97-28454. Revision of Laboratory Service Fees  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 56036-56043]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-28454]
    
    
    
    [[Page 56035]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part V
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Agriculture
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Agriculture Marketing Service
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    7 CFR Parts 91, 93 and 96
    
    
    
    Revision of Laboratory Service Fees; Proposed Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 1997 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 56036]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Parts 91, 93, and 96
    
    [Docket Number S&TD-97-001]
    
    
    Revision of Laboratory Service Fees
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to amend 
    current fees and to add new fees for laboratory testing services for 
    agricultural commodities. This proposed rule includes additional tests 
    for various commodity products. This document reflects increased 
    program costs including the cost-of-living adjustments since the last 
    fee changes.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 28, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments concerning 
    this proposed rule. Comments should be sent in triplicate to James V. 
    Falk, Docket Manager, USDA, AMS, Science and Technology, P.O. Box 
    96456, Room 3517-South, Washington, DC 20090-6456 and should refer to 
    the docket title and number located in the heading of this document. 
    Comments received will be available for public inspection in Room 3507, 
    South Agriculture Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, between the 
    hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, 
    except Federal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Alan R. Post, (202) 720-3322.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule has been determined to be 
    not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and has not been 
    reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
        This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulation, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule. There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted 
    prior to any judicial challenge to this rule or the application of its 
    provisions.
    
    Regulatory Impact Analysis
    
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Administrator of the Agricultural 
    Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this 
    action on small entities.
        There are more than 300 users of the Science and Technology 
    Division's (S&TD) laboratory testing services. Many of these users are 
    small entities under the criteria established by the Small Business 
    Administration (13 CFR 121.601). The Administrator of AMS determined 
    that this action would not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of these small businesses because only minimal 
    increases to user fees for laboratory tests for commodities are 
    recommended. Laboratory tests and services of S&TD are provided to 
    these businesses on a voluntary basis and any decision on their part to 
    discontinue the use of the services and obtain new contracts with other 
    governmental agency or private laboratories would not hinder the food 
    processors from marketing their products. In fiscal year 1996, the S&TD 
    Laboratory Program revenues exceeded obligatory costs by only $101,000. 
    The decline in revenue from the fiscal year 1995 level of $907,000 was 
    due to a decrease in the requested dairy product testing at the S&TD 
    Midwestern Laboratory in Chicago, Illinois. For fiscal year 1997 the 
    Science and Technology Division expects to report a $332,000 deficit at 
    the current fee level because there were additional revenue declines 
    with the analyzing of all other commodities at our laboratories. In 
    1997 the S&TD expects to incur revenue losses from 1996 levels of 
    $216,000 and $449,000 respectively from poultry and tobacco product 
    testing. In addition, the aflatoxin testing program net governmental 
    receipts available to cover administrative costs and authorized 
    appropriation outlays are projected to decline from $79,000 in 1996 to 
    $14,000 in 1997. This is a consequence of the increased number of 
    Peanut Administrative Committee (PAC) approved private laboratories 
    that handle required aflatoxin analyses of peanuts. In recent years 
    S&TD has voluntarily closed aflatoxin testing facilities at Camilla and 
    Ashburn, Georgia. This was a streamlining measure to reduce Federal 
    program costs and to restructure the Division to improve efficiency of 
    operations and responsiveness of services. We expect the Laboratory 
    Program to end fiscal year 1997 with an operating reserve of $3,261,000 
    which will provide a reserve balance below the 6 month reserve 
    appropriate under normal operating conditions. The AMS estimates that 
    overall this rule would yield additional laboratory testing program 
    revenues of $694,000 during fiscal year (FY) 1998. Without the fee 
    increase, anticipated revenue would not cover program costs. Projected 
    FY 1998 laboratory revenues are $5,616,000 with obligatory costs 
    projected at $6,276,000. Trust fund balances would be below the 
    required 4 month reserve levels. With a fee increase, projected FY 1998 
    revenues would be $6,310,000 with obligatory costs projected at 
    $6,276,000. The laboratory fees in the general schedules would increase 
    by approximately 6 percent. These fees are competitive to the fees 
    found in price lists distributed by private laboratories. Furthermore, 
    users of S&TD testing services are under no obligation to use them. 
    This proposed action updates lists of laboratory tests and services 
    contained in certain sections of the regulations. In addition, the fees 
    for the specialized and required aflatoxin testing of nuts and their 
    products would have increases ranging from 6 to 21 percent.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        In accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
    1980, as amended on May 22, 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35; Pub. L. 104-13 
    Sec. 2), the information collection requirements contained in the 
    provisions to be updated have been previously approved by the Office of 
    Management and Budget.
        No additional recordkeeping requirements are imposed as a result of 
    this rule.
    
