E8-31454. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Partial 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List 475 Species in the Southwestern United States as Threatened or Endangered With Critical Habitat  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

    ACTION:

    Notice of 90-day petition finding.

    SUMMARY:

    We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 90-day finding on 270 species from a petition to list 475 species in the southwestern United States as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We find that for these 270 species the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing these species may be warranted. Therefore, for these 270 species, we will not initiate a further status review in response to this petition. We ask the public to submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of these 270 species or threats to them or their habitat at any time. This information will help us monitor and encourage the conservation of these species. An additional 5 species of the 475 included in the petition do not fall within the scope of the petition or are not a listable entity and, therefore, were not considered in this finding (see Petition).

    DATES:

    The finding announced in this document was made on January 6, 2009. You may submit new information concerning this species for our consideration at any time.

    ADDRESSES:

    This finding is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Supporting information we used in preparing this finding is available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Regional Ecological Services Office, 500 Gold Ave., SW., Albuquerque, NM 87102. Please submit any new information, materials, comments, or questions concerning these species or this finding to the above address.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Nancy Gloman, Assistant Regional Director, Southwest Regional Ecological Services Office (see ADDRESSES); telephone 505/248-6920; facsimile 505/248-6788. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that we make a finding on whether a petition to list, delist, or reclassify a species presents substantial scientific or commercial information to indicate that a petitioned action may be warranted. We are to base this finding on information provided in the petition. To the maximum extent practicable, we are to make the finding within 90 days of our receipt of the petition, and publish our notice of this finding promptly in the Federal Register.

    Our standard for “substantial information,” as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations at 50 CFR 424.14(b), with regards to a 90-day petition finding is “that amount of information that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the measure proposed in the petition may be warranted.” If we find that substantial information was presented, we are required to promptly commence a status review of the species.

    In making this finding, we based our decision on information provided by the petitioner that we determined to be reliable after reviewing sources referenced in the petition and otherwise available in our files. We evaluated that information in accordance with 50 CFR 424.14(b). Our process for making this 90-day finding under section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act is limited to a determination of whether the information in the petition meets the “substantial information” threshold.

    Petition

    On June 25, 2007, we received a formal petition dated June 18, 2007, from Forest Guardians (now WildEarth Guardians) requesting that the Service: (1) Consider all full species in our Southwest Region ranked as G1 or G1G2 by the organization NatureServe, except those that are currently listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing; and (2) list each species as either endangered or threatened with critical habitat. The petition incorporates all analyses, references, and documentation provided by NatureServe in its online database at http://www.natureserve.org/​ into the petition. The petition clearly identified itself as a petition and included the identification information, Start Printed Page 420as required in 50 CFR 424.14(a). We sent a letter to the petitioners dated July 11, 2007, acknowledging receipt of the petition and stating that the petition was under review by staff in our Southwest Regional Office. On June 18, 2008, we received a petition from WildEarth Guardians dated June 12, 2008, to emergency list 32 species under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Endangered Species Act. Of those 32 species, 21 were included in the June 18, 2007, petition to be listed on a non-emergency basis. In a letter dated July 22, 2008, we stated that the information provided in both the 2007 and 2008 petitions and in our files did not indicate that an emergency situation existed for any of the 21 species. This letter concludes our processing of the emergency aspect of the 2008 petition under the APA. The following discussion presents our partial evaluation of the June 18, 2007 and June 12, 2008 petitions, based on information provided in the petition and our current understanding of the species.

    The 2007 petition included a list of 475 species. One species, Salina mucket (Potamilus metnecktayi), is also known by the scientific name Disconaias salinasensis; we were petitioned to list the species under both names. The species files in NatureServe for these two names are identical. For the remainder of our review we used the name P. metnecktayi; therefore, we reviewed only 474 actual species files. This finding addresses 270 of the 475 species for which we were petitioned. The remaining 200 species will be addressed in one or more additional 90-day findings in the future. Although we are not making a finding on the remaining 200 species at this time, the lack of inclusion of those species in this finding does not imply that we are making or will make a positive finding on any or all of the remaining species. Our priority for responding to a petition is a function of the resources that are available and competing demands for those resources.

    Because the petition requested that we consider all species from the list that were not currently listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing, 3 of the 474 species were also not included in the review. Quitobaquito pupfish (Cyprinodon eremus) is currently listed as endangered under the name desert pupfish (Cyprinodon macularius eremus). In Arizona, this family was historically represented by two recognized subspecies, Cyprinodon m. macularius and C. m. eremus, and an undescribed species, the Monkey Spring pupfish. Minckley et al. (2002, p. 701) raised C. m. eremus to a full species, C. eremus. The species is listed as endangered throughout its range, so we did not consider it as part of this petition. On December 13, 2007, we made a 12-month finding that the Jollyville Plateau salamander (Eurycea tonkawae) warrants listing, but that listing is precluded by higher listing priorities (72 FR 71040), thus rendering the species to candidate status. On December 6, 2007, we published our annual review of native species that are candidates for listing as endangered or threatened (72 FR 69034), in which we made the San Bernadino springsnail (Pyrgulopsis bernardina) a candidate species. Because these three species, Quitobaquito pupfish, Jollyville Plateau salamander, and San Bernardino springsnail, are currently listed or are candidates for listing, and we were petitioned to list species that are not listed or candidates, they were not evaluated as part of this petition.

