[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 30, 1999)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35082-35090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-16501]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 30, 1999 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 35082]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Parts 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281,
282, 283, 284, and 285
RIN 0584-AB90
Food Stamp Program: Revisions to the Retail Food Store Definition
and Program Authorization Guidance
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement provisions of the Food
Stamp Program Improvements Act of 1994 to revise the criteria for
eligibility of firms to participate in the Food Stamp Program (FSP) as
retail food stores, and to provide for notification to such firms of
eligibility criteria for participation in the FSP. The intended effect
of this proposed rule is to ensure that food stamp recipients continue
to have adequate access to retail food stores where they can purchase a
wide variety of nutritious food items, intended for home preparation
and consumption, that meet their daily food needs, and to clarify
procedures and eligibility requirements for authorizing participation
in the FSP as a retail food store. This proposed rule also reinserts
part of a sentence inadvertently removed from the regulations by an
earlier rule, and replaces references to the Secretary of Health and
Human Services with references to the Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 30, 1999 to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Judy Love, Redemption
Management Branch, Benefit Redemption Division, Food and Nutrition
Service, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22302-1594, or
faxed to (703) 305-2418. All written comments will be open to public
inspection at the office of the Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday) in
room 706, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding this rulemaking
should be addressed to Judy Love at the above address or by telephone
at (703) 305-2418.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be significant and was reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12372
The Food Stamp Program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.551. For the reasons set forth in the final
rule and related Notice to 7 CFR Part 3015 subpart V (48 FR 29115, June
24, 1983), this Program is excluded from the scope of the Executive
Order 12372 which requires inter-governmental consultation with State
and local officials.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed with regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Samuel Chambers,
Jr., the Administrator of FNS, has certified that this rule does not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, based on preliminary implementation data. It may, however,
impact a small number of firms that do not effectuate the purposes of
the FSP.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is intended to have preemptive effect
with respect to any State or local laws, regulations or policies that
conflict with its provisions, or that would otherwise impede its full
implementation. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect
unless so specified in the EFFECTIVE DATE'' paragraph of this preamble.
Prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule or the
application of its provisions, all applicable administrative procedures
must be exhausted. In the Food Stamp Program the administrative
procedures are as follows: (1) for Program benefit recipients--State
administrative procedures issued under to 7 U.S.C. 2020(e)(10) and 7
CFR 273.15; (2) for State agencies--administrative procedures issued
under to 7 U.S.C. 2023, and set forth in 7 CFR 276.7 (for rules related
to non-quality control (QC) liabilities) or 7 CFR Part 283 (for rules
related to QC liabilities); (3) for Program retailers and wholesalers--
administrative procedures issued under to 7 U.S.C. 2023, and set forth
in 7 CFR 278.8.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Pub. L.
104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, FNS
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of
the UMRA generally requires FNS to identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, more
cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the
objectives of the rule. This rule contains no Federal mandates under
the regulatory provision of Title II of the UMRA for State, local and
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
one year. Thus, this rule is not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice
announces our intent to collect additional information on the
application completed by retail food stores to request approval to
participate in the Food Stamp Program (FSP) and to obtain approval for
3 years of the revised applications.
Comments on this notice must be submitted by August 30, 1999.
[[Page 35083]]
Comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information including the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments may be sent to Lori Schack, Desk Officer, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Washington, D.C. 20502 (a copy may also be sent to Judy Love,
Redemption Management Branch, Benefit Redemption Division, Food and
Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center
Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302. For further information, or for copies of
the information collection, please contact Ms. Love at the above
address.)
All responses to this notice will be summarized, included in the
request for OMB approval, and become a matter of public record.
Title: Food Stamp Program Store Applications.
OMB Number: 0584-0008.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Abstract: The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture is the Federal agency responsible for the
FSP. The Food Stamp Act of 1977, as amended (the Act) (7 U.S.C. 2011-
2036), requires that the Agency determine the eligibility of firms and
certain food service organizations to accept and redeem food stamp
benefits and to monitor them for compliance and continued eligibility.
Part of FNS's responsibility is to accept applications from retail
food establishments and meal service programs that wish to participate
in the FSP, review the applications in order to determine whether or
not applicants meet eligibility requirements, and make determinations
whether to grant or deny authorization to accept and redeem food stamp
benefits. FNS is also responsible for requiring updates to application
information and reviewing that information to determine whether or not
the firms or services continue to meet eligibility requirements.
There are currently 3 application forms approved under OMB No.
0584-0008. Together these forms are used by retailers, wholesalers,
meal service providers, certain types of group homes, shelters, and
state-contracted restaurants, to apply to FNS for authorization to
participate in the FSP. Form FNS-252, Food Stamp Application For Stores
is generally used by stores, excluding facilities which provide meal
services such as communal dining, shelters, restaurant and other meal
service programs, which are newly applying for authorization; Form FNS-
252R, Food Stamp Program Application For Stores-Reauthorization is used
by the majority of currently authorized stores to apply for
reauthorization, excluding facilities which provide meal services such
as communal dining, shelters, restaurants and other meal service
programs; and Form FNS-252-2, Application to Participate in the Food
Stamp Program for Communal Dining Facility/Others generally used by
communal dining and restaurant facilities and other food service
programs which are newly applying or applying for reauthorization. In a
few cases, at the discretion of the FNS field offices, some stores
would be required to complete Form FNS-252 to apply for
reauthorization. Section 9(c) of the Act provides the necessary
authorization(s) to collect the information contained in these forms.
This proposed rule contains new eligibility requirements that result in
changes to the application form(s).
