97-6260. Advances to Nonmembers  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 12073-12081]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-6260]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD
    
    12 CFR Part 935
    
    [No. 97-18]
    
    
    Advances to Nonmembers
    
    AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Board.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Board of Directors of the Federal Housing Finance Board 
    (Finance Board) is amending its regulation on Federal Home Loan Bank 
    (FHLBank) advances to nonmembers. The rule establishes uniform 
    eligibility requirements and review criteria for determining whether an 
    entity may be certified as a nonmember mortgagee eligible to receive 
    FHLBank advances and devolves responsibility for making that 
    determination from the Finance Board to the FHLBanks. The Finance Board 
    also is revising the definition of the term ``state housing finance 
    agency'' (SHFA) to include all tribally designated housing entities 
    (TDHEs). The rule is part of the Finance Board's continuing effort to 
    devolve management and governance responsibilities to the FHLBanks and 
    is consistent with the goals of the National Homeownership Strategy and 
    the Regulatory Reinvention Initiative of the National Performance 
    Review.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: The final rule will become effective April 14, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine M. Freidel, Associate 
    Director, Financial Management Division, Office of Policy, 202/408-
    2976; Laura K. St. Claire, Financial Analyst, Financial Management 
    Division, Office of Policy, 202/408-2811; or, Janice A. Kaye, Attorney-
    Advisor, Office of General Counsel, 202/408-2505, Federal Housing 
    Finance Board, 1777 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Statutory and Regulatory Background
    
        Section 10b of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (Bank Act) 
    establishes the requirements for access by nonmember mortgagees to 
    FHLBank advances. See 12 U.S.C. 1430b. In order to be certified as a 
    nonmember mortgagee, an entity must: (1) Be approved by the Department 
    of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as a ``mortgagee'' under title 
    II of the National Housing Act; (2) be chartered under law and have 
    succession; (3) be subject to the inspection and supervision of a 
    governmental agency; and (4) lend its own funds as its principal 
    activity in the mortgage field. Id. 1430b(a).
        Under section 10b(a) of the Bank Act, advances to nonmember 
    mortgagees are not subject to the general collateral requirements of 
    section 10(a) of the Bank Act. Id. Instead, a FHLBank may make advances 
    to nonmember mortgagees only upon the security of mortgages insured by 
    the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) of HUD under title II of the 
    National Housing Act. Id. The amount of any advance may not exceed 90 
    percent of the unpaid principal of the collateral pledged as security 
    for the advance. Id.
        The Bank Act imposes less restrictive collateral requirements on 
    certain advances to nonmember mortgagees that are SHFAs. Id. 1430b(b). 
    Under section 10b(b) of the Bank Act, advances to SHFA nonmember 
    mortgagees that facilitate mortgage lending to low- or moderate-income 
    individuals and families (meeting the income requirements in section 
    142(d) or 143(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, generally up to 115 
    percent of the area median income) need not be secured by FHA-insured 
    mortgage loans if the advances otherwise meet the requirements of 
    section 10(a) of the Bank Act and any real estate collateral pledged to 
    secure the advances is comprised of single- or multi-family residential 
    mortgages. Id. 1430b(b), 1430(a); 26 U.S.C. 142(d), 143(f). Under 
    section 10(a), the four categories of collateral are eligible to secure 
    advances to members are: (1) Fully disbursed whole first mortgage loans 
    on improved residential real property that are not more than 90 days 
    delinquent or securities representing a whole interest in such 
    mortgages; (2) securities issued, insured, or guaranteed by the United 
    States government or any agency thereof; (3) deposits of a FHLBank; and 
    (4) other real estate related collateral if such collateral has a 
    readily ascertainable value and the FHLBank can perfect its interest 
    therein.\1\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ See 12 U.S.C. 1430(a)(1)-(4). Other acceptable real estate 
    related collateral includes, but is not limited to: privately issued 
    mortgage-backed securities other than those eligible under category 
    1; second mortgage loans, including home equity loans; commercial 
    real estate loans; and mortgage loan participations. See 12 CFR 
    935.9(a)(4)(ii). The aggregate amount of outstanding advances 
    secured by such collateral may not exceed 30 percent of a FHLBank 
    member's GAAP capital. See 12 U.S.C. 1430(a)(4); 12 CFR 
    935.9(a)(4)(iii).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In October 1996, the Finance Board published for comment a proposed 
    rule that would transfer the authority to certify an entity as a 
    nonmember mortgagee eligible to receive FHLBank advances from the 
    Finance Board to the FHLBanks subject to uniform review criteria for 
    determining compliance with statutory and regulatory eligibility 
    requirements. See 61 FR 52727 (Oct. 8, 1996). The 60-day public comment 
    period closed on December 9, 1996. See id. The Finance Board received a 
    total of 12 comments in response to the proposed rule, 6 from FHLBanks, 
    4 from trade associations, and 1 each from a certified SHFA nonmember 
    mortgagee and a federal agency. All of the commenters generally 
    supported the Finance Board's proposal. Specific comments are discussed 
    in Part II of the Supplementary Information.
    
    II. Analysis of Public Comments and the Final Rule
    
    A. Definitions
    
        The final rule amends the definition of the term ``state housing 
    finance agency'' that appears in Sec. 935.1 to include TDHEs \2\ 
    established under both tribal and state law as SHFAs. This will permit 
    every TDHE nonmember mortgagee that makes mortgage loans to low- and 
    moderate-income members of the Indian community to take advantage of 
    the more flexible collateral requirements for securing advances to SHFA 
    nonmember mortgagees. See supra part I; 12 U.S.C. 1430b(b). Each of the 
    eight commenters addressing this issue expressly supported inclusion of 
    all TDHEs in the definition and it is being adopted as proposed. A 
    trade association commenter suggested that entities other than SHFAs 
    should not be
    
    [[Page 12074]]
    
    eligible for certification as nonmember mortgagees. However, because 
    section 10b of the Bank Act clearly sets forth two classes of nonmember 
    mortgagees, one composed of SHFAs and one composed of non-SHFAs, see 12 
    U.S.C. 1430b, the suggestion would be contrary to the Bank Act and the 
    Finance Board has not adopted it in the final rule.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ Congress enacted the Native American Housing Assistance and 
    Self Determination Act of 1996 in October 1996. See Pub. L. 104-330, 
    101 Stat. 4016 (Oct. 26, 1996). The Act authorizes Indian tribes to 
    establish TDHEs to run their housing programs. See id. sec. 
    102(c)(4)(K), 110 Stat. 4025. TDHEs include all existing Indian 
    Housing Authorities as well as other entities created by Indian 
    tribes to provide assistance for affordable housing for tribal 
    members. See id. sec. 4(21), 110 Stat 4021.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Finance Board received two responses to a specific request for 
    comments regarding the inclusion of other groups in the definition of 
    SHFA. One commenter noted its belief that the definition as written is 
    sufficiently broad to cover the Department of Hawaiian Homelands, a 
    Hawaii state agency with responsibility for administering the Hawaiian 
    Homes Commission Act on behalf of Native Hawaiians. Without additional 
    detailed information, the Finance Board cannot determine whether a 
    particular entity meets the requirements of the SHFA definition. Under 
    the final rule, the Banks would make this determination at the time an 
    entity applies for certification as a nonmember mortgagee. The other 
    commenter suggested including certain nonprofit community development 
    financial institutions (CDFIs) in the SHFA definition. The Finance 
    Board based its definition of SHFA on the meaning given that term for 
    purposes of other provisions in the Bank Act. As defined elsewhere in 
    the Bank Act, the term SHFA requires the entity to be a government 
    instrumentality. See id. 1441a(c)(9)(P), 1441a-1(1). Accordingly, the 
    Finance Board's definition of SHFA requires an entity to be a 
    government instrumentality. Since nonprofit CDFIs are not government 
    instrumentalities, they cannot be certified as SHFA nonmember 
    mortgagees. However, nonprofit CDFIs that meet the eligibility 
    requirements currently may be certified as nonmember mortgagees.
    
