98-26598. Experienced Miner and Supervisor Training  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 53750-53761]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-26598]
    
    
    
    [[Page 53749]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part II
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Labor
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Mine Safety and Health Administration
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    30 CFR Parts 48, 75, and 77
    
    
    
    Experienced Miner and Supervisor Training; Final Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 1998 / 
    Rules and Regulations
    
    [[Page 53750]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    
    Mine Safety and Health Administration
    
    30 CFR Parts 48, 75, and 77
    
    RIN: 1219-AB13
    
    
    Experienced Miner and Supervisor Training
    
    AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Labor.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This final rule revises MSHA's training regulations to update 
    and upgrade certain provisions. Specifically, these revisions require 
    essential health and safety training for certain supervisors; eliminate 
    new miner training for experienced miners; and promote flexibility in 
    experienced miner training to meet the specific needs of the miner and 
    the operator. This final rule will enhance safety and health by 
    providing effective training of miners and, thus, reducing accidents, 
    injuries, and illnesses.
    
    DATES: This final rule is effective February 3, 1999, except that 
    Secs. 48.2(b)(2), 48.22(b)(2), 48.8(c), and 48.28(c) are effective 
    October 6, 1998 and Secs. 75.161 and 77.107-1 are effective October 6, 
    1999.
        Submit all comments on the information collection burden by 
    December 7, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the information collection 
    requirements directly to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
    Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer 
    for MSHA, 725 17th Street NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; and to 
    MSHA by mail to Carol J. Jones, Acting Director, Office of Standards, 
    Regulations, and Variances, MSHA, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Room 631, 
    Arlington, VA 22203; by facsimile to MSHA, Office of Standards, 
    Regulations, and Variances at 703-235-5551; or by E-mail to 
    comments@msha.gov. MSHA encourages commenters sending written comments 
    by mail or facsimile to also send a computer disk of the comments.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol J. Jones, Acting Director; MSHA, 
    Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances; 703-235-1910.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Rulemaking History
    
        Section 115 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine 
    Act), 30 U.S.C. 825, directs the Secretary of Labor to promulgate 
    regulations concerning safety and health training programs for miners. 
    Section 115 states that each mine operator must have a training program 
    approved by the Secretary. The legislative history of the Mine Act 
    indicates that Congress intended that miners be trained commensurate 
    with their exposure to mine hazards so that they can effectively deal 
    with those hazards.
        On October 13, 1978, MSHA published regulations for the training of 
    miners in 30 CFR part 48 (43 FR 47453) implementing Sec. 115 of the 
    Mine Act. Among other things, the regulations define ``miner'' and 
    ``experienced miner,'' and they specifically require new miner and 
    newly-employed experienced miner training, task training, and annual 
    refresher training.
        On September 24, 1991, MSHA published a proposed rule (56 FR 48376) 
    to revise portions of the existing regulations. The comment period for 
    the proposed rule closed January 24, 1992, and MSHA held two public 
    hearings: July 21, 1992, in Arlington, Virginia; and July 23, 1992, in 
    Denver, Colorado. The record remained open until September 25, 1992, to 
    allow for post-hearing comments.
        MSHA received comments from many segments of the mining community. 
    These comments have been reviewed and considered in the development of 
    the final rule. Some commenters, however, raised issues outside the 
    scope of the proposal. The issues addressed in the final rule are 
    limited to those specifically raised in the proposed rule.
    
    II. General Discussion
    
    Overview
    
        The Congress recognized, and MSHA's experience confirms, that 
    effective training of miners is important to preventing deaths, 
    injuries, and illnesses in mining. All miners must be trained to 
    recognize and avoid mine hazards and to work safely. Effective training 
    must be complete, preparing miners for the hazards they will face so 
    that they can assist in the prevention of accidents, injuries, and 
    illnesses. Circumstances affecting individual miners differ, however. 
    They have varying levels of mining experience and work in various 
    mining environments. Effective training must take these differences 
    into account.
        Training that is suitable for miners without mining experience may 
    not be appropriate for miners with experience. MSHA continues to allow 
    compliance flexibility under the final rule so that mine operators may 
    develop training materials that best meet their particular needs. For 
    example, training should take into account miners whose extent and type 
    of experience varies, including those transferred from one mine to 
    another mine owned by the same operator, as well as those miners who 
    have not worked in their occupation for a period of time. For this 
    reason, the final rule primarily retains a performance-oriented 
    approach to experienced miner training.
        As required in Sec. 101(a)(9) of the Mine Act, the final rule 
    promotes effective training without reducing the protection afforded 
    miners in the following ways. First, it provides that experienced 
    miners, including supervisors, must take training tailored to meet 
    their specific needs. Once a miner is experienced, that miner will not 
    have to take training designed for inexperienced miners. Second, miners 
    who are away from mining for 5 years or more must receive at least 8 
    hours of experienced miner training. Third, experienced miner training 
    includes four new subjects: prevention of accidents, emergency medical 
    procedures, health, and health and safety aspects of the tasks to be 
    performed in their jobs. Finally, miners returning to work, following 
    an absence of 12 months or less, must be made aware of any major 
    changes in the mine that may adversely affect their safety or health.
    
    Training Plan Modifications
    
        To minimize the paperwork burden, assist mine operators with 
    compliance, and focus on the importance of quality training, MSHA will 
    provide assistance and guidance for complying with this regulation. The 
    Agency will issue compliance guidelines to all mine operators further 
    explaining the required modifications to their training plans. MSHA 
    also will include a model training plan addendum with the compliance 
    guidelines. The operator can attach this model addendum to an existing 
    MSHA-approved training plan and, thus, eliminate the need to submit a 
    plan modification to MSHA for approval.
        Existing standards require mine operators to post a copy of 
    revisions to the training plan on the mine bulletin board.
    
    III. Section-By-Section Discussion
    
    Sections 48.2 and 48.22  Definitions
    
    Supervisors as Miners
        Like the proposal, the final rule eliminates the training exemption 
    for supervisors who are subject to State certification programs; all 
    supervisors are ``miners'' for training purposes. The final rule 
    removes the specific reference to supervisors from the definition of
    
    [[Page 53751]]
    
