95-16240. Minimum Security Devices and Procedures, Reports of Crimes and Suspected Crimes, and Bank Secrecy Act Compliance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 127 (Monday, July 3, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 34476-34481]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-16240]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    
    Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
    
    12 CFR Part 21
    
    [Docket No. 95-14]
    RIN 1557-AB19
    
    
    Minimum Security Devices and Procedures, Reports of Crimes and 
    Suspected Crimes, and Bank Secrecy Act Compliance
    
    AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 34477]]
    
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), as part 
    of its Regulation Review Program, is proposing to revise its regulation 
    on minimum security devices and procedures for banks, reports of crimes 
    and suspected crimes, and Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance. This 
    proposal implements a new interagency suspicious activity referral 
    process and updates and clarifies various portions of the underlying 
    reporting regulation. The proposal also reduces substantially the 
    burden on banks in reporting suspicious activities while enhancing 
    access to such information by the Federal law enforcement agencies, the 
    Federal financial institutions supervisory agencies, and Treasury.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by September 1, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Communications Division, Office 
    of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 
    20219, Attention Docket No. 95-14; or FAX number 202-874-5274. Comments 
    will be available for public inspection and photocopying at the same 
    location.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert S. Pasley, Assistant Director, 
    or Neil M. Robinson, Senior Attorney, Enforcement and Compliance 
    Division, (202/874-4800), or Daniel Cooke, Attorney, Legislative and 
    Regulatory Activities Division (202/874-5090).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The Federal financial institutions supervisory agencies (the 
    Agencies) 1 and the Department of the Treasury 2 (Treasury) 
    are responsible for ensuring that financial institutions apprise 
    Federal law enforcement authorities of any known or suspected violation 
    of a Federal criminal statute and of any suspicious financial 
    transaction. Suspicious financial transactions, which will be the 
    subject of regulations and other guidance to be issued by Treasury, can 
    include transactions that the bank suspects involve funds derived from 
    illicit activities, were conducted for the purpose of hiding or 
    disguising funds from illicit activity, otherwise violated the money 
    laundering statutes (18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957), were potentially 
    designed to evade the reporting or recordkeeping requirements of the 
    BSA (31 U.S.C. 5311 through 5330), and transactions that the bank 
    believes were suspicious for any other reason.
    
        \1\ The Federal financial institutions supervisory agencies are 
    the OCC, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Board of Governors of 
    the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance 
    Corporation, and the National Credit Union Administration.
        \2\ Through its Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Fraud, abusive insider transactions, check kiting schemes, money 
    laundering, and other crimes can pose serious threats to a financial 
    institution's continued viability and, if unchecked, can undermine the 
    public confidence in the nation's financial industry. The Agencies and 
    Federal law enforcement agencies need to receive timely and detailed 
    information regarding suspected criminal activity to determine whether 
    investigations, administrative actions, or criminal prosecutions are 
    warranted.
        An interagency Bank Fraud Working Group (BFWG), consisting of 
    representatives from many Federal agencies, including the Agencies and 
    law enforcement agencies, was formed in 1984. The BFWG addresses 
    substantive issues, promotes cooperation among the Agencies and Federal 
    and State law enforcement agencies, and improves the Federal 
    government's response to white collar crime in financial institutions. 
    It is under the auspices of the BFWG that the revisions to this 
    regulation and the reporting requirements are being made.
    
    Suspicious Activity Report
    
        The Agencies have been working on a project to improve the criminal 
    referral process, to reduce unnecessary reporting burdens on banks, and 
    to eliminate confusion associated with the current duplicative 
    reporting of suspicious financial transactions in criminal referral 
    forms and currency transaction reports (CTRs). Contemporaneously, 
    Treasury analyzed the need to implement the procedures for reporting 
    suspicious financial transactions by banks following the enactment of 
    the Annuzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act of 1992. As a result of 
    these reviews, the Agencies and Treasury approved the development of a 
    new referral process that includes suspicious financial transaction 
    reporting.
        To implement the reporting process, and to reduce unnecessary 
    burdens associated with these various reporting requirements, the 
    Agencies and FinCEN developed a new report form for reporting known or 
    suspected Federal criminal law violations and suspicious financial 
    transactions. The new form is designated the Suspicious Activity Report 
    (SAR). The SAR is a simplified and shortened version of its 
    predecessors. The new referral process and the SAR reduce the burden on 
    national banks for reporting known or suspected violations and 
    suspicious financial transactions. The Agencies anticipate that the new 
    process will be operational by October 1995.
    Proposal
    