    B. Advances to the Savings Association Insurance Fund
    
        The Finance Board received no comments on Sec. 935.20 and is 
    adopting the section as proposed. Section 935.20, which implements 
    section 31(k) of the Bank Act, see id. 1431(k), provides that an 
    FHLBank may make advances to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 
    for the use of the Savings Association Insurance Fund under certain 
    circumstances and subject to specific conditions.
    
    C. Scope
    
        Section 935.21 provides that advances to nonmember mortgagees 
    generally are subject to subpart A of part 935, which governs advances 
    to FHLBank members. See 12 CFR 935.1-935.19. A trade association 
    commenter suggested that the final rule prevent the FHLBanks from 
    applying requirements, terms, and conditions to nonmember mortgagees 
    that are not also applied to members. The Finance Board believes that 
    this provision should achieve that result. One exception to this 
    general requirement relates to the non-qualified thrift lender (non-
    QTL) provisions of the Finance Board's advances regulation. See id. 
    Sec. 935.13. Since the statutory limit on aggregate FHLBank lending 
    applies only to advances to non-QTL members, see 12 U.S.C. 1430(e)(2) 
    (emphasis added), and nonmember mortgagees are not FHLBank members, 
    advances to nonmember mortgagees need not be included in the aggregate 
    limit on advances to non-QTLs. A trade association commenter strongly 
    supported this provision as offering assurance that nonmember 
    mortgagees would not limit non-QTL members' access to advances.
    
    D. Nonmember Mortgagee Eligibility Requirements
    
    1. Eligibility Criteria
        Section 935.22(a) authorizes the FHLBanks to make advances to an 
    entity that is not a member of the FHLBank if the FHLBank certifies the 
    entity as a nonmember mortgagee. Section 935.22(b) sets forth the 
    eligibility requirements an entity must meet in order to be certified 
    as a nonmember mortgagee. In addition to the four statutory eligibility 
    criteria discussed in part 1 of the Supplementary Information, to 
    ensure the safety and soundness of the FHLBanks, the Finance Board has 
    incorporated a financial condition criterion that requires an 
    applicant's financial condition to be such that an FHLBank may safely 
    lend to it. This is the same financial condition criterion that applies 
    currently to applicants for membership in an FHLBank. See id. 
    1424(a)(2)(B); 12 CFR 933.6(a)(4). The Finance Board received no 
    comments on these provisions and is adopting them without change from 
    the proposal.
    2. Review Criteria
        Section 935.22(c) establishes uniform review criteria the FHLBanks 
    must apply to determine whether an applicant meets the eligibility 
    requirements for certification as a nonmember mortgagee. If an 
    applicant fulfills each criterion to the satisfaction of the FHLBank to 
    which it has applied, it will be deemed to meet the eligibility 
    requirements. Conversely, failure to fulfill each criterion to the 
    satisfaction of the FHLBank will render the applicant ineligible, 
    subject to appeal to the Finance Board, to be certified as a nonmember 
    mortgagee.
        Under Sec. 935.22(c)(1), an applicant is deemed to meet the 
    requirement that it be approved under title II of the National Housing 
    Act if it submits a current HUD Yearly Verification Report or other 
    documentation issued by HUD stating that the applicant is an approved 
    FHA mortgagee.
        Under Sec. 935.22(c)(2), an applicant is deemed to meet the 
    requirement that it be a chartered institution having succession if it 
    provides evidence satisfactory to the FHLBank that it is a government 
    agency, or is chartered under state, federal, local, tribal, or Alaska 
    Native village law as a corporation or other entity that has rights, 
    characteristics, and powers similar to those granted a corporation. An 
    FHLBank commenter noted that satisfactory evidence, such as statutory 
    and regulatory materials, is usually readily available to the FHLBanks, 
    and therefore suggested that the final rule require an applicant to 
    provide only a citation to, rather than copies of, appropriate 
    documents. For that reason, and to reduce the paperwork burden imposed 
    on nonmember mortgagee applicants, the Finance Board has deleted the 
    requirement that an applicant provide ``documentary'' evidence in the 
    final rule. Of course, if an FHLBank should require copies of statutes, 
    regulations, or other relevant documents, it has authority to require 
    their submission under Sec. 935.23(c)(1). See infra. In any case, an 
    FHLBank must include copies of all documents upon which it relied in 
    making its certification decision as part of the certification file 
    required under Sec. 935.23(c)(3). See infra.
        Under Sec. 935.22(c)(3), an applicant is deemed to meet the 
    requirement that it be subject to the inspection and supervision of 
    some governmental agency if it provides evidence satisfactory to the 
    FHLBank that, pursuant to statute or regulation, it is subject to the 
    inspection and supervision of a federal, state, local, tribal, or 
    Alaska Native village governmental agency. Satisfactory evidence 
    generally consists of a citation to, or copies of, relevant statutory 
    and regulatory materials. For the same reasons as discussed above for 
    Sec. 935.22(c)(2), the Finance Board has deleted the requirement that 
    an applicant provide ``documentary'' evidence in the final rule.
        In order to establish an appropriate standard for the FHLBanks to 
    determine whether an applicant meets the
    