Except for two of the new eligibility requirements (discussed later
in this notice), the burden imposed by the new requirements have
already been incorporated into Form FNS-252 and FNS-252R, as
appropriate. On May 6, 1996, FNS published a notice for public comment
on the revisions resulting from these new statutory requirements and
associated burden estimates. The burden estimates and comments received
were submitted to OMB. OMB approved the burden estimates through May
30, 1999. On October 15, 1996, FNS issued final rules (61 FR 53595)
which implemented a new collection requirement for certain users of
Form FNS-252-2. The appropriate notice soliciting comments on the
revised estimates was contained in the preamble of that rule. Again,
the burden estimates and comments were submitted to OMB. That
submission to OMB included the May 1996 estimates and the October 1996
estimates, and were approved by OMB through October 31, 1999. This new
notice announces our intent to revise the existing burden estimates
approved by OMB through October 31, 1999 and obtain OMB approval for an
additional 3 years based on proposed re-estimates of the existing
burden using more recent data as well as estimates for new information
collection that was not contained in the May 6, 1996 or October 15,
1996 notices for public comment.
We do not collect information on the number of FSP applications
received annually. Current burden estimates associated with these 3
application forms are determined from information maintained in STARS
(Store Tracking and Redemption System) based on the total number of
currently authorized stores or the number of newly authorized stores.
The number of expected applications is divided between initial
applications from new applicants and applications for reauthorization
from currently authorized stores.
We are proposing new burden estimates which: use more recent store
authorization data; include burden estimates associated with new
information collection contained in this proposed rule which was not
included in the May 6, 1996 notice; and, include a correction in burden
estimates to capture a change in application requirements for private
restaurants that was inadvertently omitted from the hourly burden
estimates when last submitted to OMB.
Adjustments--Re-estimates Based on More Recent Data and Corrections
For burden estimates associated with new applicants (initial
authorizations), we used the number of stores (all types) newly
authorized/approved currently estimated at 20,696 (rounded to 20,700)
based on FY 1997 year-end data from STARS and inflated this number by
10% (2,070) to capture a total of 22,770 applications expected to be
received and processed from stores annually. It is estimated that 98%
(22,315) of the 22,770 applications expected to be received would be on
Form FNS-252 and 2% (455 would be on Form FNS-252-2. Due to a technical
correction discussed later in this section of the preamble, the number
of expected applications would be further changed to reflect an
expected total of 22,347 applications using Form FNS-252 and 423
applications using Form FNS-252-2.
For burden estimates associated with applications for
reauthorization, we used the total number of stores (all types)
authorized (184,300) as of December 1997. Generally, authorized stores
are subject to reauthorization at least once every 4 years. Thus, it is
[[Page 35084]]
estimated that 25% (46,000) of all authorized stores would be subject
to reauthorization in any given year. Using, the number of authorized
stores as of December 1997, it is estimated that 46,000 reauthorization
applications would be expected to be received annually. Of the 46,000
reauthorization applications expected, it is estimated that 96%
(44,160) will be on Form FNS-252R, 3% (1,380) will be on Form FNS-252-
2, and 1% (460) will be on Form FNS-252.
Hourly burden time per response varies by type of application and
includes the time to review instructions, search existing data
resources, gather and copy the data needed, complete and review the
application, and submit the form and documentation to FNS. It should be
noted that the number of applicant and authorized stores has been
declining over the past few years due to several program changes, such
as changes in eligibility requirements, stronger sanctions against
violators, and implementation of Electronic Benefit Transfer systems.
These declines have resulted in a reduction in the overall number of
respondents and ultimately a reduction in the overall proposed burden
hours reflected in the summary chart.
Currently, private restaurants applying for FSP participation in
the State-administered special restaurant program use Form FNS-252-2 to
apply for participation. This category of applicant represents about 7%
of the number of current applicants using Form FNS-252-2. Over time, it
has been determined that we need additional information from such
private restaurants to ensure that they meet necessary requirements of
operation to carry out the intent of the FSP. The additional
information needed would be captured by having these respondents,
estimated at about 32, complete Form FNS-252 rather than Form FNS-252-
2. We estimate that these restaurants will spend an estimated 10
minutes of additional burden time using the longer Form FNS-252,
however, this contributes to a negligible amount to the increase in the
average hourly burden rate reflected in the chart on page 10 because
the number of respondents is so small. This change is a technical
correction rather than a re-estimate based on more recent data, and is
reflected in the number of initial applications expected to be received
as shown in the summary chart.
As currently approved by OMB, the hourly burden rate per response
for Form FNS-252 is 20 to 68 minutes, with the average being 27 minutes
and 10 to 20 minutes for Form FNS 252-2, with the average being 10
minutes. These hourly burden rates are not affected by the re-estimated
number of applications expected to be received or the technical
correction. However, previous estimates to OMB erroneously reflected
the average burden time for Form FNS-252-2 as 10 minutes. The average
time is 12 minutes and this correction appears in the proposed
estimates in the summary chart.
Adjustments--New Information Collection--Proposed Rule
This proposed rule requires that retail food stores qualifying
under criterion A offer for sale on a continuous basis a variety of
foods in each of the 4 staple food categories: Bread/Cereals; Dairy
Products; Fruits/Vegetables; and Meat/Poultry/Fish. Forms FNS-252 and
252R would be affected by this new information collection. Currently,
stores simply use a check box entitled ``Variety'' on Forms FNS-252 and
FNS-252R to indicate that they have more than one type of staple food
within each of the 4 staple food categories listed. Under the proposed
rules (Sec. 278.1(b)(1)(ii)(A)), stores would have to declare that they
have a minimum of 3 different types of staple foods in each of the 4
staple food categories. To implement this change, we would make a
simple change to the heading of the current check-box item. Hourly
burden associated with this change is expected to be negligible, so no
change is made in the estimate.