    ``miner'' under existing Secs. 48.2(a)(1)(ii) and 48.22(a)(1)(ii).
        When the training regulations were promulgated in 1978, MSHA 
    expected that State certification programs would be sufficient for 
    safety training purposes, and that Federal requirements would duplicate 
    the requirement of the states. MSHA experience has shown that State 
    certification programs generally do not focus on the safety and health 
    aspects of mining, particularly those tasks performed by miners, and 
    that accidents involving supervisors usually occur while supervisors 
    are performing mining related tasks. For these reasons, the final rule 
    will supplement the State certification program by emphasizing health 
    and safety issues specific to a particular mine or mining method.
        Supervisors direct the work force and, in that role, are 
    responsible for assuring that work is done in a safe and healthful 
    manner. In many instances, supervisors, who may have to visit many work 
    areas at a mine, may encounter more hazards than miners who may be 
    assigned to one area or one piece of equipment. Also, supervisors often 
    personally intervene and perform non-supervisory tasks when 
    interruptions of normal work operations occur or when hazardous 
    situations arise.
        Fatalities among underground coal mine supervisors, including State 
    certified supervisors, confirm their exposure to hazards. From 1990 to 
    1997, there were 35 underground coal supervisor fatalities. This figure 
    represents about 15% of all underground coal fatalities during that 
    period. Though the fatality rate for supervisors has improved in recent 
    years, their accident experience continues to warrant attention. 
    Underground coal supervisors are of particular concern because MSHA 
    estimates that only about 34% of underground coal supervisors receive 
    or are required to receive part 48 training. About 75% of surface coal 
    supervisors and all metal and nonmetal (M/NM) supervisors receive or 
    are required to receive part 48 training.
        Supervisors are subjected to many, if not more, of the hazards that 
    non-supervisory miners face and, therefore, need to receive at least 
    the same training. The final rule addresses this issue by requiring 
    that previously exempt State certified supervisors complete part 48 
    annual refresher training not more than 12 months after the publication 
    date of this final rule in the Federal Register. This will provide 
    supervisors the full complement of training that all miners receive, 
    including courses in Electrical Hazards, Health, Explosives, and 
    Prevention of Accidents. In this way, the final rule assures that 
    supervisors will be effectively trained in all health and safety 
    aspects of their work environment.
        Several commenters suggested that the training regulations refer to 
    both ``miners'' and ``supervisors'' throughout the provisions to ensure 
    that supervisors are covered by the training requirements. The Agency 
    contends that separate references to both miners and supervisors 
    throughout the rule are not necessary. All miners, including 
    supervisors, need to be effectively trained commensurate with their 
    exposure to mine hazards. Accordingly, the final rule removes the 
    supervisor exemption and, by doing so, the definition of ``miner'' will 
    include supervisors.
        Commenters pointed out that some supervisors are primarily office 
    workers who work at the mine, but are not exposed to mine hazards. 
    These commenters suggested that these supervisors not be considered 
    ``miners'' and required to complete comprehensive training. One 
    commenter suggested that MSHA add clarifying language to the regulation 
    to exclude supervisors who do not perform miners' tasks and are not 
    regularly exposed to mining hazards. MSHA agrees that these 
    supervisors, like other miners who are not regularly exposed to mining 
    hazards, do not need comprehensive training. Under the final rule, 
    supervisors will be treated like other miners. MSHA does not accept 
    that additional explanatory language is needed, however, because the 
    definitions for ``miner'' [Secs. 48.2(a) and 48.22(a)] distinguish 
    between miners who are required to take comprehensive training from 
    those, including some supervisors, who only need hazard training 
    (Secs. 48.11 or 48.31).
        On the other hand, MSHA received comments from both industry and 
    labor representatives suggesting that supervisors who are exposed to 
    mine hazards should receive training under part 48 beyond that required 
    for other miners. The comments detailed courses that should be 
    incorporated into a comprehensive training program specifically for 
    supervisors. While these comments extend beyond the scope of the 
    proposal, they raise important issues for future consideration by the 
    Agency.
        One commenter pointed out that many operators use their supervisory 
    personnel as trainers to fulfill the requirements of part 48. The 
    commenter was concerned that supervisors who conduct training would be 
    required to take the same training themselves. Supervisors and miners 
    who are MSHA approved to conduct training have demonstrated knowledge 
    of the subject matter through previous instruction or experience. MSHA, 
    therefore, will credit persons who conduct a training course with 
    having taken that particular course. For example, an MSHA approved 
    instructor who teaches a course on health will be credited with having 
    taken that course.
    Requirements for Experienced Miner Status
        In the existing standards, an ``experienced miner'' is a person who 
    has received training acceptable to MSHA from an appropriate State 
    agency within the preceding 12 months; or a person who has had at least 
    12 months experience working in a surface or underground mine during 
    the preceding 36 months; or a person who has received new miner 
    training within the preceding 12 months. If, for example, a miner is 
    laid off for more than 2 years, that miner is no longer considered 
    ``experienced'' and reverts to new miner status for training purposes. 
    In order to be considered ``experienced,'' the miner must complete new 
    miner training. Consequently, miners who may have significant mining 
    experience must take training designed for persons new to mining. The 
    proposal had addressed this lapse in ``experienced'' miner status for 
    training purposes by allowing a miner to retain this status for life if 
    the miner completed new miner training and 12 months of mining 
    experience.
        Like the proposal, the final rule defines ``experienced miner'' in 
    Secs. 48.2(b) and 48.22(b) to mean a miner who has completed new miner 
    training and has 12 months of mining experience. Once the miner has 
    attained that training and experience, the miner retains ``experienced 
    miner'' status for life for training purposes. Upon changing 
    employment, the miner is then required to receive training specifically 
    intended for experienced miners.
        The final rule allows laid-off miners to retain experienced miner 
    status, thus making them more competitive. Even when miners have not 
    been passed over, the lapse of experienced miner status has stirred 
    some resentment among miners who, by virtue of their mining experience, 
    do not want to be called or treated as ``new miners.'' The final rule 
    eliminates the lapse of the experienced miner status, and strengthens 
    experienced miner training requirements.
        MSHA received several comments on the definition of ``experienced 
    miner.'' Some commenters agreed that the combination of training and 
    experience
    
    [[Page 53752]]
    
    should qualify a person as an experienced miner.
        Other commenters stated that obtaining experienced miner status 
    might be difficult for some independent contractors working on mine 
    property. They pointed out that independent contractors are often hired 
    for their task expertise and that new miner training is not necessary 
    to assure that these contractors are knowledgeable in the health and 
    safety aspects of their tasks.
        MSHA's position is that, in addition to task expertise, these 
    independent contractors must have a solid foundation in the health and 
    safety aspects of their mine work environment. MSHA's experience 
    indicates that task expertise alone does not substitute for a 
    familiarity with surrounding safety and health hazards. For example, an 
    electrician who is contracted to work on mine property will be familiar 
    with hazards associated with working around electricity, such as water, 
    grounding, and live wires. The electrician may not be familiar with 
    mine hazards or health and safety procedures, such as the use of 
    personal protective equipment, lockout and tagging procedures, and 
    working in and around operating equipment.
        Under the proposal, experienced miner training would have been 
    ``given by an operator or state.'' Commenters said that this provision 
    would be unduly restrictive as to the types of entities that could 
    provide the training. It was never MSHA's intention to restrict who 
    could conduct the training. MSHA considered training provided by the 
    operator through a third party as training ``given by'' the operator. 
    For clarification, the final rule requires only that the training be 
    MSHA-approved. Thus, a variety of entities can conduct the MSHA-
    approved training, including private trainers, universities, trade 
    associations, and labor organizations.
        Commenters noted that contractors are mobile, performing work for 
    short periods of time at many different job sites in mining and general 
    industry. According to these commenters, such work patterns make it 
    difficult to accumulate a year's mining experience within 12 months of 
    receiving new miner training. They suggested that the definition of an 
    ``experienced miner'' include only a training requirement. Work 
    experience, however, is critical to the hands-on application of the 
    safe work procedures and practices of each task. Actually doing a task 
    in a safe manner effectively imprints those practices and procedures 
    and reinforces learning.
        One commenter suggested that experienced underground miners should 
    be considered experienced surface miners, and vice versa. MSHA rejected 
    this comment because underground and surface mining present different 
    environments, hazards, and mining equipment. If ``experienced'' status 
    is to be meaningful, an experienced underground miner must have 
    underground experience and an experienced surface miner must have 
    surface experience.
        Similarly, another commenter suggested that either surface or 
    underground training and experience should suffice for independent 
    contractors to gain ``experienced'' miner status for both locations. 
    Again, MSHA concludes that training specifically geared to those 
    respective environments is both justified and necessary because 
    independent contractors, like other miners, are exposed to hazards that 
    are unique to either surface or underground mining environments.
        MSHA acknowledges, however, that maintenance and service 
    contractors often have significant trade experience in work 
    environments similar to surface mines or the surface areas of 
    underground mines. These contractors are not exposed to appreciably 
    different hazards when they are working in similar work environments. 
    Accordingly, MSHA will allow independent contractors to count their 
    trade experience in work environments with hazards similar to mining 
    toward satisfying the 12-month surface mining experience requirement. 
    For example, a person who has repaired or changed tires for 7 months in 
    an employment setting with exposure to hazards like those found at mine 
    properties, may be credited for the 7 months experience.
        One commenter stated that it also may be difficult for some new 
    miners, especially at mines that work intermittently, to gain the 12 
    months of mining experience within 12 months of receiving new miner 
    training. Another commenter suggested that the rule should allow 
    persons 36 months to attain the 12 months of mining experience. 
    Although the Agency acknowledges the importance of mining experience, 
    it also agrees that gaining experience consecutively or within a 
    restricted time frame may be difficult in some cases. In response to 
    commenters, and to provide flexibility to both miners and operators, 
    the final rule imposes no limit on the amount of time within which the 
    miner has to accumulate the 12 months of experience.
        The proposal would have recast the existing grandfather provision 
    for miners employed on October 13, 1978, by adding a 1-year experience 
    requirement. MSHA received no comment specifically on this part of the 
    proposal. Commenters were concerned, however, that some other miners, 
    who are considered to be experienced miners under the existing rule, 
    would lose that status under this proposed provision because they do 
    not yet have 12 months of mining experience.
        MSHA wants a smooth transition under the final rule without a 
    disruption to the mining industry. Accordingly, MSHA will consider all 
    miners who are experienced miners under the existing rule on the 
    effective date of this final rule to be experienced miners for life. 
    This addresses the commenters' concern and incorporates the current 
    grandfather provision without adding requirements.
        Under the proposal, MSHA would also have considered supervisors to 
    be experienced miners if they were certified under an MSHA-approved 
    State certification program and were employed as supervisors on the 
    date of publication of this final rule. MSHA received no comment on 
    this issue and the final rule retains this provision. Because 
    supervisors are drawn from the pool of experienced miners, this 
    provision does not reduce protection afforded miners under the existing 
    standards.
    
