98-18459. Limes and Avocados Grown in Florida; Relaxation of Container Dimension, Weight, and Marking Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 37475-37480]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-18459]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Rules and Regulations
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
    having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
    to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
    under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
    
    The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
    Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
    week.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 133 / Monday, July 13, 1998 / Rules 
    and Regulations
    
    [[Page 37475]]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Parts 911 and 915
    
    [Docket No. FV98-911-2 IFR]
    
    
    Limes and Avocados Grown in Florida; Relaxation of Container 
    Dimension, Weight, and Marking Requirements
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule changes the container requirements prescribed under 
    the Florida lime and avocado Federal marketing orders. The marketing 
    orders are administered locally by the Florida Lime Administrative 
    Committee and the Avocado Administrative Committee (committees). This 
    rule simplifies container marking requirements for both limes and 
    avocados by reducing the number of times the size for limes and the 
    grade for avocados need to appear on a container. This rule also 
    removes weight limits on lime and avocado containers packed within a 
    master container, and relaxes certain minimum weight requirements on 
    containers of avocados. In addition, this rule eliminates specific 
    container dimension requirements for both limes and avocados, but 
    maintains net weight requirements. These changes will reduce handling 
    costs and provide greater flexibility in lime and avocado packing 
    operations.
    
    DATES: Effective July 14, 1998; comments received by September 11, 1998 
    will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456, Fax: (202) 205-6632. All comments should 
    reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue 
    of the Federal Register and will be made available for public 
    inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business 
    hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William G. Pimental, Marketing 
    Specialist, Southeast Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order 
    Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 2276, Winter Haven, 
    Florida 33883; telephone: (941) 299-4770, Fax: (941) 299-5169; or 
    George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration 
    Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, room 2522-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 
    20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-6632. Small 
    businesses may request information on compliance with this regulation 
    by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-
    6632.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement No. 126 and Marketing Order No. 911, both as amended (7 CFR 
    part 911), regulating the handling of limes grown in Florida, and 
    Marketing Agreement No. 121 and Marketing Order No. 915, both as 
    amended (7 CFR part 915), regulating the handling of avocados grown in 
    Florida, hereinafter referred to as the ``orders.'' The marketing 
    agreements and orders are effective under the Agricultural Marketing 
    Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter 
    referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 
    days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Under the terms of the marketing orders, fresh market shipments of 
    Florida limes and avocados are required to be inspected and are subject 
    to grade, size, maturity, and pack and container requirements. Current 
    pack and container requirements outline the types of information and 
    the number of times this information needs to appear on a container. 
    The requirements also list the specific dimensions of the containers in 
    which the fruit can be packed and the weight restrictions the packed 
    containers must meet.
        This rule makes several changes to the orders' pack and container 
    rules and regulations. This rule simplifies container marking 
    requirements for both limes and avocados by reducing the number of 
    times the size for limes and the grade for avocados need to appear on a 
    container. In addition, this rule removes net weight limits on lime and 
    avocado containers packed within a master container, and relaxes 
    certain minimum net weight requirements on containers of avocados. This 
    rule also eliminates specific container dimension requirements for both 
    limes and avocados. These changes will reduce handling costs and 
    provide greater flexibility in lime and avocado packing operations. The 
    committees met several times to discuss and recommend changes needed in 
    the container regulations. The committees met and unanimously 
    recommended these changes on July 9, 1997, August 13, 1997, and 
    February 11, 1998.
        Section 911.48 and 915.51 of the orders provide the authority to 
    issue regulations establishing specific pack
    
    [[Page 37476]]
    
