96-16710. Viruses, Serums, Toxins, and Analogous Products; Marek's Disease Vaccines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 33839-33842]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-16710]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 33840]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
    
    9 CFR Parts 112 and 113
    
    [Docket No. 94-046-2]
    
    
    Viruses, Serums, Toxins, and Analogous Products; Marek's Disease 
    Vaccines
    
    AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: We are amending the standard requirements for Marek's disease 
    vaccines by including vaccines prepared from any of the three Marek's 
    disease virus serotypes, and by defining the identity, safety, and 
    efficacy requirements for vaccines prepared from each serotype or 
    combinations of serotypes. We are also amending the requirements for 
    labeling Marek's disease vaccines. These amendments are necessary based 
    on the evolution of virus serotypes in the field, advances in the 
    development of vaccines that are currently prepared to prevent the 
    disease, and advances in the methods for evaluating such vaccines. The 
    effect of this rule will be to save license applicants time by 
    clarifying and codifying the guidelines developed for licensing these 
    products over the past several years.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: July 31, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. David Espeseth, Deputy Director, 
    Veterinary Biologics, BBEP, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 148, Riverdale, 
    MD, 20737-1237, (301) 734-8245.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Veterinary biologics are regulated under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act 
    of 1913, as amended by the Food Security Act of 1985 (21 U.S.C. 151-
    159, hereinafter referred to as the Act). In accordance with the Act, 
    the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) promulgates 
    standard requirements that establish the purity, safety, potency, and 
    efficacy requirements for these products.
        The current standard requirements in Sec. 113.330 (hereinafter 
    referred to as the regulations) for licensing Marek's disease vaccines 
    were promulgated at a time when only Serotype 3 Marek's disease 
    vaccines were prepared. Also, the standard requirements did not include 
    the evaluation of vaccine efficacy. Since that time, vaccines for 
    Serotypes 1 and 2 have been developed, very virulent forms of the field 
    virus have emerged, and other advances in our understanding of this 
    virus have occurred. In response to these changes, APHIS has developed 
    guidelines over the past several years for licensing these products.
        On May 9, 1995, we published in the Federal Register (60 FR 24584-
    24587, Docket No. 94-046-1) a proposal to amend the standard 
    requirement for Marek's disease vaccines to include Serotypes 1 and 2, 
    and to codify appropriate efficacy standards and guidelines which 
    license applicants have utilized.
        We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending 
    July 10, 1995. We received two comments by that date. They were from an 
    association of poultry producers and a poultry producer. Both 
    commenters agreed with the need for the establishment of standard 
    requirements for vaccines prepared from any of the three Marek's 
    disease virus serotypes. Both commenters were in favor of the rule as 
    proposed.
        In preparing the final rule, APHIS observed that it is necessary to 
    clarify the appropriate use of the group 4 controls in Sec. 113.330, 
    paragraphs (c)(1)(4) and (c)(4), to assess the severity of serotype 1 
    virus challenge in an immunogenicity test. The proposed rule specified 
    that ``at least'' (i.e., ``greater than or equal to'') 20 percent of 
    the birds in group 4 must have lesions for a valid test after serotype 
    1 virus challenge in birds vaccinated with a serotype 3 vaccine (see 
    Sec. 113.330, paragraph (c)(4)). For a satisfactory serotype 3 vaccine 
    immunogenicity test, the proposed rule specified that 80 percent of 
    vaccinated birds must be free of lesions (see Sec. 113.330, paragraph 
    (c)(5)). Stated another way, 20 percent of the vaccinated birds may 
    have lesions for a satisfactory serotype 3 vaccine immunogenicity test.
        When the severity of virulence of the challenge virus for a 
    serotype 1 or 2 vaccine in group 4 controls is equal to that for 
    serotype 3 vaccine, the result would be inconsistent with a claim to 
    aid in the prevention of disease against a very virulent serotype 1 
    virus (see Sec. 113.330(c)(5)). If the birds in group 4 show 20 percent 
    or fewer lesions, the challenge virus is deemed not sufficiently 
    virulent and the test is declared invalid.
        Therefore, proposed Sec. 113.330(c)(4) is amended to read ``greater 
    than'' (in place of ``at least'') 20 percent of vaccinated birds in 
    group 4 controls must have lesions for a valid immunogenicity test 
    after challenge with more virulent serotype 1 virus. The amendment to 
    proposed Sec. 113.330(c)(4) should not hold the vaccine producer to a 
    higher standard than was originally proposed. This is because the 
    proposed rule specified that the group 4 control would not apply to the 
    case of a serotype 3 vaccine challenge virus that requires that 20 per 
    cent of the vaccinated birds have lesions (see Sec. 113.330(c)(1)(iv)). 
    Thus, the amendment to Sec. 113.330(c)(4) is consistent with APHIS' 
    original intent that immunogenicity tests for serotype 1 and 2 vaccines 
    be based on challenge viruses more virulent than that for serotype 3 
    vaccines.
        Therefore, based on the rationale set forth in the proposed rule 
    and this document, we are adopting the provisions of the proposal as a 
    final rule with the change discussed in this document.
    
    Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule 
    has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive 
    Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of 
    Management and Budget.
        The amendments to the standard requirements for Marek's disease 
    vaccines codify guidelines developed for licensing these products over 
    the past several years. These amendments affect all (currently a total 
    of eight) manufacturers of Marek's disease vaccines, some of which may 
    be small businesses. By clarifying licensing requirements for Marek's 
    disease vaccines, the rule will save time during the application 
    process and will not cause an adverse economic impact on industry.
        Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and 
    Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    Executive Order 12372
    
        This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
    Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372, 
    which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local 
    officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
    
    Executive Order 12778
    
        This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, 
    Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule. There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted 
    prior
    
    [[Page 33841]]
    
    to a judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule contains no new information collection or recordkeeping 
    requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 
    et seq.).
    
    List of Subjects
    
    9 CFR Part 112
    
        Animal biologics, Exports, Imports, Labeling, Packaging and 
    containers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
    9 CFR Part 113
    
        Animal biologics, Exports, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        Accordingly, 9 CFR parts 112 and 113 are amended as follows:
    
    PART 112--PACKAGING AND LABELING
    
        1. The authority citation for part 112 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 151-159; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).
    
        2. Section 112.7 is amended by adding paragraph (m) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 112.7  Special additional requirements.
    
    * * * * *
        (m) In the case of biological products containing Marek's disease 
    virus, all labels shall specify the Marek's disease virus serotype(s) 
    used in the product.
    
    PART 113--STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
    
        3. The authority citation for part 113 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 151-159; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).
    