    Background
    
        On August 9, 1993, AMS published a rule in the Federal Register (58 
    FR 42408--42448) to combine all AMS regulations concerning laboratory 
    services. The goal was to consolidate and to transfer existing 
    laboratory testing programs operating independently under the various 
    commodity divisions (Cotton, Poultry, Fruit and Vegetable, Tobacco, 
    Dairy, and Livestock and Seed) to its S&TD, formerly the Science 
    Division. The rule included fees charged for testing and related 
    services under the diversified S&TD programs and set the hourly 
    analytical testing rate at $34.20 per hour. On May 10, 1994, an interim 
    final rule was published in the Federal Register (59 FR 24318--24325) 
    which was finalized on September 30, 1994 (59 FR 50120--50122) and 
    which reduced S&TD laboratory testing fees for certain dairy products 
    and established additional tests with fees for dairy products for 
    incorporation into existing schedules.
        The S&TD laboratory testing programs are mainly voluntary, user fee 
    services, conducted under the authority of the Agricultural Marketing 
    Act of 1946, as amended. However under certain
    
    [[Page 56037]]
    
    programs such as those involving peanuts, aflatoxin testing is 
    required. The Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to provide 
    Federal analytical testing services that facilitate marketing and allow 
    products to obtain grade designations or meet marketing standards. In 
    addition, the laboratory tests establish quality standards for 
    agricultural commodities. The Act also requires that reasonable fees be 
    collected from the users of the services to cover as nearly as possible 
    the costs of maintaining the programs.
        There is a need to revise the list of testing services available 
    due to changes in analytical methodologies and customer service needs. 
    Under this proposed rule, new laboratory tests are added to the tables 
    in Part 91 as follows: (1) Heavy metal screen, (2) niacin, (3) odor, 
    (4) vitamin B-1 (thiamin), (5) vitamin B-2 (riboflavin), (6) capsaicin 
    (hot sauce), (7) color (apparent-visual), (8) extractable color in 
    spices, (9) hydroxymethylfurfural (honey), (10) linolenic acid, (11) 
    overrun for whipping topping, (12) pH--quinhydrone (cheese), (13) serum 
    drainage for whipped topping, (14) rate of wetting (nondairy creamer), 
    (15) reducing sugars, (16) Bacillus cereus, (17) Lactobacillus count, 
    (18) Salmonella enumeration (complete test), (19) Salmonella typhi 
    (meat products), and (20) parasite identification. The direct 
    microscopic clump count (DMCC) test is removed from Table 5 in Part 91 
    because it is analogous to the bacterial direct microscopic count test. 
    Certain other laboratory tests are removed from the tables in Part 91 
    because there have been few, if any, requests for these tests in recent 
    years. These outmoded laboratory tests are fat (cheese and related 
    products), fat by specific gravity, moisture by Karl Fischer, and 
    proteolytic count (dairy products). Four existing laboratory test fees 
    in the tables of Part 91 are reduced corresponding to reduced analysis 
    time and lowered equipment cost associated with utilizing revised 
    methodology. The cholesterol test fee is lowered from $171.00 to 
    $90.65. The available carbon dioxide test fee is reduced from $136.80 
    to $54.39. The jelly strength (bloom) test fee is reduced from $85.50 
    to $54.39. The water activity test is changed from $136.80 to $27.20.
        In its analysis of projected costs for fiscal years 1997 and 1998, 
    AMS has identified increases in the costs of providing laboratory 
    testing services despite declining revenues. The total Laboratory 
    Program obligations in FY 1996 were $5,963,000 while the program 
    operating costs are projected to be $6,032,000 in FY 1997 with current 
    fees. These cost increases are attributable mainly (65 percent of total 
    operating budget or $3,684,000 in 1997) to national and locality pay 
    raises and increased benefit costs for Federal employees. A general and 
    locality salary increase for Federal employees, ranging from 3.09 to 
    6.25 percent depending on locality, effective January 1995, a general 
    and locality salary increase for Federal employees, ranging from 2.39 
    to 2.89 percent depending on locality, effective January 1996, and an 
    additional salary increase, ranging from 3.30 to 6.26 percent depending 
    on localities, effective January 1997, has materially affected the 
    costs of laboratory programs. Current and estimated demand for the 
    laboratory services are also factored in the fee revisions. Since 
    S&TD's last fee increase in August 1993 (58 FR 42408) total annual 
    revenue of the S&TD's laboratories has decreased from $6.2 million to 
    $5.6 million. Major factors affecting these revenue losses include 
    industry's implementation of plant and in-house testing, cutbacks in 
    dairy support and procurement programs, and reduction in USDA food 
    assistance programs due to re-engineering involving State and local 
    governments. It is anticipated that in FY 1998, at the current fee 
