99-19290. Rules of Practice Governing Proceedings Under the Egg Products Inspection Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 28, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 40736-40738]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-19290]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 57
    
    [Docket No. PY-99-003]
    
    
    Rules of Practice Governing Proceedings Under the Egg Products 
    Inspection Act
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is revising its 
    regulations governing the mandatory shell egg surveillance program to 
    add that the Administrator may enter into a stipulation, prior to the 
    issuance of a complaint, with any person to resolve violation cases 
    arising under the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) or the 
    regulations, without resort to formal disciplinary proceedings. In 
    December 1998, regulations in 7 CFR part 59 administered by AMS were 
    redesignated as a new part 57. AMS is amending 7 CFR part 57 to add 
    regulations previously proposed to expedite the resolution of 
    violations under the shell egg surveillance program.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 27, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas C. Bailey, Chief, 
    Standardization Branch, 202/720-3506.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule has been determined to be not 
    significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866, and therefore, has 
    not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). In 
    addition, pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the AMS has considered 
    the economic impact of this rule on small entities and has determined 
    that its provisions would not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
    
    [[Page 40737]]
    
    businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. The Small Business 
    Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.601) defines small entities that 
    produce and process chicken eggs as those whose annual receipts are 
    less than $9,000,000. Approximately 550,000 egg laying hens are needed 
    to produce enough eggs to gross $9,000,000.
        The Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.), 
    enacted in 1970, authorizes the mandatory inspection of egg products 
    operations and the mandatory surveillance of the disposition of shell 
    eggs that are undesirable for human consumption. The EPIA regulations 
    require that shell egg handlers and hatcheries register with the United 
    States Department of Agriculture. The EPIA further authorizes 
    inspections at least once each calendar quarter of egg packers that 
    have 3,000 or more laying hens and pack eggs for the ultimate consumer. 
    There are about 700 shell egg processors registered with the Department 
    that have 3,000 or more laying hens. Of these 700 registered shell egg 
    processors, we believe approximately 500 meet the definition of a small 
    business.
        The implementing regulations for the EPIA were originally contained 
    in 7 CFR part 59. Congress added provisions for imposing civil 
    penalties for certain EPIA violations as part of the Food, Agriculture, 
    Conservation and Trade Act Amendments of 1991. To implement these 1991 
    EPIA amendments, the AMS proposed changes to 7 CFR part 59. Before AMS 
    published a final rule, however, the Department consolidated food 
    safety issues into FSIS. Egg products inspection functions in the EPIA 
    were delegated to FSIS, while shell egg surveillance functions 
    continued to be administered by AMS. In August 1998, FSIS promulgated a 
    final rule to revise the regulations in 7 CFR part 59. In December 
    1998, those portions of part 59 pertinent to shell egg surveillance 
    were redesignated as a new part 57. AMS is now revising the regulations 
    in 7 CFR part 57 to set forth procedures for resolving compliance cases 
    with civil penalties as provided in the 1991 EPIA amendments.
        These regulations provide that USDA's uniform rules of practice 
    will be applicable to formal administrative proceeding for civil 
    penalties. These regulations also set forth procedures for expediting 
    the resolution of violations before institution of formal 
    administrative proceeding under the shell egg surveillance program 
    through the use of stipulation agreements. Use of these procedures by 
    alleged violators is optional. These regulations impose no new 
    requirements on businesses.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. This 
    rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule. There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted 
    prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
    
    Background
    
        The Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) authorizes the mandatory 
    inspection of egg products operations and the mandatory surveillance of 
    the disposition of shell eggs that are undesirable for human 
    consumption. From its enactment in 1970, AMS administered the EPIA and 
    its regulations in 7 CFR part 59.
        Congress amended the EPIA as part of the Food, Agriculture, 
    Conservation and Trade Act Amendments of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-237) 
    (hereafter referred to as ``the 1991 EPIA amendments''). The 1991 EPIA 
    amendments provided that civil penalties may be imposed for certain 
    violations of the mandatory inspection regulations. These amendments 
    become effective 12 months after promulgation of final regulations (21 
    U.S.C. 1034 note).
        To implement the 1991 EPIA amendments, the AMS proposed changes to 
    7 CFR parts 56 and 59 (57 FR 48569, October 27, 1992). One proposed 
    change added that the Administrator may enter into a stipulation, prior 
    to the issuance of an administrative complaint, with any person to 
    resolve violation cases arising under the EPIA or the regulations, 
    without resorting to formal disciplinary proceedings. Before AMS 
    published a final rule, however, the Department consolidated food 
    safety issues into FSIS following enactment of the Federal Crop 
    Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 
    1994 (Pub. L. 103-354; 7 U.S.C. 2204e). This included delegating 
    responsibility for the EPIA egg products inspection functions to FSIS, 
    while the shell egg surveillance functions remained with AMS. FSIS 
    promulgated a final rule that implemented the 1991 EPIA amendments by 
    revising 7 CFR part 59 (63 FR 45663, August 27, 1998; effective August 
    27, 1999).
        To complete the Department reorganization, other regulatory changes 
    have occurred to ensure that AMS and FSIS have the appropriate 
    regulations they need to carry out their responsibilities. The AMS 
    promulgated a final rule to duplicate and redesignate those portions of 
    7 CFR part 59 pertinent to shell egg inspection as a new 7 CFR part 57 
    (63 FR 69968, December 17, 1998; effective December 18, 1998). FSIS 
    promulgated a final rule to redesignate the remaining portions of 7 CFR 
    part 59 and transfer them to 9 CFR part 590 (63 FR 72351, December 31, 
    1998; effective December 31, 1998). AMS is now revising the regulations 
    in 7 CFR part 57 to provide for the settlement of cases where civil 
    penalties apply through a stipulation procedure, before instituting a 
    formal disciplinary proceeding.
    