    and container requirements for limes and avocados, respectively. These 
    requirements are specified under sections 911.311, 911.329 and 911.344 
    for limes, and under sections 915.305 and 915.306 for avocados. These 
    sections specify, in part, container size, weight, and marking 
    requirements.
        This rule makes several changes to the pack and container 
    provisions under the orders. The first change reduces the number of 
    times the size for limes and the grade for avocados need to appear on a 
    container. Sections 911.311(5)(d) and 915.306(a)(6) of the rules and 
    regulations outline the container marking requirements for limes for 
    size and avocados for grade, respectively. Current requirements specify 
    that the size for limes be marked in letters at least one inch in 
    height on two sides of the container. For avocados, the grade must be 
    stamped in letters at least one inch in height on the top and two sides 
    of the lid. This rule relaxes these requirements by establishing that 
    containers be stamped only once, anywhere except the bottom of the 
    container.
        The size and grade information on a container is usually applied 
    automatically by machine, or stamped individually by hand. Each time a 
    container is stamped, there is an associated cost. The committees 
    recommended reducing the number of times a container must be stamped, 
    as well as expanding the possible stamp location, to provide handlers 
    additional flexibility, and to reduce costs.
        The committees believe this change will benefit both large and 
    small packing operations. Larger operations use automated stamping. 
    Current stamping requirements mean that each packing line needs to have 
    at least two in-line stamp rollers or ink jet printers. In cases where 
    the line has only one stamping device, the containers must be reversed 
    and run through the line a second time for limes, and three times for 
    avocados. This can take a considerable amount of time. This change will 
    allow containers to move more rapidly through the packing line, reduce 
    the number of stamping machines required, and decrease the costs 
    associated with these activities.
        Most smaller operations stamp the containers by hand. To meet the 
    current requirements, each box must be rotated and stamped in more than 
    one location. This increases the time and effort needed to pack each 
    box. Reducing the number of times a container must be stamped will 
    decrease the amount of labor needed and the associated stamping costs 
    required to meet these requirements.
        The requirement that containers be stamped more than once with size 
    or grade information originated from the way limes and avocados were 
    marketed by retailers in the past. Limes and avocados were, at one 
    time, marketed and sold out of the containers in which the fruit was 
    originally packed. Having the information on the container appear in 
    several locations was done so that the customer could read it. However, 
    the way limes and avocados are marketed has changed. Rather than being 
    presented in the shipping container, retailers move the fruit to 
    display bins.
        The stamping of containers with required information benefits the 
    retailer and helps the committees' check that the lots (shipments) meet 
    order requirements. Retailers tend to buy in large lots, purchasing a 
    specified size and grade. The number of times an individual box needs 
    to be stamped is less important. The committees anticipate that this 
    change will reduce costs and give handlers additional flexibility under 
    the rules and regulations. Therefore, the committees recommended 
    relaxing the stamping requirements for both limes and avocados.
        The next change this rule makes is to the weight limits on 
    individual containers that are packed inside larger master containers. 
