95-23490. Restriction on Representation in Certain Eviction Proceedings  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 48950-48951]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-23490]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
    
    45 CFR Part 1633
    
    
    Restriction on Representation in Certain Eviction Proceedings
    
    AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This proposed rule is intended to ensure that recipients 
    refrain from using Legal Services Corporation (``LSC'' or 
    ``Corporation'') funds to provide representation in eviction 
    proceedings of persons engaged in certain illegal drug activity.
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 23, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted to the Office of the General 
    Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 750 First Street, N.E., 11th 
    Floor, Washington, DC 20002-4250.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victor M. Fortuno, General Counsel, at 
    (202) 336-8810.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 25, 1995, the Corporation Board of 
    Directors (``Board'') adopted a resolution requiring Corporation staff 
    to prepare a regulation prohibiting the use of Corporation funds to 
    represent in certain eviction proceedings persons alleged to be 
    engaging in illegal drug activity. On September 9, 1995, the Board's 
    Operations and Regulations Committee (``Committee'') held public 
    hearings on proposed 45 CFR Part 1633. After adopting several changes 
    to the staff draft of the regulation, the Committee voted to publish 
    the proposed rule in the Federal Register for notice and comment.
        The LSC Act grants the Corporation both general and specific 
    rulemaking authority. Texas Rural Legal Aid v. LSC, 940 F.2d 685, 690-
    91 (D.C. Cir. 1991); see e.g., 42 U.S.C. 2996e(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and 
    2996f(a)(3). In particular, section 1007(a)(3) of the LSC Act ``gives 
    [the Corporation] substantial power to regulate the `delivery of legal 
    assistance' by program recipients.'' TRLA, at 691. In addition, as a 
    private corporation granted the powers of a District of Columbia 
    nonprofit corporation, 42 U.S.C. 2996e(a), the Corporation has the 
    power to establish the terms under which it will make grants to 
    entities to provide legal assistance. Id. Congress intended the 
    exercise of ``considerable discretion'' by the Corporation in its 
    implementation of the LSC Act. Id. Finally, under section 1007(a)(2)(C) 
    of the LSC Act, 42 U.S.C. 2996f(a)(2)(C), the Corporation may provide 
    guidance to its recipients as to appropriate caseload matters by 
    establishing national goals, in conformance with which recipients are 
    to establish priorities for the acceptance of cases. Id. at 693.
        A purpose of the legal services program is to assist in improving 
    opportunities for low income persons. 42 U.S.C. 2996(3). In addition, 
    in its grantmaking and oversight functions, the Corporation must ensure 
    that recipients provide legal assistance in the most economical and 
    effective manner. 42 U.S.C. 2996f(a)(3). Hence, a principal national 
    goal of the Corporation, based in the LSC Act, is to provide economical 
    and effective legal assistance in a manner that improves opportunities 
    for low income persons.
        The drug problem has had a devastating effect on the poor in our 
    country, especially those living in public housing. This situation is 
    of grave concern to the Board, and has been an on-going concern in 
    Congress. For example, section 508(18) of H.R. 2076, an appropriations 
    measure currently before Congress, would prohibit recipients from 
    providing representation in certain drug-related eviction proceedings. 
    See H.R. 2076, 104th Cong., 1st Sess, section 504(18).
        Since tenants of public housing projects who engage in illegal drug 
    activity may be viewed as a destructive force within public housing 
    communities acting to the detriment of low income persons, it is the 
    Corporation's considered view that representation of those who engage 
    in such activity undermines the purposes of the LSC Act. Based on the 
    above, the Board directed staff to prepare a proposed regulation 
    addressing these concerns. Such regulation will implement the 
    Corporation's goal of providing economical and effective legal 
    assistance in a manner that improves opportunities for low income 
    persons and will provide specific guidance to recipients to revise 
    their priorities and procedures in the area of representation in drug-
    related eviction proceedings.
        A section-by-section discussion of the proposed rule is provided 
    below.
    
    Section 1633.1  Purpose
    
        This section sets out the purpose of the proposed rule: to 
    implement the goal of the Corporation to provide economical and 
    effective legal assistance in a manner that improves opportunities for 
    low income persons and to provide specific guidance in the case of 
    drug-related eviction proceedings by prohibiting any recipient from 
    providing representation in certain proceedings to evict from public 
    housing projects persons convicted of or being prosecuted for certain 
    drug-related activity.
    
    Section 1633.2  Definitions
    
        This section defines ``controlled substance,'' ``public housing 
    project,'' and ``public housing agency'' in the manner those terms are 
    defined by federal statute. The term ``being prosecuted'' is defined to 
    make clear that the prohibition attaches only when a prosecution has 
    been instituted and is being pursued by a governmental authority, for 
    example, by indictment or information. It is not sufficient for an 
    affidavit to have been sworn by a private citizen or for an arrest to 
    have occurred if no prosecution has followed.
    
