99-19353. Melons Grown in South Texas; Change in Container Regulation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 145 (Thursday, July 29, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 41019-41023]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-19353]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 979
    
    [Docket No. FV99-979-1 FIR]
    
    
    Melons Grown in South Texas; Change in Container Regulation
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting, as a 
    final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    changing the handling regulation currently prescribed under the South 
    Texas melon (cantaloupes and honeydews) marketing order. The marketing 
    order regulates the handling of melons grown in South Texas and is 
    administered locally by the South Texas Melon Committee (committee). 
    This rule continues in effect changes to the dimensions of bulk 
    containers used for shipping honeydew melons, requirements that these 
    containers be octagonal or rectangular in shape, and the addition of a 
    dimension tolerance for that container. It also continues the 
    provisions allowing the committee to approve the use of experimental 
    containers and melon shipments for experimental purposes, and the 
    removal of two experimental containers that have not been used by the 
    industry for several years. These changes were unanimously recommended 
    by the committee and will enable handlers to compete more effectively 
    in the marketplace.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 30, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Belinda G. Garza, McAllen Marketing 
    Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, 
    1313 E. Hackberry, McAllen, Texas 78501; telephone; (956) 682-2833, 
    Fax: (956) 682-5942; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing 
    Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 
    PO Box 96456, room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 
    720-2491; Fax: (202) 720-5698. Small businesses may request information 
    on complying with this regulation, or obtain a guide on complying with 
    fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders by 
    contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, PO Box 96456, Room 2525-S, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-
    5698, or E-mail:
    
    [[Page 41020]]
    
    Jay.Guerber@usda.gov. You may also view the marketing agreement and 
    order small business compliance guide at the following web site: http:/
    /www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement No. 156 and Order No. 979 (7 CFR part 979), regulating the 
    handling of melons grown in South Texas, hereinafter referred to as the 
    ``order.'' The marketing agreement and order are effective under the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
    674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive 
    Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988 Civil 
    Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 
    days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        This rule continues in effect changes to the dimensions of bulk 
    containers used for shipping honeydew melons, specifications for the 
    shapes of these bulk containers, the addition of a dimension tolerance 
    for that container, the addition of procedures that allow the committee 
    to approve the use of experimental containers and melon shipments for 
    experimental purposes, and the removal of two experimental containers 
    that have not been used by the industry for several years. The changes 
    will enable handlers to compete more effectively in the marketplace, 
    better meet market needs, and prevent confusion in the industry. A 
    subcommittee met on January 28, 1999, and unanimously recommended that 
    the committee approve these changes to the regulation. The committee 
    met and unanimously recommended the changes on March 30, 1999.
        Section 979.52 authorizes the issuance of regulations for grade, 
    size, maturity, quality, and pack of any or all varieties of melons 
    during any period. Section 979.54 authorizes the issuance of 
    regulations that modify, suspend, or terminate requirements issued 
    under Secs. 979.42, 979.52, or 979.60 to facilitate the handling of 
    melons for special purposes. Section 979.55 requires adequate 
    safeguards to ensure that melons handled under Sec. 979.54 are used for 
    the stated purposes.
    
