement and accompanying information identified in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section, the Department accepts the information provisionally,
but the recipient retains an ongoing responsibility for working to have
the LEA submit the information directly to the Department.
(c) In subsequent school years, the recipient must have the LEA
continue to provide information to the Department on the recipient's
employment as the Secretary may require, until the Department notifies
the recipient that the service obligation has been fulfilled. The
alternative procedures in paragraph (a)(2) of this section also apply
in subsequent years.
(d)(1) The Secretary provides a scholarship recipient with credit
toward the service obligation for teaching in a high-need school of a
high-need LEA during a summer or intersession period (for LEAs that
operate year-round programs).
(2) To receive this credit, the recipient must have the LEA at the
end of the summer or intersession period provide information to the
Department, as the Secretary may require, that confirms that the
recipient has taught during this period in a high-need school.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.48 What are a scholarship recipient's reporting
responsibilities upon failure to graduate or withdrawal of scholarship
support?
(a)(1) Within six months of the date the scholarship recipient is
no longer enrolled in the teacher training program, or within six
months of the IHE's withdrawal of scholarship support for failure to
maintain good academic standing, the recipient must submit to the
Department--
(i) The required repayment of the scholarship;
(ii) A request that the Secretary establish a binding schedule
under which the recipient is obligated to repay the scholarship,
accrued interest, and any costs of collection; or
(iii) A request that the Secretary defer the service obligation as
permitted by Sec. 611.44.
(2) Upon review of the repayment or information provided under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Department notifies the recipient
of the status of the recipient's obligations and of any schedule under
which the recipient must repay the scholarship.
(b) Until the Secretary determines that the individual either has
satisfied his or her service obligation or has repaid the full amount
of the scholarship, accrued interest, and any costs, the recipient also
remains responsible for providing the Department--
(1) The information identified in this part; and
(2) A current home address and telephone number, and a current work
address and work telephone number.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.49 What are a grantee's responsibilities for implementing the
scholarship requirements before awarding a scholarship?
Before awarding scholarship assistance with funds provided under
this part to any student attending a teacher preparation program, a
grantee must--
(a) Ensure that the student understands the terms and conditions
that the Secretary has determined must be included in the scholarship
agreement;
(b) Have the student and the institution awarding the scholarship
execute a scholarship agreement that contains these terms and
conditions; and
(c) Establish policies for--
(1) The withdrawal of scholarship support for any student who does
not remain in good academic standing; and
[[Page 1785]]
(2) Determining when and if re-negotiation of a student's
scholarship package over an extended period of time is appropriate.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.50 What are a grantee's reporting responsibilities?
(a) Within 30 days of the beginning of the teacher preparation
program's academic term or within 30 days of the execution of any
scholarship agreement, whichever is later, the grantee must provide to
the Department the following information:
(1) The identity of each scholarship recipient.
(2) The amount of the scholarship provided with program funds to
each recipient.
(3) The full-time equivalency, over each academic year, of each
recipient's enrollment in the teacher training program for which he or
she receives scholarship assistance.
(4) Other information as the Secretary may require.
(b) Within 30 days of a scholarship recipient's graduation or
withdrawal from the teacher preparation program, the grantee must
provide to the Department the following information:
(1) The date of the recipient's graduation or withdrawal.
(2) The total amount of program funds the grantee awarded as a
scholarship to the recipient.
(3) The original of any scholarship agreement executed by the
scholarship recipient and the grantee (or its partnering IHE if the
grantee is not an IHE) before the recipient was awarded a scholarship
with program funds.
(4) A statement of whether the institution has withdrawn
scholarship support because of the recipient's failure to maintain good
academic standing.
(5) Other information as the Secretary may require.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0753)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.51 How does a grantee ensure that a scholarship recipient
understands the terms and conditions of the scholarship before the
recipient leaves the teacher preparation program?
(a) An institution that provides a scholarship with funds provided
under this part must conduct an exit conference with each scholarship
recipient before that individual leaves the institution. During the
exit conference the institution must give the recipient a copy of any
scholarship agreement the recipient has executed.