    Sections 48.5 and 48.25  Training of New Miners
    
        Under the proposal, an ``experienced miner'' was a miner who had 
    completed new miner training and had 12 months of mining experience. 
    The proposal did not address what training a miner would need if the 
    miner went to work at another mine before gaining the required 12 
    months of experience. Upon reviewing the proposal, MSHA was concerned 
    that miners working in different mines before accumulating the required 
    12 months of mining experience would have to take new miner training 
    each time they began work at a new mine, resulting in unduly repetitive 
    and costly training.
        One commenter pointed out that a training and experience 
    requirement that may result in miners, including independent 
    contractors, repeatedly taking new miner training is undesirable and 
    not conducive to effective training. Another commenter suggested that 
    new miner training be good for 36 months.
        The final rule addresses this issue in Secs. 48.5(d) and 48.25(d). 
    This provision allows miners who have received new miner training in 
    the last 36 months, to take experienced miner training rather than 
    requiring them to retake new miner training. These miners will then 
    continue in the operator's regular
    
    [[Page 53753]]
    
    program of training for miners, including task and annual refresher 
    training. This approach minimizes the likelihood of repeating new miner 
    training unnecessarily. MSHA has determined that the final provision 
    reduces the compliance burden on mine operators and provides more 
    effective training to miners, while not reducing the protection under 
    the existing standards.
        For example, a person new to mining receives surface new miner 
    training, works 6 months, and leaves the mining industry. Two years 
    after receiving new miner training, the person is hired at a surface 
    mine. Because the person had received new miner training within 36 
    months, the person will be required to receive experienced miner 
    training rather than new miner training. After an additional 6 months 
    of working as a miner, the miner will have accumulated 12 months of 
    total surface mining experience and, for training purposes, will be 
    considered an experienced surface miner for life.
        Alternatively, as another example, if the miner were to receive 
    surface new miner training, work 6 months, and leave the mining 
    industry for 4 years, that miner, upon returning to surface mining, 
    will be required to repeat new miner training. After the miner 
    completes the new miner training and accumulates another 6 months of 
    mining experience, that miner will be considered an experienced surface 
    miner for life. If the miner had accumulated 12 months of mining 
    experience within 36 months of receiving new miner training, as in the 
    previous example, that miner would have been required to receive 
    experienced miner training rather than new miner training.
    
    Sections 48.6 and 48.26  Experienced Miner Training
    
        Consistent with the proposal, the final rule changes the title of 
    Secs. 48.6 and 48.26 from ``Training of newly employed experienced 
    miners; minimum courses of instruction'' to ``Experienced miner 
    training.'' Similarly, all references to ``newly employed experienced 
    miners'' are revised to read ``experienced miners.''
        The final rule states that experienced miner training pertains to 
    miners rehired or transferred from one mine owned by the same operator 
    to another, as well as to experienced miners who are newly employed at 
    the mine for the first time. The final rule also requires experienced 
    miner training for experienced underground miners who are working on 
    the surface and are transferred underground, or experienced surface 
    miners who are working underground and are transferred to the surface.
        Miners returning to the mine after an absence of more than 12 
    months are also required to receive experienced miner training. The 
    duration, not the cause, of the absence necessitates the training. The 
    final rule, therefore, removes the itemization of causes of absences 
    contained in the proposal. This avoids the possibility of miners 
    ``falling through the cracks'' when they have been absent from the mine 
    for reasons other than those listed. Thus, the absence may be for any 
    reason including, but not limited to, lay off, work stoppage, 
    termination, illness, injury, family care, extended leave, or other 
    work.
    Flexible Training
        Experienced miners who are new or returning to a mine need to be 
    apprised of the particular conditions and practices that present new 
    safety and health hazards at that mine. Effective training prepares 
    these miners to work safely by familiarizing them with the mine's 
    environment, providing them with information on the mine's plans and 
    procedures, and assuring that they have skills that are adequate to 
    perform their jobs safely. This is practical, mine-specific training.
        To provide flexibility for a variety of training needs, the final 
    rule recognizes the diversity of experience among miners. For example, 
    training geared for a miner who is experienced, but new to the 
    operation, may not be appropriate for a miner who is transferred, from 
    surface to underground or from one mine owned by the operator to 
    another, and may already be knowledgeable about the operator's plans 
    and procedures. The final rule requires the operator to vary the time 
    spent on each subject so as to address the particular needs of the 
    individual miner. It is up to the operator to determine appropriate 
    training. MSHA encourages operators to add additional safety and health 
    subjects based on the specific circumstances and conditions at the 
    mine.
        Commenters suggested that MSHA clarify whether the final regulatory 
    language refers to surface or underground miners throughout Secs. 48.6 
    and 48.26. MSHA does not include this suggestion in the final rule. The 
    term ``experienced miner'' appears in subparts A and B, which apply to 
    underground and surface miners, respectively.
        Commenters also suggested that MSHA clarify proposed 
    Secs. 48.6(a)(3) and 48.26(a)(3) concerning transferred miners from 
    underground to surface or surface to underground, to specifically state 
    which type of transferred experienced miner, surface or underground, 
    each section covers. For the same reason, the Agency does not include 
    this suggestion in the final rule. The term ``experienced miner'' 
    appears in the context of subparts A and B, which clearly apply to 
    underground miners and surface miners, respectively.
        Commenters suggested that miners who are transferred from one mine 
    to another owned by the same operator, should not be required to 
    receive all of the experienced miner training. They suggested that only 
    certain subjects be required.
        The final rule includes a performance approach to experienced 
    miners training. MSHA intends that this training requirement be 
    flexible so as to meet the needs of different miners, with their 
    varying knowledge and understanding of the mine environment. While a 
    miner transferring from one mine to another owned by the same operator 
    may need less training than another experienced miner newly employed by 
    the operator, all experienced miners must receive at least some 
    training in all of the required subject areas. This is because this 
    type of training acquaints miners with specific conditions, plans, and 
    procedures of a different mine or mine environment.
        One commenter stated that experienced miners transferred from the 
    surface area of an underground mine to underground, or vice versa, 
    should not be required to complete all of the requirements of new miner 
    training to be able to transfer. Further, the commenter recommended 
    that these transferring miners should receive, in all cases, a 
    predetermined reduction in the number of hours required in new miner 
    training.
        Experienced miner training must not be approached from the 
    standpoint of ``one size fits all.'' MSHA experience indicates that a 
    predetermined reduction of required training based on some miners 
    having prior experience does not account for differences in the miners' 
    experience. Under the final rule, as under existing policy, MSHA will 
    allow miners to receive credit for applicable training previously taken 
    under subpart A to fulfill requirements of subpart B or vice versa. For 
    example, if an experienced underground miner transfers to a surface 
    job, that miner's first aid training can be credited toward the first-
    aid training required for an inexperienced surface miner. MSHA expects 
    mine operators to assess the training needs of the transferring miner
    
    [[Page 53754]]
    