    levels, the S&TD will not have sufficient revenue to sustain present 
    staffing levels, to cover equipment and material cost increases, and to 
    still maintain an adequate reserve balance of $2.7 million or a minimum 
    4 months reserve called for by Agency policy and prudent financial 
    management.
        The AMS laboratory testing programs are voluntary, user fee 
    services, conducted under the authority of the Agricultural Marketing 
    Act of 1946, as amended. The Act requires that reasonable fees be 
    collected from the users of these services to cover, as nearly as 
    practicable, the costs of maintaining the programs. A recent review of 
    the current fee schedules, effective since September 30, 1994 (59 FR 
    50120--50122), revealed that anticipated revenue would not adequately 
    cover increasing program costs. Without a fee increase, projected FY 
    1998 revenues for laboratory services are $5,616,000 with obligatory 
    costs projected at $6,276,000. Accordingly, S&TD is proposing to 
    increase by 6 percent the currently listed laboratory fees in Tables 1 
    through 5 and in Tables 7 through 8 in Part 91. The standard hourly 
    rate would be increased from $34.20 to $36.26 (6 percent). In addition, 
    the laboratory rate for appeals, holiday and overtime service would be 
    raised from $51.30 to $54.39 per analysis hour.
        The fees and charges in Part 96 involved with the official grading 
    of any lot of cottonseed would also increase by 6 percent. These fee 
    increases are needed because of a statistical based cottonseed lot size 
    study by S&TD in 1992 and the consequential revision of rule 135, 
    section 5 of the Trading Rules of the National Cottonseed Products 
    Association. The trade association's rule allows licensed cottonseed 
    samplers under AMS's supervision to increase the maximum cottonseed lot 
    size from 150 to 300 tons to obtain a representative official 
    cottonseed sample when prevailing environmental conditions during a 
    period of 3 consecutive days do not compromise the quality of graded 
    cottonseed. This resulted in a corresponding yearly reduction of the 
    total number of official cottonseed samples subject to analytical 
    chemical methods to derive a composite official grade designation. Even 
    though the cottonseed chemist licensing program costs have been lowered 
    in recent years, the loss of revenue resulting from the decreased 
    issuance of the official cottonseed grading certificates has been 
    substantial. Therefore, the Agency proposes to revise the certificate 
    fee charged for official analysis and cottonseed grade determination 
    from $3.00 per certificate, issued by the chemist, to $3.18. The 
    application fee for a chemist's license would be raised from $1,100.00 
    to $1,166.00 for the examination, while the fee for renewal of the 
    license would be increased from $275.00 to $292.00.
        The laboratory fees for aflatoxin analyses in Table 6 in Part 91 
    would be increased or decreased depending on the commodity type or 
    analytical method utilized. The cost of analyzing shelled peanuts by 
    high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) would be decreased from 
    $50.00 to $31.00 per single analysis because automated HPLC equipment 
    is being used now in the laboratory. Other aflatoxin test fees would 
    increase by 6 to 21 percent because there are corresponding increased 
    costs of the expendable supplies and materials to perform these 
    analyses.
        The rule would remove the time allotments for single tests in 
    Tables 1 through 7 in Part 91. The time allotments stated in the prior 
    rules and regulations of the S&TD (58 FR 42415, August 9, 1993 and 59 
    FR 50121, September 30, 1994) are no longer applicable because of the 
    recent approval of automated equipment and rapid procedures for many of 
    the listed tests. This new technology comes with
    
    [[Page 56038]]
    
    increased expenses in specialized supplies and materials required to 
    perform the requested analyses.
        This proposal provides for a 30-day comment period. This period is 
    deemed appropriate in view of the need to make revisions to the current 
    fee schedules without delay if approved.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    7 CFR Part 91
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Science and Technology 
    Division Laboratories, Fees and charges
    
    7 CFR Part 93
    
        Citrus fruits, Fruit juices, Fruits, Laboratories, Nuts, Vegetables
    
    7 CFR Part 96
    
        Cottonseeds, Chemist's licensure, Cottonseed quality analysis, 
    Official grade.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, Title 7, chapter I is 
    proposed to be amended as follows:
    
    PART 91--SERVICES AND GENERAL INFORMATION
    
        1. The authority citation part 91 continues to read as follows:
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624.
    
    Subpart I--Fees and Charges
    
        2. In Sec. 91.37, Tables 1 through 8 and paragraph (b) are revised 
    and a new paragraph (d) is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 91.37  Fees for laboratory testing, analysis, and other services.
    