    Agave arizonica (Arizona agave) was recently delisted (71 FR 35195; June 19, 2006) because it was determined to be a product of hybridization and, therefore, not a listable entity. No new information was presented in the petition for Arizona agave. Because of its current status, the Arizona agave was not considered in our review. After eliminating review of Quitobaquito pupfish, Jollyville Plateau salamander, San Bernardino springsnail, and Arizona agave, there were 470 species files to continue with our review in the NatureServe database.

    This finding addresses 270 of the 470 species for which we were validly petitioned. The remaining 200 species will be addressed in one or more additional 90-day findings in the future. Our priority for responding to a petition is a function of the resources that are available and competing demands for those resources. Thus, in any given fiscal year, multiple factors dictate whether it will be possible to undertake work on particular listing actions. The resources available for listing actions are determined through the annual Congressional appropriations process. The appropriation for the Listing Program is available to support work involving the following listing actions: Proposed and final listing rules; 90-day and 12-month findings on petitions to revise critical habitat and to add species to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants or to change the status of a species from threatened to endangered; annual determinations on prior “warranted but precluded” petition findings as required under section 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act; proposed and final rules designating critical habitat; and litigation-related, administrative, and program management functions (including preparing and allocating budgets, responding to Congressional and public inquiries, and conducting public outreach regarding listing and critical habitat). The work involved in preparing various listing documents can be extensive and may include, but is not limited to, gathering and assessing the best scientific and commercial data available and conducting analyses used as the basis for our determinations under section 4(a)(1) of the Act; writing and publishing documents; and obtaining, reviewing, and evaluating public comments and peer review comments on proposed rules and incorporating relevant information into final rules. The number of listing actions that we can undertake in a given year also is influenced by the complexity of those listing actions; that is, more complex actions generally are more costly.

    We cannot spend more than is appropriated for the Listing Program without violating the Anti-Deficiency Act (see 31 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1)(A)). In addition, in FY 1998 and for each fiscal year since then, Congress has placed a statutory cap on funds which may be expended for the Listing Program, equal to the amount expressly appropriated for that purpose in that fiscal year. This cap was designed to prevent funds appropriated for other functions under the Act (e.g., Recovery funds for removing species from the Lists), or for other Service programs, from being used for Listing Program actions (see House Report 105-163, 105th Congress, 1st Session, July 1, 1997). Thus, through the listing cap and the amount of funds needed to address court-mandated listing actions, Congress and the courts have in effect determined the amount of money available for other listing activities. Therefore, the funds in the listing cap, other than those needed to address court-mandated listing actions, set the limits on our ability to fully respond to this petition. When funds become available, we will continue our review of the remaining petitioned species that are not addressed in this finding and publish one or more findings for those species.

    Species Information

    The petitioners presented two tables that collectively listed the 475 species for consideration and requested that the Service incorporate all analyses, references, and documentation provided by NatureServe in its online database into the petition. The information presented by NatureServe (http://www.natureserve.org/​explorer/​) is found Start Printed Page 421in peer-reviewed professional journal articles and is considered to be a reputable source of scientific information. We judge this source to be reliable with regard to the information it presents.

    We accessed the NatureServe database on July 5, 2007. We saved electronic and hard-copies of each species file and used this information, including references cited within these files, during our review. Therefore, all information we used from the species files in NatureServe was current to that date. All of the petitioned species were ranked by NatureServe as G1 (critically imperiled) or G1G2 (between critically imperiled and imperiled).

    We reviewed all references cited in the NatureServe database species files that were available to us. For some species in NatureServe, there is a “Local Programs” link to the Web sites of the State programs that contribute information to NatureServe. We found this “Local Programs” link to have additional information for very few of the 470 species. We reviewed information in references cited in NatureServe and information readily available in our files, on the Internet, and in local libraries that was directly relevant to the information raised in the petition. For the 21 of the 32 species which were also included in the petition to emergency list dated June 12, 2008, we also used information provided in that petition. Following review of the available information, we separated the 470 species into categories based on the level of information found.