        The OCC proposes to revise 12 CFR part 21 as part of its Regulation 
    Review Program by updating and clarifying the current rule governing 
    the filing of criminal referral reports, expanding the rule to cover 
    suspicious financial transactions, implementing the new SAR, and 
    eliminating current confusing and overly burdensome reporting 
    requirements. This action should improve reporting of known or 
    suspected violations and suspicious financial transactions relating to 
    Federally insured financial institutions while providing uniform data 
    for entry into the new interagency computer database. The OCC expects 
    that each of the other Agencies will be making substantially similar 
    changes contemporaneously.
    
    Subpart B--Suspicious Activity Reports
    
        The principal proposed changes to the OCC's current criminal 
    referral reporting rules are discussed below in the summary of the 
    proposed rule's paragraphs. Of particular note are the following: (1) 
    Raising the mandatory reporting thresholds for criminal offenses, 
    thereby reducing unnecessary reporting burdens; (2) filing only one 
    form with a single repository, rather than submitting multiple copies 
    with several Federal law enforcement and the Agencies, thereby further 
    reducing reporting burdens; and (3) melding the criminal referral and 
    suspicious financial transactions reporting requirements of the 
    Agencies and Treasury into one uniform reporting system, thereby 
    eliminating duplicative referrals.
        The subpart heading has been changed to conform to the name on the 
    SAR. The current subpart is titled ``Reports of Crimes and Suspected 
    Crimes.'' The proposed subpart heading, ``Suspicious Activity 
    Reports,'' conforms to the name of the report.
    
    Section 21.11(a)  Purpose and Scope
    
        The proposal clarifies the scope of the current rule. Under the 
    proposal, the SAR replaces the various criminal referral forms that the 
    Agencies currently require banks to file; and a bank also will file a 
    SAR instead of a CTR to report a suspicious financial 
    transaction.3
    
        \3\  The BSA requires all financial institutions to file CTRs in 
    accordance with the Department of the Treasury's implementing 
    regulations (31 CFR part 103). Part 103 requires a national bank to 
    file a CTR whenever a currency transaction exceeds $10,000. If a 
    currency transaction exceeds $10,000 and is suspicious, the bank, 
    under these new requirements, will file both a CTR (reporting the 
    currency transaction) and a SAR (reporting the suspicious criminal 
    aspect of the transaction). If a currency transaction equals or is 
    below $10,000 but is suspicious, the bank will only file a SAR. 
    
    [[Page 34478]]
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Combining suspicious financial transaction reporting and criminal 
    referral reporting should reduce confusion, increase the accuracy and 
    efficiency of reporting, and reduce the burden on banks in reporting 
    known or suspected violations, including suspicious financial 
    transactions.
    
    Section 21.11(b)  Definitions
    
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(b) defines the following terms: ``FinCEN,'' 
    ``institution-affiliated party,'' ``instructions,'' ``known or 
    suspected violation,'' and ``SAR.'' The definitions should make the 
    rule easier to interpret and apply.
        In particular, the definition of a ``known or suspected violation'' 
    refers to any matter for which a national bank has a basis to believe 
    that a violation of any Federal criminal statute has occurred, has been 
    attempted, is occurring, or may occur, coupled with a basis to believe 
    that a national bank was an actual or potential victim of the criminal 
    violation, involved in, or used to facilitate the criminal violation. 
    The definition supplants current Sec. 21.11(i), which explains the term 
    ``suspected.''
    