    * * * * *
    
          Table 1.--Single Test Laboratory Fees for Proximate Analyses      
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Type of analysis                         List fee 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ammonia, Ion Selective Electrode...........................       $81.59
    Ash, Total.................................................        36.26
    Ash, Acid Insoluble........................................        54.39
    Chloride, Salt Titration (Dairy)...........................        18.13
    Fat, Acid Hydrolysis.......................................        36.26
    Fat (Dairy Products).......................................        18.13
    Fat, Ether Extraction......................................        36.26
    Fat, Microwave--Solvent Extraction.........................        36.26
    Fiber, Crude...............................................        72.52
    Moisture, Distillation.....................................        36.26
    Moisture, Oven.............................................        18.13
    Protein, Kjeldahl..........................................        72.52
    Salt, Back Titration.......................................        27.20
    Salt, Potentiometric.......................................        18.13
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
        Table 2.--Single Test Laboratory Fees for Lipid Related Analyses    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Type of analysis                         List fee 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Acid Degree Value (Dairy)..................................       $36.26
    Acidity, Titratable........................................         9.07
    Carotene, Spectrophotometric...............................        90.65
    Catalase Test..............................................        18.13
    Cholesterol \1\............................................        90.65
    Color (Honey)..............................................        18.13
    Color, NEPA (Eggs).........................................        36.26
    Consistency, Bostwick (Cooked).............................        18.13
    Consistency, Bostwick (Uncooked)...........................        18.13
    Density (Specific Gravity).................................         9.07
    Dispersibility (Moates-Dabbah Method)......................        18.13
    Fat Stability,\2\ AOM......................................        36.26
    Fatty Acid Profile (AOAC-GC method)........................       145.04
    Flash Point Test only......................................        72.52
    Free Fatty Acids...........................................        18.13
    Meltability (Process Cheese)...............................        18.13
    Peroxidase Test............................................        18.13
    Peroxide Value.............................................        27.20
    Smoke Point Test only......................................        72.52
    Smoke Point and Flash Point................................       126.91
    Solids, Total (Oven Drying)................................        18.13
    Soluble Solids, Refractometer..............................       18.13 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ Moisture and fat analyses are required to be analyzed at an         
      additional cost as prerequisites to the cholesterol test.             
    \2\ Peroxide value analysis is required as a prerequisite to the fat    
      stability test at the additional fee.                                 
    
    
            Table 3.--Single Test Laboratory Fees for Food Additives        
                              (DIRECT AND INDIRECT)                         
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Type of analysis                         List fee 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Aflatoxin, (Dairy, Eggs)...................................      $126.91
    Alar or Daminozide Residue.................................       217.56
    Amitraz Residue, GLC.......................................       217.56
    
    [[Page 56039]]
    
                                                                            
    Alcohol (Qualitative)......................................        72.52
    Alkalinity of Ash..........................................        54.39
    Antibiotic, Qualitative (Dairy)............................        18.13
    Antibiotic, Quantitative \1\...............................       398.86
    Ascorbates (Qualitative--Meats)............................        18.13
    Ascorbic Acid, Titration...................................        36.26
    Ascorbic Acid, Spectrophotometric..........................        36.26
    Benzene, Residual..........................................        72.52
    Brix, Direct Percent Sucrose...............................        18.13
    Brix, Dilution.............................................        18.13
    Butylated Hydroxyanisole (BHA).............................        54.39
    Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT).............................        54.39
    Caffeine, Micro Bailey-Andrew..............................        54.39
    Caffeine, Spectrophotometric...............................        36.26
    Calcium....................................................        54.39
    Citric Acid, GLC or HPLC...................................        54.39
    Chlorinated Hydrocarbons:                                               
        Pesticides and Industrial Chemicals:                                
            Initial Screen.....................................       145.04
            Second Column Confirmation of Analyte..............        36.26
            3Confirmation on Mass Spectrometer.................        72.52
    Dextrin (Qualitative)......................................        18.13
    Dextrin (Quantitative).....................................       108.78
    Filth, Heavy (Dairy).......................................        90.65
    Filth, Heavy (Eggs)........................................       145.04
    Filth, Light (Eggs)........................................        90.65
    Filth, Light & Heavy (Eggs Extraneous).....................       217.56
    Flavor (Dairy).............................................         9.07
    Flavor (Products except Dairy).............................        27.20
    Fumigants:                                                              
        Initial Screen:                                                     
            Dibromochloropropane (DBCP)........................        36.26
            Ethylene Dibromide.................................        36.26
            Methyl Bromide.....................................        36.26
        Confirmation on Mass Spectrometer:                                  
            Each individual fumigant residue...................        72.52
    Glucose (Qualitative)......................................        27.20
    Glucose (Quantitative).....................................        63.46
    Glycerol (Quantitative)....................................       108.78
    Gums.......................................................       108.78
    Heavy Metal Screen \2\.....................................       317.28
    High Sucrose Content or Avasucrol:                                      
        Percent Sucrose (Holland Eggs).........................       145.04
    Hydrogen Ion Activity, pH..................................        18.13
    Mercury, Cold Vapor AA.....................................        90.65
    Metals--Other Than Heavy, Each Metal.......................        72.52
    Monosodium Dihydrogen Phosphate............................       145.04
    Monosodium Glutamate.......................................       145.04
    Niacin.....................................................        72.52
    Nitrites (Qualitative).....................................        18.13
    Nitrites (Quantitative)....................................       108.78
    Oxygen.....................................................        18.13
    Odor.......................................................         9.07
    Palatability and Odor:                                                  
        First Sample...........................................        27.20
        Each Additional Sample.................................        18.13
    Phosphatase, Residual......................................        36.26
    Phosphorus.................................................        72.52
    Propylene Glycol, Codistillation:                                       
        (Qualitative)..........................................        72.52
    Pyrethrin Residue (Dairy)..................................       145.04
    Scorched Particles.........................................         9.07
    Sodium, Potentiometric.....................................        36.26
    Sodium Benzoate, HPLC......................................        54.39
    Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS)................................       290.08
    Sodium Silicoaluminate (Zeolex)............................        72.52
    Solubility Index...........................................        18.13
    Starch, Direct Acid Hydrolysis.............................       108.78
    Sugar, Polarimetric Methods................................        36.26
    Sugar Profile, HPLC: \3\                                                
        One type sugar from HPLC profile.......................       108.78
    