    [[Page 12075]]
    
    inspection and supervision requirement, the Finance Board recast the 
    illustrative examples in the proposal as standards for meeting the 
    inspection and supervision requirements. The rule provides that an 
    applicant will be deemed to meet the subject to inspection by a 
    governmental agency requirement if there is a statutory or regulatory 
    requirement that the applicant's books and records be audited or 
    examined periodically by a governmental agency or an external auditor. 
    This audit factor was listed as an example of inspection by a 
    governmental agency in the proposed rule. The rule provides that an 
    applicant will be deemed to meet the supervision by a governmental 
    agency requirement if the governmental agency has statutory or 
    regulatory authority to remove an applicant's officers or directors for 
    malfeasance or misfeasance or otherwise exercise enforcement or 
    administrative control over actions of the applicant. This removal 
    factor was identified as an example of supervision by a governmental 
    agency in the proposed rule.
        Three commenters addressed the inspection and supervision 
    requirement. A trade association commenter asked the Finance Board to 
    include expressly legislative audits to meet the inspection requirement 
    and removal by the governor to meet the supervision requirement. To 
    accomplish the same end, a FHLBank commenter suggested defining the 
    term ``governmental agency'' broadly to include the legislature and the 
    governor. In response to these comments and to afford greater 
    flexibility, the Finance Board has added a definition of the term 
    ``governmental agency'' for purposes of this paragraph that includes 
    the governor, legislature, and any other component of a federal, state, 
    local, tribal, or Alaska Native village government with authority to 
    act for or on behalf of that government. The third commenter asked 
    whether a specific lender consortium that is examined jointly by 
    federal and state financial institution regulators satisfies the 
    supervision and inspection requirement. Without additional detailed 
    information, the Finance Board cannot determine whether a particular 
    entity meets the requirement. Under the final rule, the Banks would 
    make this determination at the time an entity applies for certification 
    as a nonmember mortgagee.
        Under Sec. 935.22(c)(4), an applicant is deemed to meet the 
    mortgage activity requirement if it provides documentary evidence 
    satisfactory to the FHLBank that it lends its own funds as its 
    principal activity in the mortgage field. A financial statement that 
    includes mortgage loan assets and their funding liabilities generally 
    will provide adequate documentary evidence. Since this type of 
    financial information is not readily available to the FHLBanks, the 
    requirement for an applicant to submit documentation remains in the 
    final rule. For purposes of this requirement, the Finance Board 
    considers the purchase of whole mortgage loans tantamount to 
    ``lending'' an applicant's funds. In the case of a federal, state, 
    local, tribal, or Alaska Native village government agency, the Finance 
    Board considers appropriated funds to be an applicant's ``own funds.'' 
    An applicant will be deemed to satisfy this requirement even though the 
    majority of its operations are unrelated to mortgage lending if its 
    mortgage activity conforms to the regulatory criteria. A trade 
    association commenter expressly supported the provision, stating that 
    an applicant that acts principally as a broker for others making 
    mortgage loans, or whose principal activity is to make mortgage loans 
    for the account of others, does not meet this requirement.
        Under Sec. 935.22(c)(5), an applicant is deemed to meet the 
    financial condition requirement if the FHLBank determines that advances 
    may be extended safely to the applicant. In order to make that 
    determination, the final rule requires an applicant to submit its most 
    recent regulatory audit or examination report and external audit 
    report. The Finance Board added a requirement to submit these specific 
    financial documents in the final rule because a FHLBank commenter 
    pointed out that applicants for FHLBank membership generally must 
    submit such documents as part of their membership application, see 12 
    CFR 933.11, and that the information provided is often critical to 
    analysis of an applicant's financial condition. The Bank also can 
    require the applicant to submit additional documentary evidence, such 
    as financial or other information.
    3. State Housing Finance Agencies
        In addition to meeting the eligibility requirements in 
    Sec. 935.22(b), any applicant seeking to take advantage of the more 
    flexible collateral requirements for advances used to facilitate 
    residential or commercial mortgage lending to certain low- and 
    moderate-income families or individuals, must provide evidence 
    satisfactory to the FHLBank that it is a SHFA as defined in Sec. 935.1. 
    See supra part II(A). Under Sec. 935.22(d), satisfactory evidence 
    generally consists of a copy of, or a citation to, the statutory and/or 
    regulatory provisions outlining the applicant's structure and 
    responsibilities. For the same reasons as discussed above for 
    Sec. 935.22(c)(2), the Finance Board has deleted the requirement that 
    an applicant provide ``documentary'' evidence in the final rule.
    
    E. Nonmember Mortgagee Applications
    
    1. Devolution
        As part of the Finance Board's continuing effort to devolve 
    management and governance responsibilities to the FHLBanks, 
    Sec. 935.23(a) authorizes the FHLBanks to approve or deny all 
    applications for certification as a nonmember mortgagee, subject to the 
    requirements of the Bank Act and Finance Board regulations. Although 
    all six commenters addressing this issue expressly supported devolution 
    of decision making authority to the FHLBanks, one trade association 
    commenter suggested delaying devolution until the FHLBanks have some 
    experience in administering the final rule. Since the basis for the 
    review criteria in the final rule is the standards previously applied 
    by the FHLBanks and the Finance Board, no delay in devolution is 
    required.
        Four FHLBank commenters requested the authority to delegate 
    application approvals to a committee of the FHLBank's board of 
    directors, the FHLBank president, or a senior officer who reports 
    directly to the president other than an officer responsible for 
    business development. This would be consistent with the Finance Board's 
    membership regulation and such authority is included in the final rule. 
    See 12 CFR 933.3(a). Also consistent with the membership regulation, 
    the final rule requires that only the FHLBanks' board of directors may 
    deny certification as a nonmember mortgagee.
    2. Application Process
        The remainder of Sec. 935.23 sets forth the procedures for 
    submission and review of nonmember mortgagee applications. Section 
    935.23(b) requires an applicant to submit an application that satisfies 
    the requirements of the Bank Act and this subpart to the FHLBank of the 
    district in which the applicant's principal place of business, as 
    determined in accordance with 12 CFR 933.18, is located.
        To ensure expeditious action on applications for certification as a 
    nonmember mortgagee, Sec. 935.23(c)(1) requires a FHLBank to act on an 
    application within 60 calendar days of the date the FHLBank deems the 
    application complete. To make certain that the time period provided for 
    review
    
    [[Page 12076]]
    