    Changes to the Bulk Container Requirements for Honeydew Melons
    
        Section 979.304 of the order's rules and regulations sets container 
    requirements for both cantaloupes and honeydew melons. Only honeydews 
    are authorized to be packed in bulk containers. Thus, these changes to 
    bulk container requirements do not apply to cantaloupes.
        Prior to the issuance of the interim final rule, Sec. 979.304(b)(4) 
    authorized the use of a bulk container for honeydew melons and 
    specified that the container be 48 inches long by 40 inches wide by 24 
    inches deep or similar dimensions. The phrase ``or similar dimensions'' 
    was included to provide flexibility recognizing that the dimensions of 
    containers sometimes are a little less or more than those specified in 
    the regulation. The committee determined that the provisions were too 
    flexible, and that the lack of specificity could result in 
    administrative, compliance, and enforcement problems.
        It now believes that a more precise tolerance is needed so there is 
    no room for misinterpretation by the industry. The committee, 
    therefore, recommended removing the phrase ``or similar dimensions'' 
    and adding in its place provisions establishing a dimension tolerance 
    of 1\1/2\ inch for each dimension. The 1\1/2\ inch tolerance for each 
    dimension for this container will allow handlers to pack honeydew 
    melons in containers with dimensions slightly different from the sizes 
    specified in the regulation. Identifying a specific dimension tolerance 
    in the regulation will prevent misunderstandings, and provide handlers 
    the flexibility to use bulk containers with slight dimension variations 
    when packing honeydew melons.
        The committee also recommended allowing the depth of the bulk 
    container to range between 24 and 36 inches to permit melon handlers to 
    pack larger or a greater number of honeydew melons in the container, if 
    they desire. The industry's need to pack larger or a greater number of 
    honeydews in the bulk container, depending on buyer or retailer needs, 
    led to this committee recommendation for increased container 
    flexibility.
        The committee further recommended that the shape of bulk containers 
    used for honeydew melons be rectangular or octagonal. Currently, these 
    are the only shapes used by handlers, and the limitation will not 
    impose an added burden on handlers. The change is expected to foster 
    compliance and simplify enforcement. Last season a total of 1,727 bulk 
    containers were shipped by the industry, compared to 1,655 containers 
    in 1997. Demand for bulk containers has increased in recent years 
    because their use results in reduced costs to receivers. Bulk bins can 
    be re-used, whereas other containers cannot. The cost of disposing of 
    used containers has increased.
    
    Addition of Provisions Allowing the Committee To Approve the Use of 
    Experimental Containers and Melon Shipments for Experimental 
    Purposes
    
        The market for both cantaloupes and honeydew melons continues to 
    undergo rapid changes. Buyers, retailers, and consumers continually 
    demand flexibility in container availability. The committee is always 
    looking for ways to strengthen and expand the market for melons. Except 
    for an experimental honeydew pony carton that was removed by the 
    interim final rule, there were no provisions in place allowing the 
    committee to approve melon shipments for experimental purposes nor in 
    experimental containers unless informal rulemaking was initiated. There 
    are times during the melon shipping season when the trade is interested 
    in receiving melons in containers other than those authorized by the 
    regulations. The industry has been using only fiberboard containers, 
    and they are interested in experimenting with plastic bins.
        Not being able to respond quickly to market demands for testing 
    different types of melon containers could have caused the South Texas 
    melon industry to lose sales to competing melon-producing areas. 
    Competition from other melon production areas demands that the Texas 
    melon industry have the ability to quickly respond to buyer, retailer, 
    and consumer demands for new containers. The committee may become aware 
    of the need for new containers during the shipping season. The shipping 
    season normally runs from
    
    [[Page 41021]]
    
    May 1 through June 20 each year. For the committee to respond quickly 
    to market needs for containers, it should have flexibility to approve 
    the use of experimental containers whenever the need arises. Also, 
    melon-producing areas without marketing orders are not bound by 
    container restrictions and have the flexibility to use different types 
    and sizes of containers as needed by consumers and retailers. The added 
    flexibility allows handlers to better meet buyers' needs.
        In addition, the committee recommended that provisions be added to 
    the regulations to permit it to approve shipments for experimental 
    purposes to allow the industry to test different types of melon 
    shipments whenever needed to meet competition from other growing areas, 
    and buyers' needs. Some handlers have expressed an interest in 
    experimenting with the shipment of cantaloupe and honeydew melons in 
    the same container.
        Establishing provisions in the regulations to allow the committee 
    to approve the use of experimental containers will allow the industry 
    to respond quickly to market needs for containers not approved under 
    the order's container regulations. Establishing provisions in the 
    regulations to allow the committee to approve shipments for 
    experimental purposes will allow the industry to test different types 
    of melon shipments when needed.
        Safeguards for these types of shipments are currently specified in 
    paragraph (f) of Sec. 979.304. A handler wanting an exemption for an 
    experimental container or experimental use would apply to the committee 
    for a Certificate of Privilege. The Certificate would be issued by the 
    committee after consideration of the application. Handlers using a 
    Certificate of Privilege are required to report each exempt shipment to 
    the committee. This enables the committee to easily track such 
    shipments, and ensure compliance with the order's rules and 
    regulations.
        Once the committee approves the use of experimental containers or 
    experimental shipments, the industry will be able to determine the 
    benefits and market acceptance of the containers and other types of 
    shipments. Also, allowing handlers to ship melons in test containers 
    enables the committee to determine whether such containers should be 
    added to the permanent list of approved containers in the regulations.
    