(b) The institution also must review with the recipient the terms
and conditions of the scholarship, including--
(1) The recipient's service obligation;
(2) How the recipient can confirm whether a school and LEA in which
he or she would teach will satisfy the service obligation;
(3) Information that the recipient will need to have the LEA
provide to the Department to enable the Secretary to confirm that the
recipient is meeting the service obligation;
(4) How the recipient may request a deferment of the service
obligation, and information that the recipient should provide the
Department in any deferment request;
(5) The consequences of failing to meet the service obligation
including, at a minimum, the amount of the recipient's potential
indebtedness; the possible referral of the indebtedness to a collection
firm, reporting it to a credit bureau, and litigation; and the
availability of a monthly payment schedule;
(6) The amount of scholarship assistance and interest charges that
the recipient must repay for failing to meet the service obligation;
and
(7) The recipient's responsibility to ensure that the Department
has a home address and telephone number, and a work address and
telephone number until the Secretary has determined that the recipient
has fulfilled the service obligation or the recipient's debt has been
paid or discharged; and
(8) The follow-up services that the institution will provide the
student during his or her first three years of teaching in a high-need
school of a high-need LEA.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Sec. 611.52 What are a grantee's programmatic responsibilities for
ensuring that scholarship recipients become successful teachers in
high-need schools?
In implementing its approved project, the grantee must--
(a) Provide scholarship recipients both before and after graduation
with appropriate support services, including academic assistance, job
counseling, placement assistance, and teaching support that will help
to ensure that--
(1) Upon graduation, scholarship recipients are able to secure
teaching positions in high-need schools of high-need LEAs; and
(2) After beginning to teach in a high-need school of a high-need
LEA, former scholarship recipients have appropriate follow-up services
and assistance during their first three years of teaching;
(b) Provide LEAs with which the grantees collaborate in teacher
recruitment activities with information and other assistance they need
to recruit highly-qualified teachers effectively; and
(c) Work with the high-need LEAs participating in its project to
ensure that scholarship recipients are placed, to the extent possible,
in highest-need schools of those LEAs.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1024(e))
Subpart F--Other Grant Conditions
Sec. 611.61 What is the maximum indirect cost rate for States and
local educational agencies?
Notwithstanding 34 CFR 75.560-75.562 and 34 CFR 80.22, the maximum
indirect cost rate that a State or local educational agency receiving
funding under the Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program may use to
charge indirect costs to these funds is the lesser of--
(a) The rate established by the negotiated indirect cost agreement;
or
(b) Eight percent.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Note: The following appendix will not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Appendix--Analysis of Comments and Changes
Comment: Proposed Sec. 611.1 defines a high-need school and a
high-need local educational agency (LEA). These definitions are
important because after graduating from their teacher preparation
programs, scholarship recipients must teach in these schools and
LEAs in order to meet their service obligations.
Consistent with section 201(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act
(HEA), the definition would offer three alternative criteria by
which a school (of a high-need LEA) can be considered high-need. Two
commenters urged us to expand these proposed criteria so that more
schools could qualify as ones in which scholarship recipients can
teach and meet their service obligations. Under one of these
proposed criteria, a school would qualify as high-need if at least
50 percent of its enrolled students are eligible to receive free and
reduced lunch subsidies, i.e., if the school is eligible to operate
a schoolwide program under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act (ESEA). One commenter supported this proposal, but
noted that many secondary schools do not have reliable data on
student eligibility for free-and reduced-lunch subsidies. The
commenter proposed, therefore, that a secondary school qualify as
one in which scholarship recipients can meet their service
obligations through alternative factors. These factors would include
having (a) multiple elementary and middle schools in its feeder
system that meet this 50-percent test; (b) a
[[Page 1786]]
drop-out rate that exceeds a specified amount; (c) more than 15
percent of teachers teaching out of files; and (d) a teacher
turnover rate exceeding ten percent.
Another commenter urged that the criterion related to the
percentage of the school's teachers teaching out-of-field be
expanded. In this regard, section 201(b)(2) of the HEA provides that
a school can be considered high-need if there is a high percentage
of secondary school teachers who are not teaching in the content
area in which the teachers were trained to teach. As proposed,
Sec. 611.1 would define this element to mean that more than 34
percent of either academic classroom teacher overall, or main
assignment faculty in two core subject departments, do not have a
major, minor, or significant course work in their main assignment
field. The proposed regulation goes on to define ``significant
coursework'' to mean ``four or more college or graduate-level
courses in the content area.''