    Sections 911.329(a)(3) and 915.305(b) specify that individual packages 
    of limes or avocados contained within master containers are not to 
    exceed four pounds in weight. This rule relaxes this weight limit, 
    allowing packaged limes or avocados contained within master containers 
    to exceed four pounds in weight.
        The committees are always looking for ways to strengthen and expand 
    the market for limes and avocados. One way they do this is through the 
    approval of experimental containers not currently included under the 
    regulations. This is done for market research purposes. The committees 
    use such research to determine the benefits and acceptance of different 
    containers in the marketplace.
        The use of master containers packed with limes and avocados in 
    packages in excess of 4 pounds has been approved on an experimental 
    basis. The approvals were made to allow handlers to meet specific 
    requests from their customers.
        Consequently, these larger sized packages within a master container 
    have been shown to have a market potential.
        The committees both discussed the merits of eliminating the four 
    pound limit on packages within a master container. The committees 
    believe this change will provide handlers with additional marketing 
    flexibility, increased sales potential, and with more opportunities to 
    satisfy customers with special needs. Based on the information 
    collected from the use of the trial containers, the committees 
    recommended that the four pound limit on packages within a master 
    container be removed.
        This rule also lowers certain minimum net weight requirements for 
    containers of avocados. Section 915.305 specifies minimum weight 
    requirements for avocados packed under the marketing order for avocados 
    grown in Florida. The current regulations specify that avocados be 
    packed in containers of 8.5, 12\1/2\, 25, 32, or 34 pounds designated 
    net weights. This rule reduces the net weight requirements of 12\1/2\, 
    25, 32, and 34 pounds to 12, 24, 31, and 33 pounds, as recommended by 
    the Avocado Administrative Committee (AAC). AAC members agreed that the 
    problems prompting this change were more prevalent in the containers 
    associated with the last four weights. Therefore, no change was 
    recommended for the 8.5 pound designated net weight.
        Handlers use containers that are associated by size with the 
    minimum weights listed under the rules and regulations. These weight 
    requirements closely match the capacity of the containers. These 
    containers are inspected by the Federal-State Inspection Service 
    (FSIS). One of the things FSIS checks is whether the packed containers 
    meet the established minimum weight requirements.
        An allowable tolerance for variation from the requirements is 
    specified under the rules and regulations. With respect to each lot of 
    containers of minimum weights 12\1/2\ and 25 pounds, only 5 percent or 
    less, by count, of the individual containers in the lot may fail to 
    meet the applicable specified weight. The tolerance is 10 percent for 
    minimum weights of 32 and 34 pounds. If the allowable tolerances are 
    exceeded, the lot fails inspection and would need to be reworked and 
    repacked before it could meet inspection.
        Failing inspection and having to rework a lot after it has been 
    packed results in a considerable loss of time and money for the 
    individual handler. One AAC member used the example of a 12\1/2\ pound 
    net weight container packed with 16 ounce avocados in a single layer 
    with 12 avocados per layer to illustrate the problem. He said that when 
    FSIS found the minimum weight to be 8 ounces short in enough boxes to 
    exceed the tolerance, they would fail the lot, requiring it to be 
    redone. Handlers then are forced to make a choice between adding an 
    additional avocado
    