    is not unduly restrictive, an application is deemed complete, thus 
    triggering the 60-day time period, only after the FHLBank has obtained 
    all required information and any other information it considers 
    necessary to process the application. The rule permits the FHLBank to 
    stop the 60-day period if it determines during the review process that 
    additional information is necessary to process the application. The 
    FHLBank must restart the 60-day time period where it stopped upon 
    receiving the additional required information. The FHLBank must notify 
    applicants in writing when the 60-day time period begins, stops, and 
    starts again. One FHLBank commenter pointed out that under a parallel 
    provision in the Finance Board's membership regulation, written notices 
    are not required and requested similar treatment in this regulation. 
    See 12 CFR 933.3(c). Written notice is necessary in order to provide an 
    appropriate record for appellate and compliance review, therefore, the 
    Finance Board is adopting the written notice requirement as proposed. 
    Further, the Finance Board intends to clarify its membership regulation 
    by including a written notice requirement in any future amendment.
        Section 935.23(c)(2) requires the board of directors of the 
    FHLBank, a duly delegated committee of the FHLBank's board of 
    directors, the FHLBank president, or a senior officer who reports 
    directly to the FHLBank president other than an officer with 
    responsibility for business development to approve, or the board of 
    directors of the FHLBank to deny, each application for certification as 
    a nonmember mortgagee by a written decision resolution that states the 
    grounds for the decision. In the proposed rule, the FHLBanks could not 
    delegate certification approvals. As stated above, see supra part 
    II(E)(1), the final rule prohibits delegation only of certification 
    denials. The FHLBank must provide a copy of the decision resolution to 
    the applicant and the Finance Board within three business days of the 
    date of the decision on an application.
        In order to provide an appropriate record for consideration of 
    certification denial appeals and for determination by Finance Board 
    examiners of a FHLBank's compliance with statutory and regulatory 
    requirements, the Finance Board has added a new Sec. 935.23(c)(3) that 
    requires a FHLBank to maintain a certification file for each applicant. 
    At a minimum, the certification file must include all documents 
    submitted by the applicant or otherwise obtained or generated by the 
    FHLBank concerning the applicant, all documents the Bank relied upon in 
    making its certification determination, including copies of statutes 
    and regulations, and the decision resolution. The FHLBank must retain 
    the certification file for at least three years after the date of its 
    decision to approve or deny certification or the date the Finance Board 
    resolves any appeal, whichever is later. The Finance Board's membership 
    rule includes a similar recordkeeping requirement. See 12 CFR 933.2(c).
        To ensure that the FHLBanks apply the nonmember mortgagee 
    eligibility requirements and review criteria uniformly and fairly and 
    treat similarly situated applicants in a consistent manner, 
    Sec. 935.23(c)(4) establishes a process by which applicants may appeal 
    FHLBank certification denials to the Finance Board. This provision 
    appeared at Sec. 935.23(c)(3) in the proposed rule. Within 90 calendar 
    days of the date of a FHLBank's certification denial, an applicant may 
    submit a written appeal to the Finance Board with a copy to the 
    FHLBank. The appeal must include the FHLBank's decision resolution and 
    a statement of the basis for the appeal with sufficient facts, 
    information, analysis, and explanation to support the applicant's 
    position. The FHLBank whose action has been appealed must submit to the 
    Finance Board a complete copy of the applicant's certification file as 
    well as any relevant new materials it receives while the appeal is 
    pending. The rule authorizes the Finance Board to request any 
    additional information or supporting arguments it may require to decide 
    the appeal. The Finance Board must make its decision within 90 calendar 
    days of the date the applicant files an appeal.
    
    F. Advances to Nonmember Mortgagees
    
        Section 935.24 establishes the terms and conditions under which a 
    FHLBank may make advances to a nonmember mortgagee. Under 
    Sec. 935.24(a), a FHLBank may lend only to a nonmember mortgagee whose 
    principal place of business is located in the FHLBank's district.
    1. Collateral Requirements in General
        Section 935.24(b) sets forth the collateral requirements for 
    advances to nonmember mortgagees. Pursuant to section 10b(a) of the 
    Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. 1430b(a), and Sec. 935.24(b)(1) of the final rule, 
    a FHLBank may make advances to any nonmember mortgagee upon the 
    security of FHA-insured mortgages, including securities representing a 
    whole interest in a pool of FHA-insured mortgages, if the nonmember 
    mortgagee provides evidence satisfactory to the FHLBank that the 
    securities are backed solely by qualifying mortgages.
    2. SHFA Collateral Requirements
        Section 935.24(b)(2) implements the less restrictive collateral 
    requirements applicable to advances to a SHFA nonmember mortgagee, the 
    proceeds of which will be used to facilitate mortgage lending that 
    benefits certain low- and moderate-income individuals or families. See 
    supra part I; 12 U.S.C. 1430b(b). Under Sec. 935.24(b)(2)(i), a FHLBank 
    may secure qualifying advances with: the collateral described in 
    Sec. 935.24(b)(1); collateral eligible under categories 1 or 2 of Bank 
    Act section 10(a), 12 U.S.C. 1430(a)(1)-(2), as described in 12 CFR 
    935.9(a)(1) or (2); or, collateral eligible under category 4 of Bank 
    Act section 10(a), 12 U.S.C. 1430(a)(4), as described in 12 CFR 
    935.9(a)(4), provided that such collateral is comprised of mortgage 
    loans on one-to-four or multi-family residential property and the 
    acceptance of such collateral will not increase the total amount of 
    advances outstanding to the SHFA secured by such collateral beyond 30 
    percent of its GAAP capital, as computed by the FHLBank. A FHLBank 
    commenter recommended that the rule specifically include as acceptable 
    collateral for SHFA advances, collateral pledged by a FHLBank member to 
    secure its obligations under a standby letter of credit issued for the 
    benefit of a FHLBank that makes a SHFA nonmember mortgagee advance. The 
    current Finance Board regulation concerning collateral for advances 
    does not address this type of collateral. See 12 CFR 935.9. The Finance 
    Board plans to consider this issue as part of a future rulemaking 
    concerning FHLBank advances.
        The proposed rule asserted that SHFA nonmember mortgagees would not 
    have any Bank Act section 10(a) category 3 collateral available to 
    secure FHLBank advances since a FHLBank may accept deposits only from 
    FHLBank members, other FHLBanks, or other instrumentalities of the 
    United States. See 12 U.S.C. 1430(a)(3), 1431(e)(1); 61 FR 52731. Three 
    FHLBank commenters found this interpretation of the Bank Act overly 
    restrictive. For the following reasons, the Finance Board agrees.\3\ 
    Section 10b(b) of the Bank Act
    
    [[Page 12077]]
    
