97-278. Milk in the Iowa Marketing Area; Temporary Revision of Rule  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 918-920]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-278]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 1079
    
    [DA-96-16]
    
    
    Milk in the Iowa Marketing Area; Temporary Revision of Rule
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document revises certain provisions of the Iowa Federal 
    milk marketing order for the months of December 1996 through March 
    1997. This action decreases the percentage of a supply plant's receipts 
    that must be delivered to fluid milk plants to qualify a supply plant 
    for pooling under the Iowa Federal milk order. The applicable 
    percentage will be decreased 10 percentage points, from 30 percent to 
    20 percent, for the months of December 1996 through March 1997. The 
    revision is being made in response to a request by a pool supply plant 
    that is regulated under the Iowa order. This action is necessary to 
    prevent the uneconomic shipment of milk.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATES: Amendment 1 is effective January 8, 1997. Amendment 2 
    is effective December 1, 1996, through March 31, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Nicholas Memoli, Marketing Specialist, USDA/AMS/Division, Order 
    Formulation Branch, Room 2971, South Building, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456, (202) 690-1932, e-mail address 
    Nicholas__X__Memoli@usda.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior document in this proceeding:
        Notice of Proposed Temporary Revision: Issued December 6, 1996; 
    published December 12, 1996 (61 FR 65366).
        The Department is issuing this final rule in conformance with 
    Executive Order 12866.
        This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
    Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have a retroactive 
    effect. This rule will not preempt any state or local laws, 
    regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
    conflict with this rule.
        The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (the ``Act''), as 
    amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), provides that administrative proceedings 
    must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 
    608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may request 
    modification or exemption from such order by filing with the Secretary 
    a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with the law. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After a hearing, the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has its 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to
    
    [[Page 919]]
    
    review the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in 
    equity is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of 
    the ruling.
    
    Small Business Consideration
    
        In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
    seq.), as amended, the Agricultural Marketing Service has considered 
    the economic impact of this action on small entities and has certified 
    that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. For the purpose of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, a dairy farm is considered a ``small business'' if it 
    has an annual gross revenue of less than $500,000, and a dairy products 
    manufacturer is a ``small business'' if it has fewer than 500 
    employees. For the purposes of determining which dairy farms are 
    ``small businesses,'' the $500,000 per year criterion was used to 
    establish a production guideline of 326,000 pounds per month. Although 
    this guideline does not factor in additional monies that may be 
    received by dairy producers, it should be an inclusive standard for 
    most ``small'' dairy farmers. For purposes of determining a handler's 
    size, if the plant is part of a larger company operating multiple 
    plants that collectively exceed the 500-employee limit, the plant will 
    be considered a large business even if the local plant has fewer than 
    500 employees. This rule lessens the regulatory impact of the order on 
    certain milk handlers and tends to ensure that dairy farmers will 
    continue to have their milk priced under the order and thereby receive 
    the benefits that accrue from such pricing.
        The revised supply plant shipping percentages are incorporated into 
    the order to prevent the uneconomic shipment of milk. This action will 
    decrease the percentage of milk receipts that handlers are required to 
    move to fluid milk distributing plants. With a decrease in the shipping 
    percentage, supply plant operators will not have to move milk 
    uneconomically to pool distributing plants to keep the milk received at 
    their plants priced under the order.
        The reduction of the required supply plant shipping percentage for 
    the months of December 1996 through March 1997 would allow the milk of 
    producers traditionally associated with the Iowa market to continue to 
    be pooled and priced under the order. The revision would lessen the 
    likelihood that more milk shipments to pool plants might be required 
    under the order than are actually needed to supply the fluid milk needs 
    of the market and would result in savings in hauling costs for handlers 
    and producers.
        This temporary revision is issued pursuant to the provisions of the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act and the provisions of 
    Sec. 1079.7(b)(1) of the Iowa order.
    
    Issuance of Notice of Proposed Revision
    
        Notice of proposed rulemaking was issued concerning a proposed 
    reduction in the percentage of a supply plant's receipts which must be 
    delivered to fluid milk plants to qualify a supply plant for pooling 
    under the Iowa order. The revisions were proposed to be effective for 
    the months of December 1, 1996, through March 31, 1997. The public was 
    afforded the opportunity to comment on the proposed notice by 
    submitting written data, views and arguments by December 19, 1996.
        Two comments were received. One comment supported the recommended 
    reduction, while the other comment supported a reduction with 
    modification.
    