    [[Page 56040]]
    
                                                                            
        Each additional type sugar.............................        18.13
    Sugars, Non-Reducing.......................................       108.78
    Sugars, Total as Invert....................................        72.52
    Sulfites (Qualitative).....................................        27.20
    Sulfur Dioxide, Direct Titration...........................        36.26
    Sulfur Dioxide, Monier-Williams............................        54.39
    Toluene, Residual..........................................        72.52
    Triethyl Citrate, GC (Quantitative)........................        36.26
    Vitamin A..................................................        90.65
    Vitamin A, Carr-Price (Dry Milk)...........................        45.33
    Vitamin B-1 (Thiamin)......................................        72.52
    Vitamin B-2 (Riboflavin)...................................        72.52
    Vitamin D, HPLC (Vitamins D 2 and D 3).....................       308.21
    Whey Protein Nitrogen......................................        27.20
    Xanthydrol Test For Urea...................................        54.39
        This is an optional test to the extraneous materials                
                          isolation test.                                   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ Antibiotic testing includes tests for chlorotetracycline,           
      oxytetracycline, and tetracycline.                                    
    \2\ Heavy metal screen includes tests for cadmium, lead, and mercury.   
    \3\ This profile includes the following components: Dextrose, Fructose, 
      Lactose, Maltose and Sucrose.                                         
    
    
      Table 4.--Single Test Laboratory Fees for Other Chemical and Physical 
                               Component Analyses                           
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Type of analysis                         List fee 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Available Carbon Dioxide (Baking Powders)..................       $54.39
    Capsaicin (Hot Sauce)......................................        72.52
    Color, Apparent-Visual.....................................         9.07
    Complete Kohman Analysis (Dairy)...........................        36.26
    Extractable Color in Spices................................        18.13
    Grape Juice Absorbency Ratio...............................        18.13
    Hydroxymethylfurfural (Honey)..............................        36.26
    Jelly Strength (Bloom).....................................        54.39
    Linolenic Acid.............................................        72.52
    Methyl Anthranilate........................................        36.26
    Net Weight (Per Can).......................................         9.07
    Non-Volatile Methylene Chloride Extract....................        90.65
    Overrun for Whipped Topping................................        27.20
    Particle Size (Ether Wash).................................        18.13
    pH--Quinhydrone (Cheese)...................................        18.13
    Potassium Iodide (Table Salt)..............................        54.39
    Quinic Acid (Cranberry Juice)..............................        63.46
    Serum Drainage for Whipped Topping.........................        18.13
    Sieve or Particle Size.....................................        18.13
    Rate of Wetting (Nondairy Creamer).........................        18.13
    Reducing Sugars............................................        72.52
    Water Activity.............................................        27.20
    Water Insoluble Inorganic: Residues (WIIR).................        72.52
    Yellow Onion Test..........................................        27.20
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
       Table 5.--Single Test Laboratory Fees for Microbiological Analyses   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Type of analysis                         List fee 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Aerobic (Standard) Plate Count.............................       $18.13
    Anaerobic Bacterial Plate Count............................        27.20
    Bacillus cereus............................................        72.52
    Bacterial Direct Microscopic Count.........................        36.26
    Campylobacter jejuni.......................................       145.04
    Coliform Plate Count (Dairy Products)......................        18.13
    Coliform Plate Count, Violet Red Bile Agar (Presumptive                 
     Coliform Plate Count).....................................        27.20
    Coliforms, Most Probable Number (MPN): 1                                
        Step 1.................................................        27.20
        Step 2.................................................        27.20
    E coli, Presumptive MPN (Additional) 2.....................        54.39
    Enterococci Count..........................................       108.78
    Lactobacillus Count 3......................................        45.33
    Listeria monocytogenes Confirmation Analysis: 4                         
        Step 1.................................................        54.39
        Step 2.................................................        54.39
    