    We were unable to readily locate one or more references, which we believed might contain additional information on threats for 82 of the species. Without review of those references, we could not be certain that we had assigned them to the correct category. Therefore, on May 12, 2008, we sent a letter to the petitioners requesting those references. The petitioners responded with copies of all but three of the requested references or information on how to purchase them. The date we received the last of the references from the petitioners was July 15, 2008. That did not provide us with sufficient time to review those references for 79 of the 82 species, so we have not addressed them in this finding, but we will consider them in one or more future findings. The 270 species included in this finding are listed in Table 1; they fit into four distinct information level categories.

    The first category, titled Category A in Table 1, has only minimal information about each species, and in some cases no more information than the name of the species. An example of a species in this category that had minimal information is a cave obligate spider with no common name (Cicurina travisae). The NatureServe file for this species names the species, states that it is endemic to Texas, and lives in subterrestrial habitat. The file provides one reference (Gertsch 1992), which contains no information on threats to the species, but describes many spiders within the genus. The Gertsch publication describes the physical characteristics of C. travisae, diagrams of body parts, and some locations where it has been found with no information on the level of survey effort to determine its range (Gertsch 1992, p. 101). The magnitude and type of information provided for other species in this category was similar in nature, or was mainly taxonomic without as much locational information. Category A contains 225 species, of which 1 is a vertebrate, 189 are invertebrates, and 35 are plants.

    Occasionally, generic information was presented in the NatureServe species files for a larger group of species we placed in Category A, such as for the class or family the species belongs to, but not specific information on the individual species. The references were taxonomic in nature or simply checklists (lists of species, for example Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States and Canada (Robbins et al. 1991)) or taxonomic keys (which provide anatomical characteristics for identification of species) and did not address threats to the species. An example that illustrates the type of generic information that was presented for such species in Category A is Silver Creek woodlandsnail (Ashmunella binneyi). The NatureServe file for this species states the name of the species and lists one reference that is a checklist of names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada (Turgeon et al. 1998). The file contains no other information specific to Silver Creek woodlandsnail. The file does describe the basic biology of terrestrial snails (pulmonates) in general stating “terrestrial gastropods do not move much usually only to find food or reproduce” and “as a whole, pulmonates (previously Subclass Pulmonata) are better dispersers than prosobranchs (previously Subclass Prosobranchia) possibly due to their hermaphroditic reproduction increasing the chance of new colonization.” The identical language was used in other NatureServe files for terrestrial snail species, and no specific information was provided about the species or threats to the species or its habitat.

    The information we reviewed for the species in Category B (see Table 1) contained basic information on the range of the species, based on some level of survey effort. Habitat was frequently mentioned as well as other aspects of the species' biology, such as food habitats. Population size or abundance, if addressed, was rarely quantified, and the database instead used descriptors such as large, small, or numerous. The available information we reviewed did not address specific threats to the species. Category B contains 38 species, of which 2 are vertebrates, 25 are invertebrates, and 11 are plants.

    An example of the type of information we found for species in Category B is illustrated by the Animas Mountains tubeshell (Holospira animasensis). The NatureServe file for the Animas Mountains tubeshell provides one reference, which is a published description of the newly discovered species (Gilbertson and Worthington 2003, pp. 220-224). That article describes the physical characteristics of the species and the habitat in which it was discovered. The article does not address threats to the Animas Mountains tubeshell. The NatureServe file for this species cites Gilbertson and Worthington (2003) and states that live individuals are known only from the north slope of a single hill at the north end of Animas Mountains, and that fossil shells were found from sediments exposed in a mine roadcut on the south side of the hill. The file also states, under Global Protection, that no occurrences are appropriately protected and managed, but under Threats, it states that threats are unknown. This information is typical for the species in Category B.

    The information we reviewed for the species in Category C (see Table 1) described one or more threats for the general area, but it did not link the threats to the species or the habitat at the site occupied by the species. Information for species in this category is sometimes provided on distribution, habitat, population size, or other aspects of the species' biology. There are five species in Category C, of which one is an invertebrate and four are plants.

    An example of the type of information we reviewed for Category C species is for Panicum mohavense (Mojave panicgrass), which occurs at one site on a large military base in New Mexico and five sites in Arizona. The NatureServe file states that for the New Mexico site, there is some grazing in the remote area where the species occurs, but that the threat to the species is unknown. The habitat is described for all of the sites, Start Printed Page 422but no threats are mentioned for the sites in Arizona. Ladyman (1999), which was cited in NatureServe, did not name additional threats to the species, but recommended additional surveys to determine habitat requirements and abundance.

    The information we reviewed for the species in Category D (see Table 1) cited one or more threats and generally linked them to the species or its habitat. However, we have no documentation to support significant impacts from the threats. These species are addressed in the Threats Analysis section. There are two species in Category D, both of which are plants.

    This finding addresses the 270 petitioned species that are listed in Table 1. Of the 270 species, 3 are vertebrates, 215 are invertebrates, and 52 are plants.