    Statement of Consideration
    
        After consideration of all relevant material, including the 
    proposed set forth in the aforesaid notice, and other available 
    information, it is hereby found and determined that the supply plant 
    shipping percentage set forth in Sec. 1079.7(b) of the Iowa Federal 
    milk order should be decreased 10 percentage points, from 30 percent to 
    20 percent, for the months of December 1996 through March 1997.
        Beatrice Cheese, Inc., a supply plant regulated under the Iowa 
    order, proposed decreasing the supply plant shipping percentage by 10 
    percentage points, from 35 percent of plant receipts to 25 percent of 
    such receipts, for the month of November 1996, and from 30 percent to 
    20 percent for the months of December 1996 through March 1997. The 
    proponent contends that the decrease is necessary to prevent the 
    uneconomic shipment of milk.
        According to Beatrice, the Department's October 23, 1996, decision 
    increasing the shipping percentage requirements to 35 percent for the 
    months of September through November beginning with October 1996, and 
    to 30 percent for the months of December through March has caused 
    unjust financial losses and the uneconomic shipment of milk to occur. 
    In order to comply with Federal order requirements, Beatrice states 
    that a significant amount of milk was unable to be pooled to the 
    detriment of Iowa's dairy farmers. Additionally, proponent claims that 
    market conditions have changed drastically in Iowa since October 1996 
    due to a drop in the cheese and butter markets which has made more than 
    enough milk available for fluid use eliminating the need for increased 
    shipping percentages.
        While Beatrice's proposal included a temporary revision of the 
    supply plant shipping percentage requirements for November 1996, the 
    proposed revision issued December 6, 1996, requesting comments limited 
    the revision period to December 1996 through March 1997. The inclusion 
    of November 1996 was impractical and infeasible given the amount of 
    time necessary for required procedures, including a comment period.
        Wapsie Valley Creamery, a supply plant regulated under Order 79, 
    submitted a comment in support of a reduction in the supply plant 
    shipping requirement by 10 percentage points for the months of December 
    1996 through March 1997. Wapsie states that milk marketing conditions 
    have changed since October 1996, and that due to the increased shipping 
    requirements recently put into effect, it has been forced to make 
    uneconomic shipments of milk to meet order regulations.
        Anderson Erickson Dairy Co. (A-E), a proprietary distributing plant 
    regulated under the Iowa order, submitted a comment supporting a 
    reduction in the supply plant shipping percentage requirements for the 
    Iowa order, but argues that the decrease should be limited to 5 
    percentage points, from 30 percent to 25 percent, for the months of 
    December 1996 through March 1997. A-E contends that, given past 
    experiences which have caused A-E to request increased shipping 
    percentages due to a lack of available milk supplies for the fluid 
    market, the percentage should be reduced only 5 percentage points from 
    the current level. A-E also states that under no circumstances should 
    the shipping requirements for September through December of future 
    years be reduced.
        At the time of A-E's previous request to have the shipping 
    percentages increased, the Department had found that in the Iowa 
    marketing area the percentage of pooled milk used in Class I had 
    noticeably increased for the months of June through August 1996 as 
    compared to earlier years. This situation indicated the need for 
    shipping percentage increases in order to attract an adequate supply of 
    milk for fluid use. However, Class I utilization for the month of 
    October 1996 in the Iowa marketing area illustrates that there is no 
    need to maintain the shipping percentages at the current level of 30 
    percent. The Class I utilization for the months of October and November 
    1996
    
    [[Page 920]]
    
    (33.8% and 32.7%, respectively) has decreased as compared to October 
    and November 1995 (49.6% and 36.1%, respectively). A decrease in Class 
    I utilization is also apparent for the January through March 1996 
    period as compared to the same months of 1995. Class I utilization 
    declined from 34.7 percent for January 1995 to 32.1 percent in January 
    1996, 35.7 percent to 33.1 percent for the month of February, and from 
    34.2 percent to 31.7 percent for March of such years. This suggests 
    that sufficient supplies of milk for fluid use should be available 
    during the months of December 1996 through March 1997 for Iowa order 
    distributing plants. Therefore, a decrease in the shipping requirement 
    is warranted. By reducing the shipping requirement percentage for the 
    December 1996 through March 1997 period to 20 percent, a reasonable 
    balance will be reached which will prevent uneconomic shipments from 
    occurring, as well as assure a sufficient milk supply.
        It is hereby found and determined that 30 days' notice of the 
    effective date hereof is impractical, unnecessary, and contrary to the 
    public interest in that:
        (a) This temporary revision is necessary to reflect current 
    marketing conditions and to maintain orderly marketing conditions in 
    the marketing area for the months of December 1996 through March 1997;
        (b) This temporary revision does not require of persons affected 
    substantial or extensive preparation prior to the effective date; and
        (c) Notice of the proposed temporary revision was given interested 
    parties and they were afforded opportunity to file written data, views, 
    or arguments concerning this temporary revision.
        Therefore, good cause exists for making this temporary revision 
    effective less than 30 days from the days from the date of issuance.
    
    List of Subject in 7 CFR Part 1079
    
        Milk marketing orders.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Part 1079 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 1079--MILK IN THE IOWA MARKETING AREA
    
        1. The authority for 7 CFR Part 1079 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
    
    Sec. 1079.7  [Amended]
    
        2. In Sec. 1079.7(b), the introductory text is amended by revising 
    the words ``30 percent'' to read ``20 percent'' effective December 1, 
    1996, through March 31, 1997.
    
        Dated: December 31, 1996.
    Richard M. McKee,
    Director, Dairy Division.
    [FR Doc. 97-278 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
     BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/8/1997
Published:
01/07/1997
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-278
Dates:
Amendment 1 is effective January 8, 1997. Amendment 2 is effective December 1, 1996, through March 31, 1997.
Pages:
918-920 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
DA-96-16
PDF File:
97-278.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 1079.7(b)(1)
7 CFR 1079.7