    [[Page 56041]]
    
                                                                            
        Step 3 (Confirmation)..................................        90.65
    Parasite Identification....................................       145.04
    Psychrotrophic Bacterial Plate Count.......................        27.20
    Salmonella (USDA Culture Method): 5                                     
        Step 1 (Dairy Products)................................        36.26
        Step 1.................................................        54.39
        Step 2.................................................        27.20
        Step 3 (Confirmation)..................................        54.39
        Serological Typing (Optional)..........................        90.65
    Salmonella Enumeration (Complete Test).....................       108.78
    Salmonella (Rapid Methods): 6                                           
        Step 1.................................................        72.52
        Step 2.................................................        27.20
        Step 3 (Confirmation)..................................        54.39
    Salmonella typhi (Meat Products) 7.........................        36.26
    Staphylococcus aureus, MPN:                                             
        With Coagulase Positive Confirmation...................        63.46
    Thermoduric Bacterial Plate Count..........................        27.20
    Yeast and Mold Count.......................................        18.13
    Yeast and Mold Differential Plate Count....................       27.20 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ Coliform MPN analysis may be in two steps as follows: Step 1--      
      presumptive test through lauryl sulfate tryptose broth; Step 2--      
      confirmatory test through brilliant green lactose bile broth.         
    \2\ Step 1 of the coliform MPN analysis is a prerequistite for the      
      performance of the presumptive E. coli test. Prior enrichment in      
      lauryl sulfate tryptose broth is required for optimal recovery of E.  
      coli from inoculated and incubated EC broth (Escherichia coli broth). 
      The E. coli test is performed through growth on eosin methylene blue  
      agar. The fee stated for E. coli analysis is a supplementary charge to
      step 1 of coliform test.                                              
    \3\ Determination of bacterial plate count of different species of      
      Lactobacillus.                                                        
    \4\Listeria monocytogenes test using the USDA method may be in three    
      steps as follows: Step 1--isolation by University of Vermont modified 
      (UVM) broth and Fraser's broth enrichments and selective plating with 
      Modified Oxford (MOX) agar; Presumptive Step 2--typical colonies      
      inoculated from Horse Blood into brain heart infusive (BHI) broth and 
      check for characteristic motility; Confirmatory Step 3--culture from  
      BHI broth with typical motility is inoculated into the seven          
      biochemical medias, BHI agar for oxidase and catalase tests, Motility 
      test medium, and Christie-Atkins-Munch-Peterson (CAMP) test. Listeria 
      monocytogenes test using the FDA method may be in three steps as      
      follows: Step 1--isolation by trypticase soy broth with 0.6% yeast    
      extract (TSB-YE) broth enrichment and selective plating with Modified 
      McBrides agar and Lithium chloride Phenylethanol Moxalactam (LPM)     
      agar; Presumptive Step 2--typical colonies inoculated to trypticase   
      soy agar with yeast extract (TSA-YE) with sheep blood plates to check 
      for hemolysis followed by inoculations to BHI broth and TSA-YE plates 
      to check for characteristic motility, gram stain and catalase test;   
      Confirmatory Step 3--culture from BHI broth with typical motility for 
      wet mount is inoculated into the required 10 biochemical medias,      
      Sulfide-Indole-Motility (SIM) medium, and the CAMP test. Serology is  
      checked using growth from TSA-YE plates. Both methods for Listeria    
      determination have the equivalent time needed for each step.          
    \5\Salmonella test may be in three steps as follows: Step 1--growth     
      through differential agars; Step 2--growth and testing through triple 
      sugar iron and lysine iron agars; Step--3 confirmatory test through   
      biochemicals, and polyvalent serological testing with Poly ``O'' and  
      Poly ``H'' antiserums. The serological typing of Salmonella is        
      requested on occasion.                                                
    \6\Salmonella test may be in three steps as follows: Step 1--growth in  
      enrichment broths and ELISA test or DNA hybridization system assay;   
      Step 2--growth and testing through triple sugar iron and lysine iron  
      agars; Step 3--confirmatory test through biochemicals, and polyvalent 
      serological testing with Poly ``O'' and Poly ``H'' antiserums.        
    \7\Salmonella typhi determination in mechanically deboned meat.         
    