    Table 1—List of 270 Species Included in This Finding by Category. An Asterisk Denotes Species in the June 12, 2008 Petition to Emergency List 32 Species

    CategoryScientific nameCommon nameRangeGroup
    AEurycea sp. 10Dolan Falls SalamanderTXvertebrate
    AGammarus pecosPecos AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    AHyalella texanaClear Creek AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    AAgylla septentrionali sA Tiger MothAZinvertebrate
    ASonorarctia fervidaA Tiger MothAZinvertebrate
    ACeratopsyche vanacaA CaddisflyNMinvertebrate
    AHydroptila abbottiA CaddisflyTXinvertebrate
    ANeotrichia juaniA CaddisflyTXinvertebrate
    ANeotrichia sonoraA CaddisflyTXinvertebrate
    ATaeniopteryx starkiTexas WillowflyTXinvertebrate
    AMelanoplus chiricahuaeA Spur-throat GrasshopperAZinvertebrate
    AMelanoplus pinalenoA Spur-throat GrasshopperAZinvertebrate
    AAgathon arizonicusA Net-winged MidgeAZinvertebrate
    AIsoperla sagittataA StoneflyTXinvertebrate
    APhreatodrobia conicaHueco CavesnailTXinvertebrate
    APyrgulopsis solaBrown SpringsnailAZinvertebrate
    APyrgulopsis sp. 2Mimbres SpringsnailNMinvertebrate
    AStygopyrgus bartonensisBarton CavesnailTXinvertebrate
    ATexapyrgus longleyiStriated HydrobeTXinvertebrate
    ATryonia bruneiBrune Spring SnailTXinvertebrate
    ATryonia diaboliDevil TryoniaTXinvertebrate
    AAshmunella animasensisAnimas Peak WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella ashmuniJemez WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella bequaertiGoat Cave WoodlandsnailTXinvertebrate
    AAshmunella binneyiSilver Creek WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella danielsiWhitewater Creek WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella edithaeMckittrick WoodlandsnailTXinvertebrate
    AAshmunella ferrissiReed's Mountain WoodlandsnailAZinvertebrate
    AAshmunella lenticulaHorseshoe Canyon WoodlandsnailAZinvertebrate
    AAshmunella mendaxIron Creek WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella mogollonensisMogollon WoodlandsnailAZinvertebrate
    AAshmunella mudgeiSawtooth Mountain WoodlandsnailTXinvertebrate
    AAshmunella pilsbryanaBlue Mountain WoodlandsnailAZinvertebrate
    AAshmunella pseudodontaCapitan WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella rileyensisMount Riley WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella salinasensisSalinas Peak WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella todseniMaple Canyon WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    AAshmunella walkeriFlorida Mountain WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    ACoelostemma pyrgonastaBishop Cap TubesnailNMinvertebrate
    ADaedalochila scintillaA Terrestrial SnailTXinvertebrate
    AGastrocopta prototypusSonoran SnaggletoothAZ, NMinvertebrate
    AGastrocopta ruidosensisRuidoso SnaggletoothKS, NE, NM, OK, TXinvertebrate
    AHolospira cockerelliCockerell HolospiraNMinvertebrate
    AHolospira metcalfiMetcalf HolospiraNMinvertebrate
    AHolospira sherbrookeiSilver Creek HolospiraAZinvertebrate
    AHumboldtiana fullingtoniCapote ThreebandTXinvertebrate
    ANaesiotus christenseniSanta Rita RabdotusAZinvertebrate
    ANesovitrea suzannaeLive Oak GlassTXinvertebrate
    AOreohelix barbataBearded MountainsnailAZ, NMinvertebrate
    AOreohelix confragosaPinos Altos MountainsnailNMinvertebrate
    AOreohelix houghiDiablo MountainsnailAZ, NMinvertebrate
    AOreohelix litoralisSan Agustin MountainsnailNMinvertebrate
    AOreohelix magdalenaeMagdalena MountainsnailNMinvertebrate
    AOreohelix swopeiMorgan Creek MountainsnailNM, WYinvertebrate
    APallifera tournescalisOuachita MantleslugOKinvertebrate
    AParavitrea alethiaGoddess SupercoilTN, TXinvertebrate
    APatera leatherwoodiPedernales OvalTXinvertebrate
    APhilomycus batchiDusky MantleslugOKinvertebrate
    APhilomycus bisdodusGrayfoot MantleslugOKinvertebrate
    ASonorella anchanaSierra Ancha TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella animasensisAnimas TalussnailNMinvertebrate
    Start Printed Page 423
    ASonorella apacheApache TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella bagnaraiRincon TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella bartschiEscabrosa TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella binneyiHorseshoe Canyon TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella bowiensisQuartzite Hill TalussnailAZ, CAinvertebrate
    ASonorella bradshaveanaBradshaw TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella clappiMadera TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella coltonianaWalnut Canyon TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella comparOak Creek TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella dalliGarden Canyon TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella delicataTollhouse Canyon TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella dragoonensisStronghold Canyon TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella ferrissiDragoon TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    AS onorella imperatrixTotal Wreck TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella imperialisEmpire Mountain TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella insignisWhetstone TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella meadiAqua Dulce TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella micromphalaMilk Ranch TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella reederiRampart TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella russelliBlack Mesa TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella tryonianaSanford TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella vespertinaEvening TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella waltoniDoubtful Canyon TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    AVertigo berryiRotund VertigoAZ, CAinvertebrate