    Removal of Two Experimental Containers
    
        An experimental honeydew pony carton added in 1985 to paragraph 
    (e)(3) and a cantaloupe carton added in 1990 to paragraph (e)(4) in 
    Sec. 979.304 have not been used for several years. The committee, 
    therefore, recommended that they be removed from the handling 
    regulation.
    
    Other Changes in the Regulations
    
        Prior to the issuance of the interim final rule, the name of one of 
    the designated inspection offices and the telephone area codes of the 
    designated inspection offices in Sec. 979.304(c)(4) were incorrect. To 
    correct these references, the committee recommended that the name of 
    the inspection office be changed to ``Texas Cooperative Inspection 
    Program'' office and the telephone area codes be changed from ``210'' 
    to ``956.''
        In addition, in Sec. 979.180 and Sec. 979.304, the word 
    ``cantaloup'' was misspelled. To correct the misspelling, all 
    references to ``cantaloup'' were changed to ``cantaloupe'' by the 
    interim final rule.
    
    Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
    prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are 14 handlers of South Texas melons who are subject to 
    regulation under the marketing order and approximately 33 melon growers 
    in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms have been 
    defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those 
    having annual receipts of less than $5,000,000, and small agricultural 
    growers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than 
    $500,000.
        Most of the handlers are vertically integrated corporations 
    involved in producing, shipping, and marketing melons. For the 1997-98 
    marketing year, 6,770 acres of production were shipped by the 
    industry's 14 handlers; the average acreage and median acreage handled 
    totaled 484 acres and 417 acres, respectively. In terms of production 
    value, total revenues from the 14 handlers were estimated to be $16.4 
    million.
        The Rio Grande Valley melon industry is characterized by growers 
    and handlers whose farming operations generally involve more than one 
    commodity, and whose income from farming operations is not exclusively 
    dependent on the production of melons. Alternative crops provide an 
    opportunity to utilize many of the same facilities and equipment not in 
    use when the melon production season is complete. For this reason, 
    typical melon growers and handlers either double-crop melons during 
    other times of the year or produce alternate commodities, like onions.
        Based on the SBA's definition of small entities, the committee 
    estimates that a majority of the 14 handlers regulated by the order 
    would be considered small entities if only their spring melon revenues 
    are considered. However, revenues from other productive enterprises 
    would likely push a large number of these handlers above the $5,000,000 
    annual receipt threshold. Of the 33 growers within the production area, 
    few have sufficient acreage to generate sales in excess of $500,000; 
    therefore, the majority of growers may be classified as small entities.
        This rule continues the changes to the container regulation to 
    accurately identify the shapes and dimensions of bulk containers 
    handlers use for shipping honeydew melons, the addition of procedures 
    allowing the committee to approve use of experimental containers and 
    melon shipments for experimental purposes, the removal of two 
    experimental containers that have not been used by the industry for 
    several years, and several minor modifications to update the 
    regulations. These changes will enable handlers to compete more 
    effectively in the marketplace, better meet market needs, and prevent 
    confusion. A subcommittee met on January 28, 1999, and unanimously 
    recommended that the committee approve these changes to the regulation. 
    The committee met and unanimously recommended the changes on March 30, 
    1999.
        Section 979.52 authorizes the issuance of regulations for grade, 
    size, maturity, quality, and pack for any or all varieties of melons 
    during any period. Section 979.54 authorizes the issuance of 
    regulations that modify, suspend, or
    