    authorizes the FHLBanks to accept collateral that meets the 
    requirements of section 10(a) to secure qualifying advances to SHFA 
    nonmember mortgagees. See 12 U.S.C. 1430b(b). Section 10(a) of the Bank 
    Act includes specifically deposits in a FHLBank as acceptable 
    collateral. See id. 1430(a). The Finance Board believes that there is 
    statutory authority to allow SHFA nonmember mortgagees to secure 
    qualifying advances with cash collateral in the form of FHLBank 
    deposits. Accordingly, the Finance Board has added a new paragraph, 
    Sec. 935.24(b)(2)(B), authorizing the FHLBanks to accept deposits in a 
    FHLBank as security for SHFA nonmember mortgagee advances. Pursuant to 
    the FHLBanks' incidental authority to do all things necessary to carry 
    out the provisions of the Bank Act, see 12 U.S.C. 1431(a), (e)(1), and 
    to facilitate acceptance of such collateral, the rule permits the 
    FHLBanks to establish cash collateral accounts for SHFA nonmember 
    mortgagees. This interpretation is consistent with the restriction on 
    acceptance of deposits by the FHLBanks contained in section 11(e)(1) of 
    the Bank Act, see id. 1431(e)(1), since the SHFA nonmember mortgagee 
    will use the cash collateral account at the FHLBank only to secure 
    advances and not to take advantage of FHLBank deposit programs, i.e., 
    SHFA nonmember mortgagees will not be able to use a FHLBank as a 
    substitute for a commercial bank.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ The statement in the preamble to the proposed rule regarding 
    acceptance of deposits from nonmember mortgagees was not meant to 
    preclude a FHLBank from accepting deposits under section 11(e)(2) of 
    the Bank Act for the purpose of providing correspondent banking 
    services, provided that the nonmember mortgagee is an institution 
    eligible to make application to become a FHLBank member. See 12 
    U.S.C. 1431(e)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        If a SHFA nonmember mortgagee wishes to pledge other than FHA-
    insured collateral, Sec. 935.24(b)(2)(ii) requires it to certify first 
    in writing to the FHLBank that it will use the proceeds of the advance 
    so secured to facilitate qualifying mortgage lending. The final rule 
    clarifies that qualifying mortgage lending includes both residential 
    and commercial mortgage lending. A trade association commenter 
    expressly supported this provision because it will allow SHFA nonmember 
    mortgagees to help small businesses and promote economic development 
    efforts.
    3. Terms and Conditions for Advances
        Section 935.24(c) outlines the terms and conditions for advances to 
    nonmember mortgagees. Under Sec. 935.24(c)(1), a FHLBank may exercise 
    its discretion to determine whether, and on what terms, it will make 
    advances to nonmember mortgagees. Section 935.24(c)(2) addresses 
    advance pricing. The provision in the proposed rule requiring the 
    FHLBanks to apply pricing criteria other than cost and credit risk to 
    nonmember mortgagee advances in the same manner as they apply those 
    criteria to member advances was intended to make clear that the 
    FHLBanks must treat all of their member and nonmember borrowers 
    equally. One commenter thought the rule should expressly require the 
    FHLBanks to price advances to SHFA nonmember mortgagees, given their 
    public purpose, at the same rate as member advances. To ensure equal 
    treatment, the final rule specifically applies the advance pricing 
    requirements applicable to member advances to nonmember mortgagee 
    advances. Accordingly, paragraph (c)(2)(i) requires a FHLBank to price 
    advances to nonmember mortgagees in accordance with the requirements of 
    Sec. 935.6(b), the advance pricing requirements for member advances. It 
    provides that the term ``member'' as used in Sec. 935.6(b), also means 
    ``nonmember'' for purposes of this section. Paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of the 
    final rule requires a FHLBank to apply the pricing criteria that appear 
    in Sec. 935.6(b)(2), including credit and other risks of lending to a 
    particular borrower and other reasonable differential pricing criteria, 
    equally to all of its member and nonmember borrowers. The pricing 
    criteria that appeared in the proposed rule are included in 
    Sec. 935.6(b).
        The Finance Board proposed deleting the current requirement that 
    nonmember mortgagee advances be priced to compensate a FHLBank for the 
    lack of a capital stock investment in the FHLBank by the nonmember 
    mortgagee. See 12 CFR 935.22(e)(2)(B)(ii); 61 FR 52731. The preamble to 
    the proposed rule stated that such compensation was unnecessary since 
    the additional earnings achieved through advances not supported by 
    capital should enhance a FHLBank's return on equity. Seven commenters 
    addressed this issue. Two commenters supported the proposal because the 
    compensation mark-up strongly discourages nonmember mortgagees from 
    using FHLBank advances. Four commenters recommended deletion of the 
    requirement and replacement with a provision giving the FHLBanks 
    discretion to adjust nonmember mortgagee advance prices by either 
    requiring a compensating balance or including compensation for the lack 
    of a capital stock investment as a reasonable pricing differential 
    criteria in Sec. 935.24(c)(3)(iii). One commenter believed that the 
    requirement should remain in the rule.
        The comments advocating a special mark-up on nonmember mortgagee 
    advances generally highlighted three concerns. The first concern was 
    that the added leverage associated with nonmember mortgagee advances 
    creates additional risk for which members should be compensated. For 
    the following reasons, the Finance Board finds this argument to be 
    unpersuasive. In order for nonmember lending to have a material impact 
    on a FHLBank's leverage, the amount of advances outstanding to 
    nonmember mortgagees would have to increase significantly over current 
    levels. For example, advances to nonmember mortgagees at the FHLBank 
    with the largest volume of such advances outstanding at the end of 1996 
    represented 0.1 percent of the FHLBank's total assets and 2 percent of 
    its capital. In addition, fully secured nonmember mortgagee advances 
    involve minimal credit risk. Therefore, the mark-up necessary to 
    compensate members for any increased risk resulting from greater 
    leverage would almost certainly be de minimis.
        The second concern expressed generally by commenters was that, 
    depending upon the relationship between the return paid on FHLBank 
    stock, a member's alternative investments, and the cost of debt, a 
    nonmember mortgagee might have a financial advantage from FHLBank 
    borrowings that would allow it to compete for mortgages with members. 
    For the following reasons, the Finance Board finds this argument to be 
    unpersuasive. On the basis of the strong growth in voluntary membership 
    since 1990, it appears that FHLBank dividend rates generally exceed the 
    alternative investment rates available to members. For example, the 
    average FHLBank dividend rate in 1996 was 120 basis points over the 
    average one-year Treasury security and, since fourth quarter 1989, only 
    two FHLBanks on eight occasions have paid a quarterly dividend rate 
    below the average federal funds rate. Accordingly, investing in FHLBank 
    stock typically should not put a member at a competitive disadvantage 
    relative to nonmember mortgagees.
        The third concern advanced by commenters in support of a 
    compensation mark-up is that funding nonmember mortgagee advances may 
    be more expensive to the extent that the cost of debt is higher than 
    the mixture of debt and equity used to fund member advances. This 
    argument also is unpersuasive. With few exceptions, FHLBank debt has 
    been less expensive than equity, thus, advances funded solely with debt 
    should be less expensive than those funded with a mix of equity and 
    debt. In addition, under Sec. 935.24(c)(2)(i), the FHLBanks must price 
    a nonmember mortgagee advance to cover the funding, operating, and
    
    [[Page 12078]]
    
