98-23328. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, South Coast Air Quality Management District  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 2, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 46659-46662]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-23328]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [CA 212-0092a; FRL-6142-5]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California 
    State Implementation Plan Revision, South Coast Air Quality Management 
    District
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the 
    California State Implementation Plan. The revisions concern rules from 
    the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). This approval 
    action will incorporate these rules into the federally approved SIP. 
    The intended effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions 
    of particulate matter (PM) in accordance with the requirements of the 
    Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). The rules control 
    PM emissions from stationary sources, including process industries and 
    cement plants. Thus, EPA is finalizing the approval of these rules into 
    the California SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on 
    SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air 
    quality
    
    [[Page 46660]]
    
    standards, and plan requirements for nonattainment areas.
    
    DATES: This rule is effective on November 2, 1998 without further 
    notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by October 2, 1998. If EPA 
    receives such comments, then it will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
    Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take 
    effect.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted to Andrew Steckel at the Region 
    IX office listed below. Copies of the rules and EPA's evaluation report 
    for the rules are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX 
    office during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rules are 
    available for inspection at the following locations:
    
    Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105
    Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street, 
    SW., Washington, DC 20460
    California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
    Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812
    South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive, 
    Diamond Bar, CA 91765
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Bowlin, Rulemaking Office 
    (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 
    75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone: (415) 744-
    1188.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Applicability
    
        The rules being approved into the California SIP include: SCAQMD 
    Rule 404, Particulate Matter--Concentration; Rule 405, Solid 
    Particulate Matter--Weight; and Rule 1112.1, Emissions of Particulate 
    Matter from Cement Kilns. These rules were submitted by the California 
    Air Resources Board to EPA on June 4, 1986.
    
    II. Background
    
        On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of total suspended 
    particulate (TSP) nonattainment areas under the provisions of the 1977 
    Clean Air Act (1977 CAA or pre-amended Act), that included the South 
    Coast Air Basin (43 FR 8964; 40 CFR 81.305). On July 1, 1987 (52 FR 
    24672) EPA replaced the TSP standards with new PM standards applying 
    only to PM up to 10 microns in diameter (PM-10).1 On 
    November 15, 1990, amendments to the 1977 CAA were enacted. Pub. L. 
    101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. On the date 
    of enactment of the 1990 CAA Amendments, PM-10 areas meeting the 
    qualifications of section 107(d)(4)(B) of the Act were designated 
    nonattainment by operation of law and classified as moderate pursuant 
    to section 188(a). The South Coast Air Basin and the Coachella Valley 
    Planning Area (which is also under SCAQMD's jurisdiction) were among 
    the areas designated nonattainment. On February 8, 1993, EPA re-
    classified five moderate non-attainment areas to serious nonattainment, 
    including the South Coast Air Basin and the Coachella Valley Planning 
    Area. See 58 FR 3334 (January 1, 1993). This Federal Register action 
    for the SCAQMD excludes the Los Angeles County portion of the Southeast 
    Desert AQMA, otherwise known as the Antelope Valley Region in Los 
    Angeles County, which is now under the jurisdiction of the Antelope 
    Valley Air Pollution Control District as of July 1, 1997.2
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ On July 18, 1997 EPA promulgated revised and new standards 
    for PM-10 and PM-2.5 (62 FR 38651). EPA has not yet established 
    specific plan and control requirements for the revised and new 
    standards. This action is part of SCAQMD's efforts to achieve 
    compliance with the 1987 PM-10 standards.
        \2\ The State has recently changed the names and boundaries of 
    the air basins located within the Southeast Desert Modified AQMA. 
    Pursuant to State regulation the Coachella-San Jacinto Planning Area 
    is now part of the Salton Sea Air Basin (17 Cal. Code. Reg. 
    Sec. 60114); the Victor Valley/Barstow Region in San Bernardino 
    County and the Antelope Valley Region in Los Angeles County are a 
    part of the Mojave Desert Air Basin (17 Cal. Code. Reg. Sec. 60109). 
    In addition, in 1996 the California Legislature established a new 
    local air agency, the Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control 
    District, to have the responsibility for local air pollution 
    planning and measures in the Antelope Valley Region (California 
    Health & Safety Code Sec. 40106).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Section 189(a) of the CAA requires moderate PM-10 nonattainment 
    areas to adopt reasonably available control measures (RACM), including 
    reasonably available control technology (RACT) for stationary sources 
    of PM-10. Section 189(b) of the CAA requires serious nonattainment 
    areas to adopt best available control measures (BACM), including best 
    available control technology (BACT).
        In response to section 110(a) and part D of the Act, the State of 
    California submitted many PM-10 rules for incorporation into the 
    California SIP on June 4, 1986, including the rules being acted on in 
    this document. This document addresses EPA's direct-final action for 
    SCAQMD Rule 404, Particulate Matter--Concentration; Rule 405, Solid 
    Particulate Matter--Weight; and Rule 1112.1, Emissions of Particulate 
    Matter from Cement Kilns. SCAQMD adopted these rules on February 7, 
    1986. These submitted rules are being finalized for approval into the 
    SIP.
        SCAQMD Rule 404 and Rule 405 are general PM rules that limit the 
    concentration and rate of PM emissions from stationary sources. SCAQMD 
    Rule 1112.1 limits PM emissions from cement plants. PM emissions can 
    harm human health and the environment. These rules were originally 
    adopted as part of SCAQMD's effort to achieve the National Ambient Air 
    Quality Standard (NAAQS) for TSP. The following is EPA's evaluation and 
    final action for these rules.
    