    Section 21.11(c)  Reports Required
    
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(c), which replaces current Sec. 21.11(b), 
    clarifies and expands the provision that requires a bank to file a 
    completed SAR. This provision raises the dollar thresholds that trigger 
    a filing requirement. It also modifies the scope of events that a 
    national bank must report by using the new term ``known, or suspected 
    violation,'' which is defined at Sec. 21.11(b)(4), and by requiring 
    that a national bank file a SAR to report a suspicious financial 
    transaction.
        Under the current rule, the OCC requires a bank to file a criminal 
    referral form with many different Federal agencies. The proposal, which 
    replaces all other requirements for filing criminal referrals and 
    suspicious financial transactions, requires a bank to file only a 
    single SAR at one location, rather than the multiple copies of the 
    criminal referral form that must now be filed with various Federal 
    agencies.
        Under proposed Sec. 21.11(c), a national bank effectively files a 
    SAR with all appropriate Federal law enforcement agencies by sending a 
    single copy of the SAR to FinCEN, whose address will be printed on the 
    SAR.
        FinCEN will input the information contained on the SARs into a 
    newly created database that FinCEN will maintain. This process meets 
    the regulatory requirement that a bank refer any known or suspected 
    criminal violation to the various Federal law enforcement agencies. The 
    database will enhance Federal law enforcement and supervisory agencies' 
    ability to track, investigate, and prosecute individuals suspected of 
    violating Federal criminal law.
        This change ensures that all SARs are placed in the database at 
    FinCEN and that the information is made available on computer to the 
    appropriate law enforcement and supervisory agencies as quickly as 
    possible. This change will reduce the filing burdens of national banks.
        The proposal removes Sec. 21.11(b)(1), which now requires national 
    banks to report any mysterious disappearance or unexplained shortage of 
    bank funds, because it would be redundant in light of proposed 
    Sec. 21.11(c)(3). In instances where criminal activity is suspected in 
    connection with any disappearance or shortage of bank funds, 
    Sec. 21.11(c)(3) requires a national bank to file a SAR.
        The proposal modifies current Sec. 21.11(b)(2), which requires 
    reporting of known or suspected criminal activity involving bank 
    insiders. The proposal replaces current Sec. 21.11(b)(2) with 
    21.11(c)(1) and describes suspects who are bank personnel more 
    precisely. Specifically, the proposal replaces ``responsible bank 
    personnel'' with ``directors, officers, employees, agents, or other 
    institution-affiliated parties.'' The proposal, however, does not 
    change the requirement that a bank file a SAR, regardless of the dollar 
    amount involved, whenever it has a substantial basis for believing that 
    a bank insider has violated a Federal criminal statute.
        The proposal modifies current Sec. 21.11(b)(3), which requires 
    reporting of known or suspected criminal activity when a bank has a 
    substantial basis for identifying a non-insider suspect where bank 
    funds or other assets involve or aggregate $1,000 or more. Proposed 
    Sec. 21.11(c)(2), which replaces current Sec. 21.11(b)(3), raises the 
    reporting threshold to $5,000.
        The proposal also modifies current Sec. 21.11(b)(4), which requires 
    banks to report any known or suspected criminal violation involving 
    $5,000 or more where the bank has no substantial basis for identifying 
    a suspect. Specifically, proposed Sec. 21.11(c)(3), which replaces 
    current Sec. 21.11(b)(4), raises the dollar reporting threshold from 
    $5,000 to $25,000.
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(c)(4) requires a national bank to report any 
    financial transaction, regardless of the dollar amount, that: (1) the 
    bank suspects involved funds derived from illicit activity, was 
    conducted for the purpose of hiding or disguising funds from illicit 
    activity, or in any way violated the money laundering statutes (18 
    U.S.C. 1956 and 1957); (2) the bank suspects was potentially designed 
    to evade the reporting or recordkeeping requirements of the BSA (31 
    U.S.C. 5311 through 5330); or (3) the bank believes to be suspicious 
    for any reason.
    