    administrative costs associated with making the advance.
        After consideration of the comments, the Finance Board has 
    determined that, given the current financial operations of the 
    FHLBanks, there do not appear to be compelling economic circumstances 
    to justify an additional compensation mark-up on nonmember mortgagee 
    advances. Further, eliminating the mark-up should enhance the FHLBanks' 
    statutory housing finance mission by providing more attractively priced 
    funds to entities that specialize in affordable housing finance. 
    Accordingly, the lack of a capital stock investment in a FHLBank by a 
    nonmember borrower is not an acceptable other risk or differential 
    pricing factor. If a FHLBank is able to show in a particular case that 
    it will suffer financial hardship as a result of lending to a nonmember 
    mortgagee, and is able to quantify the harm, it may request a 
    regulatory waiver. See 61 FR 64613 (Dec. 6, 1996), codified at 12 CFR 
    902.6.
        Two commenters asked the Finance Board to clarify whether a FHLBank 
    is required or has discretion to allow a nonmember mortgagee to 
    participate in a FHLBank's Community Investment Program (CIP). Both 
    commenters thought that the FHLBanks should grant SHFA nonmember 
    mortgagees access to advances at CIP rates. Section 10(i) of the Bank 
    Act requires each FHLBank to ``establish a program to provide funding 
    for members to undertake community-oriented mortgage lending.'' See id. 
    1430(i)(1) (emphasis added). Since the final rule gives the FHLBanks 
    discretion in pricing nonmember mortgagee advances, the FHLBanks could 
    make advances at CIP rates available to nonmember mortgagees. However, 
    because section 10(i)(1) requires establishment of a CIP only for 
    members, the FHLBanks are not required to do so. The Finance Board 
    plans to consider this issue as part of a future rulemaking concerning 
    CIP advance programs.
        Section 935.24(c)(3) limits the principal amount of any advance 
    made to a nonmember mortgagee to 90 percent of the unpaid principal of 
    the mortgage loans or securities pledged as security for the advance. 
    This limit does not apply to advances made to SHFA nonmember mortgagees 
    for the purpose of facilitating qualifying low- and moderate-income 
    mortgage lending. A trade association commented that a principal reason 
    limiting nonmember borrowing is that most FHLBanks value nonmember 
    mortgagee collateral at levels below the 90 percent limit. The Finance 
    Board believes that the FHLBanks should develop the technical capacity 
    to evaluate more precisely the risks of multi-family mortgages. This 
    potentially will lower the over-collateralization factor assigned to 
    such collateral.
    4. Transaction Accounts
        A FHLBank commenter suggested that the rule be revised to include 
    authority for the FHLBanks to establish transaction accounts with 
    nonmember mortgagees in order to facilitate the funding of advances. 
    Since the FHLBanks have incidental authority to establish limited 
    purposes deposit accounts, see supra part II(F)(2), the Finance Board 
    has added a new paragraph Sec. 935.24(d) to provide the suggested 
    authorization.
    5. Ineligibility
        Under certain circumstances certified nonmember mortgagees may 
    become ineligible to receive FHLBank advances. Section 935.24(e)(1) 
    requires a nonmember mortgagee that applies for an advance to agree 
    first in writing that it will promptly notify the FHLBank of any change 
    in its status as a nonmember mortgagee. Section 935.24(e)(2) permits a 
    FHLBank, from time to time, to require a nonmember mortgagee to provide 
    evidence that it continues to satisfy all of the statutory and 
    regulatory eligibility requirements. If the FHLBank determines that the 
    nonmember mortgagee no longer meets the eligibility requirements, 
    Sec. 935.24(e)(3) prohibits the FHLBank from extending a new advance or 
    renewing an existing advance until the entity provides evidence 
    satisfactory to the FHLBank that it is in compliance with such 
    requirements. The Finance Board received no comments regarding these 
    provisions and is adopting them without change from the proposal.
    
    III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The rule largely implements statutory requirements binding on all 
    FHLBanks, nonmember mortgagee applicants, and certified nonmember 
    mortgagees. The Finance Board is not at liberty to make adjustments in 
    the requirements to accommodate small entities. The Finance Board has 
    not imposed any additional regulatory requirements that will have a 
    disproportionate impact on small entities. Thus, in accordance with the 
    provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Board of Directors of 
    the Finance Board hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    5 U.S.C. 605(b).
    
    IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        As part of the notice of proposed rulemaking, the Finance Board 
    published a request for comments concerning the collection of 
    information contained in Secs. 935.22 through 935.24 of the proposed 
    rule. See 61 FR 52731. The Finance Board received no comments regarding 
    the collection of information. The Finance Board also submitted an 
    analysis of the information collection to the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) for review in accordance with section 3507(d) of the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. See 44 U.S.C. 3507(d). OMB assigned a 
    control number, 3069-0005, and approved the information collection 
    without conditions with an expiration date of November 30, 1999. 
    Potential respondents are not required to respond to the collection of 
    information unless the regulation collecting the information displays a 
    currently valid control number assigned by the OMB. See id. 3512(a). 
    The final rule does not substantively or materially modify the approved 
    information collection. The title, description of need and use, and a 
    description of the information collection requirements in the final 
    rule are discussed in parts I and II of the Supplementary Information.
        The following table discloses the estimated annual reporting and 
    recordkeeping burden:
    
    
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
    The estimated annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden            
     is:                                                                    
      a. Number of respondents.....................................       10
      b. Total annual responses....................................       10
          Percentage collected electronically......................        0
      c. Total annual hours requested..............................      100
      d. Current OMB inventory.....................................      100
      e. Difference................................................        0
    The estimated annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden            
     is:                                                                    
      a. Total annualized capital/startup costs....................      $ 0
      b. Total annual costs (O&M)..................................        0
      c. Total annualized cost requested...........................    6,250
      d. Current OMB inventory.....................................    6,250
      e. Difference................................................        0
                                                                            
    
        Any comments concerning the information collection should be 
    submitted to Elaine L. Baker, Executive Secretary, Federal Housing 
    Finance Board, 1777 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, and the 
    Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of 
    Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for Federal Housing 
    Finance Board, Washington, D.C. 20503.
    
    [[Page 12079]]
    
    List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 935
    
        Credit, Federal home loan banks, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
        Accordingly, the Board of Directors of the Federal Housing Finance 
    Board hereby amends part 935, chapter IX, title 12 of the Code of 
    Federal Regulations, as follows:
    
    PART 935--ADVANCES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 935 is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1422a(a)(3), 1422b(a)(1), 1426, 1429, 1430, 
    1430b, and 1431.
    
        2. Section 935.1 is amended by revising the definition of ``State 
    housing finance agency'' to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 935.1   Definitions.
    
    * * * * *
        State housing finance agency or SHFA means:
        (1) A public agency, authority, or publicly sponsored corporation 
    that serves as an instrumentality of any state or political subdivision 
    of any state, and functions as a source of residential mortgage loan 
    financing in that state; or
        (2) A legally established agency, authority, corporation, or 
    organization that serves as an instrumentality of any Indian tribe, 
    band, group, nation, community, or Alaska Native village recognized by 
    the United States or any state, and functions as a source of 
    residential mortgage loan financing for the Indian or Alaska Native 
    community.
    * * * * *
        3. Subpart B is revised to read as follows:
    
    Subpart B--Advances to Nonmembers
    
    Sec.
    935.20  Advances to the Savings Association Insurance Fund.
    935.21  Scope.
    935.22  Nonmember mortgagee eligibility requirements.
    935.23  Nonmember mortgagee application process.
    935.24  Advances to nonmember mortgagees.
    
    Subpart B--Advances to Nonmembers
    
    
    Sec. 935.20   Advances to the Savings Association Insurance Fund.
    
        (a) Authority. Upon receipt of a written request from the FDIC, a 
    Bank may make advances to the FDIC for the use of the 
    SavingsAssociation Insurance Fund. The Bank shall provide a copy of 
    such request to the Board.
        (b) Requirements. Advances to the FDIC for the use of the Savings 
    Association Insurance Fund shall:
        (1) Bear a rate of interest not less than the Bank's marginal cost 
    of funds, taking into account the maturities involved and reasonable 
    administrative costs;
        (2) Have a maturity acceptable to the Bank;
        (3) Be subject to any prepayment, commitment, or other appropriate 
    fees of the Bank; and
        (4) Be adequately secured by collateral acceptable to the Bank.
    