    [[Page 37477]]
    
    to each container, or risk the possibility of failing the minimum net 
    weight requirement. AAC members concurred with the problem presented by 
    this particular situation. Several handlers stated that rather than 
    risk being underweight, they would force an additional avocado into the 
    container. The handlers agreed that in many cases, this meant that they 
    were literally giving one avocado per pack away.
        In addition, members stated that this practice of over packing the 
    containers was having a negative effect on the avocados during 
    shipment. The AAC discussed that some shipments were being received out 
    of the production area in poor condition due to the over filling of 
    containers to ensure compliance with the minimum net weight 
    requirements. The containers were so tightly packed that the avocados 
    were bruised or damaged in transit.
        The AAC understands the benefits of a uniform pack. However, in 
    this case, the requirements were having a negative effect on the 
    condition of the avocados. Changing container sizes to better 
    accommodate the required weights would be difficult and costly. 
    Handlers have containers in inventory, and have their equipment 
    adjusted to those containers. By lowering the minimum net weights, 
    handlers will be able to use the boxes they have. This change will also 
    reduce the need to add additional avocados to meet net weight 
    requirements. In addition, it will help reduce the possibility of 
    containers failing the minimum weight requirement, and save handlers 
    the expense of reworking failed lots of avocados. This change also will 
    benefit growers by providing greater packouts and additional grower 
    revenue. Therefore, the AAC recommended lowering the minimum net 
    weights of 12\1/2\, 25, 32, and 34 pounds to 12, 24, 31, and 33 pounds 
    designated net weights. However, this action does not change the 
    established tolerances or the requirement for a fairly tight pack.
        The final change made by this rule is the elimination of specific 
    container dimension requirements from both orders' rules and 
    regulations. Current requirements include dimensions for all authorized 
    containers of limes and avocados, specifying specific measurements for 
    height, width, and depth. This rule eliminates the specific dimension 
    constraints, but maintains the container net weight requirements.
        Sections 911.329 and 915.305 of the rules and regulations outline 
    container dimension requirements for limes and avocados, respectively. 
    These sections establish specific interior dimensions in inches for 
    containers approved for use under the orders. The dimensions vary from 
    a small 5.5 pound container with measurements of 7\1/2\  x  11\7/8\  x  
    4\1/4\ inches to a large 42 pound container with measurements of 12\3/
    4\  x  15\1/4\  x  10\3/4\ inches for limes. Avocados also have similar 
    specific interior dimensions, from a small 8.5 pound container with 
    dimensions of 16\1/2\  x  13\1/2\  x  3\1/4\ inches to a large 34 pound 
    container with dimensions of 11  x  16\1/4\  x  10\3/4\ inches.
        A recent review of the containers in use throughout the industry 
    revealed that interior dimensions varied from handler to handler, and 
    in many cases, were different than those specified in the rules and 
    regulations. Some of the differences occurred in the box manufacturing 
    process, where tolerances were granted to allow for equipment 
    adjustments.
        While the dimensions of containers has varied throughout the 
    industry, the adherence to the net weight requirements has not. Under 
    current inspection procedures, the containers are being weighed and 
    checked for compliance with net weight requirements. This means that 
    even though container dimensions may vary somewhat among individual 
    handlers, the essential volume among like containers is the same. 
    Therefore, rather than revising the rules and regulations to 
    incorporate numerous additional containers with specific dimensions, 
    the committees voted to eliminate the references to set measurements 
    while maintaining the container net weight requirements.
        The committees concluded that requiring handlers to use containers 
    with specific dimensions is not necessary as long as the containers 
    used contain a net weight specified in the requirements. The committees 
    believe that even with this change, the rules and regulations continue 
    to promote the shipment of a uniform product. The committees also 
    anticipate that this change will reduce costs by allowing handlers to 
    use boxes in inventory, rather than ordering new containers and making 
    adjustments to equipment. They thought that removing specific container 
    dimension requirements provided handlers with additional packing 
    flexibility under the rules and regulations. They also agreed this 
    change made more sense than trying to add the dimensions of all the 
    containers currently in use to the requirements. Therefore, the 
    committees recommended removing the regulations requiring specific 
    interior dimensions for containers. However, all containers must 
    continue to meet the specific net weight requirements as they appear in 
    the rules and regulations.
        Section 8e of the Act provides that when certain domestically 
    produced commodities, including limes and avocados, are regulated under 
    a Federal marketing order, imports of that commodity must meet the same 
    or comparable grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements. This 
    rule changes the container marking and minimum net weight requirements 
    currently issued under these orders. Therefore, no change is necessary 
    in the lime or avocado import regulations.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this action on 
    small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory 
    flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 111 lime producers and 141 avocado 
    producers in the production area and approximately 33 lime handlers and 
    49 avocado handlers subject to regulation under the marketing orders. 
    Small agricultural producers have been defined by the Small Business 
    Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than 
    $500,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those 
    whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000 (13 CFR 121.601).
        Based on the Florida Agricultural Statistical Service and committee 
    information, the average on-tree price for fresh limes during the 1996-
    97 season was $7.10 per 88 pound box equivalent and shipments totaled 
    398,279 bushels (55 pound bushel). Approximately 20 percent of all 
    handlers handled 86 percent of Florida lime shipments.
        The average price for fresh avocados during the 1997-98 season was 
    $14.60 per 55 pound bushel box equivalent for all domestic shipments 
    and the total shipments were 937,568 bushels. Approximately 10 percent 
    of all handlers handled 90 percent of Florida avocado shipments. Many 
    lime and avocado handlers ship other tropical fruit and vegetable 
    products which are not included in the committees' data but
    
