97-21732. Fresh Peaches Grown in Georgia; Termination of Marketing Order No. 918  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 43922-43924]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-21732]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 918
    
    [Docket No. FV-97-918-1 FR]
    
    
    Fresh Peaches Grown in Georgia; Termination of Marketing Order 
    No. 918
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; Termination of Order.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule terminates the Federal marketing order regulating 
    the handling of fresh peaches grown in Georgia (order) and the rules 
    and regulations issued thereunder. The Georgia peach industry has not 
    operated under the order since its provisions were suspended March 1, 
    1993. The order does not reflect current industry structure and 
    operating procedures and there is no industry support for reactivating 
    the order. Therefore, there is no need to continue this order.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 17, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William G. Pimental, Southeast 
    Marketing Field Office, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 2276, Winter Haven, Florida 
    33883-2276; telephone: (941) 299-4770, Fax: (941) 299-5169; or Kathleen 
    Finn, Marketing Order Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, room 2530-
    S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-
    2491, Fax: (202) 720-5698. Small businesses may request information on 
    compliance with this regulation by contacting: Jay Guerber, Marketing 
    Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, 
    P.O.
    
    [[Page 43923]]
    
    Box 96456, room 2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone (202) 720-
    2491, Fax: (202) 720-5698.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is governed by provisions of 
    Sec. 608(16)(A) of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as 
    amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the Act and 
    Sec. 918.81 of the order.
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
    Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive 
    effect. This final rule will not preempt any State or local laws, 
    regulations, or polices, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict 
    with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 
    days after date of the entry of the ruling.
        This final rule terminates the order regulating the handling of 
    peaches grown in Georgia. Sections 918.81 and 918.82 of the order 
    contain the authority and procedures for termination.
        The order was initially established in 1942 to help the industry 
    solve specific marketing problems and maintain orderly marketing 
    conditions. It was the responsibility of the Peach Industry Committee 
    (committee), the agency established for local administration of the 
    marketing order, to periodically investigate and assemble data on the 
    growing, harvesting, shipping, and marketing conditions of Georgia 
    peaches. The committee tried to achieve orderly marketing and improve 
    acceptance of Georgia peaches through the establishment of minimum 
    size, maturity and quality requirements.
        The Georgia peach industry has not operated under the marketing 
    order for over four years. The order and all of its accompanying rules 
    and regulations were suspended March 1, 1993, for two years (58 FR 
    8209). At the request of the industry, the Department extended the 
    suspension for two more years (60 FR 17633). Regulations have not been 
    applied under the order since 1992, and no committee has been appointed 
    since then. The only regulations the industry is using are for 
    research, promotion, and advertising. This is handled locally by the 
    Georgia Commodity Commission through a State program.
        In 1942, when the marketing order was issued, there were over 300 
    growers of Georgia peaches. Currently, there are approximately 20 peach 
    growers.
        The Department contacted many current industry members with respect 
    to the need for reinstating the marketing order. Virtually all the 
    individuals corresponding with the Department stated they were not 
    interested in reestablishing the order. There was a peach industry 
    meeting held on February 6, 1997, in Byron, Georgia where the marketing 
    order was a topic of discussion. There was no support from the 
    attendees for reactivating or amending the order.
        There have been changes in industry structure and operating 
    procedures since the order was last amended. Making the marketing order 
    reflect these changes could require further amendments. The steps 
    necessary to amend and reactivate the existing order would be similar 
    to what would be required to establish a new order. The need for a new 
    or amended marketing order would have to be justified and supported by 
    a large majority of Georgia peach growers. This would require a public 
    hearing and a grower referendum. There is no determinable industry 
    support for a marketing order. Thus, there is little justification to 
    continue the current order.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
    prepared this regulatory flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 8 handlers of Georgia peaches who would be 
    subject to regulation under the marketing order and approximately 20 
    peach growers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms 
    have been defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) 
    as those having annual receipts of less than $5,000,000, and small 
    agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of 
    less than $500,000. The majority of the Georgia peach growers and 
    handlers may be classified as small entities.
        This final rule terminates the order regulating the handling of 
    peaches grown in Georgia. The order and its accompanying rules and 
    regulations have been suspended since March 1, 1993. No regulations 
    have been implemented since the 1990-91 season, and there is no 
    indication that such regulations will again be needed.
        The industry has been operating without a marketing order since its 
    suspension. Reestablishing the order would mean additional cost to the 
    industry stemming from assessments to maintain the order and any 
    associated costs generated by regulation. By not reinstating the 
    marketing order, the industry benefits from avoiding these costs. 
    Because the industry has been operating without an order for four 
    years, the termination of the order would have no noticeable effect on 
    either small or large operations.
        The Department attempted to solicit as much industry input on this 
    decision as possible. The Department sent a letter to current industry 
    members it was able to identify seeking comments on the need for 
    reinstating the marketing order. There was a peach industry meeting 
    held on February 6, 1997, in Byron, Georgia where the marketing order 
    was a topic of discussion. In addition, the proposed rule provided the 
    opportunity for all interested persons to comment on the termination of 
    the marketing order.
        A proposed rule was published in the June 4, 1997, issue of the 
    Federal Register giving interested persons until July 7, 1997, to file 
    written comments. No comments were received.
        The Department believes that conducting a termination referendum 
    would merely reaffirm the Georgia peach industry's continued lack of 
    interest in reactivating the marketing order and that conducting such a 
    referendum would be wasteful of Departmental and public resources.
        Therefore, pursuant to Sec. 608c(16)(A) of the Act and Sec. 918.81 
    of the order, the Secretary has determined that Marketing Order No. 
    918, covering peaches grown in Georgia, and the rules and regulations 
    issued thereunder, no longer tend to
    
    [[Page 43924]]
    
    effectuate the declared policy of the Act, and are hereby terminated.
        Trustees have been appointed to continue in the capacity of 
    concluding and liquidating the affairs of the former committee. The 
    trustees will be responsible for completing the order's unfinished 
    business, including ensuring termination of all outstanding agreements 
    and contracts, and the payment of all obligations. The trustees will be 
    responsible for safeguarding program assets, holding committee records, 
    and arranging for a financial audit to be conducted. All such actions 
    by the trustees are subject to the approval of the Secretary. Those 
    designated as trustees are Robert L. Dickey III, William H. Davidson, 
    and Al Pearson. The trustees shall continue in their capacity until 
    discharged by the Secretary.
        The remainder of the reserves, after immediate expenses are paid, 
    will be held by the trustees to be used to cover unforeseen, 
    outstanding expenses obligated by the trustees.
        Section 608c(16)(A) of the Act requires the Secretary to notify 
    Congress 60 days in advance of the termination of a Federal marketing 
    order. Congress has been so notified.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 918
    
        Marketing agreements, Peaches, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    PART 918--[REMOVED]
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, and under authority of 7 
    U.S.C. 601-674, 7 CFR part 918 is removed.
    
        Dated: August 12, 1997.
    Lon Hatamiya,
    Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 97-21732 Filed 8-15-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/17/1997
Published:
08/18/1997
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; Termination of Order.
Document Number:
97-21732
Dates:
September 17, 1997.
Pages:
43922-43924 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV-97-918-1 FR
PDF File:
97-21732.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 608(16)(A)
7 CFR 918.81