94-17218. Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Project Grants  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 19, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-17218]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: July 19, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    Public Health Service
    Health Resources and Services Administration
    42 CFR Part 51a
    RIN 0905-AD88
     
    
    Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Project Grants
    AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This final rule amends existing regulations governing the 
    Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Federal Set-Aside programs under 
    sections 502(a) and 502(b) of Title V of the Social Security Act (42 
    U.S.C. 702(a) and 702(b)). This rule revises the regulations to: 
    increase flexibility to fit changing policy concerns; implement 
    requirements established under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 
    1989 (OBRA '89) addressing collection of data from funded projects, and 
    make other changes that are technical or clarifying in nature. The rule 
    updates the existing regulations in accord with current Department 
    policy and statutory amendments made to sections 501(a), 502(a), 
    502(b), and 506(a)(3).
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is effective August 18, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Lynn Squire, Legislative Officer, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, 
    HRSA, HHS, Office of Program Development, Parklawn Building, room 18-
    20, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; telephone number: 301-443-
    2778.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 21, 1993, the Secretary published in 
    the Federal Register (58 FR 38995) a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    (NPRM) proposing to revise existing regulations governing the MCH 
    Federal Set-Aside programs to bring them into conformity with current 
    Department policy and statutory amendments to these programs. The 
    Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Services Block Grant is the only 
    federally authorized program devoted exclusively to maternal and child 
    health. First authorized under Title V of the Social Security Act (the 
    Act) in 1935 and reorganized as a block grant under the Omnibus Budget 
    Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Pub. L. 97-35), the program provides funds 
    primarily to States to develop the maternal and child health 
    infrastructure and public health system which supports the 
    establishment of community-based, family-centered systems of 
    preventive, primary and specialized care that coordinate and integrate 
    public and private sector resources for women of childbearing age, 
    infants, children, adolescents, and families, particularly those who 
    are low income, have limited access to care, or have a child with 
    special health care needs.
        Sections 502(a) and 502(b) of Title V, as amended by the Omnibus 
    Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1989 (Pub. L. 101-239), govern the 
    MCH Federal Set-Aside programs. These sections require that specified 
    portions of the annual appropriation for the MCH Block Grant be set 
    aside and retained by the Secretary to support projects in designated 
    categories. Section 502(a) established the federal set-aside for 
    Special Projects of Regional and National Significance (SPRANS), which 
    supports grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements for: training; 
    research; genetic disease and newborn screening; hemophilia treatment 
    centers; and special Maternal and Child Health Improvement Projects 
    (MCHIP). Section 502(b) was authorized under section 6502(a)(3)(b) of 
    OBRA '89. It establishes a set-aside, consisting of 12.75 percent of 
    annual appropriated amounts above $600 million, for special projects 
    termed ``Community Integrated Service Systems (CISS)'' projects. The 
    purposes of these special projects are identified under section 
    501(a)(3) of the Act. They include the development and expansion of: 
    maternal and infant home visiting programs; programs to increase the 
    numbers of obstetricians and gynecologists participating in Titles V 