The proposed regulations (Sec. 278.1(b)(1)(ii)(B)) further provide
that stores qualifying under criterion A have at least $30,000 in
annual wholesale staple food purchases. We would add a Yes/No check-box
question to Forms FNS-252 and FNS-252R to capture this information.
Most stores will know their wholesale staple food purchases exceed
$30,000 and will check this box. Those that do not know this
information will incur an estimated additional 10 minutes (or .1667
hours) of burden time to assemble and analyze readily available store
records such as wholesale inventory receipts. This requirement does not
affect users of Form FNS-252-2 as these applicants are meal service
providers, which are not subject to the new requirement, nor does it
affect stores qualifying under Criterion B, which requires that 50
percent or more of a firm's sales must be in staple foods. We do not
know how many stores would incur this additional burden on Forms FNS-
252 and 252R. For the purpose of assessing burden, we are assuming that
at least an estimated 5% (1,140) of the number of applications expected
to be received annually using Form FNS-252 (22,807) would incur this
additional burden. We further assume that at least an estimated 5%
(2,208) of the number of reauthorization applications expected to be
received using Form FNS-252R (44,160) would incur the additional
burden.
The hourly burden time for users of Form FNS-252 is estimated to be
20 to 68 minutes, with the average being 27 minutes. The hourly burden
time for users of Form FNS-252R is estimated to be 5 to 8 minutes, with
the average being 7 minutes. The estimated additional 10 minutes of
burden time associated with the new information collection requirements
would increase the average burden time for the affected respondents to
37 minutes for Form FNS-252 and 17 minutes for Form FNS-252R. Thus, the
overall average hourly burden rate for all users of these forms would
change from 27 to 27.5 minutes for Form FNS-252 and from 7 to 7.5
minutes for Form FNS-252R as a result of the new requirements.
Total number of respondents completing at least one of the 3
applications in question, taking into consideration the adjustments
discussed above, would be as follows:
FNS-252:
New authorizations......... - 22,347 (22,770 x .98 + 32).
Reauthorizations........... - 460 (184,000 x .25 x .01).
----------------
..... 22,807
FNS-252-2:
New authorizations......... - 423 (22,770 x .02-32).
Reauthorizations........... - 1,380 (184,000 x .25 x .03).
----------------
1,803
FNS-252R:
[[Page 35085]]
Reauthorizations........... - 44,160 (184,000 x .25 x .01-1,380-460).
----------------
Total Responses........ 68,770
The existing estimates, as approved by OMB through May 1999 and
shown on the following chart, reflect the total annual number of
responses as 80,613 and the annual burden hours as 18,396. The proposed
number of responses would be 68,700 with total burden hours of 16,333
hours. The net effect of the proposed burden estimates is an overall
decrease in burden hours of 2,063 hours annually.
Affected Public: Food Retail and Wholesale Firms, Meal Service
Programs, certain types of Group Homes, Shelters, and State-contracted
Restaurants.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 68,770.
Estimated Number of Responses per respondent: 1.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.237501.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 16,333.
Summary of Proposed Burden Estimates for Forms FNS-252, 252-2 and 252R
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses per Total annual Burden hours Total annual
Title respondents respondent responses per response burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form FNS-252:
Existing.................... 26,431 1 26,431 .4500 11,894
Proposed.................... 22,807 1 22,807 .4583 10,452
Difference.............. -3,624 1 -3,624 +.0083 -1,442
Form FNS-252-2:
Existing.................... 2,592 1 2,592 .1855 481
Proposed.................... 1,803 1 1,803 .2000 361
Difference.............. -789 .............. -789 +.0145 -120
Form FNS-252R:
Existing.................... 51,590 1 51,590 .1167 6,021
Proposed.................... 44,160 1 44,160 .1250 5,520
Difference.............. -7,430 .............. -7,430 +.0083 -501
Totals:
Existing.................... 80,613 .............. 80,613 .............. 18,396
Proposed.................... 68,770 .............. 68,770 .............. 16,333
Difference.............. -11,843 .............. -11,843 .............. -2,063
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
Sections 201 and 202 of the Food Stamp Program Improvements Act of
1994, Pub. L. 103-225, (hereinafter, Pub. L. 103-225), revised the
eligibility requirements found in section 3(k)(1) of the Food Stamp Act
of 1977, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2011-2036 (hereinafter the Act) for firms
participating in the Food Stamp Program (FSP) as retail food stores.
Under the current provisions of the Act, as amended by Pub. L. 103-225,
a firm to be eligible to participate as a retail food store, under
section 3(k)(1) of the Act, must offer for sale a variety of staple
foods for home preparation and consumption in each of four staple food
categories, including perishable foods in at least two of the
categories, or have the majority of its total gross sales in staple
foods for home preparation and consumption.
Current food stamp regulations, implementing section 3(k)(1) of the
Act, provide that, in order to participate in the FSP, a firm must have
more than 50 percent of its eligible food sales volume in staple food
items intended for home preparation and consumption. In 1992, when the
Department began the periodic reauthorization of retail food stores, as
authorized by the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of
1990, Pub. L. 101-624, it was determined that a significant number of
small retail food stores participating in the Food Stamp Program, under
section 3(k)(1) of the Act, no longer met the required ratio of staple
food sales to eligible food sales. Concern developed over the
possibility that a massive withdrawal of these retail food stores,
especially stores serving recipients in inner-cities and rural areas,
could create a hardship for food stamp recipients throughout the
country. Accordingly, in Pub. L. 103-225, Congress revised the
eligibility criteria that firms must meet in order to obtain and
maintain FSP authorization to participate as a retail food store.
