2012-15940. Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change Adding New Paragraph (cc) to NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.62 To Provide for a Post No Preference Light Only Quotation  

  • Start Preamble June 25, 2012.

    I. Introduction

    On May 3, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (“Exchange” or “NYSE Arca”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] a proposed rule change to add new paragraph (cc) to NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.62 to provide for a Post No Preference Light Only Quotation (“PNPLO Quotation”). The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on May 11, 2012.[3] The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.

    II. Description of the Proposal

    The Exchange has proposed to provide a new quotation type—the PNPLO Quotation. The PNPLO Quotation would be an electronic Market Maker [4] quotation that, upon initial entry into the Exchange's trading system, would only be eligible to execute against displayed liquidity on Arca's Consolidated Book.[5] If a PNPLO Quotation, upon entry, would: (1) Execute exclusively against non-displayed liquidity on the Consolidated Book, it would be rejected; (2) execute against both displayed and non-displayed liquidity on the Consolidated Book, it would immediately execute against such displayed liquidity, but not against the non-displayed liquidity, and any remaining size would be rejected; (3) execute exclusively against displayed liquidity on the Consolidated Book, it would immediately execute and any remaining size would be placed on the Consolidated Book and treated as a standard Market Maker quotation; and (4) not execute against either displayed or non-displayed liquidity, it would be placed on the Consolidated Book and treated as a standard Market Maker quotation.[6] The entry of a PNPLO Quotation would cause the automatic removal of the pre-existing quotation(s) of a Market Maker, regardless of whether the PNPLO Quotation is accepted or rejected by the NYSE Arca System.[7] Accordingly, in instances where the PNPLO Quotation is rejected by the system because of the presence of otherwise marketable non-displayed interest, the Market Maker would be required to re-enter a quotation for purposes of satisfying any applicable quoting obligations under NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.37B.[8]

    The PNPLO Quotation may only be submitted for options in penny pilot issues.[9] On the Exchange, penny pilot issues are subject to a make/take fee structure, under which Market Makers receive credits for posting liquidity and incur fees for taking liquidity.[10] By preventing interactions with resting, non-displayed liquidity through use of the PNPLO Quotation, Market Makers in penny pilot issues would be able to avoid incurring unexpectedly the fees associated with such interactions. The Exchange notes that this is desirable for Market Makers because it is difficult for them to account for this risk of interacting with non-displayed liquidity in their quoting models.[11]

    III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.[12] In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,[13] which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.

    The Exchange noted that the quoting algorithms of Market Makers may not be able to account accurately for the risk of interacting with resting, non-displayed liquidity in penny pilot issues and the related take fees. The Exchange represents that this challenge may result in Market Makers widening their quotes in penny pilot classes.[14] The Exchange further represents that use of the PNPLO Quotation should allow Market Makers to better control their execution costs by avoiding unexpected take fees related to executions with resting, non-displayed liquidity in penny pilot issues. This cost certainty, according to the Exchange, could lead to narrower quote widths in penny pilot issues, thereby improving the Exchange's market and benefiting investors. Additionally, if the PNPLO Quotation is rejected by the NYSE Arca system because of the presence of otherwise marketable non-displayed interest, the Market Maker would be required to re-enter a quotation for purposes of satisfying any applicable quoting obligations under NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.37B. For these reasons, the Commission believes that the proposed PNPLO Quotation is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act as it is designed to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market Start Printed Page 38880and a national market system, and in general to protect investors and the public interest.

    The Commission also believes that the proposed rule change is not unfairly discriminatory. Currently, market participants including Market Makers can achieve functionality similar to the PNPLO Quotation through use of the PNP-Light Order, which is a non-routable order type that is only eligible to execute against displayed liquidity.[15] The Exchange is proposing a similar functionality for use by Market Makers when quoting. The PNPLO Quotation would be available for use by all Market Makers quoting in the penny pilot classes on the Exchange.[16]

    IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[17] that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2012-05) be, and it hereby is, approved.

    Start Signature

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[18]

    Kevin M. O'Neill,

    Deputy Secretary.

    End Signature End Preamble

    Footnotes

    3.  See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66937 (May 7, 2012), 77 FR 27820 (May 11, 2012) (“Notice”).

    Back to Citation

    4.  See NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.32 (defining “Market Maker”).

    Back to Citation

    5.  See new NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.62(cc); see also NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.1(b)(37) (defining “Consolidated Book”).

    Back to Citation

    6.  See new NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.62(cc).

    Back to Citation

    7.  See supra note 3, at 27821.

    Back to Citation

    8.  See id.

    Back to Citation

    9.  See new NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.62(cc); see also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 55156 (January 23, 2007), 72 FR 4759 (February 21, 2007) (order approving penny pilot program); 56568 (September 27, 2007), 72 FR 56422 (October 3, 2007) (order approving expansion and extension of penny pilot); 59628 (March 26, 2009), 74 FR 15025 (April 2, 2009) (notice of extension of penny pilot); 60224 (July 1, 2009), 74 FR 32991 (July 9, 2009) (notice of extension of penny pilot); 60711 (September 23, 2009), 74 FR 49419 (September 28, 2009) (order partially approving expansion of penny pilot); 61061 (November 24, 2009), 74 FR 62857 (December 1, 2009) (order partially approving expansion of penny pilot); 63376 (November 24, 2010), 75 FR 75527 (December 3, 2010) (notice of extension of penny pilot); 65977 (December 15, 2011), 76 FR 79234 (December 21, 2011) (notice of extension of penny pilot).

    Back to Citation

    10.  See supra note 3, at 27821.

    Back to Citation

    11.  See id.

    Back to Citation

    12.  In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    Back to Citation

    14.  See supra note 3, at 27821.

    Back to Citation

    15.  See NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.62(v).

    Back to Citation

    16.  See supra note 3, at 27821.

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2012-15940 Filed 6-28-12; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

Document Information

Comments Received:
0 Comments
Published:
06/29/2012
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
2012-15940
Pages:
38879-38880 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-67252, File No. SR-NYSEArca-2012-05
EOCitation:
of 2012-06-25
PDF File:
2012-15940.pdf