    A*Vertigo binneyanaCylindrical VertigoCAN: BC, MB, ON; USA: IA, KS, MT, NMinvertebrate
    ACisthene conjunctaA Tiger MothTXinvertebrate
    ACatinella texanaA Terrestrial SnailLA, TXinvertebrate
    AArtesia subterraneaA Cave Obligate AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    AArtesia welbourniA Cave Obligate AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    ACaecidotea adentaA Cave Obligate IsopodOKinvertebrate
    ACaecidotea bisetusA Cave Obligate IsopodTXinvertebrate
    AHolsingerius smaragdinusA Cave Obligate AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    ASeborgia hershleriA Cave Obligate AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    AStygobromus bowmaniBowman's Cave AmphipodOKinvertebrate
    AStygobromus reddell iReddell's Cave AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    ABatrisodes grubbsiA BeetleTXinvertebrate
    ARhadine austinicaA Cave Obligate BeetleTXinvertebrate
    ARhadine insolitaA Cave Obligate BeetleTXinvertebrate
    ARhadine noctivagaA Cave Obligate BeetleTXinvertebrate
    ARhadine russelliA Cave Obligate BeetleTXinvertebrate
    AAlexicles aspersaA Tiger MothAZ, NMinvertebrate
    ALepidostoma ozarkenseA CaddisflyAR, OKinvertebrate
    ANeotrichia mobilensisA CaddisflyAL, TXinvertebrate
    AOchrotrichia guadalupensisA CaddisflyTXinvertebrate
    AMelanoplus alexanderiA GrasshopperTXinvertebrate
    AMelanoplus magdalenaeA Spur-throat GrasshopperAZ, NMinvertebrate
    ABaetodes alleniA MayflyTXinvertebrate
    AThalkethops grallatrixA Cave Obligate CentipedeNMinvertebrate
    ABalconorbis uvaldensisBalcones GhostsnailTXinvertebrate
    APhreatoceras tayloriNymph TrumpetTXinvertebrate
    APhreatodrobia coronaeA CavesnailTXinvertebrate
    APhreatodrobia rotundaBeaked CavesnailTXinvertebrate
    AAshmunella chiricahuanaCave Creek WoodlandsnailAZinvertebrate
    AAshmunella esuritorBarfoot WoodlandsnailAZinvertebrate
    AAshmunella lepidermaWhitetail WoodlandsnailAZinvertebrate
    AAshmunella rhyssaSierra Blanca WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    ADeroceras heteruraMarsh SlugNMinvertebrate
    AHolospira tantalusTeasing HolospiraAZinvertebrate
    AHolospira whetstonensisWhetstone HolospiraAZinvertebrate
    ANeohelix liodermaTulsa WhitelipOKinvertebrate
    ASonorella caerulifluminisBlue TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella micraPygmy SonorellaAZinvertebrate
    ASonorella neglectaPortal TalussnailAZinvertebrate
    AApocheiridium reddelliA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    AArcheolarca guadalupensisGuadalupe Cave PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    AArcheolarca welbourniA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionAZinvertebrate
    ACheiridium reyesiA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    AChitrella elliottiA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    AChitrella majorA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    AChitrella welbourniA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionNMinvertebrate
    ACicurina barriA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    Start Printed Page 424
    ACicurina cavernaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina coryelliA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina cuevaA Cave SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina ezelliA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina grutaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina holsingeriA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina macheteA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina mckenzieiA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina medinaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina menardiaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina obscuraA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina orelliaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina pabloA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina pasturaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina pateiA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina porteriA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina puentecillaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina rainesiA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina reclusaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina reddelliA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina reyesiA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina russelliA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina sansabaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina selectaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina serenaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina sheariA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina sprouseiA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina stowersiA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina suttoniA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina travisaeA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina ubickiA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina uvaldeA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina veneficaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina viboraA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ACicurina watersiA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ALeucohya texanaA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    AMexichthonius exoticusA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    ANeoallochernes incertusA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionNMinvertebrate
    ANeoleptoneta concinnaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ANeoleptoneta deviaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    ANeoleptoneta valverdeA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    APseudogarypus hypogeusA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionAZinvertebrate
    ATartarocreagris intermediaA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    ATexella brevidentaA Cave Obligate HarvestmanTXinvertebrate
    ATexella brevistylaA Cave Obligate HarvestmanTXinvertebrate
    ATexella diplospinaA Cave Obligate HarvestmanTXinvertebrate
    ATexella fendiA HarvestmanTXinvertebrate
    ATexella grubbsiA Cave Obligate HarvestmanTXinvertebrate
    ATexella hardeniA Cave Obligate HarvestmanTXinvertebrate
    ATexella renkesaeA Cave Obligate HarvestmanTXinvertebrate
    ATexella welbourniA Cave Obligate HarvestmanNMinvertebrate
    ATuberochernes ubickiA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionAZinvertebrate
    ATyrannochthonius troglodytesA Cave Obligate PseudoscorpionTXinvertebrate
    AHolospira millestriataA Terrestrial SnailAZinvertebrate
    ASuccinea pseudavaraA Terrestrial SnailKS, OKinvertebrate
    AApatania arizonaA CaddisflyAZinvertebrate
    AChimarra holzenthaliA CaddisflyLA, TXinvertebrate
    AChimarra primulaA CaddisflyAZinvertebrate
    ACatapyrenium granulosumNo common nameNMlichens
    AXanthoparmelia dissensaNo common nameAZ, NMlichens
    ACirsium rusbyiRusby's ThistleAZplant
    ALupinus lemmoniiLemmon's LupineAZplant
    AAconitum infectumArizona MonkshoodAZplant
    ACentaurium blumbergianumBlumberg RositaTXplant
    ACrataegus nananixoniiNixon's HawthornTXplant
    AEleocharis brachycarpaShort-fruited SpikerushTXplant
    AOpuntia martinianaSeashore CactusAZplant
    ATetraneuris verdiensisNo common nameAZplant
    AFissidens littleiNo common nameNMplant
    AArabis tricornutaRincon Mountain RockcressAZplant
    ACamissonia gouldiiDiamond Valley SuncupAZ, UTplant
    Start Printed Page 425
    ALesquerella lataLincoln County BladderpodNMplant
    ADryopteris rossiiRos's WoodfernAZplant
    ATalinum gooddingiiGoodding's FlameflowerAZplant
    ACuscuta dentatasquamataLos Pinitos DodderAZplant
    APotentilla albifloraWhite-flowered CinquefoilAZplant
    AAgalinis calycinaLeoncita False FoxgloveTX, NMplant
    AArida mattturneriNo Common NameTXplant
    AEriogonum terrenatumSan Pedro River Wild BuckwheatAZplant
    AHedyotis butterwickiaeMary's BluetTXplant
    AMachaeranthera gypsithermaGypsum Hotspring AsterNM, TXplant
    AMatelea texensisTrans Pecos MateleaTXplant
    AMentzelia memorabalisSeptember 11 StickleafAZplant
    A*Paronychia maccartiiMccart's Whitlow-wortTXplant
    APerityle fosteriFoster's RockdaisyTXplant
    APerityle vitreomontanaGlass Mountains RockdaisyTXplant
    APhysalis latiphysaBroad-leaf Ground-cherryAZplant
    A*Pseudoclappia watsoniiWatson's False-clappiaTXplant
    AScutellaria laevisSmooth-stem SkullcapTXplant
    ASenecio quayleiQuayle's RagwortTXplant
    AYucca cernuaTXplant
    ACamissonia confertifloraBunch Flower Evening PrimroseAZplant
    AThelypodium tenueFresno Creek ThelypodyTXplant
    BMenidia clarkhubbsiTexas SilversideTXvertebrate
    BSyngnathus affinisTexas PipefishTXvertebrate
    B*Procambarus nuecesNueces CrayfishTXinvertebrate
    B*Isoperla jewett iA StoneflyCO, NM, TXinvertebrate
    BJuturnia tularosaeTularosa JuturniaNMinvertebrate
    BAshmunella harrisiGoat Mountain WoodlandsnailNMinvertebrate
    BHumboldtiana agavophilaAgave ThreebandTXinvertebrate
    BHumboldtiana chisosensisChisos ThreebandTXinvertebrate
    BHemigrapsus oregonensisYellow Shore CrabTXinvertebrate
    BStreptocephalus thomasbowmaniBowman's Fairy ShrimpNMinvertebrate
    BStygobromus blinniBlinn's AmphipodAZinvertebrate
    BStygobromus boultoniBoulton's AmphipodAZinvertebrate
    BStygobromus curroaeCurro's AmphipodNMinvertebrate
    BStygobromus dejectusCascade Cave AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    BStygobromus hadenoecusDevil's Sinkhole AmphipodTXinvertebrate
    BStygobromus jemezensisJemez Mountains AmphipodNMinvertebrate
    BCuloptila kimminsiA CaddisflyAZinvertebrate
    BCuloptila moselyiA CaddisflyAZinvertebrate
    BOchrotrichia weddleaeA CaddisflyAR, OKinvertebrate
    B*Fallceon eatoniA MayflyAZinvertebrate
    BHolospira animasensisAnimas Mountains TubeshellNMinvertebrate
    BCicurina bandidaBandit Cave SpiderTXinvertebrate
    BCicurina browniA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    BEidmannella bullataA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    BEidmannella delicataA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    BEidmannella nasutaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    BEidmannella reclusaA Cave Obligate SpiderTXinvertebrate
    B*Donrichardsia macroneuronNo Common NameTXplant
    BErigeron kuscheiChiricahua FleabaneAZplant
    BPerityle ambrosiifoliaLace-leaf RockdaisyAZplant
    BPerityle ajoensisAjo RockdaisyAZplant
    BTownsendia smithiiBlack Rock Ground-daisyAZplant
    B*Proboscidea spicataMany-flowered Unicorn-plantTXplant
    BSclerocactus sileriSiler's Fishhook CactusAZplant
    BSilene rectirameaGrand Canyon CatchflyAZplant
    BViola guadalupensisGuadalupe Mountains VioletTXplant
    BCyperus cephalanthusCryptic FlatsedgeLA, TXplant
    BLechea mensalisChisos PinweedTXplant
    CProcambarus steigmaniParkhill Prairie CrayfishTXinvertebrate
    CHoustonia correlliiCorrell's BluetTXplant
    CPanicum mohavenseMojave PanicgrassAZ, NMplant
    CParonychia lundelliorumLundell's NailwortTXplant
    CErigeron heliographisHeliograph Peak FleabaneAZplant
    DErigeron hessiiHess' FleabaneNMplant
    DCymopterus beckiiPinnate Spring-parsleyAZ, UTplant
    Start Printed Page 426