H.R. Report No. 352, 103rd Congress (1993) (November 10, 1993, page
3), which accompanied Pub. L. 103-225, (hereafter Report 352), stated
that the revised eligibility criteria were intended to allow stores
that ``. . . sell a wide range and high percentage of nutritious staple
foods . . .'' to continue participating in the FSP, to ensure ``. . .
that food stamp recipients have adequate access to retail food stores.
. . .'' That same report also stated that the revised definition of a
retail food store in section 3(k)(1) was intended to `` . . . bar
marginal food stores from participating in the program. . . .''
Under current rules implementing section 3(k)(1) of the Act, a
firm's eligibility is based on the ratio of staple food sales to
eligible food sales. At section 3(g) of the Act, ``eligible food'' is
defined as any food or food product intended for home consumption
except alcoholic beverages, tobacco, hot foods, or hot food products
ready for immediate consumption. Thus, under current rules, a firm
could qualify as long as its staple food sales exceeded 50 percent of
its total eligible food sales. This means, for example, that a liquor
store that sells a variety of staple snack foods such as chips,
crackers, cheeses and hors d'oeuvres, would qualify for authorization
as long as the staple food sales exceeded eligible accessory food
sales, including carbonated and uncarbonated non-alcoholic beverages,
coffee, tea, cocoa, candy, condiments, and spices. This was true even
though a store's food sales may have represented only a small portion
of its business. Consequently, such marginal food stores have been
allowed to participate in the FSP under current rules.
[[Page 35086]]
As noted, Report 352 states that the revised definition of a retail
food store under Pub. L. 103-225 was intended to bar such marginal food
stores from participating in the FSP. Congress amended section 3(k)(1)
to require that firms sell a wide range or high percentage of staple
foods in order to be eligible to participate as a retail food store.
Thus, based on Pub. L. 103-225, this rule proposes that in order to
qualify under section 3(k)(1) of the Act, as amended, a firm must
either offer for sale an ample variety of staple foods for home
preparation and consumption in each of the four staple food categories,
including perishable foods in at least two of the categories, or have
the majority of a its total gross sales in staple foods for home
preparation and consumption. This would effectively bar many marginal
food stores from participation, and at the same time, ensure that food
stamp recipients have access to retail food stores that sell an ample
variety of staple foods intended for home preparation and consumption.
Pub. L. 103-225 and this proposed rule are not intended to affect
the current prohibition against the participation of certain types of
firms that do not effectuate the purposes of the Food Stamp Program, as
set forth in Report 352. This includes, but is not limited to, stores
selling only accessory foods, such as spices, candy, soft drinks, tea,
or coffee; ice cream vendors selling solely ice cream; specialty
doughnut shops or bakeries not selling bread. Furthermore, this rule is
not intended to affect and does not change current statutory
restrictions on the participation of meal services, wholesalers or the
special restaurant programs for the elderly, disabled, and the
homeless.
Pub. L. 103-225 and this proposed rule restate the long-standing
requirement that a qualifying firm under section 3(k)(1) of the Act
must sell staple foods for home preparation and consumption. As set
forth in section 1 of the Act, the purpose of the FSP is ``to provide
for improved levels of nutrition among low-income households.''
Further, as set forth in section 2, the FSP should ``permit low-income
households to obtain a more nutritious diet through normal channels of
trade * * *'' The policies and concepts proposed in this rule are based
on the underlying principle that a qualifying firm under section
3(k)(1) of the Act must either sell an ample variety of staple foods
for home preparation and consumption, or have the majority of its total
gross retail sales in staple foods intended for home preparation and
consumption.
In addition, Pub. L. 103-225 states that the Secretary must issue
regulations providing for periodic notice to participating retail food
stores and wholesale food concerns of the definitions of ``retail food
store,'' ``staple foods,'' ``eligible foods,'' and ``perishable
foods.'' The Department is proposing that this notification, at a
minimum, be provided at the time of the initial authorization of a
firm, as well as at the time a participating retail food store is
reauthorized.
Finally, this proposed rule reinserts language that was
inadvertently removed in a regulation published on December 27, 1996,
titled ``Revisions in Use and Disclosure Rules Involving the Sharing of
Information Provided by Retail and Wholesale Concerns with Other
Federal and State Agencies''. The language, which allows the Department
to disclose information about firms participating in the FSP for
administration and enforcement purposes, would be added to the first
sentence in Sec. 278.1(q) of the FSP regulations. This is consistent
with section 9(c)of the Food Stamp Act of 1977, as amended, and section
17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966.
Revisions in Definitions and Eligibility Criteria Involving Retail
Food Stores (7 CFR 271.2 and 7 CFR 278.1)
Under current rules (7 CFR 271.2), a retail food store is defined
as having more than 50 percent of its total eligible food sales in
staple food sales intended for home preparation and consumption. Pub.
L. 103-225 amended section 3(k)(1) of the Act and established two
separate criteria, meeting either one of which, absent any other
restriction, would qualify a firm to be eligible to accept and redeem
food stamp benefits as a participating retail food store. This
rulemaking proposes to implement changes to section 3(k)(1) of the Act
required by Pub. L. 103-225, to revise the definition of ``retail food
store'' and ``staple foods'' to conform to the statutory changes. It
also would define four new terms--``continuous basis,'' ``perishable,''
``total gross retail sales'' and ``variety of foods''--that are used in
the revised definition of a retail food store.