    and XIX; integrated MCH service delivery systems; MCH centers operating 
    under not-for-profit hospitals; rural MCH projects; and outpatient and 
    community based services for children with special health care needs. 
    Regulations published at 51 FR 7726, March 5, 1986 (and codified at 42 
    CFR 51a), focus only on the SPRANS federal set-aside under 502(a). The 
    regulations have not been revised since their initial publication.
        The NPRM proposed to: (1) Replace references to ``crippled 
    children'' with ``children with special health care needs'' in all 
    sections of the regulations, as mandated under section 9527 of COBRA; 
    (2) change the heading and revise the wording in Sec. 51a.1 to reflect 
    the intent of the section, which is to expand the regulation's 
    applicability to the CISS program under section authorized under 
    section 502(b)(1)(A) of the Act by OBRA '89; (3) In Sec. 51a.3, change 
    the language to clarify and more clearly distinguish between 
    eligibility requirements for applicants for research, training, and 
    other grant categories under the Federal Maternal and Child Health Set-
    Aside program; (4) make minor wording changes in Sec. 51a.4, to better 
    describe the application process and to more clearly distinguish 
    between requirements for research applications and those for other 
    grant categories; (5) amend Sec. 51a.5 to incorporate into the 
    Secretary's funding decisions consideration of MCH-related Healthy 
    People 2000 objectives, as required by OBRA '89 under section 501(a) of 
    the Act. The amended Sec. 51a.5 would also incorporate a statutory 
    funding preference for certain CISS project strategies in areas of high 
    infant mortality, as required by OBRA '89 under section 502(b)(2) of 
    the Act. In addition, to better reflect the diversity of project 
    categories for which applications are currently solicited and their 
    responsiveness to changing needs, the NPRM proposed to replace obsolete 
    and inflexible evaluation criteria in the section. The new criteria 
    would be consistent with Part 116 of the PHS Grants Administration 
    Manual, applicable to decisions on funding awards, while increasing 
    opportunities for the Secretary to develop criteria as needed for 
    specific project categories. Category-specific evaluation criteria 
    would be published in program announcements and/or application 
    guidances; (6) In Sec. 51a.7, make technical changes to eliminate 
    obsolete references as a result of changes in Department regulations, 
    and to correct other errors in references; and (7) add a new Sec. 51a.8 
    to set out conditions which grantees must meet. Requirements in 
    paragraph (a) would implement amendments to section 506(a)(3) of the 
    Act made by OBRA '89, which address collection of data from funded 
    SPRANS projects concerning the number of individuals served or trained, 
    as appropriate.
        In addition, the NPRM proposed information collections which have 
    been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 and assigned control number 0915-0169. 
    It also proposed to add a provision giving the Secretary discretion to 
    impose such additional conditions on grantees as the Secretary views as 
    necessary, using language identical to that in many other PHS grant 
    program regulations. Additionally, technical and ministerial revisions 
    were proposed to bring existing regulations into compliance with 
    current major departmental policy initiatives and grants policy 
    language.
        The public comment period on the proposed regulations closed on 
    September 20, 1993. The Department received 4 letters of public comment 
    on this NPRM. All significant comments have been considered and 
    discussed. Comments relating to the information collection requirements 
    in Sec. 51a.8 highlight the Department's responsibility to provide 
    grantees with clear and explicit instructions for completing prescribed 
    forms. There are no substantive differences between the proposed rule 
    and the final rule as a result of our review of public comments.
        The comments received on the proposed rule and the Department's 
    responses to the comments are discussed below under the section numbers 
    of the regulations affected.
    