    [[Page 41022]]
    
    terminate requirements issued under Secs. 979.42, 979.52, or 979.60 to 
    facilitate handling of melons for special purposes. Section 979.55 
    requries adequate safeguards to ensure that melons handled under 
    Sec. 979.54 are used for the stated purpose.
        At its meeting on March 30, 1999, the committee unanimously 
    recommended revising Sec. 979.304 as follows:
        (1) Modify the bulk container requirements to accurately identify 
    the shapes and dimensions of bulk containers used for shipping honeydew 
    melons;
        (2) Add provisions to allow the committee to approve the use of 
    experimental containers and melon shipments for experimental purposes;
        (3) Remove two experimental containers that have not been used by 
    the industry for several years; and
        (4) Make several minor modifications to update the regulations.
    
    Changes in the Bulk Container Requirements for Honeydew Melons
    
        Prior to the issuance of the interim final rule, Sec. 979.304(b)(4) 
    authorized the use of a bulk container for honeydew melons and 
    specified that the container be 48 inches long by 40 inches wide by 24 
    inches deep or similar dimensions. The committee recommended that the 
    regulation specify that the bulk containers be rectangular or 
    octagonal, the types of containers currently being used by the 
    industry, in order to help administer the program. Making the 
    regulation more specific will foster compliance and simplify 
    enforcement. Last season 1,727 of these bulk containers were shipped by 
    the industry. Specifying the shape of the bulk container in the 
    regulation cleared up any misunderstanding that any shape bulk 
    container could be used for shipping honeydew melons.
        The former regulation did not provide specific tolerances on the 
    container dimensions, and the committee did not know exactly how 
    ``similar dimensions'' was being interpreted. Differences in 
    interpretation among handlers and the industry regarding the phrase 
    ``or similar dimensions'' could have caused problems enforcing the 
    marketing order program. A more precise tolerance was needed so that 
    there was no room for misinterpretation by the industry. To clarify the 
    industry's intentions, the committee recommended removing the phrase 
    ``or similar dimensions'' and adding in its place, ``A tolerance of 
    1\1/2\ inch for each dimension shall be permitted.'' The committee 
    believes the recommendation to provide a 1\1/2\ inch tolerance for each 
    dimension on this container has provided handlers some flexibility to 
    pack honeydew melons in containers with slightly different dimensions 
    from the sizes specified in the regulation. Identifying specific 
    dimension tolerances in the regulation also has prevented possible 
    misunderstandings on authorized container dimensions.
        The committee also recommended increasing the depth allowance of 
    the bulk container by 12 inches to permit melon handlers to pack larger 
    or a greater number of honeydew melons in the container.
        Adding tolerances to the dimensions of the approved bulk container 
    and increasing the depth allowance has allowed the melon industry to 
    accept containers with slight dimension variations from box 
    manufacturers. This has given handlers additional flexibility in making 
    container purchases.
        The industry's need to pack larger or a greater number of honeydews 
    in the bulk container, depending on buyer or retailer needs, led to the 
    committee's recommendation to increase the depth allowance of the 
    container by an additional 12 inches to permit a range from 24 to 36 
    inches deep.
    