The commenter notes that his State now requires teaching
candidates to have taken more than four courses to earn a teaching
certificate in a particular content area. The commenter, therefore,
recommends that the definition also permit a school to qualify as a
high-need school if more than 34 percent of academic classroom
teachers do not have certification to teach in their main assignment
field.
Discussion: We agree that clarification is needed on how a
secondary school may qualify, on the basis of the percent of poverty
in the area it serves, as one in which a scholarship recipient may
meet his or her service obligation. As the first commenter notes, we
know from experience that high school and middle school students are
less likely to participate in free- and reduced-price lunch programs
than are elementary school students. Hence, those schools often may
not be identified as eligible for Title I services, or not qualify
to operate Title I, ESEA, schoolwide programs, despite the actual
poverty rates in the area they serve.
However, if a school--elementary, middle, or secondary--is to
meet the statutory criterion of high need because it serves an area
with a high percentage of individuals from families with incomes
below the poverty line, we continue to believe that the school still
must be eligible under Title I requirements to operate a Title I
schoolwide program. In this regard, the Department has issued
guidance for the Title I program that addresses alternative measures
for determining a secondary school's eligibility to participate in
Title I. This guidance clarifies that a school district may use
comparable data to data for free- and reduced-lunch eligibility (or
other measures permitted under Title I) that are collected through
alternative means such as a survey. Also, an LEA may use the feeder
pattern concept. This concept would allow the LEA to project the
number of low-income children in a middle school or high school
based on the average poverty rate of the elementary school
attendance areas that feed into that school. More specific
information on these alternative measures for secondary and middle
school eligibility under Title I may be found in part two of the
April 1996 Title I, Part A, Policy Guidance: Improving Basic
Programs Operated by Local Educational Agencies. This guidance is
available on the Internet at http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA/
Title I/. Further information also is available from those in the
State educational agency who administer the Title I program. (The
ESEA authorizes waivers of most Title I program requirements,
including the requirement that schools that wish to be schoolwide
programs serve an area with a specified level of poverty. The HEA
contains no comparable waiver authority. Therefore, a middle or high
school that lacks data to confirm its eligibility to operate as a
Title I schoolwide program cannot become eligible to be a high-need
school through a waiver of the Title I schoolwide program
requirements.)
Beyond this clarification, we are unable to accept the
commenter's recommendations for alternative factors that the
regulations would identify as making a secondary school one in which
a scholarship recipient may meet the service obligation. Simply
having some feeder schools meet the 50 percent threshold for free-
and reduced-lunch subsidies may not adequately address the level of
poverty in the entire area the high school serves. The school's
drop-out rate is not sufficiently related to the permissible
criteria in section 201(b)(2) of the statute.
Finally, we believe that the standards of (1) 15 percent of
teachers teaching out-of-field, and (2) a teacher turnover rate
exceeding ten percent, which the commenter proposes, would permit
too many schools to be considered high need. Aside from the poverty
criterion, the law permits high need to be based on a ``high''
percentage of secondary school teachers teaching out-of-field, or a
``high'' teacher turnover rate. In the application package available
in February 1999 for the initial Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
Program competitions, we explained that 34 percent (incorrectly
printed as ``35 percent'') teaching out-of-field and a 15 percent
attrition rate reflect the best available national data on what
these statutory terms mean. More specifically, 34 percent teaching
out-of-field reflects an average of the percentage of public school
teachers without a major or minor in their main assignment field and
the percentage of teachers in high-poverty schools teaching out-of-
field. A 15 percent teacher attrition rate reflects nationwide data
on the percentage of teachers in all schools, including in high-
poverty schools, who do not return to the same school the following
year.
Action: The definition of ``high-need LEA'' in Sec. 611.1 has
been modified. It now clarifies that the term includes an LEA with
at least one school (1) in which at least 50 percent of enrolled
students are eligible for free- and reduced lunch subsidies, or (2)
that otherwise is eligible, without a waiver, to operate as a
schoolwide program under Title I of the ESEA.