    
                Table 6.--Laboratory Fees for Aflatoxin Analyses            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Fee per                  
            Aflatoxin test by commodity            single      Fee per pair 
                                                  analysis     analyses \1\ 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Peanut Butter (TLC--CB--Affinity Column)..        $36.26  NA \2\        
    Corn (TLC--CB--Affinity Column)...........         36.26  NA            
    Roasted Peanuts (TLC--BF).................         36.26  NA            
    Brazil Nuts (TLC--BF).....................         72.52  NA            
    Pistachio Nuts (TLC--BF)..................         72.52  NA            
    Shelled Peanuts (TLC--Affinity Column)....         17     34            
    Shelled Peanuts (HPLC)....................         31     62            
    Tree Nuts (TLC)...........................         36.26  NA            
    Oilseed Meals (TLC).......................         36.26  NA            
    Edible Seeds (TLC)........................         36.26  NA            
    Dried Fruit (TLC).........................         36.26  NA            
    Small Grains (TLC)........................         36.26  NA            
    In-Shell Peanuts (TLC)....................         17     34            
    Silage; Other Grains (TLC)................         36.26  NA            
    Submitted Samples (TLC--Affinity Column)..         36.26  NA            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ Aflatoxin testing of raw peanuts under Peanut Marketing Agreement   
      for subsamples 1-AB, 2-AB, 3-AB, and 1-CD is $34.00 per pair of       
      analyses using Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC) and Best Foods (BF)    
      extraction or immunoaffinity column chromatography method. The BF     
      method has been modified to incorporate a water slurry extraction     
      procedure. The Contaminants Branch (CB) method is used on occasion as 
      an alternative method for peanuts and peanut meal when doubt exists as
      to the effectiveness of the Best Foods method in extracting aflatoxin 
      from the sample or when background interferences exist that might mask
      TLC quantitation of aflatoxin. The cost per single or pair of analyses
      using High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is $31.00 and $62.00,
      respectively. Other aflatoxin analyses for fruits and vegetables are  
      listed at Science and Technology Division's current hourly rate of    
      $36.26.                                                               
    \2\ NA denotes not applicable.                                          
    
    
    [[Page 56042]]
    
    
         Table 7.--Miscellaneous Charges Supplemental to the Science and    
                 Technology Division's Laboratory Analysis Fees             
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Laboratory service description                  List fee 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sample Grinding Raw Peanuts by Vertical Cutter Mixer (VCM).       $18.13
    Sample Grinding Canned Boned Poultry (VCM).................        36.26
    Sample Grinding (Meats, Meat Products, Meals, Ready-to-                 
     Eat):                                                                  
        per pouch or raw sample................................         9.07
        per tray pack..........................................        18.13
    Compositing Multiple Subsamples for an Individual Test                  
     Sample Unit per subsample.................................         9.07
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
        Table 8.--Additional Charges Applicable to the Sample Receipt and   
                                 Analysis Report                            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Service description                      List charge     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Established Courier Expense at Albany, Georgia     $2.15                
     S&TD Laboratory.                                                       
    Courier Expense at Other AMS Laboratories:                              
        Mileage Charge Set at $0.31 Per Mile           Varies               
         Roundtrip from Laboratory to Delivery Site.                        
    Facsimile Charge (Per Analysis Report)...........  $3.20 minimum up to  
                                                        first 3 pages, then 
                                                        $1.10 per page      
    Additional Analysis Report or Extra Certificate    $18.13 per report or 
     (\1/2\ hour charge).                               certificate reissued
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (b) The fee charge for any laboratory analysis not listed in 
    paragraph (a) of this section, or for any other applicable services 
    rendered in the laboratory, shall be based on the time required to 
    perform such analysis or render such service. The standard hourly rate 
    shall be $36.26.
    * * * * *
        (d) When Science and Technology Division provides applied and 
    developmental research and training activities for microbiological and 
    chemical analyses on agricultural commodities the applicant will be 
    charged a fee on a reimbursable cost basis.
        3. Section 91.38 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 91.38  Additional fees for appeal of analysis.
    