    Part 51a--Project Grants for Maternal and Child Health
    
        One respondent expressed support for the proposed replacement of 
    all references to ``crippled'' children in all sections of the 
    regulation to ``children with special health care needs.'' The 
    Department is making this change to conform with Section 9527 of the 
    Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) [Pub. L. 99-
    272], which substitutes the term `Children with Special Health Care 
    Needs' for `Crippled Children' throughout Title V.
    
    Section 51a.5  What criteria will DHHS use to decide which projects to 
    fund?
    
        One respondent was concerned that some potential SPRANS and CISS 
    applicants do not work closely enough or early enough with the State 
    Title V agency in developing their grant proposals. This respondent 
    suggested adding ``the quality of coordination with the state Title V 
    program'' to the criteria used by the Department to review projects for 
    funding.
        The Department wishes to stress that it considers a key objective 
    of these new rules to be the elimination of obsolete and overly-rigid 
    evaluation criteria in order to better accommodate the broad diversity 
    of project categories in which grants are awarded; in recent years, the 
    number of separate categories and subcategories has exceeded 35. 
    Limiting regulatory review criteria to the minimum required by Part 116 
    of the Public Health Service (PHS) Grants Administration Manual does 
    not affect the Department's ability to publish in annual program 
    announcements and/or application guidelines additional criteria for any 
    grant category. This limitation is also consistent with Executive Order 
    12875 of October 26, 1993, which discourages executive departments from 
    promulgating any regulation ``that is not required by statute and that 
    creates a mandate upon a State, local, or tribal government''.
        The Department will include category-appropriate review criteria in 
    the application guidelines it distributes for each grant category. Most 
    demonstration grant categories can be expected to contain review 
    criteria relating to meaningful and timely consultation and 
    collaboration by applicants with the State Title V agency, as well as 
    with other State, local, and tribal governments regarding matters that 
    uniquely affect their communities. The Department notes, however, that 
    the statute does not condition awards under the MCH Federal Set-Aside 
    programs on coordination with the State Title V agency and that such 
    coordination may not be relevant for every grant category. The 
    statutory emphasis on ``regional and national significance'' reflects 
    Congressional intent that some categories should properly serve 
    interests beyond those of the host State. Because both categorical 
    diversity and changing priorities over time are fully accommodated by 
    customizing annual announcements and/or guidelines, the Department is 
    making no changes to the review criteria in this section.
        This respondent also suggested that priorities for funding within 
    the SPRANS and CISS programs be determined in consultation with State 
    Title V programs. Agency discretion in selection of priorities for 
    funding in both the SPRANS and CISS programs is actually extremely 
    limited. The major SPRANS categories are identified in section 502(a) 
    and CISS project categories are specified in some detail in sections 
    and 502(b) of Title V. Subcategories and priorities under SPRANS can 
    change from year to year; typically, however, they are designed to 
    fulfill specific Congressional or Administration program directives. 
    The Department has an established mechanism for soliciting comments 
    from the public on proposed priorities for Title V grant programs. 
    Annual announcements of the availability of funding for SPRANS and CISS 
    invite public comment on the published program priorities. When 
    application deadlines prevent consideration of public comments in 
    developing priorities for the current fiscal year, they are considered 
    for the following fiscal year. In addition, numerous formal and 
    informal opportunities currently exist for consultation and exchanges 
    of views on grant priorities between the Department's central and 
    regional office officials and State Title V programs and their chosen 
    representatives.
        One respondent pointed out a misprint in the NPRM listing of CISS 
    funding preferences, which is corrected in the final regulation. The 
    misprint resulted in incorrectly combining two separate statutory 
    categories--integrated maternal and child health service systems and 
    maternal and child health centers operating under the direction of not-
    for-profit hospitals--and in omitting the category of outpatient and 
    community based services for children with special health care needs.
    
    Section 51a.8  What other conditions apply to these grants?
    
        OBRA '89 added a requirement (under sec. 506(a)(3) of the Act) for 
    annual collection of data from SPRANS and CISS project grants, 
    including: (1) Information on the number of individuals served or 
    trained; (2) a copy of any evaluation conducted by the recipient; and 
    (3) a list of Healthy Children 2000 objectives addressed by the project 
    and data on how the project met the objectives.
        Two respondents raised concerns regarding the applicability of 
    individual-oriented reporting requirements to projects whose objectives 
    or activities are primarily population-based, such as infrastructure 
    building, needs assessment, quality control, or policy development. The 
    Department appreciates these concerns. To accommodate variations in the 
    targeting of the major types of SPRANS/CISS grants, the Department has 
    developed and OMB has approved for a one-year period, through November 
    1994, a ``SPRANS/CISS Uniform Data Collection Instrument'' for use in 
    this annual data collection, which will usually take place in the 
    spring of each fiscal year. Following the submission by SPRANS/CISS 
    grantees of their completed data forms, the Maternal and Child Health 
    Bureau (MCHB) will compile the data in compliance with the legislative 
    mandate for information on the number of persons served or trained. 
    Four separate SPRANS/CISS Uniform Data Collection Instrument forms have 
    been designed for use in FY 1994, customized for projects focusing on: 
    (1) Training; (2) research; (3) data analysis; and (4) other 
    discretionary grants. The development of the forms to be used in this 
    information collection was guided by an active data development 
    committee within the MCHB. The forms were sent to all Public Health 
    Service Regional Offices for review. In addition, draft data collection 
    instruments were disseminated in FY 1993 for field testing to nine 
    institutions representing each major type of SPRANS/CISS grantee, i.e. 
    training, research, genetics, hemophilia, and MCH improvement projects.
    