    Addition of Provisions Allowing the Committee To Approve the Use of 
    Experimental Containers and Melon Shipments for Experimental 
    Purposes
    
        The marketplace continues to undergo rapid changes. Buyers, 
    retailers, and consumers continually demand flexibility in container 
    availability. The committee is always looking for ways to strengthen 
    and expand the market for melons. Except for an experimental honeydew 
    pony carton provision that was removed by the interim final rule, there 
    were no procedures in place to allow the committee to approve melon 
    shipments for experimental purposes nor in experimental containers 
    unless they initiated informal rulemaking. There are times during the 
    melon shipping season when the trade is interested in receiving melons 
    in containers other than those authorized by the regulations. The 
    industry has been using only fiberboard containers, and they are 
    interested in experimenting with plastic bins. The committee did not 
    have the flexibility to react quickly to the need for containers not 
    approved for South Texas melon shipments. Not being able to respond 
    quickly to market demands for testing different types of melon 
    containers could have caused the South Texas melon industry to lose 
    sales to competing melon-producing areas.
        Competition from other melon production areas demands that the 
    Texas melon industry be able to quickly respond to buyer, retailer, and 
    consumer demands for new containers. Because the melon regulatory 
    period begins May 1 each year and runs through June 20, the committee 
    is not able to meet, approve regulatory changes, and promptly complete 
    the rulemaking process in order to approve various types of 
    experimental containers. The industry may not be aware of the need for 
    new containers until it is in the middle of its shipping season. For 
    the committee to respond quickly to market needs for containers which 
    were not currently authorized, it needed the flexibility to approve the 
    use of experimental containers whenever the need arose. Also, melon-
    producing areas without marketing orders are not bound by container 
    restrictions and have the flexibility to use different types and sizes 
    of containers as needed by consumers and retailers. The added 
    flexibility will allow handlers to meet the competition from other 
    areas and better meet buyers' needs. In addition, the committee 
    recommended that provisions be added to the regulations to permit it to 
    approve shipments for experimental purposes to allow the industry to 
    test different types of melon shipments whenever needed. As mentioned 
    before, some handlers have expressed an interest in experimenting with 
    the shipment of cantaloupes and honeydew melons in the same container.
        Establishing provisions to allow the committee to approve the use 
    of experimental containers will allow the industry to respond quickly 
    to market needs for containers not approved under the orders's 
    container regulations, and establishing provisions to authorize the 
    committee to approve shipments for experimental purposes will allow the 
    industry to test different types of melon shipments when needed. 
    Because the committee has established safeguard for these types of 
    experimental containers or experimental shipments, the industry will be 
    able to determine the benefits and market acceptance of the containers 
    or other types of shipments. Also, allowing handlers to ship melons in 
    test containers will enable the committee to determine whether such 
    containers should be added to the permanent list of approved 
    containers.
    
    Removal of Two Experimental Containers
    
        Two experimental containers in (e)(3) (a honeydew pony carton added 
    in 1985) and (e)(4) (a cantaloupe carton added in 1990) of Sec. 979.304 
    are obsolete and have not been used for several years, and the 
    committee recommended that they be removed from the handling
    
    [[Page 41023]]
    
    regulation. The interim final rule removed these containers from the 
    regulation.
    
