2023-11683. Air Plan Approval; California; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    ACTION:

    Final rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve a revision to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD or “District”) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from Portland cement kilns. We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). Approving this rule corrects a deficiency identified in MDAQMD's reasonably available control technology (RACT) demonstrations for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

    DATES:

    This rule is effective July 3, 2023.

    ADDRESSES:

    The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0923. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with a disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Elijah Gordon, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972–3158 or by email at gordon.elijah@epa.gov.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Throughout this document, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the EPA.

    Table of Contents

    I. Proposed Action

    II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    III. EPA Action

    IV. Incorporation by Reference

    V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    I. Proposed Action

    On July 15, 2022 (87 FR 42422), the EPA proposed to approve the following rule into the California SIP. Start Printed Page 36250

    Table 1—Submitted Rule

    Local agencyRule No.Rule titleAmendedSubmitted
    MDAQMD1161Portland Cement Kilns01/22/201805/23/2018

    As mentioned in our proposed action, submitted Rule 1161 meets the requirement to correct a deficiency identified in the EPA's February 12, 2018 (83 FR 5921) partial conditional approval of MDAQMD's RACT demonstrations for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The partial conditional approval was based, in part, on commitments from MDAQMD to revise and submit amendments to Rule 1161 that would meet current RACT requirements. Revisions to Rule 1161, submitted to the EPA on May 23, 2018, addressed this deficiency by establishing a more stringent NOX limit for Portland cement kilns. These revisions fulfill the commitment made by MDAQMD and the California Air Resources Board, with respect to Rule 1161, necessary for the EPA to fully approve the rule. Our proposed action contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.

    II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments.

    III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into the California SIP. The January 22, 2018 version of Rule 1161 will replace the previously approved version of this rule in the SIP. This action corrects the deficiency related to Rule 1161 that was previously identified in the EPA's action on MDAQMD's RACT demonstrations for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

    IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of MDAQMD Rule 1161, “Portland Cement Kilns,” amended on January 22, 2018, which regulates NOX emissions from the operation of cement kilns. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

    V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:

    • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);

    • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

    • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

    • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
    • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
    • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
    • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.

    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

    Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address “disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects” of their actions on minority populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as “the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.” EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that “no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and policies.”

    The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Due to the nature of the action being taken here, this action is expected to have a neutral impact on the air quality of the affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.

    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of Start Printed Page 36251 this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 1, 2023. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    • Environmental protection
    • Air pollution control
    • Incorporation by reference
    • Intergovernmental relations
    • Nitrogen oxides
    • Ozone
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    End List of Subjects Start Signature

    Dated: May 25, 2023.

    Martha Guzman Aceves,

    Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    End Signature

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency amends Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    End Authority

    Subpart F—California

    Start Amendment Part

    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(300)(i)(A)( 2) and (c)(518)(i)(A)( 9) to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part
    Identification of plan—in part.
    * * * * *

    (c) * * *

    (300) * * *

    (i) * * *

    (A) * * *

    ( 2) Previously approved on February 27, 2003 in paragraph (c)(300)(i)(A)( 1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(518)(i)(A)( 9): Rule 1161, amended on March 25, 2002.

    * * * * *

    (518) * * *

    (i) * * *

    (A) * * *

    ( 9) Rule 1161, “Portland Cement Kilns,” amended on January 22, 2018.

    * * * * *
    [Amended]
    Start Amendment Part

    3. Section 52.248 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (d)(1)(ix).

    End Amendment Part End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2023–11683 Filed 6–1–23; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/3/2023
Published:
06/02/2023
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
2023-11683
Dates:
This rule is effective July 3, 2023.
Pages:
36249-36251 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0923, FRL-9882-02-R9
Topics:
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
PDF File:
2023-11683.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Mojave Desert Rule 1161 TSD
» C. EPA Guidance Documents, Policies, and Rulemakings
» B. Supporting Material and Other Documents
» A. State Implementation Plan Submittal Documents
» Docket Index NPRM EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0923
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52