    Smoke Free Workplace
    
        Public Law 103-227, enacted on March 31, 1994, prohibits smoking in 
    certain facilities in which minors will be present. The Department of 
    Health and Human Services is now preparing to implement the provision 
    of that law. Until those implementation plans are in place, PHS 
    continues to strongly encourage all grant recipients to provide a smoke 
    free workplace and promote the nonuse of all tobacco products.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866
    
        These regulations govern a financial assistance program in which 
    participation is voluntary. The Department believes that the resources 
    required to implement the new requirements in this final rule are 
    minimal. In accordance with the requirements of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act of 1980, the Secretary certifies that these regulations 
    will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities.
        The Department also has determined that this rule is not a major 
    rule under Executive Order 12866; therefore, a regulatory impact 
    analysis is not required. The rule will not exceed the threshold level 
    of $100 million established in section (b) of Executive Order 12866.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule contains information collections which have been approved 
    by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1980 and assigned control number 0915-0169. The title, 
    description, and respondent description of the information collections 
    are shown below with an estimate of the annual reporting, notification 
    and recordkeeping burdens. Included in the estimate is the time for 
    reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
    maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
    collection of information.
        Title: SPRANS/CISS Uniform Data Collection Instrument.
        Description: Information will be collected from funded projects to 
    enable the Secretary to respond to congressional reporting mandates 
    required by OBRA '89 concerning individuals served or trained by 
    projects, their responsiveness to Healthy Children 2000 objectives, and 
    their evaluation status.
        Description of Respondents: Recipients of SPRANS and CISS project 
    awards.
        Estimated Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          No. of       Responses per     Hours per                  
                        Section                        respondents      respondent       response       Total hours 
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Reporting:                                                                                                      
        Sec. 51a.8..................................             580               1               4           2,320
                                                     ---------------------------------------------------------------
          Total Burden..............................  ..............  ..............  ..............           2,320
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        We received one comment on the estimated annual reporting burden 
    published in the NPRM. The estimate of four hours per response was 
    based on initial information provided to MCHB by a sampling of 
    grantees' data specialists. Feedback from the field test has confirmed 
    the general accuracy of the estimated burden. Prior to expiration of 
    OMB approval for this data collection, in November 1994, the utility of 
    the data instrument will be reviewed and an analysis of grantee 
    experience in complying with the requirements will be done. The 
    estimated reporting burden remains the same as in the proposed rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 51a
    
        Grand programs--health, Health care, Health professions, 
    Handicapped, Maternal and child health.
    
    
        Dated: April 12, 1994.
    Philip R. Lee,
    Assistant Secretary for Health.
        Approved: July 7, 1994.
    Donna E. Shalala,
    Secretary.
    
    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, No. 93.110, Maternal and 
    Child Health Consolidated Federal Programs).
    
    
        Accordingly, 42 CFR Part 51a is amended as set forth below:
    
    PART 51a--PROJECT GRANTS FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH
    
        1-2. The authority citation for Part 51a is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
    
        Authority: Sec. 1102 of the Social Security Act, 49 Stat. 647 
    (42 U.S.C. 1302); sec. 502(a), 502(b)(1)(A), and 506(a)(3) of the 
    Social Security Act, 95 Stat. 819-20 (42 U.S.C. 702(a), 702(b)(1)(A) 
    and 706(a)(3)).
    