    and to determine any applicable training to credit.
        Several commenters objected to the phrase in the proposal that 
    training be ``thorough and effective.'' They maintained that such a 
    requirement was vague, subjective, and could cause enforcement 
    problems. MSHA agrees. The final rule does not include this language. 
    However, MSHA expects mine operators to provide necessary training to 
    ensure that miners have the information they need to work in a safe and 
    healthy environment.
    Additional Experienced Miner Courses
        The existing standards require training in some subjects to 
    acquaint newly employed experienced miners with the environment, 
    operations, and hazards at the mine. Miners with more than 1 year of 
    total mining experience, and who have less than 1 year of mine 
    experience at the mine where the accident occurred, accounted for about 
    22% of all miner fatalities from 1990 to 1997. During that period of 
    time, these miners accounted for only 5% of the total mining 
    population. This high percentage of accidents indicates that 
    experienced miners new to a mine are not receiving the training they 
    need to work safely.
        The final rule strengthens training for experienced miners, 
    requiring training in four additional subjects to increase their 
    ability to work safely, avoid injuries and illness, and respond to 
    emergencies. The added courses are: (1) prevention of accidents, with a 
    review of accidents that have occurred at the mine; (2) the mine's 
    emergency medical arrangements and the location of first-aid equipment 
    and supplies; (3) health, including instruction on the purpose of 
    taking dust and noise measurements, and explaining warning labels and 
    any health control plan in effect at the mine; and (4) the health and 
    safety aspects of the task to which the miner will be assigned.
        Regarding the course on prevention of accidents, one commenter 
    stated that a review of all accidents should not be required because 
    training on specific accidents might not be feasible under certain 
    circumstances due to employee confidentiality or pending litigation. 
    The commenter was also concerned that, interpreted broadly, the 
    provision would require mine operators to provide training on every 
    accident that occurs at a mine, regardless of degree of the injury.
        While some duplicate wording has been removed, the final rule 
    retains the proposed requirement that a review of general causes of 
    accidents applicable to the mining environment and causes of specific 
    accidents at the mine be provided. MSHA intends that mine operators' 
    instruct miners on accidents of particular concern at the mine. It is 
    the mine operator's responsibility to determine which accidents should 
    be reviewed as part of the training. This flexibility is important for 
    providing mine operators the latitude to design their own training, 
    tailored to address the specific needs of their unique mining 
    conditions.
        Commenters objected to the proposed first-aid instruction 
    requirement and suggested that it be eliminated or changed. Some 
    commenters recommended that first-aid methods be taught according to a 
    national program. Alternatively, some commenters suggested that 
    instruction should focus on making miners aware of the locations of 
    first-aid supplies, rather than requiring training in first-aid 
    methods. Some commenters noted that a review of first aid would be 
    redundant, as it is done in annual refresher training, and that 
    instruction on this subject would impose a burden on many operators to 
    hire an approved first-aid instructor and obtain first-aid teaching 
    equipment.
        In response to commenters, the final rule requires that experienced 
    miners be made aware of emergency medical arrangements and locations of 
    first-aid equipment and supplies. Consistent with this change, the 
    Agency has changed the title ``First aid'' to ``Emergency medical 
    procedures.'' Miners who take this course also must take annual 
    refresher training that includes instruction in first-aid methods. 
    Additionally, some miners and designated supervisors will receive 
    first-aid training under the requirements in 30 CFR parts 56, 57, 75, 
    and 77.
        One commenter questioned the need for taking any training related 
    to health measurements, noting that an experienced miner already knows 
    the purpose for taking health measurements. MSHA disagrees. It is 
    important that miners know the health measurements in place at the 
    mine. Miners who move from one mine to another may encounter new and 
    different health issues. Health measurement training also serves to 
    reinforce the importance of appropriate health protection.
        Several commenters suggested that instruction on warning labels be 
    included in hazard recognition training rather than training related to 
    health. While understanding warning labels promotes safe handling of 
    materials, frequently the associated hazards have harmful, long-term 
    effects on miners' health. Under the final rule, therefore, miners must 
    receive training on warning labels as a part of health training.
        One commenter suggested that MSHA provide flexibility for the 
    health course requirement. The commenter suggested that MSHA provide 
    language in this section exempting training that does not apply to a 
    particular operation. For example, training on the use of respirators 
    should not be required if the miner would not be required to use 
    respirators. MSHA agrees that training for miners must be relevant for 
    the needs of each miner and, therefore, the final rule adds the 
    language ``where applicable'' to this requirement.
        One commenter noted that, for clarity, the health training 
    requirement should match that of annual refresher training. MSHA 
    agrees, and has reworded the language to be consistent with that in the 
    surface annual refresher training requirements [30 CFR 48.28(b)(8)].
        One commenter suggested that the proposed requirement for 
    instruction in the mandatory health and safety aspects of miners' tasks 
    in Secs. 48.6(b)(11) and 48.26(b)(11) would duplicate the existing 
    course, ``Mandatory health and safety standards'' in Secs. 48.6(b)(2) 
    and 48.26(b)(2). MSHA concurs to the extent that, in the proposal, both 
    courses included instruction in mandatory health and safety standards. 
    Under the final rule, there is no duplication. The final rule also 
    clarifies that the training required in Secs. 48.6(b)(11) and 
    48.26(b)(11) is not for miners who, because of no task experience 
    within the prior 12 months, are required to take task training under 
    Secs. 48.7 and 48.27.
        Proposed Secs. 48.6(e) and 48.26(e) addressed task training. MSHA 
    agrees with commenters that this provision duplicates existing part 48 
    regulations, and it is not included in the final rule. The final rule 
    clarifies language in Secs. 46.6(b)(11) and 48.26(b)(11), ``Health and 
    safety aspects of the tasks to which the experienced miner is 
    assigned,'' that if a miner receives task training under Secs. 48.7 or 
    48.27, then training in the health and safety aspects of the task is 
    not required under experienced miner training.
        Like the proposal, the final rule modifies the language in 
    Sec. 48.26(b)(5), pertaining to instruction in escape and emergency 
    evacuation plans, by adding the words, ``in effect at the mine.'' This 
    change is made to keep the subject matter focused on the plans and 
    procedures at the specific mine. MSHA received no comments on this 
    change.
        In response to comments, the final rule also modifies, the language 
    in Secs. 48.6(b)(7) and 48.26(b)(7), concerning instruction in hazard 
    recognition, focusing on the recognition and
    
    [[Page 53755]]
    
    avoidance of hazards present at a specific mine. Like the proposal, the 
    final rule is performance oriented and does not specify particular 
    topics to cover in this course, so that the mine operator will have the 
    flexibility to address hazardous conditions unique to the mine. MSHA 
    expects mine operators to take a close look at hazards related to mine 
    gases, electricity, explosives, and haulage, where applicable. In 
    identifying these areas the Agency does not intend that they are all 
    inclusive, but rather indicative of hazards at the mine that could 
    potentially cause an accident.
        Several commenters responded to proposed Secs. 48.6(f) and 
    48.26(f), which provided that experienced miners returning to work 
    after an absence of up to 12 months must receive training on changes in 
    the mine environment. The final rule revises and redesignates the 
    provisions as Secs. 48.6(e) and 48.26(e). The Agency intends that this 
    training be practical awareness training so that returning miners, 
    experienced and inexperienced, may know the changes which could 
    adversely affect their safety and health.
        Commenters questioned what changes would trigger this training for 
    miners returning to work. Commenters suggested that only significant or 
    fundamental changes be covered. In response to comments, the final rule 
    clarifies that the changes must be ``major.'' A major change is a 
    change which the operator knows or should know is likely to endanger 
    the safety or health of the miner. To facilitate the effectiveness of 
    training, commenters also suggested that it be given by knowledgeable 
    persons designated by the operator. The Agency has included this 
    suggestion in the final rule. These knowledgeable persons do not have 
    to be approved instructors.
        In addition, commenters were concerned about recordkeeping, 
    including documentation and tracking burdens. Consistent with the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act, intended to minimize recordkeeping 
    requirements, the final rule requires no recordkeeping under 
    Secs. 48.6(e) and 48.26(e). This will assist operators in providing the 
    practical awareness training in a timely manner.
        Commenters were also concerned that MSHA specify what is intended 
    by an ``absence'' and suggested that a minimum absence time be 
    included, such as 60 days, before this training requirement would be 
    triggered. MSHA intends that this provision address miners who are away 
    from the mine site for any length of time up to 12 months for whatever 
    reason (illness, injury, lay-off, work stoppage, vacation, weekend, 
    off-shift time, etc.). The Agency has not included a minimum length of 
    absence because changes at the mine site which endanger miners' safety 
    or health can occur quickly; these changes may have nothing to do with 
    the length of the absence. Therefore, the final rule is not conditioned 
    on any minimum time related to an absence.
        Another commenter suggested that, instead of an absence of up to 12 
    months, 6 months should be the maximum absence allowed under this 
    paragraph. The final rule contemplates that returning experienced 
    miners will receive either this training under Secs. 48.6(e) or 
    48.26(e) or receive the full complement of experienced miner training 
    under this section. Because experienced miner training [Secs. 48.6 or 
    48.26] is required for a miner who is absent for more than 12 months, 
    the 12-month maximum is retained in Secs. 48.6(e) and 48.26(e) in the 
    final rule.
    Specific Time Requirements
        In the preamble to the proposed rule, MSHA invited comment on 
    whether these regulations should specify time requirements, 
    particularly a minimum number of hours for experienced miner training. 
    Some commenters stated that a time requirement would inhibit the 
    flexibility for training experienced miners. Because the experienced 
    miner training covers varying backgrounds, and individual training 
    needs differ, the final rule does not contain a ``one-size-fits-all'' 
    time minimum for all experienced miners. As noted above, under the 
    final rule, operators must design the instruction to meet the specific 
    needs of the miners. For training to be meaningful, it must instill 
    knowledge or proficiency in the subject matter. Under the final rule, 
    operators must provide training in necessary subjects in sufficient 
    depth so as to adequately meet the miners' needs.
        Other commenters said that there should be a required minimum of 8 
    hours of training to assure that adequate time is devoted to training. 
    The Agency agrees that a minimum time is warranted in the limited 
    instance of miners returning to mining after an extended absence of 
    many years. Over time, safety skills and knowledge erode, this is 
    further exacerbated by long absences. Mining is becoming increasingly 
    complex and subject to technological innovation. Miners re-entering the 
    field after being away for many years, need to be properly trained. 
    Training must be of sufficient duration to apprise these miners of new 
    developments, as well as re-acquaint them with safe mining practices 
    and procedures. In response to comments, and to assure that miners who 
    have been away from mining for an extended period receive adequate 
    training, the final rule requires that experienced miners returning 
    after an absence from mining of 5 years or more must receive at least 8 
    hours of experienced miner training before starting work. MSHA is aware 
    that many operators already provide 8 hours of training for all newly 
    employed experienced miners and commends the industry for this 
    commitment to better, more comprehensive training.
    
