2022-01532. COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

    ACTION:

    Interim final rule; withdrawal.

    SUMMARY:

    OSHA is withdrawing the November 5, 2021, emergency temporary standard (ETS) which was issued to protect unvaccinated employees of large employers (100 or more employees) from the risk of contracting COVID-19 by strongly encouraging vaccination.

    DATES:

    The withdrawal is effective January 26, 2022.

    ADDRESSES:

    In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 2112(a), the agency designates Edmund C. Baird, Associate Solicitor of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, to receive petitions for review of this agency action. Service can be accomplished by email to zzSOL-Covid19-ETS@dol.gov.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    General information and press inquiries: Contact Frank Meilinger, Director, Office of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone (202) 693-1999; email meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.

    For technical inquiries: Contact Andrew Levinson, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone (202) 693-1950.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    I. Background and Rationale for Withdrawal

    On November 5, 2021, OSHA adopted an emergency temporary standard (the Vaccination and Testing ETS), under sections 4, 6(c), and 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655(c), 657), to protect unvaccinated employees of large employers (100 or more employees) from the risk of contracting COVID-19 by strongly encouraging vaccination (86 FR 61402). The Vaccination and Testing ETS required covered employers to develop, implement, and enforce a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, with an exception for employers that instead adopted a policy requiring employees to either get vaccinated or elect to undergo regular COVID-19 testing and wear a face covering at work in lieu of vaccination. That ETS also serves as a “proposed rule” for a “proceeding” to promulgate an occupational safety or health standard. 29 U.S.C. 655(c)(3); see 29 U.S.C. 655(b).

    On January 13, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the Vaccination and Testing ETS, finding that challengers were likely to prevail on their claims. Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Dep't of Labor, 595 U.S. __, __(2022) (per curium) (slip op. at 5, 9). After evaluating the Court's decision, OSHA is withdrawing the Vaccination and Testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard. To the extent that this withdrawal is not already generally exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act and the OSH Act, OSHA finds good cause that the opportunity for public comment on this withdrawal is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), and 29 U.S.C. 655(b) because it would unnecessarily delay the resolution of ambiguity for employers and workers alike. This agency action becomes effective immediately both because there is good cause and because the action removes a requirement on the regulated community. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), (3).

    Although OSHA is withdrawing the Vaccination and Testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard, OSHA is not withdrawing the ETS to the extent that it serves as a proposed rule under section 6(c)(3) of the Act, and this action does not affect the ETS's status as a proposal under section 6(b) of the Act or otherwise Start Printed Page 3929 affect the status of the notice-and-comment rulemaking commenced by the Vaccination and Testing ETS. See 29 U.S.C. 655(c)(3).

    Notwithstanding the withdrawal of the Vaccination and Testing ETS, OSHA continues to strongly encourage the vaccination of workers against the continuing dangers posed by COVID-19 in the workplace.

    II. Minor Revisions to § 1910.504 and § 1910.509

    OSHA has removed the reference to § 1910.501 from the introductory text of the Mini Respiratory Protection requirements in § 1910.504 because the former section is now removed. The Mini Respiratory Protection Program section is retained, however, because it remains a requirement for respirator use under § 1910.502(f)(4). Similarly, OSHA has revised the incorporation-by-reference list in § 1910.509 by removing the reference to § 1910.501(h) from § 1910.509(b)(5), as the incorporation by reference list now pertains only to documents incorporated by reference in § 1910.502.

    Because these minor revisions do not make any substantive change to the duties of employers, OSHA finds good cause that the opportunity for public comment on these revisions is unnecessary within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and 29 U.S.C. 655(b). In addition, OSHA finds that public comment is impracticable in light of the need to provide clarity to the regulated community and to workers.