    
    Sec. 935.21  Scope.
    
        With the exception of Sec. 935.13, and except as otherwise provided 
    in Sec. 935.20 and Sec. 935.24, the requirements of subpart A of this 
    part apply to this subpart.
    
    
    Sec. 935.22  Nonmember mortgagee eligibility requirements.
    
        (a) Authority. Subject to the provisions of the Act and this 
    subpart, a Bank may make advances to an entity that is not a member of 
    the Bank if the Bank has certified the entity as a nonmember mortgagee.
        (b) Eligibility requirements. A Bank may certify as a nonmember 
    mortgagee any applicant that meets the following requirements:
        (1) The applicant is approved under title II of the National 
    Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707, et seq.);
        (2) The applicant is a chartered institution having succession;
        (3) The applicant is subject to the inspection and supervision of 
    some governmental agency;
        (4) The principal activity of the applicant in the mortgage field 
    consists of lending its own funds; and
        (5) The financial condition of the applicant is such that advances 
    may be safely made to it.
        (c) Satisfaction of eligibility requirements--(1) HUD approval 
    requirement. An applicant shall be deemed to meet the requirement in 
    section 10b(a) of the Act and paragraph (b)(1) of this section that it 
    be approved under title II of the National Housing Act if it submits a 
    current HUD Yearly Verification Report or other documentation issued by 
    HUD stating that the Federal Housing Administration of HUD has approved 
    the applicant as a mortgagee.
        (2) Charter requirement. An applicant shall be deemed to meet the 
    requirement in section 10b(a) of the Act and paragraph (b)(2) of this 
    section that it be a chartered institution having succession if it 
    provides evidence satisfactory to the Bank, such as a copy of, or a 
    citation to, the statutes and/or regulations under which the applicant 
    was created, that:
        (i) The applicant is a government agency; or
        (ii) The applicant is chartered under state, federal, local, 
    tribal, or Alaska Native village law as a corporation or other entity 
    that has rights, characteristics, and powers under applicable law 
    similar to those granted a corporation.
        (3) Inspection and supervision requirement. An applicant shall be 
    deemed to meet the inspection and supervision requirement in section 
    10b(a) of the Act and paragraph (b)(3) of this section if it provides 
    evidence satisfactory to the Bank, such as a copy of, or a citation to, 
    relevant statutes and/or regulations, that, pursuant to statute or 
    regulation, the applicant is subject to the inspection and supervision 
    of a federal, state, local, tribal, or Alaska native village 
    governmental agency. An applicant shall be deemed to meet the 
    inspection requirement if there is a statutory or regulatory 
    requirement that the applicant be audited or examined periodically by a 
    governmental agency or by an external auditor. An applicant shall be 
    deemed to meet the supervision requirement if the governmental agency 
    has statutory or regulatory authority to remove an applicant's officers 
    or directors for cause or otherwise exercise enforcement or 
    administrative control over actions of the applicant. For purposes of 
    this paragraph (c)(3), the term ``governmental agency'' includes the 
    governor, legislature, and any other component of a federal, state, 
    local, tribal, or Alaska native village government with authority to 
    act for or on behalf of that government.
        (4) Mortgage activity requirement. An applicant shall be deemed to 
    meet the mortgage activity requirement in section 10b(a) of the Act and 
    paragraph (b)(4) of this section if it provides documentary evidence 
    satisfactory to the Bank, such as a financial statement or other 
    financial documents that include the applicant's mortgage loan assets 
    and their funding liabilities, that it lends its own funds as its 
    principal activity in the mortgage field. Lending funds includes, but 
    is not limited to, the purchase of whole mortgage loans. In the case of 
    a federal, state, local, tribal, or Alaska Native village government 
    agency, appropriated funds shall be considered an applicant's own 
    funds. An applicant shall be deemed to satisfy this requirement 
    notwithstanding that the majority of its operations are unrelated to 
    mortgage lending if its mortgage activity conforms to this requirement. 
    An applicant that acts principally as a broker for others making 
    mortgage loans, or whose principal activity is to make mortgage loans 
    for the account of others, does not meet this requirement.
        (5) Financial condition requirement. An applicant shall be deemed 
    to meet the financial condition requirement in
    
    [[Page 12080]]
    
    paragraph (b)(5) of this section if the Bank determines that advances 
    may be safely made to the applicant. The applicant shall submit to the 
    Bank copies of its most recent regulatory audit or examination report, 
    or external audit report, and any other documentary evidence, such as 
    financial or other information, that the Bank may require to make the 
    determination.
        (d) State housing finance agencies. In addition to meeting the 
    requirements in paragraph (b) of this section, any applicant seeking 
    access to advances as a SHFA pursuant to Sec. 935.24(b)(2) shall 
    provide evidence satisfactory to the Bank, such as a copy of, or a 
    citation to, the statutes and/or regulations describing the applicant's 
    structure and responsibilities, that the applicant is a state housing 
    finance agency as defined in Sec. 935.1.
        (e) Ineligibility. Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, if 
    an applicant does not satisfy the requirements of this subpart, the 
    applicant is ineligible to be certified as a nonmember mortgagee.
    
    (The Office of Management and Budget approved the information 
    collection requirements contained in this section and assigned 
    control number 3069-0005 with an expiration date of November 30, 
    1999)
    
    
    Sec. 935.23  Nonmember mortgagee application process.
    
