97-18841. Labeling of Natural or Regenerated Collagen Sausage Casings  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 137 (Thursday, July 17, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 38220-38222]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-18841]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 137 / Thursday, July 17, 1997 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 38220]]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Food Safety and Inspection Service
    
    9 CFR Parts 317 and 381
    
    [Docket No. 94-030P]
    RIN 0583-AB98
    
    
    Labeling of Natural or Regenerated Collagen Sausage Casings
    
    AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is proposing to 
    require the source labeling of natural sausage casings if they are 
    derived from a different type of livestock or poultry than the meat or 
    poultry in the enclosed sausage. FSIS is also proposing to require 
    source labeling for regenerated collagen casings.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 15, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit an original and two copies of comments to: FSIS 
    Docket Clerk, DOCKET #94-030P, Room 102, Cotton Annex, 300 C Street, 
    SW, Washington, DC 20250-3700. Reference materials cited in this docket 
    will be available for public inspection in the FSIS Docket Room from 
    8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William Hudnall, Assistant Deputy 
    Administrator, Standards & Methods Review, Office of Policy, Program 
    Development and Evaluation; (202) 205-0495.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On July 18, 1994, FSIS was petitioned by the Office of the Attorney 
    General of the State of Connecticut to adopt a regulation to require 
    the identification of the origin of natural sausage casings on sausage 
    offered for sale in commerce. The Attorney General was responding to a 
    letter he had received from a Connecticut consumer describing the 
    consumer's difficulty in attempting to ascertain the origin of a 
    natural sausage casing.
        The consumer had gone to a local supermarket's butcher shop to 
    purchase chicken and other non-pork sausages ``in packages the butcher 
    shop makes in-house.'' Before purchasing any sausages, however, the 
    consumer asked the butcher whether there was ``even a minuscule bit of 
    pork anywhere in the sausage.'' The consumer was dismayed to learn that 
    the casing surrounding a non-pork sausage could, in fact, be a pork 
    casing and that no law or regulation required the origin of the casing 
    to be on the sausage's label. In her letter to the Attorney General, 
    the consumer observed that the failure of sausage manufacturers to 
    label the origin of natural sausage casings had resulted in the 
    unintended consumption of pork products by persons who, for religious 
    reasons, did not want to consume them. On behalf of this consumer, the 
    Attorney General of the State of Connecticut petitioned FSIS to require 
    the identification of the origin of natural sausage casings. The 
    Attorney General stated that he believes strongly that it is essential 
    for a consumer to be provided with meaningful labeling information as 
    to the nature and content of a sausage's casing, whether based upon 
    dietary, religious or other factors.
        On August 25, 1995, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism 
    submitted a similar petition to FSIS requesting that the nature of 
    sausage casings (natural or regenerated) be identified on the label, as 
    well as the species origin of the casings. The petitioner stated that 
    religious concerns motivated the request for a more specific ingredient 
    declaration. Referencing the issue raised by the Connecticut consumer, 
    this petitioner stated that current federally-approved labels ``would 
    not warn a religious Jew or Muslim that a sausage with chicken or veal 
    contents is cased with pig collagen.'' This petitioner argued that 
    ``Federally-approved labels must warn consumers of the species of 
    origin of collagen casing--the labels are the only means of preventing 
    consumers from unknowingly consuming prohibited food products and 
    removing uncertainty regarding the origin of food products.'' The 
    petitioner went on to say that federally-approved labels should impart 
    as much information as possible to health-conscious and interested 
    consumers, ``whether such consumers are religious or non-religious.''
        Based on its review of these petitions, FSIS concluded that there 
    was merit to the argument that consumers of sausages made with natural 
    casings expect the casings to be derived from the same species as a 
    species indicated on the product label. For example, consumers expect 
    that the natural casing of a sausage labeled ``beef sausage'' to be 
    derived from cattle. Similarly, FSIS believes that consumers of poultry 
    sausage, e.g., chicken franks, expect the sausage to be made from 
    poultry and do not expect the casing to be derived from a red meat 
    source.
        However, sausages are not always encased in a casing derived from 
    the same type of livestock or poultry as the meat block. They may be 
    encased in natural casings that derive from a different type of 
    livestock or poultry from that of the sausages. For example, a 
    combination beef-and-lamb sausage may be made with a pork casing. 
    Currently, in such a case, the manufacturer of the beef-and-lamb 
    sausage is not required to disclose that the natural casing is not 
    derived from the same type of livestock species as the sausage itself. 
    (Poultry viscera are not currently used to encase sausages due to their 
    small size.)
        FSIS has a broad array of food safety and other consumer protection 
    responsibilities. In particular, FSIS has authority to regulate the 
    processing and distribution of meat and poultry products to prevent the 
    sale of misbranded products in interstate commerce (see 21 U.S.C. 601 
    et seq. and 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.). Under the Federal Meat Inspection 
    Act (FMIA), the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA), and the federal 
    meat and poultry products inspection regulations, a meat or poultry 
    product is ``misbranded'' if its labeling is false or misleading in any 
    way.
        Having concluded that consumers could incorrectly assume that 
    sausages made with natural casings or regenerated collagen casings are 
    derived from the same species as a species indicated on the product 
    label, the Agency informed the public of its labeling policies 
    regarding those types of sausage casings. On July 31, 1996, FSIS 
    published a ``Notice of Policy Statement'' in the Federal Register 
    explaining FSIS's policy on the labeling
    