    Section 21.11(d)  Time for Reporting
    
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(d), which replaces current Sec. 21.11(c), sets 
    forth the time requirements a bank must meet when filing a SAR. The 
    proposal does not substantively change the current requirements.
        Under current Sec. 21.11(e), ``Manner of Reporting,'' a bank may 
    file the appropriate criminal referral form in several ways, including 
    submitting a photocopy or facsimile of the appropriate form. Under the 
    proposal, a bank may file a SAR by photocopy and also by magnetic 
    means, such as by a computer disk. However, FinCEN will not be able to 
    receive SARs by facsimile machine. In the future, the OCC anticipates 
    that a bank will be able to file a SAR electronically.
        The Agencies, working with FinCEN, are developing computer software 
    to assist banks in preparing and filing SARs. The software will allow a 
    bank to complete a SAR, to save the SAR on its computers, and to print 
    a hard copy of the SAR for its own records. The computer software will 
    also enable a bank to file a SAR using various forms of magnetic media, 
    such as computer disk or magnetic tape. The OCC will make the software 
    available to all national banks. A bank, of course, may complete and 
    file a SAR using a printed form, without using this software, if it so 
    desires.
        Because the permitted methods of filing the SAR may change, the OCC 
    has removed current Sec. 21.11(e). The permissible methods of filing 
    the SAR will be stated in the instructions to the SAR.
    
    Section 21.11(e)  Reports to State and Local Authorities
    
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(e), which replaces current Sec. 21.11(d), 
    modifies the scope of this provision slightly. Proposed Sec. 21.11(e) 
    encourages national banks to file SARs with State and local law 
    enforcement agencies where appropriate. Proposed Sec. 21.11(e) 
    
    [[Page 34479]]
    removes the unnecessary reference to Federal law.
    
    Section 21.11(f)  Retention of Records
    
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(f) requires a bank to retain a copy of the SAR 
    and the original of any related documentation relating to a SAR for a 
    period of ten years. The current rule is silent on this issue. However, 
    the current criminal referral forms require a bank to submit copies of 
    all related documentation when it files a criminal referral.
        The new SAR reduces this burden by eliminating altogether the 
    requirement to submit underlying documentation in connection with a 
    criminal referral. Instead, the proposal requires that the 
    documentation be identified and treated as filed with the SAR and that 
    the bank maintain the documentation, along with a copy of the SAR, for 
    ten years from the submission date. This time frame corresponds with 
    the statutes of limitations for most Federal criminal statutes 
    involving financial institutions.
        This approach ensures that Federal law enforcement agencies and the 
    Agencies, upon request, have access to any documentation necessary to 
    prosecute a violation or pursue an administrative action by requiring 
    banks to preserve underlying documentation for ten years.
    
    Section 21.11(g)  Exemptions
    
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(g), which replaces current Sec. 21.11(f), does 
    not substantively revise this provision.
    
    Section 21.11(h)  Notification of the Board of Directors
    
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(h), which replaces current Sec. 21.11(g), 
    reduces the burden the current rule places on boards of directors to 
    review criminal referrals. Under the current rule, each national bank 
    must have procedures that ensure that the bank's board of directors is 
    notified of each criminal referral before the next board meeting.
        The proposal does not require a bank to have specific procedures 
    for notifying its board of directors of a SAR. In addition, the 
    proposal permits the management of the bank to notify either the board 
    of directors or a committee of directors or executive officers 
    designated by the board to receive notice of the filing of a SAR.
        The OCC intends that each national bank maintain appropriate 
    mechanisms to ensure that its board of directors can be informed 
    promptly of SARs when appropriate. However, the OCC recognizes that 
    board review of all SAR filings is impracticable in some cases. 
    Therefore, under the proposal, the OCC gives each bank discretion to 
    establish reporting systems appropriate for the particular institution.
        The proposal also ensures, however, that if the bank elects to 
    provide notice to a committee rather than the entire board, the bank 
    may not give notice of a SAR filing to any director or officer who is a 
    suspect in the known or suspected violation. The proposal also requires 
    management to notify the entire board of directors, except the suspect, 
    when an executive officer or director is a suspect.
    
