[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 123 (Monday, June 28, 1999)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 34540-34541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-16358]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 20
46 CFR Part 5
[USCG-1998-3472]
RIN 2115-AF59
Rules of Practice, Procedure, and Evidence for Administrative
Proceedings of the Coast Guard
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Correction to interim rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects the interim rule (USCG-1998-3472) as
published on May 24, 1999. The rule revises the rules for Practice,
Procedure, and Evidence for Administrative Proceedings.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective June 28, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Documents as indicated in this preamble are available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (USCG-1998-
3472), U.S. Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh
Street SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. They are also available over the
Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this rule, call
George J. Jordan, Attorney-Advisor, Office of the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, telephone 202-267-0006. For questions on viewing, or
submitting material to the docket, call Dorothy Walker, Chief, Dockets,
Department of Transportation, telephone 202-366-9329.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This rulemaking was necessary as part of a Coast Guard effort to
improve both (1) the administrative efficiency of Coast Guard
adjudicative procedures in general and (2) proceedings against merchant
mariners' credentials in particular. It follows an overall Coast Guard
initiative to streamline its resources, yet maintain effectiveness in
all affected areas.
The Coast Guard maintains two separate sets of procedural rules
that govern administrative adjudication. 46 CFR part 5 contains the
rules for Suspension and Revocation (S&R). These rules have their basis
in criminal procedure. 33 CFR part 20 contains the rules for class II
civil penalties. These rules have their basis in the Model Rules of
Administrative Procedure and in other modern rules for civil
procedures. Both sets of rules, however, contain outdated and
inefficient procedures, many of which are not effective in the
adjudication of Coast Guard actions.
This rulemaking consolidates both sets of rules in 33 CFR part 20.
It removes those procedures that impede the efficient handling of
cases. In addition, it revises those rules that are not consistent with
relevant legal standards and practices.
Need for Correction
As published, the interim rule contained both a table that may
prove to be misleading and a misnumbering. In the table, the acceptable
methods of service did not correspond unambiguously to the types of
filed documents. The misnumbering employed a roman numeral instead of
an Arabic one.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, correct the interim rule as published on May 24, 1999
(USCG-1998-3472), which is the subject of FR Doc. 99-12750, to read as
follows:
Sec. 20.304 [Corrected]
1. On pages 28064 and 28065, correct TABLE 20.304(D) to read as
follows:
* * * * *
Table 20.304 (D).--How To Serve Filed Documents
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of filed document Acceptable methods of service
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Complaint.......................... (i) Certified mail, return
receipt requested.
[[Page 34541]]
(2) Default Motion..................... (ii) Personal delivery.
(iii) Express-courier service
that has receipt capability.
(3) Answer............................. (i) Mail.
(ii) Personal delivery.
(iii) Express-courier service.
(iv) Fax.
(4) Any other filed document........... (i) Mail.
(ii) Personal delivery.
(iii) Express-courier service.
(iv) Fax.
(v) Other electronic means (at
the discretion of the ALJ).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 20.304 [Corrected]
2. On page 28065, correct paragraph ``(e)(i)'' to read ``(e)(1)''.
* * * * *
Dated: June 22, 1999.
J E Shkor,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 99-16358 Filed 6-25-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M