    [[Page 38221]]
    
    of meat or poultry sausages made with natural casings (61 FR 39853; 
    July 31, 1996). That notice clarified FSIS's position that a sausage 
    encased in a natural casing not obtained from the same type of 
    livestock or poultry as the meat inside is misbranded under the FMIA or 
    the PPIA unless the product is properly labeled to show the origin of 
    the natural casing. If the casing is not obtained from the same type of 
    livestock or poultry as the meat inside and the product is not properly 
    labeled, it is misbranded.
        On October 9, 1996, the North American Natural Casing Association 
    filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture alleging in 
    pertinent part that FSIS's July 31, 1996, policy notice violated the 
    rulemaking procedures set forth in Sec. 553 of the Administrative 
    Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(e)). In response to this lawsuit, 
    FSIS has reassessed the need for notice and comment rulemaking to 
    clarify requirements for casings in the context of misbranding and, 
    therefore, is proposing to codify the labeling requirements for natural 
    and regenerated collagen casings. FSIS is also proposing to require 
    that establishments that manufacture natural or regenerated collagen 
    casings, and establishments that manufacture sausages encased in 
    casings derived from a different type of livestock or poultry than the 
    encased meat(s), keep records identifying the source of the casings. 
    Pending completion of this rulemaking, FSIS is suspending enforcement 
    of the July 1996 policy statement.
    
    Natural Sausage Casings
    
        Natural animal casings have been traditional containers for sausage 
    materials for centuries. Swine, sheep, and cattle are the primary 
    sources for natural casings. Hog casings come from the stomach, the 
    small and large intestines, and the rectum (bung). Cattle casings come 
    from the esophagus (weasand), the small and large intestines, the bung, 
    and the bladder. Sheep casings come only from the intestines. FSIS does 
    not know of any natural casings derived from poultry sources.
        The manufacture of natural casings consists typically of washing, 
    scraping, and treating the casings with chemicals to remove solubles 
    and grading them for size and condition. The natural casings are then 
    salted, packaged, and shipped in brine to the point of use. They can 
    easily be detected on the product they encase and are useful because 
    they allow smoke and moisture to permeate the sausage during 
    processing. Natural casings are usually considered edible, and are 
    eaten with the sausage they encase, except for the thicker, larger 
    casings, which, while edible, are not eaten because of their toughness.
    