    III. EPA Evaluation and Action
    
        In determining the approvability of a PM-10 rule, EPA must evaluate 
    the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA 
    regulations, as found in section 110 and part D of the CAA and 40 CFR 
    part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 
    Implementation Plans). EPA must also ensure that rules are enforceable 
    and strengthen or maintain the SIP's control strategy.
        The statutory provisions relating to RACM/RACT and BACM/BACT are 
    discussed in EPA's ``General Preamble'', which provides the Agency's 
    preliminary views on how EPA intends to act on SIPs submitted under 
    Title I of the CAA. See 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992), 57 FR 18070 
    (April 28, 1992), and 59 FR 41998 (8/16/94). In this rulemaking action, 
    EPA is applying these policies, taking into consideration the specific 
    factual issues presented.
        On September 28, 1981 EPA approved into the SIP versions of SCAQMD 
    Rule 404, Particulate Matter--Concentration, and Rule 405, Solid 
    Particulate Matter--Weight, that had been adopted on October 5, 1979. 
    The submitted versions of Rule 404 and Rule 405 contain the same 
    requirements as the current SIP rules but have been revised to exempt 
    sources subject to SCAQMD Rule 1112.1, Emissions of Particulate Matter 
    from Cement Kilns.
        There is currently no version of SCAQMD Rule 1112.1, Emissions of 
    Particulate Matter from Cement Kilns, in the SIP. The submitted rule 
    applies to gray cement plants and includes the following provisions:
         Emission limit of 0.40 pounds per ton of kiln feed for 
    plants with kiln feed rates of less than 75 tons per hour (tph)
         Emission limit of 30 pounds per hour for plants with kiln 
    feed rates of 75 tph or greater.
        EPA has evaluated the submitted rules and has determined that they 
    fulfill the RACT requirements of CAA
    
    [[Page 46661]]
    
    section 189(a). In subsequent action on the SCAQMD PM-10 BACM Plan, EPA 
    will determine if the submitted rules also fulfill the BACT 
    requirements of CAA section 189(b).
        SCAQMD Rule 404, Particulate Matter--Concentration; SCAQMD Rule 
    405, Solid Particulate Matter--Weight; and SCAQMD Rule 1112.1, 
    Emissions of Particulate Matter from Cement Kilns, are consistent with 
    the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA PM-10 RACT policy. Therefore, the 
    rules are being approved under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting 
    the requirements of sections 110(a) and part D. A more detailed 
    evaluation can be found in EPA's evaluation report for these rules.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future implementation 
    plan. Each request for revision to the state implementation plan shall 
    be considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and 
    environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and 
    regulatory requirements.
        EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the 
    Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this 
    Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document 
    that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should 
    relevant adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective 
    November 2, 1998 without further notice unless the Agency receives 
    relevant adverse comments by October 2, 1998.
        If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a timely 
    withdrawal of the direct final rule informing the public that the rule 
    will not take effect. All public comments received will then be 
    addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The 
    EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule. Any 
    parties interested in commenting on this rule should do so at this 
    time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this 
    rule will be effective on November 2, 1998 and no further action will 
    be taken on the proposed rule.
    
    IV. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13045
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
    regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
        The final rule is not subject to E.O. 13045, entitled ``Protection 
    of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks,'' because 
    it is not an ``economically significant'' action under E.O. 12866.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the 
    Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve 
    requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
    Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the 
    Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on 
    any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the 
    Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility 
    analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic 
    reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base 
    its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. 
    EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    
    C. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to 
    private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA must 
    select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative that 
    achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory 
    requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for 
    informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly 
    or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        EPA has determined that this approval action does not include a 
    Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or 
    more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or 
    to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-existing 
    requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new Federal 
    requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or 
    tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
    
    D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
    to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
    ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. Sec. 804(2).
    
    E. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
    judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
    of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 2, 1998. Filing a 
    petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
    does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
    review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
    review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
    rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
    to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
    reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Particulate matter.
    
        Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
    Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
    
        Dated: July 31, 1998.
    Felicia Marcus,
    Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    
        Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
    
    [[Page 46662]]
    
    Subpart F--California
    
        2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(169) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (169) New and amended regulations submitted on June 4, 1986 by the 
    Governor's designee.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
        (1) Rules 404 and 405 adopted on May 7, 1976 and amended on 
    February 7, 1986. Rule 1112.1 adopted on February 7, 1986.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 98-23328 Filed 9-1-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/2/1998
Published:
09/02/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
98-23328
Dates:
This rule is effective on November 2, 1998 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by October 2, 1998. If EPA receives such comments, then it will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take effect.
Pages:
46659-46662 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CA 212-0092a, FRL-6142-5
PDF File:
98-23328.pdf
CFR: (2)
40 CFR 60114)
40 CFR 52.220