Eligibility Requirements Under Criterion A
Criterion A, section 3(k)(1)(A) as amended by Pub. L. 103-225, is
the first basis upon which a firm may qualify for participation in the
FSP as a retail food store. Section 3(k)(1)(A) requires that an
establishment or house-to-house trade route offer for sale, on a
continuous basis, a variety of staple foods intended for home
preparation and consumption in each of the four categories of staple
foods, as specified in subsection (u)(1) of the Act, including
perishable foods in at least two of the four categories.
The Department proposes to revise the definition of ``staple food''
contained in regulations at 7 CFR 271.2 to mean those items intended
for home preparation and consumption in the following four categories:
(1) meat, poultry, or fish; (2) bread or cereals; (3) vegetables or
fruits; and, (4) dairy products. ``Staple foods'' do not include
accessory food items such as coffee, tea, cocoa, carbonated and
uncarbonated drinks, candy, condiments, and spices (section 3(u)(2) of
the Act). The definition of ``staple food'' under current rules in 7
CFR 271.2 and in previous statutory language at section 3(k)(1) of the
Act, described ``staple food'' as items for home preparation and
consumption, such as meat, poultry, fish, bread, breadstuffs, cereals,
vegetables, fruits, fruit and vegetable juices, dairy products and the
like, but not including accessory food items, such as coffee, tea,
cocoa, carbonated and uncarbonated drinks, candy, condiments, and
spices.
Hot foods, by statute, continue to be ineligible for purchase with
food stamps under this proposed rule, and therefore do not qualify as
staple foods for the purpose of determining eligibility. Pub. L. 103-
225 and this rule do not change the definition of ``eligible foods''
that can be purchased with food coupons.
The revised statutory definition of retail food store under this
criterion includes four new terms--``variety of foods,'' ``continuous
basis,'' ``perishable foods,'' and ``total gross retail sales''
(section 3(k)(1)(A) of the Act, as amended by Pub. L. 103-225). Firms
that qualify to participate in the Food Stamp Program as a retail food
store under Criterion A, must stock and offer for sale a variety of
foods on a continuous basis in each of the four defined staple food
categories, with perishable foods in at least two of those categories.
Variety of Foods
The Department proposes that the term ``variety of foods'' means
that a qualifying firm must maintain no fewer than three different
varieties of staple food items for home preparation and consumption in
each of the four defined staple food categories, including perishable
foods in at least two of those categories.
The Department further proposes that the term ``variety of foods''
should not be interpreted as meaning different brands, different types
of packaging,
[[Page 35087]]
different package sizes, or similar food items with varying
ingredients. The purpose of this is to ensure that food stamp
recipients have a reasonable selection of foods from which to choose.
For example, a store could not satisfy the dairy requirement under
Criterion A by stocking only skim milk, whole milk, and chocolate milk,
because these milks with varying ingredients would count as only one
variety. Examples of processed foods with similar ingredients that
would count as a single staple food variety for the purpose of
determining store eligibility are: various types and brands of sausage
(mild, spicy, low salt, low fat); breakfast cereals; sliced breads
(white, wheat, rye, oat bran, and multi-grains); pasta sauces; and milk
(low fat, flavored, canned, powdered). Examples of unprocessed foods
that, because of their similarities, would count as a single staple
food variety for the purpose of determining store eligibility are:
different types of apples, lettuce, mushrooms, potatoes, cabbage,
tomatoes, squash, or onions. The Department is particularly interested
in receiving comments on this aspect of the proposed rulemaking.
In addition, the Department proposes that multi-ingredient food
items intended for home preparation and consumption, such as macaroni
and cheese, canned beef stew, cold pizzas or frozen dinners, would only
be counted as one variety of staple food, which would normally be based
on the main staple food ingredient as determined by the Department. For
example, macaroni and cheese would be counted as only one variety, a
pasta, and not a cheese or both pasta and cheese, because pasta is the
main ingredient. The Department believes this proposal is needed for
clarification purposes and to ensure more consistent application of the
new retail store definition in determining a firm's eligibility. The
Department also believes this proposal is reasonable and prudent and
meets the intent of Congress in requiring eligible stores to sell a
variety of staple foods. The Department invites comments regarding this
criteria.
Continuous Basis
The stated purpose of the FSP in section 2 of the Act is to
alleviate hunger and malnutrition and to permit low-income households
to obtain a more nutritious diet. Report 352 states that ``only food
stores that carry an ample supply of food items in each category of
staple foods would be authorized to accept and redeem food stamps.'' It
is, therefore, important that authorized firms qualifying under section
3(k)(1) of the Act be able to provide food stamp households access to
an ample variety of staple food items in sufficient amounts on a
continuous basis. The Department proposes that one way to measure
whether or not qualifying firms offer a sufficient depth of stock in
staple foods on a continuous basis is to require that firms meet a
minimum annual staple food wholesale purchase threshold, which would
require verification of at least $30,000 in staple food wholesale
purchases annually. Wholesale purchases are purchases of goods by
retailers for resale to consumers. This threshold may be periodically
adjusted. Participating stores would be notified in advance of any
changes in the minimum annual staple food threshold. The Department
seeks comments on its proposed threshold, as well as any alternative
suggestions.
The Department proposes that a retail food store covered by section
3(k)(1) of the Act would not qualify under Criterion A if it failed to
meet the minimum $30,000 in staple food wholesale purchases annually.
New stores must meet this standard to be authorized, and all
participating stores must continue to meet this standard in order to
maintain their authorization. New stores may meet the standard through
projections of, at least, $30,000 in staple food wholesale purchases
annually.