    Sections 48.8(c) and 48.28(c)  Annual Refresher Training of Supervisors
    
        In the proposed rule, if training was required by Secs. 75.161(a) 
    or 77.107-1 within 30 days of the effective date of the revision, 
    annual refresher training would not begin more than 31 days after the 
    effective date. The Agency was concerned that, as worded, this 
    provision was confusing and unnecessary. Accordingly, Secs. 48.8(c) and 
    48.28(c) is modified in the final rule. Supervisors subject to MSHA 
    approved State certification must receive annual refresher training not 
    more than 12 months after this rule is published.
        To accommodate flexibility, reduce burden, and respond to 
    commenters' concerns, the Agency is providing an effective date of 12 
    months for mine operators to provide annual refresher training for 
    supervisors. Consistent with existing MSHA training policy for miners, 
    the final rule establishes the initial anniversary date for annual 
    refresher training of supervisors, for the month the final rule is 
    published. Therefore, October, 1998 is the initial anniversary month 
    for those supervisors who were not required to receive annual refresher 
    training. These supervisors have 12 months from this date to complete 
    annual refresher training. By allowing 12 months for this training, the 
    Agency allows time for outreach activities for operators and 
    supervisors, and facilitates the inclusion of State certified 
    supervisors into the operator's existing annual refresher training 
    program cycle.
        If the mine operator wants to provide annual refresher training to 
    all miners only once a year, then the supervisor would have to receive 
    the training with other miners before 12 months have elapsed. This will 
    establish a new anniversary date for that supervisor.
        According to one commenter, the scheduling of annual refresher 
    training for supervisors, who have been trained under the requirements 
    of 30 CFR 75 and 77, should not be limited to the coal sector of the 
    mining industry. This
    
    [[Page 53756]]
    
    aspect of the final rule primarily affects coal supervisors, however, 
    because some of these supervisors were previously exempt from part 48 
    training.
    
    Sections 75.161 and 77.107-1  Plans for Training Programs
    
        Like the proposed rule, the final rule revises certain training 
    provisions in 30 CFR parts 75 and 77, for certified persons in 
    underground and surface coal mines, respectively. It removes course 
    requirements for methane measurement and oxygen deficiency testing, 
    roof and rib control, ventilation, and use of self-contained self-
    rescue devices from Sec. 75.161 and the course requirement for 
    principles of mine rescue from Sec. 77.107-1. These deletions do not 
    reduce protection afforded miners under the existing rule, but only 
    eliminate duplicate provisions and consolidate training requirements in 
    part 48.
        Specifically, the final rule removes the training requirement in 
    Sec. 75.161(a) for methane measurement and oxygen deficiency testing, 
    which is covered in Sec. 48.8(b)(10) (Mine gases); in Sec. 75.161(a) 
    for roof and rib control and ventilation plans, which is covered in 
    Sec. 48.8(b)(4) (Roof or ground control and ventilation plans); and in 
    Sec. 75.161(c) for self-contained self-rescue devices, which is covered 
    in Sec. 48.8(b)(8) (Self-rescue devices and respiratory devices). The 
    final rule also revises Sec. 77.107-1 by deleting the reference to 
    principles of mine rescue, as this training is covered under existing 
    Sec. 48.28(b)(3) (Escape and emergency evacuation plans; fire warning 
    and firefighting).
        One commenter suggested that MSHA add language to clarify that 
    training received under part 48 would not diminish State and Federal 
    requirements for certified persons. The final rule removes only 
    duplicate training requirements from 30 CFR 75 and 77. Additional 
    training requirements for certified persons, under existing standards 
    in parts 75 and 77, are not covered by part 48 and are unchanged; 
    therefore, additional language to address this point is unnecessary.
        One commenter believed that MSHA did not go far enough in removing 
    overlapping topics. This commenter recommended also removing the first-
    aid training requirements from 30 CFR parts 75 and 77 and leaving the 
    first-aid requirements in 30 CFR part 48 to satisfy all first-aid 
    training needs. In 30 CFR part 48, however, supervisors may never 
    receive a comprehensive first-aid course, because they can receive only 
    a review of basic first-aid and satisfy requirements for part 48 annual 
    refresher training. The first-aid training requirements in 
    Secs. 75.1713 and 77.1705 will assure that there are supervisors on 
    mine property who will receive, at a minimum, 5 hours of refresher 
    first-aid training annually.
        As discussed previously, MSHA allows operators 12 months to provide 
    annual refresher training to supervisors under Secs. 48.8 and 48.28. 
    This requirement, however, does not eliminate the requirement for 
    annual training of certified and qualified persons under the existing 
    Secs. 75.161 and 77.107-1. In removing courses that duplicate those 
    required under part 48 from the training required for certified and 
    qualified persons by parts 75 and 77, the final rule creates the 
    potential for a lapse in vital training. To eliminate this possible 
    lapse in training, the effective date for removal of duplicate training 
    courses from 30 CFR parts 75 and 77 is also 12 months from the date of 
    publication of this final rule.
        In effect, this will require an underground supervisor to receive 
    annual refresher training under Sec. 48.8, as well as annual training 
    under existing Sec. 75.161 during the 12 months after the final rule is 
    published. MSHA will, however, allow for crediting during this 
    transition period. As an example, if a supervisor receives annual 
    refresher training under Sec. 48.8 before 12 months has lapsed since 
    the supervisor last received training under Sec. 75.161, and the 
    refresher training duplicates the existing requirements of Sec. 75.161, 
    that supervisor will not have to repeat those duplicate courses when 
    next receiving training under Sec. 75.161. After the effective date of 
    final Secs. 75.161 and 77.107-1, which is 12 months from date of 
    publication in the Federal Register, (1) all supervisors will have 
    received initial annual refresher training under part 48; (2) the 
    duplicate courses will have been removed from the training required by 
    Secs. 75.161 and 77.107-1; and (3) these duplicate courses will be 
    covered in the supervisor's subsequent annual refresher training under 
    part 48.
        MSHA also proposed removing Sec. 77.1709, which requires new 
    employees to be trained in safety rules and safe work procedures before 
    they begin work at the mine. These requirements are covered under 
    Sec. 48.25 (Training of new miners), Sec. 48.26 (Experienced miner 
    training), and Sec. 48.27 (New task training). MSHA received no 
    comments on this proposal. The final rule removes existing 
    Sec. 77.1709.
    
    IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The final rule contains collection of information requirements in 
    Secs. 48.2/22 and 48.6/26. The information collection requirements 
    associated with part 48 training are approved under OMB Control Number 
    1219-0070. This final rule will require modification of the information 
    collection budget for part 48. These requirements have been submitted 
    to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under section 
    3504(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA 95). The 
    respondents and requirements are discussed below with an estimate of 
    the annual information collection burden.
    
    Description of Respondents
    
        The respondents are mine operators and individuals who are paid to 
    perform tasks for the mine operator (e.g., instructors). Respondents 
    are not required to respond to any collection of information unless it 
    displays a currently valid OMB control number. MSHA estimates that this 
    information collection requirement affects all (about 20,650) mines and 
    independent contractors. MSHA data for 1997 indicate that there are 
    about 2,560 coal mines, 10,960 metal/nonmetal mines, 3,890 independent 
    contractors at coal mines, and 3,240 independent contractors at metal/
    nonmetal mines.
    
    Description of Information Collection Burden
    
        The estimated incremental information collection burden hours 
    associated with this final rule can be divided into the following three 
    categories: (1) revising the definition of ``miner;'' (2) improving 
    experienced miner training; and (3) requiring experienced miners, 
    before they return to work following an absence of 12 months or less, 
    to have training on the significant changes in the mine environment 
    that could affect the miners' safety or health.
    State-Certified Supervisors as ``Miners''
        The burden hours and associated costs for supervisors to take 
    annual refresher training are included under the costs for changing the 
    definition of ``miner'' to include all supervisors who previously had 
    been exempt from part 48. The final rule increases the hours associated 
    with this recordkeeping burden.
        The current MSHA-approved training form (5000-23) is constructed 
    for ease in keeping a record of the miners' and supervisors' various 
    training courses. MSHA anticipates that the keeping of this record for 
    supervisors requires only the supervisor's name, the date of the 
    training, and checks in the appropriate boxes to indicate the types of 
    training taken. The burden hours for this change
    