        (a) Authority. The Banks are authorized to approve or deny all 
    applications for certification as a nonmember mortgagee, subject to the 
    requirements of the Act and this subpart. A Bank may delegate the 
    authority to approve applications for certification as a nonmember 
    mortgagee only to a committee of the Bank's board of directors, the 
    Bank president, or a senior officer who reports directly to the Bank 
    president other than an officer with responsibility for business 
    development.
        (b) Application requirements. An applicant for certification as a 
    nonmember mortgagee shall submit an application that satisfies the 
    requirements of the Act and this subpart to the Bank of the district in 
    which the applicant's principal place of business, as determined in 
    accordance with part 933 of this chapter, is located.
        (c) Application process--(1) Action on applications. A Bank shall 
    approve or deny an application for certification as a nonmember 
    mortgagee within 60 calendar days of the date the Bank deems the 
    application to be complete. A Bank shall deem an application complete, 
    and so notify the applicant in writing, when it has obtained all of the 
    information required by this subpart and any other information it deems 
    necessary to process the application. If a Bank determines during the 
    review process that additional information is necessary to process the 
    application, the Bank may deem the application incomplete and stop the 
    60-day time period by providing written notice to the applicant. When 
    the Bank receives the additional information, it shall again deem the 
    application complete, so notify the applicant in writing, and resume 
    the 60-day time period where it stopped.
        (2) Decision on applications. The Bank or a duly delegated 
    committee of the Bank's board of directors, the Bank president, or a 
    senior officer who reports directly to the Bank president other than an 
    officer with responsibility for business development shall approve, or 
    the board of directors of a Bank shall deny, each application for 
    certification as a nonmember mortgagee by a written decision resolution 
    stating the grounds for the decision. Within three business days of a 
    Bank's decision on an application, the Bank shall provide the applicant 
    and the Board with a copy of the Bank's decision resolution.
        (3) File. The Bank shall maintain a certification file for each 
    applicant for at least three years after the date the Bank decides 
    whether to approve or deny certification or the date the Board resolves 
    any appeal, whichever is later. At a minimum, the certification file 
    shall include all documents submitted by the applicant or otherwise 
    obtained or generated by the Bank concerning the applicant, all 
    documents the Bank relied upon in making its determination regarding 
    certification, including copies of statutes and regulations, and the 
    decision resolution.
        (4) Appeals. Within 90 calendar days of the date of a Bank's 
    decision to deny an application for certification as a nonmember 
    mortgagee, the applicant may submit a written appeal to the Board that 
    includes the Bank's decision resolution and a statement of the basis 
    for the appeal with sufficient facts, information, analysis, and 
    explanation to support the applicant's position. Appeals shall be sent 
    to the Federal Housing Finance Board, 1777 F Street, N.W., Washington 
    D.C. 20006, with a copy to the Bank.
        (i) Record for appeal. Upon receiving a copy of an appeal, the Bank 
    whose action has been appealed shall provide to the Board a complete 
    copy of the applicant's certification file maintained by the Bank under 
    paragraph (c)(3) of this section. Until the Board resolves the appeal, 
    the Bank shall promptly provide to the Board any relevant new materials 
    it receives. The Board may request additional information or further 
    supporting arguments from the applicant, the Bank, or any other party 
    that the Board deems appropriate.
        (ii) Deciding appeals. Within 90 calendar days of the date an 
    applicant files an appeal with the Board, the Board shall consider the 
    record for appeal described in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section and 
    resolve the appeal based on the requirements of the Act and this 
    subpart.
    
    (The Office of Management and Budget approved the information 
    collection requirements contained in this section and assigned 
    control number 3069-0005 with an expiration date of November 30, 
    1999)
    
    
    Sec. 935.24  Advances to nonmember mortgagees.
    
        (a) Authority. Subject to the provisions of the Act and this 
    subpart, a Bank may make advances only to a nonmember mortgagee whose 
    principal place of business, as determined in accordance with part 933 
    of this chapter, is located in the Bank's district.
        (b) Collateral requirements--(1) Advances to nonmember mortgagees. 
    A Bank may make an advance to any nonmember mortgagee upon the security 
    of the following collateral:
        (i) Mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration of 
    HUD under title II of the National Housing Act; or
        (ii) Securities representing a whole interest in the principal and 
    interest payments due on a pool of mortgage loans insured by the 
    Federal Housing Administration of HUD under title II of the National 
    Housing Act. A Bank may only accept as collateral the securities 
    described in this paragraph (b)(1)(ii) if the nonmember mortgagee 
    provides evidence that such securities are backed solely by mortgages 
    of the type described in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
        (2) Certain advances to SHFAs. (i) In addition to the collateral 
    described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a Bank may make an 
    advance to a nonmember mortgagee that has satisfied the requirements of 
    Sec. 935.22(d) for the purpose of facilitating residential or 
    commercial mortgage lending that benefits individuals or families 
    meeting the income requirements in section 142(d) or 143(f) of the 
    Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 142(d) or 143(f)) upon the security of 
    the following collateral:
        (A) The collateral described in Sec. 935.9(a)(1) or (2).
        (B) The collateral described in Sec. 935.9(a)(3). Solely for the 
    purpose of facilitating acceptance of such collateral, a Bank may 
    establish a cash collateral account for a nonmember
    
    [[Page 12081]]
    
    mortgagee that has satisfied the requirements of Sec. 935.22(d).
        (C) The real estate related collateral described in 
    Sec. 935.9(a)(4), provided that such collateral is comprised of 
    mortgage loans on one-to-four family or multifamily residential 
    property and the acceptance of such collateral will not increase the 
    total amount of advances outstanding to the SHFA secured by such 
    collateral beyond 30 percent of its GAAP capital, as computed by the 
    Bank.
        (ii) Prior to making an advance pursuant to this paragraph (b)(2), 
    a Bank shall obtain a written certification from the nonmember 
    mortgagee that it shall use the proceeds of the advance for the 
    purposes described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section.
        (c) Terms and conditions--(1) General. Subject to the provisions of 
    this paragraph (c), a Bank, in its discretion, shall determine whether, 
    and on what terms, it will make advances to a nonmember mortgagee.
        (2) Advance pricing. (i) A Bank shall price advances to nonmember 
    mortgagees in accordance with the requirements for pricing advances to 
    members set forth in Sec. 935.6(b). Wherever the term ``member'' 
    appears in Sec. 935.6(b), the term shall be construed also to mean 
    ``nonmember mortgagee.''
        (ii) A Bank shall apply the pricing criteria identified in 
    Sec. 936.5(b)(2) equally to all of its member and nonmember mortgagee 
    borrowers.
        (3) Limit on advances. The principal amount of any advance made to 
    a nonmember mortgagee may not exceed 90 percent of the unpaid principal 
    of the mortgage loans or securities pledged as security for the 
    advance. This limit does not apply to an advance made to a nonmember 
    mortgagee under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
        (d) Transaction accounts. Solely for the purpose of facilitating 
    the making of advances to a nonmember mortgagee, a Bank may establish a 
    transaction account for each nonmember mortgagee.
        (e) Loss of eligibility--(1) Notification of status changes. A Bank 
    shall require a nonmember mortgagee that applies for an advance to 
    agree in writing that it will promptly inform the Bank of any change in 
    its status as a nonmember mortgagee.
        (2) Verification of eligibility. A Bank may, from time to time, 
    require a nonmember mortgagee to provide evidence that it continues to 
    satisfy all of the eligibility requirements of the Act and this 
    subpart.
        (3) Loss of eligibility. A Bank shall not extend a new advance or 
    renew an existing advance to a nonmember mortgagee that no longer meets 
    the eligibility requirements of the Act and this subpart until the 
    entity has provided evidence satisfactory to the Bank that it is in 
    compliance with such requirements.
    
    (The Office of Management and Budget approved the information 
    collection requirements contained in this section and assigned 
    control number 3069-0005 with an expiration date of November 30, 
    1999)
    
        By the Board of Directors of the Federal Housing Finance Board.
    
        Dated: February 19, 1997.
    Bruce A. Morrison,
    Chairperson.
    [FR Doc. 97-6260 Filed 3-13-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/14/1997
Published:
03/14/1997
Department:
Federal Housing Finance Board
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-6260
Dates:
The final rule will become effective April 14, 1997.
Pages:
12073-12081 (9 pages)
Docket Numbers:
No. 97-18
PDF File:
97-6260.pdf
CFR: (19)
12 CFR 935.23(a)
12 CFR 935.24(a)
12 CFR 935.9(a)(4)
12 CFR 936.5(b)(2)
12 CFR 935.24(b)(1)
More ...