    Threats Analysis

    Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 424) set forth the procedures for adding species to the Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. A species, subspecies, or distinct population segment of vertebrate taxa may be determined to be endangered or threatened due to one or more of the five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence.

    In making this 90-day finding, we evaluated whether information on threats to the 270 species, as presented in the petition and other readily available information at the time of the petition review, is substantial, thereby indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. Our evaluation of this information is presented below.

    A. Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or Curtailment of the Species' Habitat or Range

    For those species we placed in Categories A, B, and C, no information was presented on threats to the species or their habitats; therefore we find the petition, including all available references and the NatureServe species files, does not present substantial information that the present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of the species' habitat or range is a threat to any of the 268 species in Categories A, B, and C. For one of the two plant species in Category D (Table 1), information related to habitat impacts at one or more occupied sites is presented.

    Cymopterus beckii (pinnate spring-parsley) occurs in 1 area in Arizona and in 2 areas in Utah; within the 2 areas in Utah, it is known to occur at more than 40 sites, most discovered in the past 10 years. NatureServe (http://www.natureserve.org/​explorer/​) cites park visitor impacts, presumably trampling, as a potential threat at Capitol Reef National Park in Utah. However, following 3 years of intensive surveys in the 2 Utah areas where the species was found at 42 new sites, Clark (2002, p. 49) stated that the majority of the new sites are in remote locations with difficult accessibility that serves to protect the plants from human disturbance. No additional threats were identified for those new sites, and we found no information about threats to the species in Arizona (Arizona Game and Fish Department 2004, p. 4). Therefore, we find the petition and supporting information does not present substantial scientific or commercial information to indicate C. beckii is threatened by the present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range.

    B. Overutilization for Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or Educational Purposes

    For those species we placed in Categories A, B, and C, no information was presented on threats to the species or their habitats; therefore we find the petition, including all available references and the NatureServe species files, does not present substantial information that overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes is a threat to 268 of the 270 species. For one of the two plants in Category D (Table 1), information related to overutilization for recreational use at one or more occupied sites is presented. This information is discussed below.