    [[Page 53757]]
    
    in the final rule are those associated with the actual time spent in 
    filling out the training form. MSHA estimates that this recordkeeping 
    will take about 3 minutes (0.05 hours) each for about 5,900 coal 
    supervisors annually. This burden will be about 300 hours at an 
    associated cost of about $12,700. This final rule will not impose 
    additional burden hours for the instructor because the supervisor can 
    attend training with other miners.
    Requirements for ``Experienced Miner'' Status
        This final rule changes the requirements for obtaining experienced 
    miner status for training purposes. It removes the lapse in 
    ``experienced miner'' status currently required when a miner has been 
    away from mining for over 3 years. There is no additional paperwork 
    associated with this change.
    Training Plan Revisions
        This final rule will require mine operators to modify their 
    training plans. Training Plan revisions are approved under OMB Control 
    Number 1219-0009. MSHA estimates that the burden hours for this 
    recordkeeping will not change because the Agency intends to distribute 
    a training plan addendum which operators can use to modify their 
    training plans without having to submit the change to MSHA for 
    approval.
    Development of Training Course
        The development of training courses is considered an information 
    collection burden under PRA 95. The final rule adds four courses to 
    experienced miner training. Three of these four courses are currently 
    included in ``new miner'' training and need only slight modification to 
    tailor them to the needs of experienced miners. Based on past 
    experience, MSHA expects that these courses will be developed or 
    modified by management or supervisory personnel. The total estimated 
    one-time, initial information collection burden, for the development of 
    a new course and modifying the existing courses, is about 24,000 hours 
    with an associated cost of about $918,200. Further, the Agency 
    estimates that any subsequent revisions to the courses would impose 
    only a negligible burden.
    Additional Instructor Time
        MSHA estimates that the four additional required courses will 
    increase the time spent on experienced miner training by an average of 
    2 additional hours. MSHA estimates that the additional burden hours for 
    training conducted by 8,850 instructors will be about 17,700 hours at 
    an associated cost of $688,100. MSHA estimates that the incremental 
    expense for supplies and course materials are negligible.
    Significant Changes in the Mine Affecting Safety and Health
        The final rule requires operators to provide instruction about any 
    significant changes in the mine environment that have occurred while 
    the miner was away that could affect the miner's safety or health. For 
    the purpose of this analysis, MSHA estimates that about 32,660 miners 
    who return to work following an absence of 12 months or less, will need 
    such instruction. MSHA estimates further that this instruction will 
    take about 5-6 minutes (0.1 hour) and it will be provided orally by the 
    miner's supervisor. MSHA estimates that this new provision will impose 
    an additional burden on mine operators of about 6500 hours at an 
    associated cost of about $251,800.
        MSHA did not include burden estimates for supervisors instructing 
    groups of miners returning after a change of shift, a holiday, or a 
    weekend. MSHA considers that the supervisor's instruction of miners at 
    the beginning of a new workshift is a normal business practice.
    Summary of Information Collection Burden
        The following chart summarizes MSHA's estimates for compliance with 
    PRA 95.
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                        Average No.
                Provision                   No.        Average hours    Average No.    responses per    Total hours
                                        respondents    per response      responses      respondent
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Annually Recurring Burden
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Secs.  48.2/22(a)...............           2,699            0.05           5,901            2.19             295
    Secs.  48.5/25(d), 48.6/26(b)...          20,646            1.09          16,205            0.78          17,693
    Secs.  48.6/26(e)...............          20,646            0.10          65,329            3.16           6,533
                                                                                                     ---------------
        Total.......................          20,646            0.28          87,435            4.23          24,521
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 One-Time Initial Burden
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Secs.  48.6/26(b)...............          20,646            1.16          20,646            1             23,981
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *Discrepancies due to rounding.
    
        Submit written comments on the information collection burden by 
    December 7, 1998 to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for 
    MSHA, 725 17th Street NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.
    
    V. Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 requires that regulatory agencies 
    assess both the costs and benefits of intended regulations. MSHA has 
    determined that this rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action.
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires regulatory agencies 
    to consider a rule's impact on small entities. Under the RFA, MSHA must 
    use the Small Business Administration's (SBA) definition for a small 
    mine of 500 or fewer employees or, after consultation with the SBA 
    Office of Advocacy, establish an alternative definition for the mining 
    industry by publishing that definition in the Federal Register for 
    notice and comment. MSHA traditionally has considered small mines to be 
    those with fewer than 20 employees. For the purposes of the RFA, MSHA 
    has analyzed the impact of the final rule both on mines with 500 or 
    fewer employees and on those with fewer than 20 employees. MSHA has 
    determined that this final rule will not impose a substantial cost 
    increase on small mines, whether a small mine is defined as fewer than 
    20 miners or fewer than 500 miners.
        MSHA has prepared a Regulatory Economic Analysis (REA) and 
    Regulatory Flexibility Certification Statement to fulfill the 
    requirements of E.O. 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This REA 
    is available
    
    [[Page 53758]]
    
    from the Agency upon request and is posted on MSHA's Homepage at 
    www.msha.gov.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Certification Statement
    
        Based on its analysis of costs and benefits, MSHA certifies that 
    this final rule will not impose a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
    
    Factual Basis for Certification
    
        MSHA used a quantitative approach in concluding that the final rule 
    does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. This final rule will change the definition of a miner 
    to include State-certified supervisors, change the definition of 
    experienced miner to reflect a miner's past experience, and strengthen 
    training requirements for experienced miners.
    Compliance Costs
        The incremental compliance costs of this rule include (1) the 
    annually recurring costs for training previously exempted State-
    certified supervisors and the added training for experienced miners, 
    and (2) the one-time cost for modifying existing courses and developing 
    a new course for experienced miner training. MSHA estimates that the 
    total initial cost will be $3.5 million. This includes an annually 
    recurring cost of about $2.6 million and a one-time cost of about $0.9 
    million. MSHA has determined that this final rule will not have a 
    significant economic impact on prices, production, or employment.
        In its estimates, MSHA used a wage rate, including non-wage 
    benefits, of $43 per hour for coal supervisors and $36 per hour for 
    metal/nonmetal supervisors. MSHA used preliminary 1997 Agency data to 
    determine the number of mines and miners. These estimates include 
    contractors and contractor employees subject to the training 
    requirements. MSHA developed the distribution of supervisors as a 
    percentage of employment based on this Agency data.
    Cost Impact on Small Entities
        Using the Agency's traditional definition of a small mine, i.e., 
    one employing fewer than 20 miners, MSHA estimates that the initial 
    cost of this final rule will be about $1.88 million, which includes an 
    annually recurring cost of $1.22 million and a one-time cost of $0.66 
    million. Using MSHA's traditional definition of a small entity, small 
    operators have an estimated revenue of about $16.4 billion based on 
    1997 data. The cost impact on this industry segment is about 0.01% of 
    revenue.
        MSHA estimates that the initial cost of the final rule for small 
    mines, using SBA's definition of 500 or fewer employees, will be about 
    $3.44 million, which includes an annually recurring cost of $2.52 
    million and a one-time cost of $0.92 million. Using SBA's definition of 
    a small entity, small operators have an estimated revenue of about 
    $54.7 billion based on 1997 data. The cost impact on this industry 
    segment is less than 0.01% of revenue.
        The estimated contribution of the mining industry to the gross 
    domestic product is about $58 billion of which the estimated cost of 
    the final rule is less than 0.01%. When estimated compliance costs are 
    so small in relation to estimated revenues, the Agency believes that it 
    is generally appropriate to conclude that there is no significant 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. MSHA believes that 
    this analysis provides a reasonable basis for the certification in this 
    case.
        The Agency will provide a copy of this final rule and regulatory 
    flexibility certification statement to the SBA Office of Advocacy. In 
    addition, MSHA will mail a copy of the final rule, including the 
    preamble and regulatory flexibility certification statement, to all 
    affected mines and miners' representatives.
    Benefits
        The RFA requires that, when developing regulations with major 
    economic impacts, agencies evaluate and include, wherever possible, 
    compliance alternatives that minimize any adverse impact on small 
    entities. This final rule benefits both small and large mining 
    operators and contractors by providing compliance flexibility, where 
    appropriate, which allows the operator or contractor to be more 
    responsive to the needs of miners. Thus, it enhances safety and health.
        This final rule removes the exemption of State-certified 
    supervisors from the definition of ``miner'' for purposes of part 48 
    training. This change affects supervisors in coal mines. From 1990 
    through 1997, 50 coal supervisors (12.9% of all coal fatalities) were 
    killed. Of these, 35 occurred underground. Had the percentage of 
    fatalities been the same for coal supervisors as for non-supervisory 
    coal miners, MSHA projects that 43 coal supervisors (23 of which are 
    underground coal supervisors), rather than 50, would have died during 
    this time period. The average of these higher than expected fatalities 
    is about 0.9 fatalities per year. The higher than expected number of 
    fatalities is 1.5 per year for underground coal mine supervisors. Based 
    on the greater impact on underground coal supervisors, MSHA estimates 
    that the training required by this rule will help reduce excess 
    supervisory fatalities by about 0.5 fatalities per year, which is 
    slightly more than 50%.
        Similarly, the percentage of fatalities between 1990 and 1997 for 
    miners who had more than 1 year of total mining experience, but less 
    than 1 year at the mine where the fatality occurred, is greater than 
    the percentage of fatalities for all other miners. During that time 
    period, these newly-employed experienced miners (NEEMs) incurred 174, 
    or 22%, of the 793 fatalities, even though NEEMs constitute only about 
    5.3% of the miner population. Had the percentage of fatalities been the 
    same for NEEMs as the percentage of fatalities for other miners, 
    including new miners and supervisors, MSHA projects that 34 NEEMs, 
    rather than 174, would have died during this time period. The average 
    of the 140 higher than expected fatalities is about 17.5 per year.
        In its Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis and Regulatory 
    Flexibility Analysis: Proposed Rule on Part 48 Training (PRIA), August 
    1991, MSHA had estimated that implementation of the proposed rule would 
    have reduced NEEM fatalities by 20%. The PRIA states:
    