    Stipulation Procedure for Assessing Penalties
    
        The amended EPIA includes provisions for imposing civil penalties 
    for certain violations of the mandatory inspection regulations. These 
    penalty provisions are applicable to the egg and egg products 
    inspection programs, with the exception of violations occurring in 
    official egg products plants and violations for which criminal 
    penalties have already been imposed. The Secretary of Agriculture has 
    the authority under the Act to impose civil penalties through formal 
    administrative proceedings. However, these regulations permit the AMS 
    Administrator, prior to initiating a formal administrative proceeding, 
    to enter into a written agreement or stipulation with a violator who 
    agrees to waive a hearing and pay a civil penalty.
        Under these stipulation procedures, the AMS Administrator would 
    give the violator notice of the alleged violation and an opportunity 
    for a hearing. The violator would have the option to waive the hearing 
    and agree to pay a specified civil penalty within a prescribed period 
    of time. In turn, the Administrator would agree to accept the civil 
    penalty in settlement of the particular matter involved if the penalty 
    is paid within the specified time. If, however, the violator does not 
    pay the civil penalty within that period of time, the Department would 
    institute a formal administrative proceeding. A civil penalty offered 
    in a stipulation would have no bearing on the civil penalty that the 
    Department might seek in a formal administrative proceeding.
        A formal disciplinary proceeding can take a relatively long period 
    of time to resolve, and can be costly for both the Department and the 
    violator. The Department is implementing the use of stipulation 
    agreements, where appropriate, to improve compliance with the EPIA. 
    Accordingly, AMS is amending the regulations by adding a
    
    [[Page 40738]]
    
    subpart on stipulation procedures. This procedure would enable AMS to 
    better enforce the Act and regulations by expediting the resolution of 
    compliance cases.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 57
    
        Eggs and egg products, Exports, Food grades and standards, Food 
    labeling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        For reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 57 is amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 57--INSPECTION OF EGGS (EGG PRODUCTS INSPECTION ACT)
    
        1. The authority citation for part 57 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 1031-1056.
    
        2. Sections 57.1 through 57.970 are designated as subpart A and the 
    heading of subpart A is added to read as follows:
    
    Subpart A--Regulations Governing the Inspection of Eggs
    
    * * * * *
        3. A new subpart B is added to read as follows:
    
    Subpart B--Rules of Practice Governing Proceedings Under the Egg 
    Products Inspection Act
    
    Scope and Applicability of Rules of Practice
    
    
    Sec. 57.1000  Administrative proceedings.
    
        (a) The Uniform Rules of Practice for the Department of Agriculture 
    promulgated in subpart H of part 1, subtitle A, title 7, Code of 
    Federal Regulations, are the Rules of Practice applicable to 
    adjudicating administrative proceedings under section 12(c) of the Egg 
    Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1041).
        (b) In addition to the proceedings set forth in paragraph (a) of 
    this section, the Administrator, in his discretion, at any time prior 
    to the issuance of a complaint seeking a civil penalty under the Act 
    may enter into a stipulation with any person, in accordance with the 
    following prescribed conditions:
        (1) The Administrator gives notice of an apparent violation of the 
    Act or the regulations issued thereunder by such person and affords 
    such person an opportunity for a hearing regarding the matter as 
    provided by the Act;
        (2) Such person expressly waives hearing and agrees to a specified 
    order including an agreement to pay a specified civil penalty within a 
    designated time; and
        (3) The Administrator agrees to accept the specified civil penalty 
    in settlement of the particular matter involved if it is paid within 
    the designated time.
        (4) If the specified penalty is not paid within the time designated 
    in such stipulation, the amount of the stipulated penalty shall not be 
    relevant in any respect to the penalty that may be assessed after the 
    institution of a formal administrative proceeding pursuant to the 
    Uniform Rules of Practice, Subpart H, Part 1, Title 7, Code of Federal 
    Regulations.
    
        Dated: July 22, 1999.
    Kenneth C. Clayton,
    Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-19290 Filed 7-27-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/27/1999
Published:
07/28/1999
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-19290
Dates:
August 27, 1999.
Pages:
40736-40738 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. PY-99-003
PDF File:
99-19290.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 57.1000