    Section 21.11(i)  Compliance
    
        The proposal changes the heading of the paragraph from 
    ``Penalties'' to ``Compliance'' to reflect better the range of informal 
    and formal supervisory actions available to the Agencies. The proposal 
    clarifies that the OCC treats a national bank's failure to comply with 
    reporting requirements like any other violation of law or regulation, 
    which may result in supervisory actions, including enforcement actions. 
    The current rule, at Sec. 21.11(h) (Penalties), appears to set a 
    standard for penalties (willful failure to file or careless disregard 
    in filing reports), that is inconsistent with the applicable statutory 
    standard for violation of an agency regulation. This proposed change 
    conforms the OCC's rules with the rules of the Board of Governors of 
    the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Deposit Insurance 
    Corporation.
    
    Section 21.11(j)  Obtaining the SAR
    
        Proposed Sec. 21.11(j) states that SARs may be obtained from the 
    appropriate OCC District Office at the address listed in 12 CFR part 4. 
    The current rule does not contain a comparable instruction.
    
    Section 21.11(k)  Confidentiality of SARs
    
        The proposal preserves the confidential nature of criminal referral 
    reports by stating that a SAR and the information contained in a SAR 
    are confidential.
    
    Comments
    
        The OCC invites public comment on all aspects of this proposal.
    DERIVATION TABLE FOR 12 CFR PART 21
        This table directs readers to the provisions of the current 12 CFR 
    part 21.11 on which the revised 12 CFR part 21.11 is based.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Revised provision            Current provision          Comments   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sec.  21.11(a).............  Sec.  21.11(a)............  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(b)(1)..........  - - -.....................  Added.         
    Sec.  21.11(b)(2)..........  - - -.....................  Added.         
    Sec.  21.11(b)(3)..........  - - -.....................  Added.         
    Sec.  21.11(b)(4)..........  Derived in part from Sec.   Added.         
                                  21.11(i).                                 
    Sec.  21.11(b)(5)..........  - - -.....................  Added.         
    Sec.  21.11(c)(1)..........  Sec.  21.11(b)(2).........  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(c)(2)..........  Sec.  21.11(b)(3).........  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(c)(3)..........  Sec.  21.11(b)(1) & (4)...  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(c)(4)..........  Derived in part from the    Added.         
                                  OCC's current criminal                    
                                  referral forms.                           
    Sec.  21.11(d)(1)..........  Sec.  21.11(c)(1) & (3)...  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(d)(2)..........  Sec.  21.11(c)(2).........  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(e).............  Sec.  21.11(d)............  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(f).............  - - -.....................  Added.         
    Sec.  21.11(g)(1)..........  Sec.  21.11(f)(1).........  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(g)(2)..........  Sec.  21.11(f)(2).........  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(h)(1)..........  Sec.  21.11(g)............  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(h)(2)..........  - - -.....................  Added.         
    Sec.  21.11(i).............  Sec.  21.11(h)............  Modified.      
    Sec.  21.11(j).............  - - -.....................  Added.         
    Sec.  21.11(k).............  - - -.....................  Added.         
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [[Page 34480]]
    
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the 
    OCC hereby certifies that this proposed rule will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    This proposal primarily reorganizes the process for making criminal 
    referrals and has no material impact on national banks, regardless of 
    size. Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The collection of information contained in this notice of proposed 
    rulemaking have been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
    for review in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (PRA) 
    (44 U.S.C. 3504(h)). Comments on the collection of information should 
    be sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork 
    Reduction Project (1557-0180), Washington, DC 20503, with copies to the 
    Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division (1557-0180), Office of 
    the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 
    20219.
        The collection of information in this proposed rule is limited to 
    the retention of records and is found in 12 CFR 21.11(f), which 
    requires national banks to retain copies of all documentation 
    supporting a SAR for ten years. The SAR will be submitted to OMB 
    separately for PRA review. The OCC requires banks to retain this 
    information to ensure that law enforcement and supervisory agencies 
    have access to the documentation necessary to prosecute a violation or 
    pursue an administrative action. The likely respondents are banks.
        Estimated total annual recordkeeping burden: 5,400 hours.
        The estimated annual burden per recordkeeper varies from less than 
    one hour to 1,300 burden hours, depending on individual circumstances, 
    with an average of 1.8 hours.
        Estimated number of recordkeepers: 3,000.
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        The OCC has determined that this document is not a significant 
    regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 Statement
    
        Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 
    104-4 (Unfunded Mandates Act) (signed into law on March 22, 1995) 
    requires that an agency prepare a budgetary impact statement before 
    promulgating a rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in 
    expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
    or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. If a 
    budgetary impact statement is required, section 202 of the Unfunded 
    Mandates Act also requires an agency to identify and consider a 
    reasonable number of regulatory alternatives before promulgating a 
    rule. The OCC has determined that it is not required to prepare a 
    written statement under section 202 and has concluded that, on balance, 
    this proposal provides the most cost-effective and least burdensome 
    alternative to achieve the objectives of the rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 21
    
        Bank Secrecy Act, Check kiting, Criminal referrals, Criminal 
    transactions, Currency, Defalcations, Embezzlement, Insider abuse, 
    Money laundering, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Security measures, Theft.
    
    Authority and Issuance
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, part 21 of chapter I of 
    title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended 
    to read as follows:
    
    PART 21--MINIMUM SECURITY DEVICES AND PROCEDURES, REPORTS OF 
    SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES, AND BANK SECRECY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
    
        1. The heading for part 21 is revised as set forth above.
        2. The authority citation for part 21 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a, 1818, 1881-1884, and 3401-3422.
    
        3. Subpart B of part 21 is revised to read as follows:
    Subpart B--Reports of Suspicious Activities
    
    
    Sec. 21.11  Suspicious Activity Report.
    
        (a) Purpose and scope. This section ensures that national banks 
    file a Suspicious Activity Report when they detect a known or suspected 
    violation of Federal law or a suspicious financial transaction. This 
    section applies to all national banks as well as any Federal branches 
    and agencies of foreign banks licensed or chartered by the OCC.
        (b) Definitions. For the purposes of this section:
        (1) FinCEN means the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the 
    Department of the Treasury.
        (2) Institution-affiliated party means any institution-affiliated 
    party as that term is defined in sections 3(u) and 8(b)(5) of the 
    Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(u) and 1818(b)(5)).
        (3) Instructions means the instructions on the SAR.
        (4) Known or suspected violation means any matter for which there 
    is a basis to believe that a violation of a Federal criminal statute 
    (including a pattern of criminal violations) has occurred or has been 
    attempted, is occurring, or may occur, and there is a basis to believe 
    that a national bank was an actual or potential victim of the criminal 
    violation, involved in, or used to facilitate the criminal violation.
        (5) SAR means a Suspicious Activity Report.
        (c) SARs required. A national bank shall file a SAR with the 
    appropriate Federal law enforcement agencies and Treasury and in 
    accordance with the Instructions, by sending a completed SAR to FinCEN 
    in the following circumstances:
        (1) Whenever the national bank detects a known or suspected 
    violation of Federal criminal law and has a substantial basis to 
    believe that one of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or 
    other institution-affiliated parties committed or aided in the 
    commission of the violation;
        (2) Whenever the national bank detects a known or suspected 
    violation of Federal criminal law, there is an actual or potential loss 
    to the national bank (before reimbursement or recovery) aggregating 
    $5,000 or more, and the bank has a substantial basis for identifying a 
    possible suspect or group of suspects, where none of the suspects are 
    included in paragraph (c)(1) of this section;
        (3) Whenever the national bank detects a known or suspected 
    violation of Federal criminal law, there is an actual or potential loss 
    to the national bank (before reimbursement or recovery) aggregating 
    $25,000 or more, and the bank has no substantial basis for identifying 
    a possible suspect or group of suspects; or
        (4) Whenever a financial transaction is conducted, or attempted, at 
    the national bank and:
        (i) The bank suspects that the transaction involved funds derived 
    from illicit activity, was conducted for the purpose of hiding or 
    disguising funds from illicit activity, or in any way violated the 
    money laundering statutes (18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957);
        (ii) The bank suspects that the transaction was potentially 
    designed to evade the reporting or recordkeeping requirements of the 
    Bank Secrecy Act (31 U.S.C. 5311 through 5330) or regulations issued 
    thereunder; or 
    