        In evaluating the potential effectiveness of these proposed 
    additional training requirements * * *, MSHA relied upon its 
    experience in observing the effectiveness of training programs and 
    upon a qualitative review of the possible effects on injury rates of 
    the experience and seniority factors. On that basis, therefore, MSHA 
    estimates that about 20 percent of the excess fatalities occurring 
    to newly-employed experienced miners, or about four fatalities per 
    year, could be prevented by compliance with the proposed 
    requirements * * *. (Pages III-20 and III-21)
    
        A commenter stated that attributing a lack of part 48 training to 
    the higher than expected fatality rate among underground coal 
    supervisors or NEEMs is ``too simplistic.'' This commenter contends 
    that most mines already provide supervisors with some or all of the 
    required part 48 training. Commenters submitted alternative 
    explanations as to why supervisors and NEEMs have a fatality rate 
    higher than other categories of miners. One commenter stated that many 
    supervisors often do not use the best judgment in every situation; 
    neither do they use necessary safety equipment in all cases. Further 
    this commenter stated that the higher fatality rate for NEEMs was due, 
    in part, to the fact that some miners
    
    [[Page 53759]]
    
    were using techniques learned from previous mining experience which 
    might not be appropriate to handle a different mining condition or 
    situation.
        In both the PRIA and this REA, MSHA estimates that about 20% of the 
    supervisors at small underground coal mines, 40% of the supervisors at 
    large underground coal mines, and 75% of the supervisors at surface 
    coal mines receive or conduct part 48 annual refresher training. All 
    supervisors at M/NM mines are required to receive part 48 training. 
    Furthermore, in the PRIA, the Agency acknowledged that training, in and 
    of itself, does not prevent accidents. The Agency contends, however, 
    that training contributes to a reduction in accidents, injuries, 
    illnesses, and fatalities by fostering safe work practices, increasing 
    job skills, and enhancing hazard awareness and prevention. The PRIA 
    stated that compliance with the revised part 48 rule would help prevent 
    about 50% of the excess supervisory fatalities and 20% of the excess 
    NEEM fatalities.
        In the absence of any comments or data to refute this estimate, 
    MSHA estimates that compliance with this final rule will help reduce 
    the greater than expected number of supervisory and NEEM fatalities by 
    four fatalities per year (0.5 supervisor and 3.5 NEEM fatalities). MSHA 
    contends that effective training, tailored to the needs of individual 
    miners and supervisors, together with reinforcement of management's 
    policies, procedures, and work practices affecting miners' safety and 
    health, can have a substantial impact on eliminating the unsafe 
    behaviors and work practices described by commenters.
    
    VI. Executive Order 12875 and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    
        Executive Order (E.O.) 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental 
    Partnership, requires executive agencies and departments to reduce 
    unfunded mandates on State, local, and tribal governments; to consult 
    with these governments prior to promulgation of any unfunded mandate; 
    and to develop a process that permits meaningful and timely input by 
    State, local, and tribal governments in the development of regulatory 
    proposals containing a significant unfunded mandate. E.O. 12875 also 
    requires executive agencies and departments to increase flexibility for 
    State, local, and tribal governments to obtain a waiver from Federal 
    statutory or regulatory requirements.
        The final rule will impact about 212 sand and gravel or crushed 
    stone operations that are run by State, local, or tribal governments 
    for the construction and repair of highways and roads. MSHA offered 
    these governments an opportunity to provide meaningful and timely 
    input, at the proposed rule stage, through the promulgation of the 
    proposal for notice and comment. MSHA also mailed a copy of the 
    proposed rule to each mine owned or operated by a State, local, or 
    tribal government. No state or local government commented or requested 
    a waiver of regulatory requirements. MSHA will mail a copy of this 
    final rule to these 212 entities.
        The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act was enacted in 1995. While much of 
    the Act is designed to assist the Congress in determining whether its 
    actions will impose costly new mandates on State, local, and tribal 
    governments, the Act also includes requirements to assist Federal 
    agencies to make this same determination with respect to regulatory 
    actions.
        MSHA has determined that, for purposes of Sec. 202 of the Unfunded 
    Mandates Reform Act of 1995, this final rule does not include any 
    Federal mandate that may result in increased expenditures by State, 
    local, or tribal governments in the aggregate of more than $100 
    million, or increased expenditures by the private sector of more than 
    $100 million. Moreover, the Agency has determined that for purposes of 
    Sec. 203 of that Act, this final rule does not significantly or 
    uniquely affect these entities.
    
    VII. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From 
    Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    
        In accordance with E.O. 13045, MSHA has evaluated the environmental 
    health and safety effects of the rule on children. The Agency has 
    determined that the final rule will have no effect on children.
    
    VIII. Executive Order 13084 (Consultation and Coordination with 
    Indian Tribal Governments)
    
        MSHA certifies that the final rule does not impose substantial 
    direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments.
        Further, MSHA provided the public, including Indian tribal 
    governments which operated mines, the opportunity to comment during the 
    proposed rule's comment period. No Indian tribal government applied for 
    a waiver or commented on the proposal.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    30 CFR Part 48
    
        Mine safety and health, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Training programs.
    
    30 CFR Part 75
    
        Coal mines, Mine safety and health, Training programs, Underground 
    mining.
    
    30 CFR Part 77
    
        Coal mines, Mine safety and health, Surface mining, Training 
    programs.
    
        Dated: September 29, 1998.
    J. Davitt McAteer,
    Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health.
    
        Accordingly, for the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR, 
    chapter 1, is amended as set forth below.
    
    PART 48--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 48 is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811, 825.
    
        2. Remove the words ``training of newly employed experienced 
    miners'' and add, in their place, the words ``experienced miner 
    training'' in the following places:
        a. Sec. 48.2(a)(1) introductory text
        b. Sec. 48.22(a)(1) introductory text
        3. Remove the words ``training newly employed experienced miners'' 
    and add, in their place, the words ``training experienced miners'' in 
    the following places:
        a. Sec. 48.3(a) introductory text
        b. Sec. 48.23(a) introductory text
        4. Section 48.2 is amended by removing paragraph (a)(1)(ii), 
    redesignating paragraph (a)(1)(iii) as paragraph (a)(1)(ii), and 
    revising paragraphs (a)(2) and (b) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 48.2  Definitions.
    
        For the purposes of this subpart A--
        (a) * * *
        (2) Miner means, for purposes of Sec. 48.11 (Hazard training) of 
    this subpart A, any person working in an underground mine, including 
    any delivery, office, or scientific worker or occasional, short-term 
    maintenance or service worker contracted by the operator, and any 
    student engaged in academic projects involving his or her extended 
    presence at the mine. This definition excludes persons covered under 
    paragraph (a)(1) of this section and subpart C of this part.
        (b) Experienced miner means:
        (1) A miner who has completed MSHA-approved new miner training for 
    underground miners or training acceptable to MSHA from a State agency 
    and who has had at least 12 months of underground mining experience; or
        (2) A supervisor who is certified under an MSHA-approved State 
    certification program and who is
    
    [[Page 53760]]
    
    employed as an underground supervisor on October 6, 1998; or
        (3) An experienced underground miner on February 3, 1999.
    * * * * *
        5. Section 48.5 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as 
    follows.
    
    
    Sec. 48.5  Training of new miners; minimum courses of instruction; 
    hours of instruction.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) A newly employed miner who has less than 12 months of mining 
    experience and has received the courses and hours of instruction in 
    paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, within 36 months preceding 
    employment at a mine, does not have to repeat this training. Before the 
    miner starts work, the operator must provide the miner with the 
    experienced miner training in Sec. 48.6(b) of this part and, if 
    applicable, the new task training in Sec. 48.7 of this part. The 
    operator must also provide the miner with annual refresher training and 
    additional new task training, as applicable.
        6. Section 48.6 is amended by revising the heading, paragraph (a), 
    the introductory text of paragraph (b), and paragraph (b)(7); by 
    redesignating paragraph (b)(8) as paragraph (b)(12), and paragraph 
    (b)(9) as paragraph (b)(13); and by adding new paragraphs (b)(8), 
    (b)(9), (b)(10), (b)(11), (c), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 48.6  Experienced miner training.
    