    [[Page 37478]]
    
    would contribute further to handler receipts.
        Using these prices, about 90 percent of lime and avocado handlers 
    could be considered small businesses under the SBA definition and about 
    10 percent of the handlers could be considered large businesses. The 
    majority of Florida lime and avocado producers and handlers may be 
    classified as small entities.
        Under Sec. 911.48 and Sec. 915.51 of the marketing orders for limes 
    and avocados grown in Florida, the committees have the authority to 
    establish and modify pack and container requirements for limes and 
    avocados handled under the order. Current pack and container 
    requirements outline the types of information and the number of times 
    this information needs to appear on a container. The requirements also 
    list the specific requirements as to container size and weight 
    restrictions the packed container must meet.
        This rule makes several changes to Secs. 911.311 and 911.329, and 
    Secs. 915.305 and 915.306 of the rules and regulations concerning the 
    pack and container requirements for limes and avocados, respectively. 
    This rule simplifies container marking requirements for both limes and 
    avocados by reducing the number of times the size for limes and the 
    grade for avocados need to appear on a container. This rule also 
    removes net weight limits on lime and avocado containers packed within 
    a master container, and relaxes certain minimum net weight requirements 
    on packed avocados. In addition, this rule eliminates specific 
    container dimension requirements for both limes and avocados. These 
    changes will reduce handling costs and provide greater flexibility in 
    lime and avocado packing operations.
        This rule will have a positive impact on affected entities. The 
    changes were recommended to reduce costs and provide additional 
    flexibility in packing limes and avocados. None of the changes are 
    expected to increase costs associated with the pack and container 
    requirements.
        The change in the stamping requirement will allow containers to 
    move more rapidly through the packing line, reduce the number of 
    stamping machines and labor needed, and decrease costs associated with 
    complying with the marking requirements.
        The committees believe this change will benefit both large and 
    small packing operations. Larger operations use automated stamping. 
    Current stamping requirements mean that each packing line needs to have 
    at least two in-line stamp rollers or ink jet printers. In cases where 
    the line has only one stamping device, the containers must be reversed 
    and run through the line a second time for limes, and three times for 
    avocados. This can take a considerable amount of time. This change will 
    allow containers to move more rapidly through the packing line, reduce 
    the number of stamping machines required, and decrease the costs 
    associated with these activities.
        Most smaller operations stamp the containers by hand. To meet the 
    current requirements, each box must be rotated and stamped in more than 
    one location. This increases the time and effort needed to pack each 
    box. Reducing the number of times a container must be stamped will 
    decrease the amount of labor needed and the associated stamping costs 
    required to meet these requirements.
        The change in net weight of a container packed within a master 
    container will provide handlers with more options in how they use a 
    master container, and provide handlers greater flexibility in 
    addressing the needs of customers.
        Lowering certain minimum net weight requirements for avocados will 
    reduce the practice of over filling containers to ensure compliance 
    with the minimum net weight requirements. Some handlers have been 
    packing the containers so tightly that the avocados were bruised or 
    damaged in transit. This change will reduce the need to add additional 
    avocados to meet net weight requirements, thus, saving on costs from 
    adding additional fruit to the containers and damaged fruit. This 
    change also will help reduce the possibility that containers will fail 
    the minimum weight requirement, saving the handler the expense of 
    reworking failed lots of avocados. Growers also might benefit from this 
    change. If less fruit damage results in increased customer satisfaction 
    and higher f.o.b. prices, some additional revenue might be passed on to 
    the growers.
        A recent review of the containers in use throughout the industry 
    revealed that the interior dimensions varied with each packer, and in 
    many cases, were different than those specified in the rules and 
    regulations. Absent this change eliminating specific container 
    dimensions, some handlers would need to bear the expense of ordering 
    new boxes, and take a loss on the boxes they have in inventory, or 
    petition the committees to expand the list of approved container 
    dimensions. The elimination of specific container dimension 
    requirements from both orders' rules and regulations will reduce costs 
    to handlers by allowing handlers to use boxes in inventory, rather than 
    having to order new containers.
        As long as the containers contain enough limes or avocados to meet 
    net weight requirements, the committees believe that different 
    container dimensions are not necessary. The committees believe that 
    even with this change, the rules and regulations will continue to 
    promote the shipment of uniform product, while providing handlers 
    additional latitude in their choice of containers.
        These changes are intended to reduce costs and provide additional 
    flexibility for all those covered under the orders. The opportunities 
    and benefits of this rule are expected to be equally available to all 
    lime and avocado handlers and growers regardless of their size of 
    operation.
        Other alternatives to the actions approved were considered by the 
    committees prior to making the recommendations. One alternative 
    discussed by the committees regarding the stamping question was to 
    require containers to continue to be stamped on two sides for limes, 
    and on the top and two sides of the lid for avocados. The committees 
    believed that this is a duplicate effort that provides little benefit 
    and increases associated packing costs. They rejected this alternative.
        The committees also considered an alternative to the change 
    recommended regarding the weight of containers packed within a master 
    container. The committees discussed establishing another net weight 
    limitation above the current four pound restriction. However, the 
    committees believed that just increasing the weight limit would still 
    limit flexibility and rejected that option.
        The AAC considered several alternatives to relaxing specific 
    minimum net weight requirements. One alternative discussed was 
    increasing the percentage tolerance in terms of the number of 
    containers that could fail to meet the weight requirements before the 
    entire lot would fail. Members were concerned that raising the 
    allowable tolerance would have a negative impact on the uniformity of 
    the pack, allowing for too much variance from the standard. There was 
    also concern that this may not fully address the problem. Even with the 
    increased tolerance, to avoid reaching the limit, there would still be 
    cause to over pack containers. Another alternative considered was to 
    change the way the tolerance was measured, changing from containers per 
    lot to an average of containers packed on a given day. Under this 
    alternative, a handler would not know if they had exceeded the 
    allowable tolerance until
    
    [[Page 37479]]
    
