94-29674. Importation of Exotic Wild Birds to the United States; Amendment of Final Rule Implementing the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992; Final Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 231 (Friday, December 2, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-29674]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: December 2, 1994]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part IX
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of the Interior
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    50 CFR Part 15
    
    
    
    
    Importation of Exotic Wild Birds to the United States; Amendment of 
    Final Rule Implementing the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992; Final 
    Rules
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 15
    
    RIN 1018-AC51
    
     
    Importation of Exotic Wild Birds to the United States; Amendment 
    of Final Rule Implementing the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service.
    
    Action: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On October 23, 1992, the Wild Bird Conservation Act (WBCA) was 
    signed into law, the purposes of which include promoting the 
    conservation of exotic birds by: ensuring that all imports into the 
    United States of species of exotic birds are biologically sustainable 
    and not detrimental to the species; ensuring that imported birds are 
    not subject to inhumane treatment during capture and transport; and 
    assisting wild bird conservation and management programs in countries 
    of origin. This final rule amends the final rule published by the Fish 
    and Wildlife Service (Service) on November 16, 1993, in the Federal 
    Register (58 FR 60524), which implements the prohibitions stipulated in 
    the WBCA and provides permit requirements and procedures for some 
    allowed exemptions. As a result of a lawsuit filed on February 15, 1994 
    by the Humane Society of the United States and Defenders of Wildlife, 
    and a resultant District Court Order that declared a portion of the 
    contested regulation as invalid, the Service hereby amends 50 CFR 15.11 
    (b) and (c). Notice of the Court Order was published in the Federal 
    Register on May 24, 1994 (59 FR 26810). Consistent with that Court 
    Order, the Service announced in that Federal Register notice that all 
    exotic birds in listed Appendix III of The Convention on International 
    Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) are covered by the automatic import 
    moratorium of the WBCA, regardless of their country of origin.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on the December 2, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Susan S. Lieberman, U. S. Fish and 
    Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 N. Fairfax 
    Drive, Room 420C, Arlington, VA 22203, telephone (703) 358-2093.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends 50 CFR 15.11 (b) and (c)--
    Prohibitions, of the final rule published in the Federal Register, 
    November 16, 1993 (58 FR 60524).
        In the final rule of November 16, 1993, the Service interpreted 
    that Appendix III species are considered CITES-listed species for the 
    purposes of these regulations only if they originate in the country 
    that listed them in Appendix III. The Service noted that the listing of 
    a species in Appendix III is a unilateral action by a particular CITES 
    Party, thereby requiring CITES permits and implementation of CITES 
    permit issuance requirements for that country only; when the species is 
    found in countries that did not list it in Appendix III, only a 
    certificate of origin is required, stating that it did not originate in 
    the country that listed the species in Appendix III. Therefore, when 
    the species is found in countries other than where listed in Appendix 
    III, it is not subject to the same level of CITES controls, and indeed 
    is only listed in the Appendices to assist the listing state in 
    implementing its domestic legislation. Based on its understanding of 
    the intent of Congress, the Service implemented a final rule whereby 
    Appendix III species were subject to the automatic import prohibitions 
    of the law, only if they originated in the listing country. Otherwise, 
    they would be subject to the discretionary prohibitions of the law.
        The Humane Society of the United States and Defenders of Wildlife 
    brought a civil action against the Secretary of the Interior in the 
    United States District Court for the District of Columbia challenging 
    that part of 50 CFR 15.11 which restricts the importation of certain 
    Appendix III exotic birds (Humane Society of the United States v. 
    Babbitt, Civ. No. 94-0296, D.D.C., March 29, 1994). A hearing in the 
    District Court took place on March 7, 1994. Plaintiffs argued that this 
    provision, which was adopted through notice and comment procedures, 
    violates the language of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992. They 
    sought relief to suspend or invalidate the following exception, 
    contained in the final rule, to the prohibition on importation of birds 
    listed in the Convention's appendices: ``This paragraph (b) does not 
    apply to an exotic bird species listed in Appendix III to the 
    Convention that originated in a country that has not listed the species 
    in Appendix III'' (50 CFR 15.11 (b) (2)). Plaintiffs argued that this 
    provision violates the plain language of the Act, which bars the 
    importation of ``any'' species listed in ``any'' appendix to the 
    Convention.
        On March 29, 1994, U.S. District Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer found 
    the contested regulation to be invalid. [This Court Order was discussed 
    in a Notice in the Federal Register published on May 24, 1994.] 
    Therefore, the Service hereby amends 50 CFR 15.11 (b) and (c) to comply 
    with the Court Order. The Service mandates that all bird species listed 
    in CITES Appendix III (in addition to those in Appendices I or II), 
    wherever found, cannot be imported into the U.S. unless they are either 
    accompanied by an import permit issued pursuant to Subpart C of 50 CFR 
    Part 15, or they are included in an approved list. On March 17, 1994, 
    the Service published in the Federal Register (59 FR 12784) a proposed 
    rule that would establish those approved lists. This final rule is a 
    result of the Court Order discussed in the Notice published in the 
    Federal Register on May 24, 1994, and is adopted through public notice 
    and comment procedures. Therefore, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
    553(d)(3), the Service has determined that good cause, as reflected by 
    the final Court Order, exists so that this final rule will be made 
    effective upon publication in the Federal Register. The Service 
    received a total of three comments on the proposed rule preceding this 
    final rule that was published in the Federal Register on June 3, 1994 
    (59 FR 28826). One commenter endorsed the proposed ruling. One 
    commenter supported the original interpretation by the Service in the 
    WBCA of birds listed in CITES Appendix III, and inquired as to why the 
    Service did not appeal the decision rendered in the Court Order. The 
    decision not to appeal was made by the Service, the Solicitor's Office, 
    and the Justice Department after careful deliberation over the legal, 
    policy, and budgetary implications of continued litigation. The 
    remaining commenter addressed concerns that though valid, were not 
    pertinent to the contents of the proposed rule.
    