        (a) Except as provided in paragraph (e), this section applies to 
    experienced miners who are--
        (1) Newly employed by the operator;
        (2) Transferred to the mine;
        (3) Experienced underground miners transferred from surface to 
    underground; or
        (4) Returning to the mine after an absence of more than 12 months.
        (b) Experienced miners must complete the training prescribed in 
    this section before beginning work duties. Each experienced miner 
    returning to mining following an absence of 5 years or more, must 
    receive at least 8 hours of training. The training must include the 
    following instruction:
    * * * * *
        (7) Hazard recognition. The course must include the recognition and 
    avoidance of hazards present in the mine.
        (8) Prevention of accidents. The course must include a review of 
    the general causes of accidents applicable to the mine environment, 
    causes of specific accidents at the mine, and instruction in accident 
    prevention in the work environment.
        (9) Emergency medical procedures. The course must include 
    instruction on the mine's emergency medical arrangements and the 
    location of the mine's first aid equipment and supplies.
        (10) Health. The course must include instruction on the purpose of 
    taking dust, noise, and other health measurements, where applicable; 
    must review the health provisions of the Act; and must explain warning 
    labels and any health control plan in effect at the mine.
        (11) Health and safety aspects of the tasks to which the 
    experienced miner is assigned. The course must include instruction in 
    the health and safety aspects of the tasks assigned and the safe work 
    procedures of such tasks. Experienced miners who must complete new task 
    training under Sec. 48.7 of this part do not need to take training 
    under this paragraph.
    * * * * *
        (c) The operator may include instruction on additional safety and 
    health subjects based on circumstances and conditions at the mine.
        (d) The training time spent on individual subjects must vary 
    depending upon the training needs of the miners.
        (e) Any miner returning to the same mine, following an absence of 
    12 months or less, must receive training on any major changes to the 
    mine environment that have occurred during the miner's absence and that 
    could adversely affect the miner's health or safety.
        (1) A person designated by the operator who is knowledgeable of 
    these changes must conduct the training in this paragraph. An MSHA 
    approved instructor is not required to conduct the training outlined in 
    this paragraph.
        (2) No record of this training is required.
        (3) The miner must also complete annual refresher training as 
    required in Sec. 48.8, if the miner missed taking that training during 
    the absence.
        7. Section 48.8 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 48.8  Annual refresher training of miners; minimum courses of 
    instruction; hours of instruction.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) All coal supervisors who are subject to Sec. 75.161(a) of this 
    chapter must receive annual refresher training required by this section 
    within 12 months of October, 1998.
    * * * * *
        8. Section 48.22 is amended by removing paragraph (a)(1)(ii), 
    redesignating paragraph (a)(1)(iii) as paragraph (a)(1)(ii), and 
    revising paragraphs (a)(2) and (b) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 48.22  Definitions.
    
        For the purposes of this subpart B--
        (a) * * *
        (2) Miner means, for purposes of Sec. 48.31 (Hazard training) of 
    this subpart B, any person working in a surface mine, including any 
    delivery, office, or scientific worker or occasional, short-term 
    maintenance or service worker contracted by the operator, and any 
    student engaged in academic projects involving his or her extended 
    presence at the mine. This definition excludes persons covered under 
    paragraph (a)(1) of this section and subpart C of this part.
        (b) Experienced miner means:
        (1) A miner who has completed MSHA-approved new miner training for 
    surface miners or training acceptable to MSHA from a State agency and 
    who has had at least 12 months of surface mining experience; or
        (2) A supervisor who is certified under an MSHA-approved State 
    certification program and who is employed as a surface supervisor on 
    October 6, 1998; or
        (3) An experienced surface miner on February 3, 1999.
    * * * * *
        9. Section 48.25 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as 
    follows.
    
    
    Sec. 48.25  Training of new miners; minimum courses of instruction; 
    hours of instruction.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) A newly employed miner who has less than 12 months of mining 
    experience and has received the courses and hours of instruction in 
    paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, within 36 months preceding 
    employment at a mine, does not have to repeat this training. Before the 
    miner starts work, the operator must provide the miner with the 
    experienced miner training in Sec. 48.26(b) of this part and, if 
    applicable, the new task training in Sec. 48.27 of this part. The 
    operator must also provide the miner with annual refresher training and 
    additional new task training, as applicable.
        10. Section 48.26 is amended by revising the heading, paragraph 
    (a), the introductory text of paragraph (b), paragraph (b)(5), and 
    paragraph (b)(7); by redesignating paragraph (b)(8) as paragraph 
    (b)(12); and by adding new paragraphs (b)(8), (b)(9), (b)(10), (b)(11), 
    (c), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 48.26  Experienced miner training.
    
        (a) Except as provided in paragraph (e), this section applies to 
    experienced miners who are--
    
    [[Page 53761]]
    
        (1) Newly employed by the operator;
        (2) Transferred to the mine;
        (3) Experienced surface miners transferred from underground to 
    surface; or
        (4) Returning to the mine after an absence of more than 12 months.
        (b) Experienced miners must complete the training prescribed in 
    this section before beginning work duties. Each experienced miner 
    returning to mining following an absence of 5 years or more, must 
    receive at least 8 hours of training. The training must include the 
    following instruction:
    * * * * *
        (5) Escape and emergency evacuation plans; firewarning and 
    firefighting. The course must include a review of the mine escape 
    system and the escape and emergency evacuation plans in effect at the 
    mine, and instruction in the firewarning signals and firefighting 
    procedures in effect at the mine.
    * * * * *
        (7) Hazard recognition. The course must include the recognition and 
    avoidance of hazards present in the mine.
        (8) Prevention of accidents. The course must include a review of 
    the general causes of accidents applicable to the mine environment, 
    causes of specific accidents at the mine, and instruction in accident 
    prevention in the work environment.
        (9) Emergency medical procedures. The course must include 
    instruction on the mine's emergency medical arrangements and the 
    location of the mine's first aid equipment and supplies.
        (10) Health. The course must include instruction on the purpose of 
    taking dust, noise, and other health measurements, where applicable; 
    must review the health provisions of the Act; and must explain warning 
    labels and any health control plan in effect at the mine.
        (11) Health and safety aspects of the tasks to which the 
    experienced miner is assigned. The course must include instruction in 
    the health and safety aspects of the tasks assigned and the safe work 
    procedures of such tasks. Experienced miners who must complete new task 
    training under Sec. 48.27 of this part do not need to take training 
    under this paragraph.
    * * * * *
        (c) The operator may include instruction in additional safety and 
    health subjects based on circumstances and conditions at the mine.
        (d) The training time spent on individual subjects must vary 
    depending upon the training needs of the miners.
        (e) Any miner returning to the same mine, following an absence of 
    12 months or less, must receive training on any major changes to the 
    mine environment that have occurred during the miner's absence and that 
    could adversely affect the miner's health or safety.
        (1) A person designated by the operator who is knowledgeable of 
    these changes must conduct the training in this paragraph. An MSHA 
    approved instructor is not required to conduct the training outlined in 
    this paragraph.
        (2) No record of this training is required.
        (3) The miner must complete annual refresher training as required 
    in Sec. 48.28, if the miner missed taking that training during the 
    absence.
        11. Section 48.28 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 48.28  Annual refresher training of miners; minimum courses of 
    instruction; hours of instruction.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) All coal supervisors who are subject to Sec. 77.107-1 of this 
    chapter must receive annual refresher training required by this section 
    within 12 months of October, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    PART 75--[AMENDED]
    
        12. The authority citation for part 75 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811.
    
        13. Section 75.161 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.161  Plans for training programs.
    
        Each operator must submit to the district manager, of the Coal Mine 
    Safety and Health District in which the mine is located, a program or 
    plan setting forth what, when, how, and where the operator will train 
    and retrain persons whose work assignments require that they be 
    certified or qualified. The program must provide--
        (a) For certified persons, annual training courses in first aid, 
    principles of mine rescue, and the provisions of this part 75; and
        (b) For qualified persons, annual courses in performance of the 
    task which they perform as qualified persons.
    
    PART 77--[AMENDED]
    
        14. The authority citation for part 77 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811, 957, 961.
    
        15. Section 77.107-1 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 77.107-1  Plans for training programs.
    
        Each operator must submit to the district manager, of the Coal Mine 
    Safety and Health District in which the mine is located, a program or 
    plan setting forth what, when, how, and where the operator will train 
    and retrain persons whose work assignments require that they be 
    certified or qualified. The program must provide--
        (a) For certified persons, annual training courses in the tasks and 
    duties which they perform as certified persons, first aid, and the 
    provisions of this part 77; and
        (b) For qualified persons, annual courses in performance of the 
    tasks which they perform as qualified persons.
    
    
    Sec. 77.1709  [Removed]
    
        16. Section 77.1709 is removed.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-26598 Filed 10-5-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-43-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/3/1999
Published:
10/06/1998
Department:
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-26598
Dates:
This final rule is effective February 3, 1999, except that Secs. 48.2(b)(2), 48.22(b)(2), 48.8(c), and 48.28(c) are effective October 6, 1998 and Secs. 75.161 and 77.107-1 are effective October 6, 1999.
Pages:
53750-53761 (12 pages)
PDF File:
98-26598.pdf
CFR: (17)
30 CFR 75.161(a)
30 CFR 48.8(b)(4)
30 CFR 48.28(b)(3)
30 CFR 75.161(c)
30 CFR 203
More ...