    
        3. Section 51a.1 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 51a.1  To which programs does this regulation apply?
    
        The regulation in this part applies to grants, contracts, and other 
    arrangements under section 502(a) and 502(b)(1)(A) of the Social 
    Security Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 702(a) and 702(b)(1)(A)), the 
    Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Federal Set-Aside project grant 
    programs. Section 502(a) authorizes funding for special projects of 
    regional and national significance (SPRANS), research and training 
    projects with respect to maternal and child health and children with 
    special health care needs (including early intervention training and 
    services development); genetic disease testing, counseling and 
    information programs; comprehensive hemophilia diagnostic and treatment 
    centers; projects for screening and follow-up of newborns for sickle 
    cell anemia and other genetic disorders; and special maternal and child 
    health improvement projects. Section 502(b)(1)(A) authorizes funding 
    for projects termed community integrated service system (CISS) projects 
    for the development and expansion of: maternal and infant health home 
    visiting; projects to increase the participation of obstetricians and 
    pediatricians in title V and title XIX programs; integrated maternal 
    and child health service systems; maternal and child health centers 
    operating under the direction of not-for-profit hospitals; rural 
    maternal and child health programs; and outpatient and community-based 
    services programs for children with special health care needs.
    
        4. Section 51a.3 is revised to read as follows:
    Sec. 51a.3  Who is eligible to apply for Federal funding?
    
        (a) With the exception of training and research, as described in 
    paragraph (b) of this section, any public or private entity, including 
    an Indian tribe or tribal organization (as those terms are defined at 
    25 U.S.C. 450b) is eligible to apply for federal funding under this 
    Part.
        (b) Only public or nonprofit private institutions of higher 
    learning may apply for training grants. Only public or nonprofit 
    institutions of higher learning and public or private nonprofit 
    agencies engaged in research or in programs relating to maternal and 
    child health and/or services for children with special health care 
    needs may apply for grants contracts or cooperative agreements for 
    research in maternal and child health services or in services for 
    children with special health care needs.
        5. Section 51a.4 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 51a.4  How is application made for Federal funding?
    
        An application for funding under the MCH Federal Set-Aside project 
    grant programs must be submitted to the Secretary at such time and in 
    such manner as the Secretary may prescribe. It must include a budget 
    and narrative plan of the manner in which the project will meet each of 
    the requirements prescribed by the Secretary. The plan must describe 
    the project in sufficient detail to identify clearly the nature, need, 
    and specific objectives of, and methodology for carrying out, the 
    project. (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control 
    number 0915-0050)
        6. Section 51a.5 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 51a.5  What criteria will DHHS use to decide which projects to 
    fund?
    
        (a) The Secretary will determine the allocation of funds available 
    under sections 502(a) and 502(b)(1)(A) of the Act for each of the 
    activities described in Sec. 51a.1.
        (b) Within the limit of funds determined by the Secretary to be 
    available for each of the activities described in Sec. 51a.1, the 
    Secretary may award Federal funding for projects under this part to 
    applicants which will, in his or her judgment, best promote the purpose 
    of title V of the Social Security Act and address achievement of 
    Healthy Children 2000 objectives,\1\ taking, the following factors into 
    account:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\Healthy Children 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease 
    Prevention Objectives Related to Mothers, Infants, Children, 
    Adolescents, and Youth is a special compendium of health status 
    goals and national health objectives affecting mothers, infants, 
    children, adolescents, and youth originally published in Healthy 
    People 2000 in September 1990. Potential applicants may obtain a 
    copy of Healthy People 2000 (Full Report: Stock No. 017-001-00474-0 
    or Healthy People 2000 (Summary Report; Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) 
    through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office 
    Washington, DC 20402-9325, (telephone: 202 783-3238).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (1) The extent to which the project will contribute to the 
    advancement of maternal and child health and/or improvement of the 
    health of children with special health care needs;
        (2) The extent to which the project is responsive to policy 
    concerns applicable to MCH grants and to program objectives, 
    requirements, priorities and/or review criteria for specific project 
    categories, as published in program announcements or guidance 
    materials.
        (3) The extent to which the estimated cost to the Government of the 
    project is reasonable, considering the anticipated results;
        (4) The extent to which the project personnel are well qualified by 
    training and/or experience for their roles in the project and the 
    applicant organization has adequate facilities and personnel; and
        (5) The extent to which, insofar as practicable, the proposed 
    activities, if well executed, are capable of attaining project 
    objectives.
        (c) For the following types of CISS projects, preference for 
    funding will be given to qualified applicants in areas with a high 
    infant mortality rate (relative to the latest average infant mortality 
    rate in the United States or in the State in which the area is 
    located):
        (1) Projects for the development and expansion of maternal and 
    infant health home visiting;
        (2) Projects to increase the participation of obstetricians and 
    pediatricians in title V and title XIX programs;
        (3) Integrated maternal and child health service systems;
        (4) Maternal and child health centers operating under the direction 
    of not-for-profit hospitals;
        (5) Rural maternal and child health programs; and
        (6) Outpatient and community based services for children with 
    special health care needs.
        7. Section 51a.7(a) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 51a.7  What other DHHS regulations apply?
    