    the end of the packing day. This would mean that if a handler was found 
    to be out of compliance, they would be out of compliance for the whole 
    day, requiring a rework of all the fruit packed that day rather than 
    only the lots that failed. The committees also considered changing the 
    container requirements to specify containers that were wider and longer 
    than present containers. Discussion concluded that there were already 
    numerous containers and that adding or changing several containers to 
    cover all the weights, sizes, and varieties would make things more 
    complicated. It would also increase the financial burden by requiring 
    the purchase of new boxes, and the modifying of equipment and pallets 
    to accommodate the change. Therefore, the committees dismissed these 
    alternatives.
        Two alternatives to eliminating specific container dimension 
    requirements were presented for discussion. One alternative was to 
    leave all lime and avocado containers as they are now. A review of the 
    containers in use throughout the industry revealed that interior 
    dimensions varied from handler to handler and in many cases, were 
    different than those specified in the rules and regulations. However, 
    not making this change could result in additional costs for handlers. 
    The second alternative centered on adjusting the regulations to 
    accommodate all the containers currently in use. The committees 
    rejected the idea of adding more containers to the regulations as 
    making things overly complicated with little discernable benefit. The 
    committees believed that the recommended change will continue to 
    promote the shipment of uniform product, require no additional cost, 
    and allow handlers additional flexibility in choice of containers. 
    Based on this discussion, this alternative was rejected.
        This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping 
    requirements on either small or large lime or avocado handlers. As with 
    all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are 
    periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
    duplication by industry and public sectors. In addition, the Department 
    has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap 
    or conflict with this rule.
        Further, the committees' meetings were publicized throughout the 
    lime and avocado industries and all interested persons were invited to 
    attend the meetings and participate in the committees' deliberations. 
    Like all the committees' meetings, the July 9, 1997, August 13, 1997, 
    and February 11, 1998, meetings were public meetings and all entities, 
    both large and small, were able to express their views on these issues. 
    Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on the 
    regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small 
    businesses.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the committees' recommendations, and other information, it is found 
    that this interim final rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to 
    effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
        This rule invites comments on changes to the pack and container 
    requirements currently prescribed under the Florida lime and avocado 
    marketing orders. Any comments received will be considered prior to 
    finalization of this rule.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good 
    cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public 
    interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into 
    effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date 
    of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register 
    because: (1) Handlers are currently shipping limes and will begin to 
    ship avocados shortly; (2) the committees unanimously recommended these 
    changes at public meetings and interested persons had an opportunity to 
    provide input; (3) this rule relaxes container size, weight, and 
    marking requirements; (4) Florida lime and avocado handlers are aware 
    of this rule and need no additional time to comply with the relaxed 
    requirements; and (5) this rule provides a 60-day comment period and 
    any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this 
    rule.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    7 CFR Part 911
    
        Limes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    7 CFR Part 915
    
        Avocados, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 911 and 915 
    are amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for both 7 CFR parts 911 and 915 
    continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
    PART 911--LIMES GROWN IN FLORIDA
    
        2. In Sec. 911.311, the introductory text of paragraph (d) is 
    revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 911.311  Florida lime pack and container marking regulation.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) No handler shall handle any container of seedless limes, grown 
    in the production area, unless such container is marked once on the top 
    or on any one side of the container, not to include the bottom, with 
    letters at least one inch in height with one of the size designations 
    shown in column 1 of the following table: Provided, That the number of 
    seedless limes in a ten pound sample of a particular size designation, 
    representative of the limes in the container, corresponds to the 
    permissible size range in column 2 of such table for such size 
    designation: Provided further, That not more than 10 percent of the 
    containers in any lot may fail to meet these requirements.
    * * * * *
        3. In Sec. 911.329, paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) through (a)(2)(xi) are 
    removed, and paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (a)(2)(iii) and paragraph 
    (a)(3) are revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 911.329  Florida lime container regulation.
    
        (a)(1) * * *
        (2) * * *
        (i) All limes shall be packed in containers of 5.5, 8, 10, 20, and 
    38 pounds designated net weights. The net weight of the contents shall 
    not be less than the designated net weight. The net weight of limes 
    shall not exceed the designated net weight by more than two pounds for 
    10 and 20 pound containers, and shall not exceed the designated net 
    weight by more than four pounds for 38 pound containers. Further, the 
    net weight shall not exceed the designated net weight by more than one 
    pound for 8 pound containers, and this container shall be for export 
    shipments only.
        (ii) When a container of 38 pounds designated net weight is used as 
    a master container for bagged limes, the minimum net weight of limes 
    shall be 35 pounds, provided the container is marked ``Master 
    Container.''
        (iii) Such other types and sizes of containers as may be approved 
    by the Florida Lime Administrative Committee, with the approval of the 
    Secretary, for testing in connection with a research project conducted 
    by or in cooperation with said committee: Provided, That the handling 
    of each lot of limes in such test containers shall be
    
    [[Page 37480]]
    
    subject to the prior approval, and under the supervision of, the 
    Florida Lime Administrative Committee.
        (3) The limitations set forth in paragraph (a)(2) of this section 
    shall not apply to master containers of individual packages, including 
    individual bags of limes: Provided, That the markings or labels, if 
    any, on such packages do not conflict with the markings or labels on 
    the master container.
    * * * * *
    
    PART 915--AVOCADOS GROWN IN SOUTH FLORIDA
    
        4. Section 915.305, is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 915.305  Florida Avocado Container Regulation 5.
    