    Section 1633.3  Prohibition
    
        This section sets out the prohibition on the use of Corporation 
    funds. It is intended to preclude the provision of representation in a 
    proceeding to evict from a public housing project a person who has been 
    recently convicted of or is being prosecuted for illegal drug activity. 
    Such activity must be evidenced by a conviction or current prosecution 
    for the sale, distribution, use or manufacture of a controlled 
    substance. Under the prohibition if representation was commenced prior 
    to prosecution, the recipient should seek to end the representation if 
    a prosecution is thereafter commenced. The Corporation has concluded 
    that a formal charge of illegal drug activity against a client will 
    suffice to prohibit representation even though a conviction has not as 
    yet resulted. The Corporation, however, believes that the prohibition 
    should apply only when the charge of illegal drug activity has resulted 
    in formal prosecution proceedings.
        In addition, the prohibition applies only if the allegation which 
    forms the 
    
    [[Page 48951]]
    basis for the eviction proceeding is that the particular illegal drug 
    activity for which the person has been convicted or is being prosecuted 
    did or does now threaten the health or safety of others living in the 
    public housing project or working in the public housing agency. This 
    qualification is intended to make clear that, in order for the 
    prohibition to apply, the allegation which forms the basis for the 
    eviction must be that, at the time the illegal drug activity was 
    engaged in, it threatened the health or safety of others within the 
    public housing community or that the activity currently threatens such 
    health or safety. In other words, the threat must stem from the illegal 
    drug activity which resulted in prosecution/conviction.
        Finally, the prohibition extends only to the individual who has 
    been convicted or is being prosecuted, and does not extend to other 
    members of the individual's household who may be facing eviction 
    because of the individual's illegal activity. For example, if a person 
    is facing eviction based on the fact that another person in the 
    household has been convicted of or is being prosecuted for the illegal 
    sale, distribution, use or manufacture of a controlled substance, then 
    the prohibition would not attach.
    
    Section 1633.4  Recordkeeping
    
        This section requires recipients to maintain documentation 
    regarding representation declined under this part. Such recordkeeping 
    will assist the Corporation in its compliance monitoring efforts and 
    will provide empirical data for informational purposes.
    
    List of Subjects in 45 CFR 1633
    
        Legal services, Drugs, Public housing.
    
        For reasons set forth in the preamble, LSC proposes to amend 45 CFR 
    chapter XVI by adding part 1633 as follows:
    
    PART 1633--RESTRICTION ON REPRESENTATION IN CERTAIN EVICTION 
    PROCEEDINGS
    
    Sec.
    1633.1  Purpose.
    1633.2  Definitions.
    1633.3  Prohibition.
    1633.4  Recordkeeping.
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996e(a), (b)(1)(A), 2996f(a)(2)(C), 
    2996f(a)(3), 2996g(e).
    
    
    Sec. 1633.1  Purpose.
    
        This part is designed to ensure that Corporation funds will not be 
    used to provide representation in certain eviction proceedings to 
    persons charged with or convicted of illegal drug activities.
    
    
    Sec. 1633.2  Definitions.
    
        (a) ``Controlled substance'' has the meaning given that term in 
    section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802);
        (b) ``Public housing project'' and ``public housing agency'' have 
    the meanings given those terms in section 3 of the United States 
    Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a); and
        (c) A person is ``being prosecuted'' if a criminal proceeding has 
    been instituted against such person by a governmental authority with 
    jurisdiction to bring such prosecution.
    
    
    Sec. 1633.3  Prohibition.
    
        Corporation funds shall not be used to defend any person in a 
    proceeding to evict that person from a public housing project if:
        (a) the person has been recently convicted of or is being 
    prosecuted for the illegal sale, distribution, use or manufacture of a 
    controlled substance; and
        (b) the eviction proceeding is brought by a public housing 
    authority on the basis that such illegal drug activity for which the 
    person has been convicted or for which the person is being prosecuted 
    did or does now threaten the health or safety of other tenants residing 
    in the public housing project or employees of the public housing 
    agency.
    
    
    Sec. 1633.4  Recordkeeping.
    
        Recipients shall maintain a record of all instances in which 
    representation is declined under this part. Records required by this 
    section shall be available to the Corporation, and should be maintained 
    in a manner consistent with the attorney-client privilege and the rules 
    of professional responsibility applicable in the local jurisdiction.
    
        Dated: September 18, 1995.
    Suzanne B. Glasow,
    Senior Counsel for Operations & Regulations.
    [FR Doc. 95-23490 Filed 9-20-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/21/1995
Department:
Legal Services Corporation
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-23490
Dates:
Comments must be submitted on or before October 23, 1995.
Pages:
48950-48951 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-23490.pdf
CFR: (4)
45 CFR 1633.1
45 CFR 1633.2
45 CFR 1633.3
45 CFR 1633.4