        4. Section 113.330 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 113.330  Marek's Disease Vaccines.
    
        Marek's disease vaccine shall be prepared from virus-bearing tissue 
    culture cells. Only Master Seed Virus which has been established as 
    pure, safe, and immunogenic shall be used for preparing the production 
    seed virus for vaccine production.
        (a) The Master Seed Virus shall meet the applicable requirements 
    prescribed in Sec. 113.300, and the requirements prescribed in this 
    section. The identity test required in Sec. 113.300(c) shall be 
    conducted in a serotype-specific manner by a method acceptable to 
    APHIS. Each lot of Master Seed Virus shall also be tested for pathogens 
    by the chicken embryo inoculation test prescribed in Sec. 113.37, 
    except that, if the test is inconclusive because of a vaccine virus 
    override, the chicken inoculation test prescribed in Sec. 113.36 may be 
    conducted and the virus judged accordingly.
        (b) Safety test. The Master Seed Virus shall be nonpathogenic for 
    chickens as determined by the following procedure:
        (1) Specific pathogen free chickens or embryos, negative for 
    Marek's disease virus antibodies, and from the same source, shall be 
    isolated into the following groups:
        (i) Group 1. At least 50 test subjects shall be inoculated with 10 
    times as much viable virus as will be contained in one dose of vaccine, 
    by the route recommended for vaccination.
        (ii) Group 2. At least 50 test subjects shall be injected with a 
    very virulent Marek's disease virus provided or approved by APHIS, at a 
    dosage level that will cause gross lesions of Marek's disease in at 
    least 80 per cent of the chickens within 50 days.
        (iii) Group 3. Fifty uninoculated controls. For in ovo studies, 
    this group should receive a sham inoculation of diluent.
        (iv) Group 4. For studies evaluating Serotype 1 Master Seed 
    Viruses, a group of 50 uninoculated control chickens shall be housed in 
    contact with the group 1 vaccinated chickens.
        (2) At least 40 chickens in each group shall survive to 5 days of 
    age. All chickens that die shall be necropsied and examined for lesions 
    of Marek's disease and cause of death. The test shall be judged 
    according to the following criteria:
        (i) At 50 days of age, the remaining chickens in group 2 shall be 
    killed and examined for gross lesions of Marek's disease. If at least 
    80 percent of this group do not develop Marek's disease, the test is 
    inconclusive and may be repeated.
        (ii) At 120 days of age, the remaining chickens in groups 1, 3, and 
    4 shall be weighed, killed, and necropsied. If less than 30 of the 
    chickens in group 3 survive the 120 day period, or if any of the 
    chickens in group 3 have gross lesions of Marek's disease at necropsy, 
    the test is declared inconclusive. If less than 30 chickens in groups 1 
    and 4 survive the 120 day period; or if any of the chickens in groups 1 
    and 4 have gross lesions of Marek's disease at necropsy; or if the 
    average body weight of the chickens in groups 1 or 4 is significantly 
    (statistically) different from the average in group 3 at the end of the 
    120 days, the lot of Master Seed Virus is unsatisfactory.
        (3) For tests involving in ovo inoculation, hatchability results 
    shall also be reported for each group.
        (c) Immunogenicity. Each lot of Master Seed Virus used for vaccine 
    production shall be tested for immunogenicity at the highest passage 
    level allowed for the product, and the virus dose to be used shall be 
    established as follows:
        (1) Specific pathogen free chickens or embryos, negative for 
    Marek's disease antibodies, and from the same source, shall be isolated 
    into the following groups:
        (i) Group 1. A minimum of 35 test subjects shall be inoculated with 
    the vaccine, using the recommended route, at 1 day of age for chicks or 
    18 days of embryonation for embryos. The dose used shall be established 
    by 5 replicate virus titrations conducted by a cell culture system or 
    other titration method acceptable to APHIS.
        (ii) Group 2. A minimum of 35 nonvaccinated test subjects shall be 
    held as challenge controls.
        (iii) Group 3. A minimum of 25 nonvaccinated test subjects shall be 
    held as nonchallenge controls.
        (iv) Group 4. Except for studies evaluating vaccines which contain 
    only a Serotype 3 virus as the Marek's disease fraction, a minimum of 
    35 chicks shall be vaccinated at 1 day of age with a licensed Serotype 
    3 vaccine, in order to document the severity of the very virulent 
    challenge.
        (2) At least 30 chickens in groups 1, 2, and 4, and at least 20 
    chickens in group 3, shall survive to 5 days of age. All chickens in 
    groups 1, 2, and 4 shall be challenged at 5 days of age in the 
    following manner:
        (i) For studies evaluating vaccines which contain only a Serotype 3 
    virus as the Marek's disease fraction, groups 1 and 2 shall be 
    inoculated with a standard virulent challenge virus provided or 
    approved by APHIS.
        (ii) For all other Marek's disease vaccines, groups 1, 2, and 4 
    shall be inoculated with a very virulent challenge virus provided or 
    approved by APHIS.
        (3) All chickens shall be observed until 7 weeks of age, 
    necropsied, and examined for grossly observable lesions consistent with 
    Marek's disease. All chickens dying before the end of the 7 week 
    observation period shall be necropsied and evaluated for gross lesions 
    of Marek's disease. Any chickens not so examined shall be scored as 
    positive for Marek's disease.
        (4) For a valid test, at least 80 percent of the chickens in group 
    2 must develop grossly observable lesions, none of the chickens in 
    group 3 shall develop
    