    Regenerated Collagen Sausage Casings
    
        Sausage casings can also be manufactured from collagen. 
    Manufactured collagen casings are made from collagen extracted from 
    cattle hides or hog skins. A process called regeneration extracts the 
    collagen from the hide. After being extracted, the collagen is 
    dissolved and pushed out into a tube and hardened. It is then washed, 
    swelled with acid, and formed. The final shape is fixed in an alkali 
    bath.
        FSIS has tentatively decided to propose to require source labeling 
    of regenerated collagen casings because consumers may be confused about 
    the nature of sausages encased in such casings without that 
    information. All establishments involved in the manufacture and use of 
    regenerated collagen casings, from the facility extracting collagen 
    from the hides to the facility receiving the regenerated collagen 
    casings, plus any other establishments that might be included in the 
    process, would be responsible for knowing the source of the hides from 
    which the ``native'' collagen is removed. All establishments would be 
    required to keep records indicating the livestock or poultry source of 
    the regenerated collagen.
        However, the data currently available to the Agency indicates that 
    regenerated collagen casings do not retain any of their original animal 
    character. It is conceivable, therefore, that sausage manufacturers 
    would not be able to determine the source of the regenerated collagen 
    if the facility removing the ``native'' collagen does not itself keep a 
    record of the source of the hides. This, in turn, would make it 
    difficult for an FSIS inspector to verify the source of a regenerated 
    collagen casing to determine if the encased sausage is mislabeled. FSIS 
    believes, however, that all establishments, especially collagen 
    extractors, keep records of this nature as a matter of course. 
    Therefore, the Agency believes that this requirement will not impose a 
    significant or undue burden on the industry.
        In light of the technical limits and practical difficulties that 
    may exist in determining the source of regenerated collagen casings, 
    FSIS is seeking comments concerning the feasibility of requiring 
    establishments extracting collagen from hides and sausage manufacturers 
    to identify the source of their regenerated collagen casings and 
    whether imposing such a requirement would benefit consumers. FSIS is 
    also interested in learning if a scientific test that can ascertain the 
    source of a regenerated collagen casing has been or is being developed.
    
    The Proposal
    
        FSIS is proposing to amend the Federal meat and poultry products 
    inspection regulations to require that labels of sausages encased in 
    natural casings or regenerated collagen casings identify the type of 
    livestock or poultry from which the casings were derived, such as beef, 
    swine or sheep, if the casings are derived from a different type of 
    livestock or poultry than any meat or poultry ingredient of the 
    sausage. The manufacturer may place the identity of the sausage casing 
    on the principal display panel or in the ingredient statement. 
    Establishments that produce, manufacture or use natural or regenerated 
    sausage casings would also be required to maintain records identifying 
    the source of the casings.
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
    Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) all state 
    and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule 
    will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this 
    rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before 
    parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
    
    Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The 
    rule has been determined to be not significant and, therefore, has not 
    been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
        In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, FSIS has performed an Initial 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, which is set out below, regarding the 
    impact of the rule on small entities. However, FSIS does not currently 
    have all the data necessary for a comprehensive analysis of the effects 
    of this rule on small entities. Therefore, FSIS is inviting comments 
    concerning potential effects. In particular, FSIS is interested in 
    determining the number, kind and characteristics of small firms that 
    may incur benefits or costs from implementation of this proposed rule.
        This proposed rule would require manufacturers of sausages encased 
    in natural or regenerated collagen casings to label the source of those 
    casings if the casings are derived from a different type of livestock 
    or poultry than the encased sausage meat(s). However, FSIS believes
    
    [[Page 38222]]
    
    the associated labeling costs would be low. Manufacturers would be able 
    to defer the development of new labels for sausage products in natural 
    and regenerated collagen casings until their existing stocks of labels 
    are exhausted. Moreover, the new labels could be generically approved; 
    manufacturers would not have to prepare and submit FSIS Form 7234-1, 
    ``Application for Labels, Marking, or Device,'' or the new label. 
    Identification of the source of natural sausage casings or regenerated 
    collagen casings could also be a selling point for some manufacturers.
        This regulation would be beneficial to consumers because it would 
    reduce confusion about the source of the casings surrounding those 
    sausages and give them additional information with which to make 
    informed choices about the sausages they purchase. Natural casings 
    constitute between 15 and 20 percent of the sausage casing market; 
    regenerated collagen casings constitute approximately 40 percent of 
    that same market.
    