    Effects of the Rule
    
        The Service has determined that this final rule is categorically 
    excluded under Departmental procedures in complying with the National 
    Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). See DOI Departmental Manual, 516 DM 2, 
    Appendix 1, 1.10. The regulations are procedural in nature, and the 
    environmental effects are judged to be minimal, speculative, and do not 
    lend themselves to meaningful analysis. The permits and other 
    administrative actions authorized under the WBCA and regulations will 
    be subject to future NEPA documentation requirements, on a case-by-case 
    basis.
    
    Executive Orders 12866, 12612, and 12630 and the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act
    
        This final rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget 
    review under Executive Order 12866. This action would not be expected 
    to have significant taking implications for U.S. citizens, as per 
    Executive Order 12630. Any effects on small entities (importers, 
    shippers, etc.) would likely be minor, and would in any event be the 
    mandatory result of the district court ruling. Future final rulemaking 
    will establish procedures for listing of species approved for import, 
    which may reduce any effects on small entities. No reporting 
    requirements would be added to existing regulations. Therefore, this 
    revision would not have a significant economic effect on a substantial 
    number of small entities as described by the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act. Since this final rule applies to importation of live exotic birds 
    into the United States, it does not contain any Federalism impacts as 
    described in Executive Order 12612. The Department has certified that 
    this rule meets the applicable standards provided in Sections 2(a) and 
    2(b)(2) of Executive Order 12778.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        No new information collection requirement(s) are contained in this 
    final rule for which OMB approval under 44 U.S.C. 3501 is necessary.
    
    Author
    
        The author of this final rule is Mark Phillips, Office of 
    Management Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington, VA 
    22202 (703/358-2104, ext. 5450)
    
    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 15
    
        Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation, 
    Wildlife.
    
    Regulation Promulgation
    
        Accordingly, Part 15 of Chapter I of title 50 of the Code of 
    Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
    
    PART 15--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 15 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 4901-4916.
    
        2. Section 15.11 of Subpart B is amended by revising Sec. 15.11 (b) 
    and (c) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 15.11  Prohibitions.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) It is unlawful to import into the United States any exotic bird 
    species listed in the Appendices to the Convention that is not included 
    in the approved list of species, pursuant to subpart D of this part, 
    except that this paragraph (b) does not apply to any exotic bird that 
    was bred in a foreign breeding facility listed as qualifying pursuant 
    to subpart E of this part.
        (c) It is unlawful to import into the United States any exotic bird 
    species not listed in the Appendices to the Convention that is listed 
    in the prohibited species list, pursuant to subpart F of this part.
    * * * * *
        Dated: November 21, 1994.
    George T. Frampton, Jr.,
    Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
    [FR Doc. 94-29674 Filed 12-1-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/2/1994
Published:
12/02/1994
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-29674
Dates:
This final rule is effective on the December 2, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: December 2, 1994
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 15.11