Comment: One commenter stated that it is not practical for an
IHE to provide follow-up services to former scholarship recipients
for three years after the individual becomes a teacher. The
commenter, from a grantee awarded a Partnership Program grant under
section 203 of the HEA, asserts that there are many contractual and
budgetary issues affecting the LEA that are beyond the IHE's
control. The commenter recommends that the regulations instead
require the IHE to provide induction services during the teacher's
first year, and otherwise make services available to the teacher,
upon request, for up to three years after graduation.
Discussion: Section 204(d)(1)(C) of the HEA requires that
Teacher Recruitment Program grantees provide follow-up services to
former scholarship recipients during their first three years of
teaching. For the other two Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
Programs, the State Grant Program and the Partnership Grants for
Improving Teacher Education Program, the law authorizes grantees to
use program funds for ``[a]ctivities described in section 204(d).''
See sections 202(d)(7) and 203(d)(7) of the HEA, respectively. As
section 204(d)(1)(C) authorizes scholarship assistance to
individuals attending teacher preparation programs, State and
Partnership Program grantees may use grant funds to award these
scholarships.
However, by authorizing State and Partnership Program grantees
to use program funds for activities described in section 207(d), we
believe Congress intended that those who receive scholarship
assistance under these two programs would benefit before and after
graduation from the same range of IHE services that recipients of
scholarships funded under the Teacher Recruitment Program must
receive. Hence, we also believe that it is appropriate to require,
through these regulations, State and Partnership grantees to provide
former scholarship recipients with the same level of follow-up
services after graduation as is required under the Teacher
Recruitment Program. These services would include, as required by
section 204(d)(1)(c), follow-up activities during these new
teachers' first three years of teaching.
We do note that the law does not specify the degree of these
services. Consistent with a grantee's approved applications, we
believe that the form, content, and extent of these follow-up
services will be determined through collaboration among the LEA,
scholarship recipient(s), and the program grantee.
Action: None.
Comment: One commenter stated that all States and partnerships
using program funds to award teacher recruitment scholarships should
prioritize placements in ways that assure that schools in the States
with greatest need have the best opportunities to hire well-trained
teachers. Therefore, the commenter recommended that all States and
partnerships, in collaboration with high-need LEAs, be required to
give priority in placing scholarship recipients in LEAs and schools
that demonstrate the greatest need according to one of the three
criteria with which 611.1 defines ``high need.''
Discussion: We agree with the thrust of the comment. The purpose
of the Teacher Recruitment Program is to address chronic shortages
of qualified teachers in high-need schools and school districts.
IHEs and LEAs should work together to encourage teaching
[[Page 1787]]
candidates who receive scholarship assistance with Teacher Quality
Enhancement Program funds to fulfill their service obligations by
becoming teachers in the highest need schools and school districts.
However, we are concerned that the commenter's recommendations
would (1) burden IHEs unduly with the responsibility for securing
data on literally scores of schools and then somehow ranking those
schools by relative need, and (2) involve the IHE too intimately in
hiring decisions that are better left to the scholarship recipients
and LEA and school officials. For this reason, we believe that the
better approach is to require the IHE, in collaboration with the
high-need LEA(s) with which it partners, to ensure that scholarship
recipients are placed, to the extent possible, in the highest-need
schools of those LEAs.
Action: Section 611.52(c) (proposed 611.40(d)(3)) has been
modified accordingly.
Comment: As proposed, Sec. 611.39(a) would require former
scholarship recipients who are fulfilling their service obligations
to have high-need LEAs in which they teach submit employment
information periodically to the Department confirming that they are,
in fact, meeting their service obligation. One commenter expressed
concern that if, through no fault of the teacher, the LEA does not
forward the information to the Department, the former scholarship
recipient could be wrongly held responsible for repaying the
scholarship assistance he or she had received. The commenter
recommended that we accept, on an interim basis if necessary,
evidence such as a notarized statement that the scholarship
recipient had requested the LEA to submit the information verifying
employment.