    [[Page 34481]]
    
        (iii) The bank believes that the transaction was suspicious for any 
    reason.
        (d) Time for reporting.--(1) Generally. A national bank shall file 
    the SAR required by paragraph (c) of this section within 30 calendar 
    days after the date of initial detection of an act described in 
    paragraph (c) of this section, and, in situations involving violations 
    requiring immediate attention, such as when a reportable violation is 
    on-going, the financial institution shall immediately notify, by 
    telephone, the appropriate law enforcement authority in addition to 
    filing a timely SAR.
        (2) No suspect identified. If no suspect was identified on the date 
    of detection of an act described in paragraph (c) of this section, the 
    national bank may delay filing a SAR for an additional 30 calendar days 
    after identification of a suspect, but in no case may a national bank 
    delay filing a SAR more than 60 calendar days after the date of 
    detecting an act described in paragraph (c) of this section.
        (e) Reports to State and local authorities. A national bank is 
    encouraged to file a copy of the SAR with State and local law 
    enforcement agencies where appropriate.
        (f) Retention of records. A national bank shall maintain a copy of 
    any SAR filed and the original of any related documentation for a 
    period of ten years from the date of filing the SAR, unless the OCC 
    informs the bank in writing that the bank may discard the materials 
    sooner. A national bank shall make all supporting documentation 
    available to appropriate law enforcement agencies upon request. 
    Supporting documentation shall be identified and treated as filed with 
    the SAR.
        (g) Exemptions. (1) A bank need not file a SAR for a robbery or 
    burglary committed or attempted that is reported to appropriate law 
    enforcement authorities.
        (2) A bank need not file a SAR for lost, missing, counterfeit, or 
    stolen securities if it files a report pursuant to the reporting 
    requirements of 17 CFR 240.17f-1.
        (h) Notification to board of directors--(1) Generally. Whenever a 
    national bank files a SAR pursuant to this section, the management of 
    the bank shall promptly notify its board of directors, or a committee 
    of directors or executive officers designated by the board of directors 
    to receive notice.
        (2) Suspect is a director or executive officer. If the bank files 
    the SAR pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section and the suspect is a 
    director or executive officer, the bank may not notify the suspect, 
    pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 5318(g)(2), but shall notify all directors who 
    are not suspects.
        (i) Compliance. Failure to file a SAR in accordance with this 
    section and the Instructions may subject the national bank, its 
    directors, officers, employees, agents, or other institution-affiliated 
    parties to supervisory actions including enforcement actions.
        (j) Obtaining SARs. A national bank may obtain SARs and the 
    Instructions from the appropriate OCC District Office listed in 12 CFR 
    part 4.
        (k) Confidentiality of SARs. SARs are confidential. Any person 
    subpoenaed or otherwise requested to disclose a SAR or the information 
    contained in a SAR shall decline to produce the information citing this 
    section, applicable law (e.g., 31 U.S.C. 5318(g)), or both.
    
        Dated: June 27, 1995.
    Eugene A. Ludwig,
    Comptroller of the Currency .
    [FR Doc. 95-16240 Filed 6-30-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/03/1995
Department:
Comptroller of the Currency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
95-16240
Dates:
Comments must be received by September 1, 1995.
Pages:
34476-34481 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-14
RINs:
1557-AB19
PDF File:
95-16240.pdf
CFR: (24)
12 CFR 21.11(a)
12 CFR 21.11(b)(1)
12 CFR 21.11(b)(2)
12 CFR 21.11(b)(3)
12 CFR 21.11(b)(4)
More ...