As mentioned above, Congress revised the eligibility requirements
in section 3(k)(1) of the Act in response to concerns that a number of
small firms (particularly convenience type stores), were at risk of
losing their authorization to accept food stamps. This concern was
particularly evident in inner-cities and rural areas where the
Department seeks to ensure that food stamp households have access to
nutritious foods that are intended for home preparation and
consumption. The department anticipates that because of the relatively
few firms that may be negatively impacted by these requirements and the
small quantities of staple foods that affected stores sell to
recipients, their ineligibility will not cause hardship to food stamp
households and the standard will continue to allow adequate recipient
access to eligible staple food for home preparation and consumption.
Perishable Foods
The Department proposes that, for the purpose of this rule, the
term ``perishable foods'' means frozen staple foods as well as fresh,
unrefrigerated or refrigerated staple foods that have a turnover rate
of approximately 2 to 3 weeks to ensure that optimal quality is
maintained. Frozen food is included as a perishable because of the
potential for frozen foods to deteriorate if they are maintained at
temperatures above freezing for lengthy periods of time. Typically,
perishable foods will spoil or suffer significant deterioration in
quality within a 2-3 week period. Examples of perishable food items
include fresh milk; fresh or frozen vegetables, fruits, breads, meats,
and fish. Two or more staple food categories must include perishable
foods. Congressional intent for this requirement, as referenced in
Report 352, is to ensure ``* * *adequate turnover of items in those
categories* * *.'' which is evidence that a firm is a legitimate food
store regularly in the business of selling food for home preparation
and consumption under section 3(k)(1) of the Act.
Eligibility Requirements Under Criterion B
The eligibility requirements under this criterion, section
3(k)(1)(B) of the Act, are similar to current rules, but rather than
requiring a firm to have more than 50 percent of its total eligible
food sales in staple foods, it requires that more than 50 percent of
its total gross retail sales be in staple food sales. A firm that meets
the eligibility requirements of the first criterion (Criterion A)
(absent other restrictions) would not be required to meet this second
criterion (Criterion B) and likewise, a firm that meets the second
criterion (absent other restrictions) would not be required to meet the
first criterion.
The Department wishes to clarify that total gross retail sales
means all retail sales of the firm, including food and non-food
merchandise, as well as services such as rental fees, professional
fees, and entertainment/sports/game income. However, the Department
proposes that retail service fees directly connected to the processing
of staple foods, such as raw meat, poultry or fish by the service
provider, would be calculated as staple food sales under Criterion B.
This is to ensure that specialty firms, such as those selling only
meat, are not negatively impacted by the proposed retail food store
definition if they derive a high percentage of their gross retail sales
from services that are not staple food sales but are directly related
to staple food sales, such as meat processing fees. These types of
specialty firms generally offer reasonably priced staple foods and
provide a valued service to food stamp recipients, and clearly
effectuate the purposes of the FSP. The Department wishes to reiterate,
however, that service charges such as rental fees, professional fees,
and entertainment/
[[Page 35088]]
sports/games incomes are to be included in the computation of a firm's
total gross retail sales.
Verification of Information
As set forth in Pub. L. 103-225, the Department proposes that
verification of information (such as a firm's food sales data,
wholesale purchasing receipts, and inventory records) that covers an
appropriate period of time may be required to be provided by the firm
to the Department to document compliance with eligibility criteria.
Failure to provide this information when requested would result in the
denial or withdrawal of authorization.
Recipient Hardship Consideration
Historically, FSP rules and the Act have only stipulated special
recipient hardship exceptions in rare cases involving stores that have
committed violations and face disqualification from program
participation under section 278.6. This rule does not propose to create
a new recipient hardship exception for applicant firms. The Department
is, however, requesting comments regarding justification for such an
exception.
Ineligible Stores
The changes proposed in this rulemaking are intended to allow
continued FSP participation as a retail food store for firms that
effectuate the purposes of the FSP and which meet either of the
criterion under section 3(k)(1). In keeping with the intent of
Congress, it is not the purpose of this proposed rulemaking to expand
participation to entities that have not been allowed to participate in
the past under section 3(k)(1). Thus, the Department wishes to
reiterate that firms that are primarily restaurants would qualify to
participate in the FSP only under the restrictions of the special,
State administered restaurant programs that serve only special
populations (the elderly, disabled or homeless food stamp recipients)
at concessional prices. These programs are specifically provided for in
section 3(g) of the Act. Therefore, at section 271.2, paragraph 4, the
Department has proposed that firms having more than 50 percent of their
total gross retail sales in hot or cold prepared foods that are not
intended for home preparation and consumption, such as prepared
sandwiches, prepared salads and individual cones or dishes of ice
cream, that are consumed on the premises or sold for carryout, will
continue to be ineligible under section 3(k)(1) (A) or (B) of the Act.
This position is strongly supported by the manner in which the statute
at section 3(k) was constructed and subsequently amended by Pub. L.
103-225. That is, section 3(k) sets forth 4 separate and distinct types
of eligible firms. Firms described in sections 3(k) (2), (3) and (4)
are clearly distinguishable from those covered in 3(k)(1) and are
singled out for special treatment. Section 3(k)(2) covers, among other
firm types, private restaurants by directly referencing entities cited
in sections 3(g) (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), and (9), under the definition
of ``food.'' Clearly Pub. L. 103-225 amended only section 3(k)(1) and
did not change the restrictions on the types of firms covered under
sections 3(k) (2), (3) and (4).
Finally, the provisions in sections 3(g) (3), (4) and (9) of the
Act under the definition of ``food,'' permit private establishments
(i.e., restaurants) to accept food stamps only from elderly, disabled
or homeless individuals, and only if the establishment has a contract
with an agency of the State to offer meals to such persons at
concessional prices.