    Paperwork Requirements
    
        Abstract: Under this proposed rule, sausage manufacturers would 
    need to label the source of natural sausage casings or regenerated 
    collagen casings if they are derived from a different type of livestock 
    or poultry than the meat(s) in the enclosed sausage. These 
    establishments would have to develop product labels in accordance with 
    the proposed rule. FSIS would consider these labels to be generically 
    approved in accordance with 9 CFR 317.5 and 381.133. Any burden 
    associated with labeling changes would be approved under OMB number 
    0583-0092.
        Establishments that produce, manufacture or use natural or 
    regenerated sausage casings, or sausages encased in either of those 
    types of casings would also be required to maintain records identifying 
    the source of the casings. FSIS believes, however, that all of these 
    establishments keep records of this nature as a matter of course.
        Estimate of Burden: Establishments producing, manufacturing or 
    using natural or regenerated collagen casings, and establishments 
    producing sausages encased in natural or regenerated sausage casings. 
    FSIS estimates that the time associated with collecting the required 
    information would be 15 minutes. FSIS estimates that this recordkeeping 
    would occur once a day.
        Respondents: Meat and poultry establishments manufacturing natural 
    or regenerated collagen sausage casings, and meat and poultry 
    establishments manufacturing sausages encased in these types of 
    casings.
        Estimated number of Respondents: 40 meat and poultry 
    establishments.
        Estimated number of Responses per Respondent: 10,000.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2,500 hours.
        Comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed collection of 
    information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
    the Agency, including whether the information will have practical 
    utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the 
    proposed collection of information including the validity of the 
    methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
    utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
    to minimize the burden of collection of information on those who are to 
    respond, including through use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
    mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms 
    of information technology. Comments may be sent to Lee Puricelli, 
    Paperwork Specialist, see address above, and Desk Officer for 
    Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
    Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20253.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    9 CFR Part 317
    
        Food labeling, Food packaging, Meat inspection.
    
    9 CFR Part 381
    
        Food labeling, Poultry and poultry products.
    
        For the reasons discussed in the preamble, FSIS is proposing to 
    amend 9 CFR parts 317 and 381 of the Federal meat and poultry products 
    inspection regulations as follows:
    
    PART 317--LABELING, MARKING DEVICES, AND CONTAINERS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 317 would continue to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 601-695; 7 CFR 2.18, 2.53.
    
        2. Section 317.8 would be amended by adding a new paragraph (b)(37) 
    to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 317.8  False or misleading labeling or practices generally; 
    specific prohibitions and requirements for labels and containers.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (37) The labels of sausages encased in natural casings made from 
    livestock or poultry viscera or regenerated collagen casings shall 
    identify the type of livestock or poultry from which the casings were 
    derived, if the casings are from a different type of livestock or 
    poultry than the encased meat(s). The identity of the casing, if 
    required, may be placed on the principal display panel or in the 
    ingredient statement. Establishments producing, manufacturing or using 
    natural or regenerated collagen sausage casings shall maintain records 
    documenting the livestock or poultry source in accordance with 
    Sec. 320.3.
    
    PART 381--POULTRY PRODUCTS INSPECTION REGULATIONS
    
        3. The authority citation for part 381 would continue to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138f, 450; 21 U.S.C. 451-470; 7 CFR 2.18, 
    2.53.
    
        4. Section 381.117 would be amended by adding paragraph (f) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 381.117  Name of product and other labeling.
    
    * * * * *
        (f) The labels of sausages encased in natural casings made from 
    livestock or poultry viscera or regenerated collagen casings shall 
    identify the type of livestock or poultry from which the casings were 
    derived, if the casings are from a different type of livestock or 
    poultry than the encased meat(s). The identity of the casing, if 
    required, may be placed on the principal display panel or in the 
    ingredient statement. Establishments producing, manufacturing or using 
    natural or regenerated collagen sausage casings shall maintain records 
    documenting the livestock or poultry source in accordance with 
    Sec. 381.177.
    
        Done at Washington, DC, on July 9, 1997.
    Thomas J. Billy,
    Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 97-18841 Filed 7-16-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/17/1997
Department:
Food Safety and Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
97-18841
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before September 15, 1997.
Pages:
38220-38222 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 94-030P
RINs:
0583-AB98: Identification of the Origin of Sausage Casings
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0583-AB98/identification-of-the-origin-of-sausage-casings
PDF File:
97-18841.pdf
CFR: (4)
9 CFR 317.8
9 CFR 320.3
9 CFR 381.117
9 CFR 381.177