    Other Changes in the Regulations
    
        Prior to the interim final rule, the name and telephone area codes 
    of an inspection office in Sec. 979.304(c)(4) were incorrect. To 
    correct these references, the committee recommended that the name of 
    the inspection office be changed to ``Texas Cooperative Inspection 
    Program'' office and the telephone area codes be changed from ``210'' 
    to ``956.''
        In Marketing Order No. 979 the correct spelling of ``cantaloupe'' 
    is used, and in Secs. 979.180 and 979.304, ``cantaloup'' was 
    misspelled. To correct the misspelling and for consistency, all 
    references to ``cantaloup'' were changed to ``cantaloupe'' by the 
    interim final rule.
        This rule will continue to permit the South Texas melon industry to 
    experiment with different types of containers prior to adding them to 
    their approved container list. The committee believes this will allow 
    handlers to more effectively accommodate retailer and customer needs.
        The committee recommended these changes to assist the consuming 
    public in receiving Texas melons in containers they desire. Permitting 
    the South Texas melon industry to experiment with different types of 
    containers without the need for rulemaking and adding tolerance to the 
    approved honeydew bulk container have small entity orientation.
        An alternative to the recommended changes would have been to keep 
    the regulations as they are, however:
        (1) It was the committee's desire to come up with a more workable 
    bulk honeydew container regulation to make it more precise and 
    eliminate potential problems. Not permitting a 1\1/2\ inch tolerance 
    for each dimension on the bulk container could have prevented the 
    industry from marketing honeydew melons in containers which might be 
    manufactured slightly different from the sizes specified in the 
    regulation.
        (2) Not permitting the committee to quickly approve shipments for 
    experimental purposes exempt from regulations or in experimental 
    containers without rulemaking could have hindered the industry's 
    ability to respond to market needs and prevented it from marketing more 
    melons. Not providing the committee the flexibility to quickly respond 
    to market demands for test containers or shipments could have resulted 
    in the industry losing sales to other melon producing areas.
        (3) The two permanent experimental containers were no longer needed 
    because the containers have not been used for a number of years, and a 
    new section was added to make it possible for the committee to quickly 
    approve the use of experimental containers.
        (4) Not updating the name and telephone numbers of the inspection 
    office to accurately reflect the correct information could have caused 
    confusion in the industry.
        Although authorizing melon shipments for experimental purposes and 
    the use of experimental containers will impose some additional 
    reporting and recordkeeping requirements on melon handlers, this will 
    be minimal. Currently, handlers making shipments of melons for special 
    purposes, including experimental, are required to obtain a Certificate 
    of Privilege to notify the committee of their intent to ship melons for 
    these purposes. Also, handlers must prepare a special purpose shipment 
    report on each shipment and forward it to the committee. The committee 
    estimates that approximately two or four handlers might request 
    approval for the use of experimental containers, which will increase 
    the total reporting and recordkeeping burden by approximately .1 to .2 
    hours, and this time to currently approved under OMB No. 0581-0178 by 
    the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
        As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are 
    periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
    duplication by industry and public sectors. In addition, as noted in 
    the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, the Department has not 
    identified any relevant Federal rules and duplicate, overlap or 
    conflict with this rule.
        Further, the committee's meeting was publicized throughout the 
    melon industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the 
    meeting and participate in committee deliberations. Like all committee 
    meetings, the March 30, 1999, meeting was a public meeting and all 
    entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on 
    this issue. The committee itself is composed of 10 members, of which 9 
    are growers and handlers, and one represents the public. Also, the 
    committee has a subcommittee to review certain issues and make 
    recommendations to the committee. The subcommittee met on January 28, 
    1999, and discussed this issue in detail. The meeting was a public 
    meeting and both large and small entities were able to participate and 
    express their views.
        An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the 
    Federal Register on May 4, 1999. Copies of the rule were mailed by the 
    committee's staff to all committee members and melon handlers. In 
    addition, the rule was made available through the Internet by the 
    Office of the Federal Register. That rule provided for a 60-day comment 
    period which ended July 6, 1999. No comments were received.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that 
    finalizing an interim final rule, without change, was published in the 
    Federal Register (64 FR 23754, May 4, 1999) will tend to effectuate the 
    declared policy of the Act.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
    
        Marketing agreements, Melons, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    PART 979--MELONS GROWN IN SOUTH TEXAS
    
        Accordingly, the intermin final rule amending 7 CFR part 979 which 
    was published at 64 FR 23754 on May 4, 1999, is adopted as a final rule 
    without change.
    
        Dated: July 23, 1999.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 99-19353 Filed 7-28-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/30/1999
Published:
07/29/1999
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-19353
Dates:
August 30, 1999.
Pages:
41019-41023 (5 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV99-979-1 FIR
PDF File:
99-19353.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 979.54
7 CFR 979.304