    [[Page 33842]]
    
    grossly observable lesions, and (when included) greater than 20 percent 
    of the chickens in group 4 must develop grossly observable lesions.
        (5) For a valid test to be considered satisfactory, at least 80 
    percent of the chickens in group 1 must remain free of grossly 
    observable lesions. The appropriate product claim resulting from a 
    satisfactory test would be to aid in the prevention of Marek's disease, 
    for vaccines containing only a Serotype 3 virus as the Marek's disease 
    fraction, or to aid in the prevention of very virulent Marek's disease, 
    for all other vaccines.
        (d) Test requirements for release. Each serial and subserial shall 
    meet the applicable requirements prescribed in Sec. 113.300. The 
    identity test required in Sec. 113.300(c) shall be conducted in a 
    serotype-specific manner by a method acceptable to APHIS. Final 
    container samples of completed product shall also meet the requirements 
    in paragraphs (d) (1), (2), and (3) of this section. Any serial or 
    subserial found unsatisfactory by a prescribed test shall not be 
    released.
        (1) Purity test. The chicken embryo inoculation test prescribed in 
    Sec. 113.37 shall be conducted, except that, if the test is 
    inconclusive because of a vaccine virus override, the chicken 
    inoculation test prescribed in Sec. 113.36 may be conducted and the 
    virus judged accordingly.
        (2) Safety test. At least 25 one-day-old, specific pathogen free 
    chickens shall be injected, by the subcutaneous route, with the 
    equivalent of 10 chicken doses of virus (vaccine concentrated 10X). The 
    chickens shall be observed each day for 21 days. Chickens dying during 
    the period shall be examined, cause of death determined, and the 
    results recorded.
        (i) If at least 20 chickens do not survive the observation period, 
    the test is inconclusive.
        (ii) If lesions of any disease or cause of death are directly 
    attributable to the vaccine, the serial is unsatisfactory.
        (iii) If less than 20 chicks survive the observation period and 
    there are no deaths or lesions attributable to the vaccine, the test 
    may be repeated one time, Provided, that if the test is not repeated, 
    the serial shall be declared unsatisfactory.
        (3) Potency test. The samples shall be titrated using a cell 
    culture system or other titration method acceptable to APHIS. For 
    vaccines composed of more than one Marek's disease virus serotype, each 
    fraction shall be titrated in a serotype-specific manner.
        (i) Samples of desiccated vaccine shall be incubated at 37 deg.C 
    for 3 days before preparation for use in the potency test. Samples of 
    desiccated or frozen vaccine shall be reconstituted in diluent 
    according to the label recommendations, and held in an ice bath at 
    0 deg.C to 4 deg.C for 2 hours prior to use in the potency test.
        (ii) For a serial or subserial to be eligible for release, each 
    serotype contained in the vaccine shall have a virus titer per dose 
    which is at least 3 times greater than the number of plaque forming 
    units (pfu) used in the immunogenicity test prescribed in paragraph (c) 
    of this section, but not less than 1000 pfu per dose.
        (iii) When tested (without the pretest incubation of desiccated 
    products) at any time within the expiration period, each serotype 
    contained in the vaccine shall have a virus titer per dose which is at 
    least 2 times the number of pfu used in the immunogenicity test, but 
    not less than 750 pfu per dose.
    
        Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of June 1996.
    Donald W. Luchsinger,
    Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-16710 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/31/1996
Published:
07/01/1996
Department:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-16710
Dates:
July 31, 1996.
Pages:
33839-33842 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 94-046-2
PDF File:
96-16710.pdf
CFR: (3)
9 CFR 112.7
9 CFR 113.37
9 CFR 113.330