Discussion: We agree with the commenter's concern and
recommendation, except that we believe the recommendation does not
sufficiently encourage recipients to have LEAs provide us with
timely information that verifies the scholarship recipient's
employment as a teacher in a high-need school of a high-need LEA.
After considering the matter, we are satisfied that the scholarship
recipient should be permitted to meet this responsibility to verify
that he or she is meeting the service obligation in either of two
ways. Specifically, in lieu of having the LEA provide the needed
information to us in a timely manner, the recipient may attach to
the notarized statement a copy of the information that he or she has
asked the LEA to provide to the Department.
We will consider the timely receipt of this notarized statement
and attachment as satisfactory provisional evidence that the
individual is meeting the service obligation, and so should not be
responsible for its repayment. However, the Department will be
unable to determine finally that this is so without the signed
statement from the LEA. Therefore, the scholarship recipient will
have a continuing responsibility to work to get the LEA to submit
this information.
Action: Sections 611.46 and 611.47 (proposed Sec. 611.39(a) and
(b)) have been modified accordingly.
Comment: One commenter stated that the proposed reasons for
which the Department would defer a scholarship recipient's service
obligation are too limited. The commenter recommends that deferments
also be available for students who currently are attending two-year
institutions and cannot be admitted to the continuing, and
certifying, higher education program due to changes in admission
standards that were implemented after the student had received a
Title II scholarship.
Discussion: A scholarship recipient's responsibility for
repaying the scholarship, accrued interest, and costs of collection,
if any, only arises if the scholarship recipient (1) graduates from
a teacher preparation program and fails to confirm to the Department
that he or she has fulfilled the service obligation, (2) withdraws
from the teacher preparation program, or (3) is found to be no
longer in good standing. We see no reason to expand the proposed
areas in which deferment of the service obligation, or
responsibility to repay the indebtedness, is available. One of the
conditions of the scholarship is that the recipient will repay the
scholarship amount plus accrued interest if he or she does not
remain in good academic standing. Assuming that the recipient
remains in good academic standing, we believe that the appropriate
response to the situation the commenter posed is for the grantee to
continue working with the scholarship recipient to permit him or her
to meet any new admission requirements that the continuing
institution may adopt.
We add only that we believe the situations the commenter
describes should be quite rare. First, the kinds of changes in
admission standards that the commenter describes are likely to be
very infrequent. Beyond this, with regard to scholarship recipients,
we presume that program grantees are in a position to influence the
admission standards and decisions of the teacher preparation
programs they are implementing or with which they are partnering.
Action: None.
Comment: One commenter asserted that the proposed regulations
would inappropriately penalize scholarship recipients who, upon
graduation, fail immediately to find employment as teachers in high-
need schools and school districts. The commenter also criticized the
service obligation as a disincentive to minority recruitment since
students have other scholarship opportunities that do not attach
these conditions.
Discussion: The law requires those who receive scholarships with
Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant Program funds to meet the service
obligation. Moreover, as proposed, Sec. 611.37(b)(2) would enable a
scholarship recipient to have the service obligation deferred where,
despite due diligence, the recipient is unable to secure employment
as a teacher in a high-need school of a high-need LEA.
Action: None.
Comment: One commenter stated that while most of the regulations
were clearly stated, the regulations would be easier to read if they
were divided into more, but shorter, sections.
Discussion: Some of the regulations do not seem appropriate for
dividing into parts. However, we agree with the commenter that both
proposed Sec. 611.39 (``What are a scholarship recipient's reporting
responsibilities?'') and proposed Sec. 611.40 (``What are a
grantee's responsibilities for helping to implement the scholarship
requirements?'') would be clearer if broken into a series of shorter
regulations.
Action: The final regulations have been revised accordingly.
We also have made these regulations applicable to all three of
the Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant Programs by (1) renumbering
them, (2) moving them to a new and generally applicable subpart E,
``Scholarships,'' and (3) thereby eliminating, as no longer
necessary, proposed Sec. 611.42 (``What rules govern scholarships
funded by the State or Partnership Programs for individuals
attending teacher preparation programs?'')
[FR Doc. 00-646 Filed 1-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-U