        (a) The appellant will be charged an additional fee at a rate of 
    1.5 times the standard rate stated in Sec. 91.37(a) if, as a result of 
    an authorized appeal analysis, it is determined that the original test 
    results are correct. The appeal laboratory rate is $54.39 per analysis 
    hour.
        (b) The appeal fee will be waived if the appeal laboratory test 
    discloses that an inadvertent error was made in the original analysis.
        4. In Sec. 91.39, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 91.39  Special request fees for overtime and legal holiday 
    service.
    
        (a) Laboratory analyses initiated at the special request of the 
    applicant to be rendered on Saturdays, Sundays, Federal holidays, and 
    on an overtime basis will be charged at a rate of 1.5 times the 
    standard rate stated in Sec. 91.37(a). The premium laboratory rate for 
    holiday and overtime service will be $54.39 per analysis hour.
    * * * * *
        5. In Sec. 91.40, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 91.40  Fees for courier service and fasimile of the analysis 
    report.
    
        (a) The AMS peanut aflatoxin laboratory at Albany, Georgia, has a 
    set courier charge of $2.15 per trip to retrieve the sample package. 
    The mileage charge specified in Table 8 of this part for courier 
    service at other AMS laboratories is based on the shortest roundtrip 
    route from laboratory to sample retrieval site.
    * * * * *
    
    PART 93--PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
    
        1. The authority citation part 93 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624.
    
    Subpart B--Peanuts, Tree Nuts, Corn and Other Oilseeds
    
        2. In Sec. 93.11, the definition for ``aflatoxin'' is revised to 
    read as follows:
        Aflatoxin. A toxic metabolite produced by the molds Aspergillus 
    flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus, and Aspergillus nomius. The aflatoxin 
    compounds fluoresce when viewed under UV light as follows: aflatoxin 
    B1 and derivatives with a blue fluorescence, aflatoxin 
    B2 with a blue-violet fluorescence, aflatoxin G1 
    with a green fluorescence, aflatoxin G2 with a green-blue 
    fluorescence, aflatoxin M1 with a blue-violet fluorescence, 
    and aflatoxin M2 with a violet fluorescence. These closely 
    related molecular structures are referred to as aflatoxin 
    B1, B2, G1, G2, 
    M1, M2, GM1, B2a, 
    G2a, R0, B3, 1-
    OCH3B2, and 1-CH3G2.
        3. In Sec. 93.12, paragraph (b)(1) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 93.12  Analyses available and locations of laboratories.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * * (1) The Science and Technology Division Aflatoxin 
    Laboratories at Albany and Blakely, Georgia will perform other analyses 
    for peanuts, peanut products, and a variety of oilseeds. The analyses 
    for oilseeds include testing for free fatty acids, ammonia, nitrogen or 
    protein, moisture and volatile matter, foreign matter, and oil (fat) 
    content.
    * * * * *
    
    PART 96--COTTONSEED SOLD OR OFFERED FOR SALE FOR CRUSHING PURPOSES 
    (CHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND UNITED STATES OFFICIAL GRADE CERTIFICATION)
    
        1. The authority citation part 96 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624.
    
        2. Section 96.20 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 96.20  Fee for chemist's license.
    
        (a) The fee for the examination of an applicant for a license as a 
    chemist to analyze and certify the grade of cottonseed shall be 
    $1,166.00.
        (b) The examination fee shall be paid at the time the application 
    is filed or at a time prior to the administration of the
    
    [[Page 56043]]
    
    examinations. This fee shall be paid regardless of the outcome of the 
    licensing examinations. The examination fee shall be nonrefundable to 
    the applicant; however, in the evident of death of the applicant prior 
    to the examination, full payment of the fee may be returned to the 
    applicant's beneficiary. If an application is filed with an 
    insufficient fee, the application and fee submitted will be returned to 
    the applicant.
        (c) For each renewal of a chemist's license, the fee shall be 
    $292.00.
        3. In Sec. 96.21, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 96.21  Fee for certificates to be paid by licensee to Service.
    
        (a) To cover the cost of administering the regulations in this 
    part, each licensed cottonseed chemist shall pay to the Service $3.18 
    for each certificate of the grade of cottonseed issued by the licensee.
    * * * * *
        Dated: October 17, 1997.
    Lon Hatamiya,
    Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-28454 Filed 10-27-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/28/1997
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
97-28454
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before November 28, 1997.
Pages:
56036-56043 (8 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Number S&TD-97-001
PDF File:
97-28454.pdf
CFR: (7)
7 CFR 91.37
7 CFR 91.38
7 CFR 91.39
7 CFR 91.40
7 CFR 93.12
More ...