    III. State Plans

    The occupational safety and health programs run by the 28 States and U.S. territories with their own OSHA-approved occupational safety and health plans (State Plans) must be at least as effective as Federal OSHA's program. This includes a requirement that, when Federal OSHA makes a program change that renders its program more effective, the State Plan must timely adopt a corresponding change in order to maintain a safety and health program that is at least as effective as Federal OSHA (29 CFR 1902.32(e); 29 CFR 1902.44(a)). However, where, as here, the Federal program change does not impose any new requirements or otherwise render the Federal program more effective, State Plans are not required to take any action.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1910

    • COVID-19
    • Disease
    • Health facilities
    • Health
    • Healthcare
    • Incorporation by reference
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Public health
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Respirators
    • SARS-CoV-2
    • Vaccines
    • Viruses
    End List of Subjects

    Authority and Signature

    Douglas L. Parker, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210, authorized the preparation of this document pursuant to the following authorities: Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657); Secretary of Labor's Order 8-2020 (85 FR 58393 (Sept. 18, 2020)); 29 CFR part 1911; and 5 U.S.C. 553.

    Start Signature

    Signed at Washington, DC, on January 21, 2022.

    Douglas L. Parker,

    Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.

    End Signature

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 1910 of title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 1910—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS

    Subpart U—COVID-19

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for subpart U continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, and 657; Secretary of Labor's Order No. 8-2020 (85 FR 58393); 29 CFR part 1911; and 5 U.S.C. 553.

    End Authority
    [Removed and Reserved]
    Start Amendment Part

    2. Remove and reserve § 1910.501

    End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

    3. Amend § 1910.504 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part
    Mini Respiratory Protection Program.

    (a) Scope and application. This section applies only to respirator use in accordance with § 1910.502(f)(4).

    * * * * *
    Start Amendment Part

    4. Amend § 1910.509 by revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part
    Incorporation by reference.
    * * * * *

    (b) * * *

    (5) Isolation Guidance. COVID-19: Isolation If You Are Sick; Separate yourself from others if you have COVID-19, updated February 18, 2021, IBR approved for § 1910.502(l).

    * * * * *
    End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2022-01532 Filed 1-25-22; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4510-26-P

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/26/2022
Published:
01/26/2022
Department:
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim final rule; withdrawal.
Document Number:
2022-01532
Dates:
The withdrawal is effective January 26, 2022.
Pages:
3928-3929 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. OSHA-2020-0007
RINs:
1218-AD42: COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard Rulemaking
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/1218-AD42/covid-19-vaccination-and-testing-emergency-temporary-standard-rulemaking
Topics:
Diseases, Health, Health care, Health facilities, Incorporation by reference, Occupational safety and health, Public health, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
PDF File:
2022-01532.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Chamber of Commerce -- Ex Parte Communication Form
» Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021a, October 4). Demographic Characteristics of People Receiving COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-demographic. (CDC, October 4, 2021a)
» Barry J et al. (2021, September 24). Unvaccinated Workers Say They’d Rather Quit Than Get a Shot, but Data Suggest Otherwise. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/unvaccinated-workers-say-theyd-rather-quit-than-get-a-shot-but-data-suggest-otherwise/. (Barry et al., September 24, 2021)
» Pappas, S. (2020, May 19). How COVID-19 Deaths are Counted. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-covid-19-deaths-are-counted1/. (Pappas, May 19, 2020).
» Bui D et al. (2020, August 17). Racial and ethnic disparities among COVID-19 cases in workplace outbreaks by industry sector — Utah, March 6–June 5, 2020. MMWR: 69:1133–1138. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6933e3.htm. (Bui et al., August 17, 2020)
» National Cancer Institute (NCI). (2015, April 29). Age and Cancer Risk. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/age. (NCI, April 29, 2015)
» Mitze T et al. (2020, June 1). Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany: a synthetic control method approach. IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (Germany). http://ftp.iza.org/dp13319.pdf. (Mitze et al., June 1, 2020)
» Hendrix J et al. (2020, July 17). Absence of apparent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from two stylists after exposure at a hair salon with a universal face covering policy — Springfield, Missouri, May 2020. MMWR, 69, 930-932. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6928e2. (Hendrix et al., July 17, 2020)
» Gallaway S et al. (2020, October 6). Trends in COVID-19 incidence after implementation of mitigation measures - Arizona, January 22–August 7, 2020. MMWR, 69, 1460-1463. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6940e3. (Gallaway et al., October 6, 2020)
» Ueki H et al. (2020, October 21). Effectiveness of Face Masks in Preventing Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2. mSphere 5:e00637-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00637-20. (Ueki et al., October 21, 2020)
CFR: (3)
29 CFR 1910.501
29 CFR 1910.504
29 CFR 1910.509