        (a) No handler shall handle any avocados for the fresh market from 
    the production area to any point outside thereof in containers having a 
    capacity of more than 4 pounds of avocados unless the containers meet 
    the requirements specified in this section: Provided, That the 
    containers authorized in this section shall not be used for handling 
    avocados for commercial processing into products pursuant to 
    Sec. 915.55(c). All avocados shall be packed in containers of 33, 31, 
    24, 12, and 8.5 pounds designated net weights and shall conform to all 
    other applicable requirements of this section:
        (1) Containers shall not contain less than 33 pounds net weight of 
    avocados, except that for avocados of unnamed varieties, which are 
    avocados that have not been given varietal names, and for Booth 1, 
    Fuchs, Trapp varieties, such weight shall be not less than 31 pounds 
    with respect to each lot of such containers, not to exceed 10 percent, 
    by count, of the individual containers in the lot may fail to meet the 
    applicable specified weight but no container in such lot may contain a 
    net weight of avocados exceeding 2 pounds less than the specified net 
    weight, and each avocado in such container in a lot shall weigh at 
    least 16 ounces, except that not to exceed 10 percent, by count, of the 
    fruit in the lot may fail to meet such weight requirement but not more 
    than double such tolerance shall be permitted for an individual 
    container in the lot; or
        (2) Containers shall not contain less than 24 pounds net weight of 
    avocados: Provided, That not to exceed 5 percent, by count, of such 
    containers in any lot may fail to meet such weight requirement. All 
    avocados packed at this designated net weight shall be placed in two 
    layers and the net weight of all avocados in any such container shall 
    not be less than 24 pounds: Provided, That the requirement as to 
    placing avocados in two layers only shall not apply to such container 
    if each of the avocados therein weighs 14 ounces or less; or
        (3) Containers shall not contain less than 12 pounds net weight of 
    avocados: Provided, That not to exceed 5 percent, by count, of such 
    containers in any lot may fail to meet such weight requirement. All 
    avocados packed at this designated net weight shall be placed in one 
    layer only and the net weight of all avocados in any such container 
    shall not be less than 12 pounds; or
        (4) Containers shall not contain less than 8.5 pounds net weight of 
    avocados: Provided, That not to exceed 5 percent, by count, of such 
    containers in any lot may fail to meet such weight requirement. All 
    avocados packed at this designated net weight shall be placed in one 
    layer only and the net weight of all avocados in any such container 
    shall not be less than 8.5 pounds. Such containers shall be for export 
    shipments only.
        (5) Such other types and sizes of containers as may be approved by 
    the Avocado Administrative Committee, with the approval of the 
    Secretary, for testing in connection with a research project conducted 
    by or in cooperation with said committee: Provided, That the handling 
    of each lot of avocados in such test containers shall be subject to 
    prior approval, and under the supervision of, the Avocado 
    Administrative Committee.
        (b) The limitations set forth in paragraph (a) of this section 
    shall not apply to master containers for individual packages of 
    avocados: Provided, That the markings or labels, if any, on the 
    individual packages within such master containers do not conflict with 
    the markings or labels on the master container.
        5. In Sec. 915.306, paragraph (a)(6) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 915.306  Florida avocado grade, pack, and container marking 
    regulation.
    
        (a)* * *
        (6) Such avocados when handled in containers authorized under 
    Sec. 915.305, except for those to export destinations, are marked once 
    with the grade of fruit in letters and numbers at least one inch in 
    height on the top or one side of the container, not to include the 
    bottom, effective each fiscal year from the first Monday after July 15 
    until the first Monday after January 1.
    * * * * *
        Dated: July 7, 1998.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 98-18459 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/14/1998
Published:
07/13/1998
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim final rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
98-18459
Dates:
Effective July 14, 1998; comments received by September 11, 1998 will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
Pages:
37475-37480 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV98-911-2 IFR
PDF File:
98-18459.pdf
CFR: (5)
7 CFR 915.55(c)
7 CFR 911.311
7 CFR 911.329
7 CFR 915.305
7 CFR 915.306