        (a) Several other DHHS regulations apply to awards under this part. 
    These include, but are not limited to:
        42 CFR Part 50--Policies of general applicability:
        Subpart B--Sterilization of persons in federally assisted family 
    planning projects.
        Subpart C--Abortions and related medical services in federally 
    assisted programs of the Public Health Service.
        Subpart E--Maximum allowable cost for drugs.
        45 CFR Part 76--Governmentwide debarment and suspension 
    (nonprocurement) and governmentwide requirements for drug-free 
    workplace (grants).
        45 CFR Part 80--Nondiscrimination under programs receiving Federal 
    assistance through the Department of Health and Human Service--
    Effectuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
        45 CFR Part 81--Practice and procedure for hearings under Part 80 
    of this title.
        45 CFR Part 84--Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in 
    programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial 
    assistance.
        45 CFR Part 86--Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education 
    programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial 
    assistance.
        45 CFR Part 91--Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in HHS 
    programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance.
        45 CFR Part 93--New restrictions on lobbying.
        (b) In addition to the above regulations, the following apply to 
    projects funded through grants:
        42 CFR Part 50--Policies of general applicability:
        Subpart D--Public Health Service grant appeals procedure.
        45 CFR Part 16--Procedures of the Departmental Grant Appeals Board.
        45 CFR Part 74--Administration of grants to nonprofit 
    organizations.
        45 CFR Part 75--Informal grant appeals procedures.
        45 CFR Part 92--Administration of grants to State and local 
    governments.
    * * * * *
        8. Section 51a.8 is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 51a.8  What other conditions apply to these grants?
    
        (a) Recipients of project grants will be required to submit such 
    additional information to the Secretary on an annual basis as the 
    Secretary determines, including:
        (1) the number of individuals served or trained, as appropriate 
    under the project;
        (2) a copy of any evaluation conducted by the recipient; and
        (3) a list of Healthy Children 2000 objectives addressed by the 
    project and data on how the project contributed toward meeting the 
    objectives.
        (b) The Secretary may at the time of award of project grants under 
    this Part impose additional conditions, including conditions governing 
    the use of information or consent forms, when, in the Secretary's 
    judgment, they are necessary to advance the approved program, the 
    interest of public health, or the conservation of grant funds.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-17218 Filed 7-18-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-15-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/18/1994
Published:
07/19/1994
Department:
Health Resources and Services Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-17218
Dates:
This regulation is effective August 18, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 19, 1994
RINs:
0905-AD88
CFR: (7)
42 CFR 51a.1
42 CFR 51a.3
42 CFR 51a.4
42 CFR 51a.5
42 CFR 51a.7
More ...