    Erigeron hessii (Hess' fleabane) is known from two sites in a Wilderness Area on the Gila National Forest in New Mexico. Plants are scattered in crevices of exposed rock (Nesom 1978, p. 443). The known sites are in a remote area (Sivinski 1998, p. 2). The NatureServe file contains a statement that at one of the sites, those plants that occur on a scenic overlook at the top of the outcrop that is occupied by the species may be trampled by hikers. No references are cited for this statement, and none of the references cited in the NatureServe file mention trampling by hikers (Kartez 1994; Nesom 1978; New Mexico Native Plant Protection Advisory Committee (NMPPAC 1984, p. 28); Sivinski 1998; Sivinski and Lightfoot 1995), although Nesom (1978, p. 443) and NMPPAC (1984, p. 28) state that at one site, it occurs along one or more trails. Robert Sivinski is the sole State-employed botanist in New Mexico responsible for rare plants in the State. He leads the New Mexico Rare Plant Technical Committee (NMRPTC), formerly the NMPPAC, which meets regularly to review and update information on the status of rare New Mexico plants. Sivinski (1998), which is cited in NatureServe, appeared on the NMRTPC Web site in 1998, but is currently not readily available. In the 2008 version on the NMRTPC Web site that was accessed by the Service on March 4, 2008 at http://nmrareplants.unm.edu/​rarelist.php,, it states that there are no current land uses that threaten the species and points out that it is within a Wilderness Area, where major ground disturbing activities are prohibited. The NMPPAC (1984, p. 28) stated that no threats were known. The NMRPTC 2008 Web site also provides a recommendation that surveys be conducted for the species at additional suitable rock outcrops in the area.

    For Erigeron hessii, we find that although a specific threat to each species was mentioned in NatureServe for a single site or area, additional substantial information was presented in cited references or was readily available to us that the species is not threatened by overutilization for recreational purposes. Therefore, the petition does not present substantial information that overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes is a threat to this species.

    C. Disease or Predation

    For those species we placed in Categories A, B, and C, no information was presented on threats to the species or their habitats; therefore we find the petition, including all available references and the NatureServe species files, does not present substantial information that disease or predation is a threat to any of the 268 species in Categories A, B, and C. For the two remaining species in Category D, no information on threats due to disease or predation was presented. Therefore we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information that the petitioned action may be warranted due to threats from this factor.

    D. Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory Mechanisms

    The petition discusses the lack of protection under the Act for the petitioned species, stating that unless a species is listed as threatened or endangered under the Act, it receives no protections from the statute. The petition provides no information addressing any other State or Federal regulations, and no information about the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms.

    The petitioner's claim that we could afford more protection to these petitioned species if they were listed under the Act does not provide substantial information that the existing regulatory mechanisms are inadequate. As the petitioner acknowledges, under 16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(1)(A), we must reach our determination solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available. The petition did not present Start Printed Page 427any specific information related to other Federal, State, or local government regulatory mechanisms that may exist to provide regulatory protections for the 270 species or their respective habitats. Therefore, we conclude that the petition does not present substantial information that any of the 270 species may warrant listing due to inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms.

    E. Other Natural or Manmade Factors Affecting the Species' Continued Existence

    While we recognize that many of the species contained within the NatureServe database have limited distribution or small population size, limited distribution and population size were not identified as threats faced by the any of the 270 species in the petition, including all available references and the NatureServe species files and these two factors alone without elaboration may not be substantial information that may warrant listing under the Act. No other information that could be categorized under Factor E was presented in the petition or was readily available to us for the species in any of the four categories. Therefore, we conclude that the petition does not present substantial information that other natural or manmade factors affecting the species' continued existence are a threat to any of the 270 species.

    Finding

    We have reviewed and evaluated the five listing factors with regard to 270 of the 475 petitioned species, based on the information in the petition and the literature cited in the petition, and we have evaluated the information to determine whether the sources cited support the claims made in the petition. We also reviewed reliable information that was readily available to us. Based on this review and evaluation, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information that listing these 270 species as threatened or endangered under the Act may be warranted. For 8 of the 32 species we were petitioned in 2008 to emergency list, we also find that the 2007 petition, the 2008 petition, NatureServe, references cited in the petitions and in NatureServe, and information readily available to us did not present substantial information that emergency listing those 8 species is warranted. Although we will not commence a status review in response to 270 of the 475 species petitioned in 2007 and 8 of the 32 species petitioned in 2008, we will continue to accept information and materials regarding any of the 270 species at our Southwest Regional Ecological Services Office (see ADDRESSES). Further, as indicated previously, we will address the remaining 200 species in future findings.

    References Cited

    A complete list of references cited is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov and upon request from the Southwest Regional Ecological Services Office (see ADDRESSES).

    Author

    The primary authors of this document are the staff members of the Southwest Regional Ecological Services Office (see ADDRESSES).

    Authority

    The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

    Start Signature

    Dated: December 23, 2008.

    Kenneth Stansell,

    Acting Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. E8-31454 Filed 1-5-09; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P

Document Information

Comments Received:
0 Comments
Published:
01/06/2009
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of 90-day petition finding.
Document Number:
E8-31454
Dates:
The finding announced in this document was made on January 6, 2009. You may submit new information concerning this species for our consideration at any time.
Pages:
419-427 (9 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FWS-R2-ES-2008-0130, MO 9221050083
PDF File:
e8-31454.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 17