Periodic Notification to Stores
In accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth in
section 202 of Pub. L. 103-225, this rule proposes that firms
participating as retail food stores will be provided periodic
notification of program eligibility criteria. In order to maintain
program integrity, authorized retail food stores must fully understand
and comply with regulatory requirements to continue to participate in
the FSP. Thus, the Department proposes that when a new firm applies for
authorization, it will routinely be provided with materials that lay
out the criteria for authorization under section 3(k)(1) of the Act. In
addition, FNS will provide this information when a participating retail
food store receives its reauthorization notification, and at other
times, upon request. These materials, at a minimum, will include the
definitions of ``retail food store,'' ``eligible foods,'' ``staple
foods,'' and ``perishable foods.''
Request for Comments on Proposed Retail Food Store Eligibility Criteria
Because the statutory requirements were effective upon enactment,
most of the changes in store eligibility criteria required by Pub. L.
103-225 have been implemented. The proposed wholesale purchase
threshold used to define the continuous basis requirement under
Criterion A is new and has not been implemented. The Department
believes most firms that are otherwise eligible under Criterion A will
meet this new proposed requirement. Some small stores that are
currently eligible may not meet this proposed threshold; however,
because these stores tend to sell primarily staple food items, they
should easily qualify under Criterion B, which does not include such a
threshold.
The Department projects that the overall impact of this proposed
rule will not affect most stores currently participating in the Food
Stamp Program. FNS data shows that 1.7 percent of all stores evaluated
for reauthorization between October, 1993 and September, 1998, (2,866
out of 168,079 stores) failed to meet either Criterion A or B. The
Department requests comments on the effects of this proposed rule,
including costs and benefits.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 271
Administrative practice and procedure, Food stamps, Grant
programs--social programs.
7 CFR Part 278
Administrative practice and procedure, Banks, Banking, Claims, Food
stamps, Groceries--retail, Groceries, General line--wholesaler,
Penalties.
Accordingly, 7 CFR parts 271 through 285 are proposed to be amended
as follows:
PARTS 271-285--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for parts 271 through 285 is revised to
read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2011-2036.
PART 271--GENERAL INFORMATION AND DEFINITIONS
2. In Sec. 271.2:
a. The definitions of ``retail food store'' and ``staple food'' are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 271.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Retail food store means: (1) An establishment or house-to-house
trade route that sells food for home preparation and consumption
displayed in a public area, and, either offers for sale on a continuous
basis, a variety of foods in sufficient quantities in each of the four
categories of staple foods including perishable foods in at least two
such categories (Criterion A) as set forth in Sec. 278.1(b)(1), or has
more than 50 percent of its total gross retail sales in staple foods
(Criterion B) as set forth in Sec. 278.1(b)(1). Entities that have more
than 50 percent of their total gross sales in hot and/or cold prepared,
ready-to-eat foods that are intended for
[[Page 35089]]
immediate consumption either for carry-out or on-premises consumption,
and require no additional preparation, are not eligible for FSP
participation as retail food stores under Sec. 278.1(b)(1);
(2) An entity with indicators which may be used to establish that a
firm is a legitimate retail food store. These include, but are not
limited to, the following: a firm's marketing structure; appropriate
retail business licenses; the posting of prices, and the accessibility
of food items offered for sale; and
(3) An entity that meets this definition of retail food store as
determined by visual inspection, sales records, wholesale purchase
records, counting of stockkeeping units, or other inventory or
accounting recordkeeping methods that are customary or reasonable in
the retail food industry.
* * * * *
Staple food means those food items intended for home preparation
and consumption in each of the following food categories: meat,
poultry, or fish; bread or cereals; vegetables or fruits; and dairy
products. Commercially processed foods and prepared mixtures with
multiple ingredients shall only be counted in one staple food category.
For example, foods such as cold pizza, macaroni and cheese, multi-
ingredient soup, or frozen dinners, shall only be counted as one staple
food item and will normally be included in the staple food category of
the main ingredient as determined by FNS. Hot foods are not eligible
for purchase with food stamps, and therefore do not qualify as staple
foods for the purpose of determining eligibility under
Sec. 278.1(b)(1). Accessory food items including, but not limited to,
coffee, tea, cocoa, carbonated and uncarbonated drinks, candy,
condiments, and spices shall not be considered staple foods for the
purpose of determining eligibility of any firm. However, accessory
foods that are offered for sale in authorized retail food stores are
eligible food items to be purchased with food stamp benefits.
* * * * *
PART 278--PARTICIPATION OF RETAIL FOOD STORES, WHOLESALE FOOD
CONCERNS AND INSURED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
3. In Sec. 278.1:
a. Paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(ii) are revised;
b. Paragraph (b)(1)(iii) is redesignated as paragraph (b)(1)(v) and
revised;
c. Paragraph (b)(1)(iv) is redesignated as paragraph (b)(1)(vi) and
a heading is added;
d. New paragraphs (b)(1)(iii) and (b)(1)(iv) are added;
e. The first sentence of paragraph (q) introductory text is revised
and a new sentence is added after the first sentence.
f. Paragraph (q)(3)(iii) is amended by removing the words
``Secretary of Health and Human Services'' wherever they appear, and
adding in their place the words ``Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration''; and,
g. A new paragraph (t) is added.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 278.1 Approval of retail food stores and wholesale food concerns.
* * * * *
(b) Determination of authorization.* * *
(1) The nature and extent of the food business conducted by the
applicant. (i) Retail food store. An establishment or house-to-house
trade route shall normally be considered to have food business of a
nature and extent that will effectuate the purposes of the program if
they sell food for home preparation and consumption and meet one of the
following criteria:
(A) offer for sale, on a continuous basis, a variety of qualifying
foods in each of the four categories of staple foods as defined in
Sec. 271.2 of this chapter, including perishable foods in at least two
of the categories; or
(B) have more than 50 percent of the total gross retail sales of
the establishment or route in staple foods; and
(C) eligibility determination may be based on, but not limited to,
visual inspection, sales records, purchase records, counting of
stockkeeping units, or other inventory or accounting recordkeeping
methods that are customary or reasonable in the retail food industry.
In determining eligibility such information may be requested for
verification purposes, and failure to provide such documentation may
result in denial or withdrawal from the FSP.
(ii) Application of Criterion A. In order to qualify under this
criterion, firms shall:
(A) Offer for sale and displayed in a public area, qualifying
staple food items on a continuous basis, evidenced by having on any
given day, no fewer than three different varieties of food items in
each of the four staple food categories;
(B) Meet a minimum annual staple food wholesale purchase
requirement of $30,000 which may be shown through business records such
as, but not limited to, wholesale purchase receipts or sales records,
or by visual inspections. Failure to provide verifying information when
requested shall result in the denial or withdrawal of authorization.
Wholesale purchases are purchases of goods by retailers for resale to
consumers. For new firms, this minimum annual staple food wholesale
purchase requirement may be met by business projections. This minimum
annual staple food wholesale purchase requirement may be periodically
adjusted after advance notification to participating firms of such a
change;
(C) Offer for sale perishable staple food items in at least two
staple food categories. Perishable foods are items which are either
frozen staple food items or fresh, unrefrigerated or refrigerated
staple food items that will spoil or suffer significant deterioration
in quality within 2-3 weeks;
(D) Variety of foods is not to be interpreted as different brands,
different nutrient values, different varieties of packaging, or
different package sizes. Similar processed food items with varying
ingredients such as, but not limited to, sausages, breakfast cereals,
milk, sliced breads, and cheeses, and similar unprocessed food items,
such as, but not limited to, different varieties of apples, cabbage,
tomatoes, or squash, shall not be considered as more than one staple
food variety each for the purpose of determining variety. Multiple
ingredient food items intended for home preparation and consumption,
such as, but not limited to, cold pizza, macaroni and cheese, soup, or
frozen dinners, shall only be counted as one staple food variety each
and will normally be included in the staple food category of the main
ingredient as determined by the FNS; and
(E) Failure to stock and offer for sale staple food items as
required under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section shall result in the
store not meeting Criterion A.
(iii) Application of Criterion B. In order to qualify under this
criterion, firms must have more than 50 percent of their total gross
retail sales in staple food sales. Total gross retail sales must
include all retail sales of a firm, including food and non-food
merchandise, as well as services, such as rental fees, professional
fees, and entertainment/sports/games income. However, a fee directly
connected to the processing of staple foods, such as raw meat, poultry
or fish by the service provider, shall be calculated as staple food
sales under Criterion B.
(iv) Ineligible firms. Firms that do not meet the eligibility
requirements in this section or that do not effectuate the purpose of
the FSP shall not be eligible for program participation. New applicant
firms that are found to be ineligible will be denied authorization for
program participation and
[[Page 35090]]
authorized retail food stores found to be ineligible will be withdrawn
from program participation. Ineligible firms under this paragraph
(b)(1)(iv) include, but are not limited to, stores selling only
accessory foods, including spices, candy, soft drinks, tea, or coffee;
ice cream vendors selling solely ice cream; and specialty doughnut
shops or bakeries not selling bread. In addition, firms that are
considered to be restaurants, that is, firms that have more than 50
percent of their total gross retail sales in hot and/or cold prepared
foods not intended for home preparation and consumption, shall not
qualify for participation as retail food stores under Criterion A or B.
This includes firms that primarily sell prepared foods that are
consumed on the premises or sold for carryout. This does not, however,
change the eligibility requirements for the special restaurant programs
that serve the elderly, disabled, and homeless populations, as set
forth in paragraph (d) of this section.
(v) Wholesale food concerns. Wholesale food concerns, the primary
business of which is the sale of eligible food at wholesale, and which
meet the staple food requirements in paragraph (b) of this section,
shall normally be considered to have adequate food business for the
purposes of the program, provided such concerns meet the criteria
specified in paragraph (c) of this section.
(vi) Co-located wholesale food concerns. * * *
* * * * *
(q) Use and disclosure of information provided by firms. With the
exception of EINs and SSNs, any information collected from retail food
stores and wholesale food concern, such as ownership information and
sales and redemption data, may be disclosed for purposes directly
connected with the administration and enforcement of the Food Stamp Act
and these regulations, and can be disclosed to and used by State
agencies that administer the Special Supplemental Food Program for
Women, Infants and Children (WIC). Such information may also be
disclosed to and used by Federal and State law enforcement and
investigative agencies for the purpose of administering or enforcing
other Federal or State law, and the regulations issued under such other
law.* * *
* * * * *
(t) Periodic notification. The FNS will issue periodic notification
to participating retail stores and wholesale food concerns to clarify
program eligibility criteria, including the definitions of ``retail
food store'', ``staple foods'', ``eligible foods'', and ``perishable
foods''. At a minimum, such information will be provided to stores at
the time of authorization, reauthorization and upon request.
Dated: June 18, 1999.
Shirley R. Watkins,
Under Secretary, Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services.
[FR Doc. 99-16501 Filed 6-29-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-U
